equest is made to APHIS, APHIS will evaluate the request and can decide to allow ordisallow importation (§ 322.12 <strong>of</strong> the Honeybee Act). Both B. occidentalis and B.terricola have parts <strong>of</strong> their ranges outside <strong>of</strong> the native range <strong>of</strong> B. impatiens. Interstateand international transport <strong>of</strong> bumble bees, such as B. impatiens, to areas where they donot normally occur, may increase the exposure <strong>of</strong> wild bumble bees to exotic pathogensand destroy the isolated populations <strong>of</strong> B. occidentalis and B. terricola that remain. Sincethese commercially raised bees may carry exotic diseases, they are a potential threat evenwithin their native range, particularly to populations that are in decline such as B. affinis.APHIS has the ability to establish a domestic quarantine <strong>of</strong> bumble bees, in order to stopthe spread <strong>of</strong> a pathogen that may be causing the extinction <strong>of</strong> North American bumblebees, although they have not yet done this and have said that they are not likely to do this(W. Wehling and C. Stewart, personal communication, April 2008).C. Habitat Alteration<strong>Bumble</strong> bee populations are subject to threat by many kinds <strong>of</strong> habitat alterations whichmay destroy, fragment, degrade, or reduce their food supplies (flowers that produce thenectar and pollen they require), nest sites (e.g. abandoned rodent burrows or undisturbedgrass), and hibernation sites for over-wintering mated queens. Fragmentation <strong>of</strong> bumblebee populations can result in problems including inbreeding depression (Darvill et al.2006; Ellis et al. 2006) and an increased risk <strong>of</strong> extinction due to demographicstochasticity. Threats that alter habitat required by bumble bees include agriculturalintensification, livestock grazing, urban development, and fragmentation <strong>of</strong> landscapes.Agricultural intensification:Increases in farm size and operating efficiency have led to loss <strong>of</strong> pollinator friendlyhedge rows, weed cover, and legume pastures through more modern practices includingmore effective land leveling, irrigation, tilling, and pesticide and fertilizer usage.Although most Bombus sensu stricto nest underground, nests are sometimes locatedabove the ground in clumps <strong>of</strong> grass (Macfarlane et al. 1994). <strong>Bumble</strong> bee nests that areformed above ground are at risk <strong>of</strong> being destroyed by farm machinery (Goulson 2003).Hines and Hendrix (2005) found that bumble bee diversity in Iowa prairies was linked t<strong>of</strong>loral abundance and the presence <strong>of</strong> grasslands in the surrounding landscape, both <strong>of</strong>which are negatively affected in many agricultural landscapes. In Ireland, England, andcentral Europe, agricultural intensification is deemed responsible for recent declines <strong>of</strong>bumble bee species (Williams 1986; Carvell et al. 2006; Diekotter et al. 2006; Fitzpatricket al. 2007; Kosior et al. 2007; Goulson et al. 2008). The decline <strong>of</strong> bumble bees inIllinois was found to coincide with a period <strong>of</strong> major agricultural intensification in theMidwest, indicating that agricultural intensification may have led to the local extirpationand decline <strong>of</strong> Illinois bumble bees (Grixti et al. in press).Livestock grazing:Livestock grazing may adversely impact bumble bee populations by (1) depleting bumblebee food sources (Morris 1967; Sugden 1985; Carvell 2002; Kruess and Tscharntke2002a, 2002b; Vazquez and Simberl<strong>of</strong>f 2003; Hatfield and LeBuhn 2007), (2) trampling<strong>of</strong> above ground nesting sites (Sugden 1985), and (3) negatively impacting nesting28
