<strong>York</strong>. However, it should be noted that a recent decision <strong>in</strong> Hoffman v. ParadePublications has expanded the scope of the Division and the NYSHRL to coverout-of-state employees of <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> employers. 903. Conflict Resolution: The Division may attempt to resolve the problem byconciliation. 91 While this step will usually proceed after the <strong>in</strong>vestigation phase iscompleted, the Division may commence a conciliation process at any po<strong>in</strong>t afterthe compla<strong>in</strong>t is filed. Conciliation is generally conducted by a division<strong>in</strong>vestigator or prosecutor, rather than by a dist<strong>in</strong>ct mediation program. If anagreement is reached through conciliation, it must <strong>in</strong>clude a commitment fromthe employer to cease engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the discrim<strong>in</strong>atory acts. 92 It may <strong>in</strong>clude otheragreements between the parties designed to remedy the harm caused bydiscrim<strong>in</strong>ation. 93 If an agreement is reached, the Division will provide the partieswith a written order confirm<strong>in</strong>g the terms that must be met. 94 With<strong>in</strong> one year ofthe written order, the Division will <strong>in</strong>vestigate to make sure that the terms of theorder are be<strong>in</strong>g met, and can take action to enforce compliance if they are not,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g impos<strong>in</strong>g up to one year of jail time and/or a $500 f<strong>in</strong>e. 954. Hear<strong>in</strong>g: If conciliation has not been attempted, or has been unsuccessful, theDivision usually will proceed to a hear<strong>in</strong>g at the Division offices with<strong>in</strong> 270 daysafter the compla<strong>in</strong>t was filed. 96 In the hear<strong>in</strong>g, compla<strong>in</strong>ants may generally berepresented by their own attorney or if they do not have an attorney, a Divisionappo<strong>in</strong>tedprosecutor will advance the claim. 97 However, <strong>in</strong> the latter <strong>in</strong>stance,the prosecutor represents the state, not the compla<strong>in</strong>ant.5. If a compla<strong>in</strong>t was dismissed by the Division either for lack of jurisdiction, or forlack of cause, the compla<strong>in</strong>ant can appeal this decision through the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>state court system. The court can overrule the Division and order a hear<strong>in</strong>g. 98 Ifthis occurs, the Division must proceed to a hear<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> 120 days of the courtorder. 996. Resolution: Based on the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the Division at its hear<strong>in</strong>g, the Division mayorder a variety of remedies, discussed further <strong>in</strong> the next section.90 Hoffman v. Parade Publications, 878 N.Y.S.2d 320 (1st Dept. 2009).91 N.Y. Exec. <strong>Law</strong> § 297(3)(a).92 Id. § 297 (3)(a).93 Id.94 N.Y. Exec. <strong>Law</strong> § 297(3)(b).95 Id. §§ 297(7), 299.96 Id. § 297(4)(a).97 Id.98 Id.99 Id.To learn more go to http://www.nymakesworkpay.org15
<strong>Disability</strong> & <strong>Employment</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong>:Analysis and Recommendations7. Appeal: Decisions of the Division may be appealed <strong>in</strong> court. 100Some states and the ADA make the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative compla<strong>in</strong>t process a gate-keep<strong>in</strong>gfunction. Under the ADA, a legal claim cannot proceed <strong>in</strong> court until the Equal<strong>Employment</strong> Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issues a “right to sue letter” or until theagency has completed its <strong>in</strong>ternal processes, at which po<strong>in</strong>t a person can appeal thatdecision <strong>in</strong> court. 101 Workers <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>, however, have the benefit of access to eitherthe state courts or the Division of Human Rights. It is possible to bypass the Divisionentirely if a trial is preferred. The only limitation is that a person cannot pursue bothoptions simultaneously – it is not possible to go to trial, while also await<strong>in</strong>g a hear<strong>in</strong>g orenter<strong>in</strong>g conciliation through the Division of Human Rights. 102There are some reasons why pursu<strong>in</strong>g a compla<strong>in</strong>t through an adm<strong>in</strong>istrative processmay be preferable to a judicial fil<strong>in</strong>g. For <strong>in</strong>stance, it generally is easier to representoneself through adm<strong>in</strong>istrative compla<strong>in</strong>t processes than to proceed without an attorney<strong>in</strong> court. In addition, the agency bears the cost of <strong>in</strong>vestigation and hear<strong>in</strong>g, whereasgo<strong>in</strong>g to court <strong>in</strong>volves court costs and attorneys’ fees, which cannot be recovered fromthe los<strong>in</strong>g party <strong>in</strong> NYSHRL employment claims. 103On the other hand, fil<strong>in</strong>g a compla<strong>in</strong>t with the Division of Human Rights must beaccomplished with<strong>in</strong> one year, 104 whereas the statute of limitations to file anemployment discrim<strong>in</strong>ation claim <strong>in</strong> a state court is three years from the orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>cident. 105 In contrast, the EEOC requires that a compla<strong>in</strong>t first be filed with<strong>in</strong> 180 daysof the discrim<strong>in</strong>atory <strong>in</strong>cident, although that deadl<strong>in</strong>e can be extended to 300 dayswhere a claim is based on violations of both federal and state disability civil rightslaws. 106 Regardless, the NYSHRL allows for more time than that available for ADAclaims, both for Division compla<strong>in</strong>ts and lawsuits.Division <strong>in</strong>vestigators, prosecutors and hear<strong>in</strong>g officer staff receive <strong>in</strong>itial tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g onrequirements for reasonable accommodation and <strong>in</strong>teractive process, and have options100 Id. § 298.101 ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000(e)(5)(c), 12117(a).102 N.Y. Exec. <strong>Law</strong> § 297(9). If an <strong>in</strong>dividual has filed a compla<strong>in</strong>t with the Division, and decides to go tocourt, (s)he may voluntarily dismiss the compla<strong>in</strong>t with the Division <strong>in</strong> order to move forward <strong>in</strong> the statecourt system.103 See id. § 297(9)-(10).104 Id. § 297(5).105See Edgar De Leon, Basic <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Employment</strong> <strong>Law</strong>,http://www.deleonlawyers.com/CM/Articles/article-ny-employment-law.asp (last visited Feb. 19, 2010).Where discrim<strong>in</strong>atory actions are cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g, courts have sometimes allowed related events that tookplace more than three years ago to be treated as “timely” under the NYSHRL. Gangemi <strong>Law</strong> Firm, P.C.,Primer on the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Human Rights <strong>Law</strong>,http://www.newyorkemploymentattorneyblog.com/2008/06/primer_on_the_new_york_state_h.html (lastvisited February 19, 2010).106 See Equal <strong>Employment</strong> Opportunity Commission, Federal <strong>Law</strong>s Prohibit<strong>in</strong>g Job Discrim<strong>in</strong>ationQuestions and Answers, http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/qanda.html (last visited March 24, 2010).16