as recently as 2007, Massachusetts as recently as 2002 (M. Veit, personalcommunication, June 2008). Several B. terricola workers were found in Sproul StateForest in Pennsylvania in 2006, although no B. terricola were found at the same locationin 2007 (R. Jacobson, personal communication, September 2007). In 2008, several B.terricola were seen at each <strong>of</strong> three sites in Maine (B. Heinrich, personal communication,August, 2008). Bombus terricola were seen by another observer at four different sites inVermont in 2008 (L. Richardson, personal communication, August 2008). Two B.terricola workers were observed in Nova Scotia in 2008 (K. MacKenzie, personalcommunication, July 2008).Midwestern United States:In a 1995 survey, B. terricola accounted for 93% <strong>of</strong> northern Wisconsin bees (Macfarlane1998). <strong>Bumble</strong> bee collector Dale Reimer had been searching regularly, but had not seenany B. terricola at a site where they were formerly common around Mountain, Wisconsin(Oconto County) since 2003. In 2007 and 2008, Reimer observed several dozenspecimens within a 15 mile radius around the town <strong>of</strong> Mountain (D. Reimer, personalcommunication, March 2008). One B. terricola was collected in 2001 at ManitowishWaters, Wisconsin and in 2008 a nest was sited in Two Rivers, Wisconsin for the firsttime since 2001 (D. Reimer, personal communication, July 2008). A specimen wasphotographed in Nova Scotia in 2007 (J. DeLong, personal communication, January2008). In April, 2008, a queen B. terricola was seen near Manitowoc, east-centralWisconsin, where B. terricola has been absent or nearly so for several years (Liz Day,Bombus List-serv, April, 2008). An examination <strong>of</strong> historical records revealed that B.terricola was present in parts <strong>of</strong> Illnois in 1900 to 1949, but has been absent since thattime (Grixti et al. in press).Southeastern United States:B. terricola has been observed in Tennessee in 2006 although it was absent fromcollections between 1999 and 2006 (A.J. Mayor personal communication September,2007). B. terricola was also observed at another location in Tennessee in 2008 (R. Bettge,personal communication, August, 2008).Region Researcher /PublicationdateSouthernOntario(26 sites)Historical surveyYear(s)Macfarlane 1971-1973Total # <strong>of</strong>bumblebeescollectedRelativeabundance <strong>of</strong>B. terricola incollection3,632 3% SouthernOntario(26 sites)Region Researcher /PublicationdateColla &Packer(2008)Recent surveyTable 3. Comparison <strong>of</strong> survey before 1999 and a more recent survey <strong>of</strong> B. terricola.Historic abundance Region Researcher /Publication dateYear(s) Total # <strong>of</strong> bumblebees collectedRelative abundance <strong>of</strong> B.terricola in collectionB. terricola was formerly common in Maineand Vermont (B. Heinrich pers. comm.Sept. 2007)Maine andVermontHeinrich 2007 679 0.4%Year(s)Total # <strong>of</strong>bumble beescollectedinformation on historic status not available New York Giles & Ascher (2006) 2003 1,260 0%Table 4. Relative abundance <strong>of</strong> B. terricola in recent surveys.2004-2006Relativeabundance <strong>of</strong>B. terricolain collection1,195 0.001%16
Parallel decline <strong>of</strong> a cuckoo bee:B. terricola, as well as B. affinis, declines have likely caused a severe reduction inBombus ashtoni populations. Bombus ashtoni is bumble bee species that parasitizes otherbumble bees by entering nests and using the worker force <strong>of</strong> the host colony to raise theiryoung instead <strong>of</strong> the queen’s progeny. B. ashtoni exclusively parasitizes B. terricola andB. affinis (Plath 1934; Fisher 1984; Laverty and Harder 1988). B. ashtoni has not beenfound in any parts <strong>of</strong> its former range since 2000 (J. Ascher, personal communication,August 2008). Since parasitic bumble bees are dependent on their hosts for reproduction,declines in host numbers can have severe effects