odents which in turn reduces the number <strong>of</strong> nest sites available for bumble bees.Livestock grazing has differing impacts on flora and fauna based on the type, habitat,intensity, timing, and length <strong>of</strong> livestock grazing (Gibson et al. 1992; Sjodin 2007), butthere is potential for a negative impact on bee populations with many grazing situations.Urban development:While urban gardens and parks may provide habitat for some pollinators includingbumble bees (Frankie et al. 2005; McFrederick and LeBuhn 2006), they tend not tosupport the species richness <strong>of</strong> bumble bees that can be found in nearby wild landscapes(R. Thorp personal observation) or that was present historically (McFrederick andLeBuhn 2006). There is indication that human built structures such as roads and railroadsfragment plant populations and restrict bumble bee movement (Bhattacharya et al. 2003).Habitat fragmentation:Agricultural intensification, livestock grazing, urban development, as well as otherfactors, can lead to the fragmentation <strong>of</strong> bumble bee habitat into pieces that are too smallor too distant to support diverse bumble bee communities (Goulson et al. 2008).Fragmented habitats may not support healthy metapopulation structures and mayeliminate or decrease source populations <strong>of</strong> bumble bees for recolonization (NationalResearch Council 2007).Fire suppression:In pre-settlement times, meadows were maintained by periodic fires that helped curtailconversion to forest by restricting the establishment <strong>of</strong> trees along forested edges withgrasslands. Fire suppression, and resultant forest encroachment into occupied meadowpatches, reduces meadow habitats available to bumble bees.D. PesticidesInsecticides:Insecticide applications may threaten populations <strong>of</strong> bumble bees <strong>of</strong> the subgenusBombus sensu stricto. The National Academy <strong>of</strong> Science National Research Council’sreport on the <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pollinators in North America notes that bumble bees can benegatively affected by many pesticides, but the lack <strong>of</strong> large scale monitoring <strong>of</strong> bumblebees makes the scope <strong>of</strong> the problem difficult to fully determine. The report also pointsout that ground-nesting bumble bees are uniquely susceptible to pesticides that are usedon lawns or turf (National Research Council 2007). Foraging bees are poisoned bypesticides when they absorb the fast-acting toxins through their integument (the outer“skin” that forms their exoskeleton), drink contaminated nectar, or gather pesticidecoveredpollen or micro-encapsulated poisons. Pesticide drift from aerial spraying cankill 80% <strong>of</strong> foraging bees close to the source and drift can continue to be dangerous forwell over a mile (Johansen and Mayer 1990). Insecticides applied in the spring, whenbumble bee queens are foraging and colonies are small, are likely to have a moresignificant effect on bumble bee populations (Goulson et al. 2008). The relatively recentand increased use <strong>of</strong> persistent neonicotinoid pesticides, known to be highly toxic to bees,may pose an increased threat to bumble bees in the subgenus Bombus (Colla and Packer2008).29
- Page 1 and 2: Status Review of Three Formerly Com
- Page 4 and 5: use as commercial pollinators. Dr.
- Page 6 and 7: B. Habitat requirementsB. affinis,
- Page 8 and 9: and with black hairs extending rear
- Page 10 and 11: Although this species was formerly
- Page 12 and 13: September 2007).RegionSouthernOntar
- Page 14 and 15: B. Pollination EcologyBombus terric
- Page 16 and 17: as recently as 2007, Massachusetts
- Page 18 and 19: Variety 1: As nominate form above,
- Page 20 and 21: the Rocky Mountains. Below are find
- Page 22 and 23: Historical records from within San
- Page 24 and 25: VI. CURRENT AND POTENTIAL THREATS -
- Page 26 and 27: impatiens to be transported into th
- Page 30 and 31: Insecticides are used in wild lands
- Page 32 and 33: eetles use commercial honey bee col
- Page 34 and 35: diseases by the commercial bumble b
- Page 36 and 37: Brown, M. J. F., R. Schmid-Hempel,
- Page 38 and 39: Fitzpatrick, U., T. E. Murray, R. J
- Page 40 and 41: Holm, S. N. 1966. The utilization a
- Page 42 and 43: Leonard, M. D. 1928. A list of the
- Page 44 and 45: Medler, J. T. and D. W. Carney. 196
- Page 46 and 47: Plowright, R. C., B. A. Pendrel, an
- Page 48 and 49: 48: 543-548.Stephen, W. P. 1957. Bu
- Page 50 and 51: Williams, P. H., M. B. Arau ́jo, a
- Page 52 and 53: Abbreviations for museums are as fo
- Page 54 and 55: Tennessee: Sugarlands, 12-Apr-1949,
- Page 56 and 57: H.C. Manis, Strange, U of ID; 2: Bu
- Page 58 and 59: Montrose, 5-Aug-1960, F., P., & M.
- Page 60 and 61: Lick Cr. 28 mi SE Union 4280 ft, 3-
- Page 62 and 63: N.E. Woodley, Strange, WSU; Richlan