Report on an Audit of Government's Poverty Reduction Programmes ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PROVINCESOURCE OF PROGRAMMENUMBEROFPROJECTSSub-Total 3093NORTH WEST Agiculture (AGIS) 188Dept of Education 1973Dept of Housing 3PDLG 11Land Affairs 147Offi ce of the Premier 20Public Works 113Social Development 38Unspecifi ed 3Sub-Total 2496NORTHERNCAPE Agiculture (AGIS) 38DPLG 24Land Affairs 157Dept of Housing 13Northern Cape Agriculture and Land Reform 23Public Works 98Unspecifi ed 3Sub-Total 356WESTERN CAPE Agiculture (AGIS) 97Dept of Education 214Dept of Housing 2DPLG 18Land Affairs 362Public Works 382Social development 11Unspecifi ed 16WC Social Servoces and Poverty Alleviation 39Sub-Total 1141ProvinceUnspecifi ed Dept of Education 4Dept of Housing 2DPLG 2Limpopo Offi ce of the Premier 20234
PROVINCESOURCE OF PROGRAMMENUMBEROFPROJECTSPublic Works 439Unspecifi ed 24Sub-Total 673Grand-Total 29966To look more closely at the distribution of projects that have been received and integrated into the database,an analysis of the programmes was done and is presented in Table 8. The largest programme database that wasreceived was that from the Offi ce of the Premier in the Free State. This was followed by the projects containedin the different components of the EPWP. The Poverty Management Information System (of the Limpopo Growthand Development Strategy) with 1195 was the fourth largest programme. The national Department of Agricultureprovided the next largest source of data from their Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD),Settlement and Land Acquisition Grant (SLAG) and Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme (CASP).The Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Programme (ISRDP) and the Municipal Infrastructure Grant(MIG) could not be made available by the national DPLG, but some of the project data was included as part ofprovincial department submissions to the project team. Flagship poverty reduction programmes, such as theEPWP and the National School Nutrition Programme, have been obtained centrally from the Departments ofPublic Works and Education, respectively.Table 8: Analysis of projects by programme.NumberofProgramme NameProjectsNational School Nutrition Programme (NSNP) of the Department of Education 16641Free State Growth and Development Strategy (FSGDS) of the Free State Offi ce of thePremier2712EPWP-Infrastructure of the Department of Public Works 1915EPWP-Environmental & Culture of the Department of Public Works 1281Poverty Management Information System (MIS) of Limpopo: Offi ce of the Premier 1195Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD) of the Department of LandAffairs970Settlement and Land Acquisition Grant (SLAG) of the Department of Land Affairs 884Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme (CASP) of the Department of Agriculture 603Restitution Discretionary Grant of the Department of the Department of Land Affairs 528Project Linked Subsidy of the Department of Housing 447Executive Outreach of Mpumalanga Offi ce of the Premier 412Projects under an unspecifi ed programme of the Department of Agriculture (AGIS) 250EPWP-Social of the Department of Public Works 218Poverty Alleviation by Local Authorities of the Department of Social Development: Gauteng 20435
Page 3: Report on an Audit
Page 7: 4.2.1 Accessing information on prog
Page 11 and 12: The PSC therefore decided to undert
Page 13 and 14: There is a need for a system that a
Page 15 and 16: Chapter OneIntroduction1
Page 17 and 18: is to determine the extent to which
Page 19 and 20: In order to test the utility of suc
Page 21: Microsoft Excel workbooks or just o
Page 24 and 25: Findings of the workshops largely c
Page 27: Chapter ThreeDefinition of Poverty
Page 30 and 31: Turning now to the case of South Af
Page 32 and 33: Table 1: Categories based on types
Page 34 and 35: 20such initiatives creates interdep
Page 36 and 37: 4.1 Design of the programme and pro
Page 38 and 39: A description of the fi elds contai
Page 40 and 41: DescribeLocationProjectNameProjectS
Page 42 and 43: Table 4: Description of fields in p
Page 44 and 45: of different departments and progra
Page 46 and 47: Table 7: Projects integrated into d
Page 50 and 51: NumberofProgramme NameProjectsLED P
Page 52 and 53: Figure 2: Distribution of poverty r
Page 54 and 55: Table 9: Breakdown of projects in t
Page 56 and 57: projects were fi nanced. Among thos
Page 58 and 59: 5.1 ConclusionsThrough the extensiv
Page 60 and 61: ecome the offi cial source of names
Page 62 and 63: Henriot, P., 2002. “Church’s So
Page 64 and 65: Surty, E., 2004. ‘Address by the
Page 66 and 67: Government sourcesSource Year Summa
Page 68 and 69: DSD, “IntegratedNational Business
Page 70 and 71: T. Mbeki, State of theNation addres
Page 72 and 73: PROGRAMME EVALUATIONSSource Year Su
Page 74 and 75: Palmer DevelopmentGroup, “Special
Page 76 and 77: ACADEMIC SOURCESS. Parnell,“Const
Page 78 and 79: World Bank, WorldDevelopment <stron
Page 80 and 81: United Nations,Poverty in theHuman
Page 82 and 83: A. Coudouel, J. S.Hentschel, and Q.
Page 84 and 85: LIST OF INTERVIEW DISCUSSION QUESTI
Page 86 and 87: The tables below categorizes the ty
Page 88 and 89: Addendum 3List of Departments thatA
Page 90 and 91: Free State Social Development Mina
Page 92 and 93: Limpopo Offi ce Of The Premier V Ge
Page 94 and 95: Northern Cape OPSC Carin Du Plessis
Page 96 and 97: EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENT’S POVERT
Page 98 and 99:
EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENT’S POVERT
Page 100 and 101:
Key Performance IndicatorsProjectNu
Page 102 and 103:
EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENT’S POVERT
Page 104:
Republic of South AfricaPublic Serv
show all

Report on an Audit of Government's Poverty Reduction Programmes ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?