on parasitic bumble bee’s populations.Decline <strong>of</strong> B. affinis and B. terricola populations is the most likely cause <strong>of</strong> the possibleextinction <strong>of</strong> B. ashtoni. The absence <strong>of</strong> B. ashtoni since 2000 provides indirect evidence<strong>of</strong> a decline <strong>of</strong> their hosts, B. affinis and B. terricola.SummaryBombus terricola was once common and widespread across 21 U.S. states and sevenCanadian provinces. Although some individuals were recently found in isolated parts <strong>of</strong>its range between 2005 and 2008, the observations and data presented above suggest thatthis bumble bee has drastically declined in large parts <strong>of</strong> its range.V. THE WESTERN BUMBLE BEE, BOMBUS OCCIDENTALIS GREENEA. <strong>Species</strong> Description (nominate form)Queens and Workers:Bombus occidentalis queens and workers are similar in coloration. The queen is 17 to 19mm in length, 9 to 10 mm in breadth. The worker is 9 to 14 mm in length, 5 to 7 mm inbreadth. Their hair is entirely black on the head. Their hair is yellow on the front part <strong>of</strong>the thorax. The first through the basal section <strong>of</strong> the fourth abdominal segments haveblack hair. The apex <strong>of</strong> the fourth abdominal segment as well as segments five and six arewhitish. The hair on their legs is black.Males:The male is 13 to 17 mm in length, 6 to 8 mm in breadth. The hair on the head is paleyellowish on the front <strong>of</strong> the face. The top <strong>of</strong> the head has pale yellowish hairs medially,with some black hairs, especially laterally. The hair on the front <strong>of</strong> the thorax is paleyellowish. The hair on the first to third abdominal segments is black. The basal part <strong>of</strong> thefourth abdominal segment is black, with the remainder, as well as segments five to seven,whitish.While B. affinis and B. terricola exhibit some color variation throughout their ranges, B.occidentalis is the most chromatically variable North American species in the subgenusBombus. Franklin (1913) describes twelve female and twelve male variants <strong>of</strong> thisspecies in his revision <strong>of</strong> New World bumble bees. As a result, many variety names havebeen applied to this species. Major color variants <strong>of</strong> B. occidentalis females, pictured inFigure 6, include:17
- Page 1 and 2: Status Review of Three Formerly Com
- Page 4 and 5: use as commercial pollinators. Dr.
- Page 6 and 7: B. Habitat requirementsB. affinis,
- Page 8 and 9: and with black hairs extending rear
- Page 10 and 11: Although this species was formerly
- Page 12 and 13: September 2007).RegionSouthernOntar
- Page 14 and 15: B. Pollination EcologyBombus terric
- Page 18 and 19: Variety 1: As nominate form above,
- Page 20 and 21: the Rocky Mountains. Below are find
- Page 22 and 23: Historical records from within San
- Page 24 and 25: VI. CURRENT AND POTENTIAL THREATS -
- Page 26 and 27: impatiens to be transported into th
- Page 28 and 29: equest is made to APHIS, APHIS will
- Page 30 and 31: Insecticides are used in wild lands
- Page 32 and 33: eetles use commercial honey bee col
- Page 34 and 35: diseases by the commercial bumble b
- Page 36 and 37: Brown, M. J. F., R. Schmid-Hempel,
- Page 38 and 39: Fitzpatrick, U., T. E. Murray, R. J
- Page 40 and 41: Holm, S. N. 1966. The utilization a
- Page 42 and 43: Leonard, M. D. 1928. A list of the
- Page 44 and 45: Medler, J. T. and D. W. Carney. 196
- Page 46 and 47: Plowright, R. C., B. A. Pendrel, an
- Page 48 and 49: 48: 543-548.Stephen, W. P. 1957. Bu
- Page 50 and 51: Williams, P. H., M. B. Arau ́jo, a
- Page 52 and 53: Abbreviations for museums are as fo
- Page 54 and 55: Tennessee: Sugarlands, 12-Apr-1949,
- Page 56 and 57: H.C. Manis, Strange, U of ID; 2: Bu
- Page 58 and 59: Montrose, 5-Aug-1960, F., P., & M.
- Page 60 and 61: Lick Cr. 28 mi SE Union 4280 ft, 3-
- Page 62 and 63: N.E. Woodley, Strange, WSU; Richlan