11.07.2015 Views

Status Review of Three Formerly Common Species of Bumble Bee ...

Status Review of Three Formerly Common Species of Bumble Bee ...

Status Review of Three Formerly Common Species of Bumble Bee ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

odents which in turn reduces the number <strong>of</strong> nest sites available for bumble bees.Livestock grazing has differing impacts on flora and fauna based on the type, habitat,intensity, timing, and length <strong>of</strong> livestock grazing (Gibson et al. 1992; Sjodin 2007), butthere is potential for a negative impact on bee populations with many grazing situations.Urban development:While urban gardens and parks may provide habitat for some pollinators includingbumble bees (Frankie et al. 2005; McFrederick and LeBuhn 2006), they tend not tosupport the species richness <strong>of</strong> bumble bees that can be found in nearby wild landscapes(R. Thorp personal observation) or that was present historically (McFrederick andLeBuhn 2006). There is indication that human built structures such as roads and railroadsfragment plant populations and restrict bumble bee movement (Bhattacharya et al. 2003).Habitat fragmentation:Agricultural intensification, livestock grazing, urban development, as well as otherfactors, can lead to the fragmentation <strong>of</strong> bumble bee habitat into pieces that are too smallor too distant to support diverse bumble bee communities (Goulson et al. 2008).Fragmented habitats may not support healthy metapopulation structures and mayeliminate or decrease source populations <strong>of</strong> bumble bees for recolonization (NationalResearch Council 2007).Fire suppression:In pre-settlement times, meadows were maintained by periodic fires that helped curtailconversion to forest by restricting the establishment <strong>of</strong> trees along forested edges withgrasslands. Fire suppression, and resultant forest encroachment into occupied meadowpatches, reduces meadow habitats available to bumble bees.D. PesticidesInsecticides:Insecticide applications may threaten populations <strong>of</strong> bumble bees <strong>of</strong> the subgenusBombus sensu stricto. The National Academy <strong>of</strong> Science National Research Council’sreport on the <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pollinators in North America notes that bumble bees can benegatively affected by many pesticides, but the lack <strong>of</strong> large scale monitoring <strong>of</strong> bumblebees makes the scope <strong>of</strong> the problem difficult to fully determine. The report also pointsout that ground-nesting bumble bees are uniquely susceptible to pesticides that are usedon lawns or turf (National Research Council 2007). Foraging bees are poisoned bypesticides when they absorb the fast-acting toxins through their integument (the outer“skin” that forms their exoskeleton), drink contaminated nectar, or gather pesticidecoveredpollen or micro-encapsulated poisons. Pesticide drift from aerial spraying cankill 80% <strong>of</strong> foraging bees close to the source and drift can continue to be dangerous forwell over a mile (Johansen and Mayer 1990). Insecticides applied in the spring, whenbumble bee queens are foraging and colonies are small, are likely to have a moresignificant effect on bumble bee populations (Goulson et al. 2008). The relatively recentand increased use <strong>of</strong> persistent neonicotinoid pesticides, known to be highly toxic to bees,may pose an increased threat to bumble bees in the subgenus Bombus (Colla and Packer2008).29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!