11.07.2015 Views

sapstain fungi of some commercially important timbers and their ...

sapstain fungi of some commercially important timbers and their ...

sapstain fungi of some commercially important timbers and their ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTIONFungi cause different kinds <strong>of</strong> damages to timber viz. decay, s<strong>of</strong>t rot,<strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> mould. Mould occurs on the surface <strong>of</strong> the timber <strong>and</strong> generally hasa woolly or powdery appearance. Moulds cause superficial staining due to thepresence <strong>of</strong> mycelium as well as <strong>their</strong> coloured spore masses. Discolouration <strong>of</strong>sapwood caused by <strong>fungi</strong> is commonly known as <strong>sapstain</strong>. As the colour thatthese <strong>fungi</strong> impart to the wood is frequently bluish-gray, the stain is <strong>of</strong>ten referredto as blue stain. Stain due to <strong>fungi</strong> may be superficial or penetrating. Deep seatedpenetrating stains are caused by <strong>fungi</strong> that have dark coloured hyphae or thatproduce pigments diffusing into the wood tissues. Soon after the tree is felled,the cut ends <strong>of</strong> the logs <strong>and</strong> portions from which the bark has been removed, getexposed to infection by spores <strong>of</strong> staining <strong>fungi</strong>.Discolouration <strong>of</strong> wood is one <strong>of</strong> the defects which causes considerableloss (in quality) <strong>of</strong> wood products. Sapstain, besides spoiling the appearance <strong>of</strong>the timber, affects the goods stored in contact with the stained wood. In paperindustry, when stained timber is used, more chemicals are required to bleach thepulp. Due to the susceptible nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>some</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>timbers</strong> to <strong>sapstain</strong> attack, theyare processed at the earliest to avoid infection <strong>and</strong> this urgency <strong>of</strong>ten causespractical difficulties to the manufacturers.In Kerala, small scale wood-based industries such as packing case, plywood<strong>and</strong> match units, utilize large quantity <strong>of</strong> wood from miscellaneous treespecies. It is estimated that there are about 460 packing case, 81 plywood <strong>and</strong> 144match units in the State. The major timber species employed in match industriesin Kerala are Bombax ceiba (Linn.), Ailanthus triphysa (Dennst) Alston, Alstoniascholaris (Linn.) R. Br <strong>and</strong> <strong>some</strong> other s<strong>of</strong>t woods available. In recent years, withthe dwindling natural forest resources it has become necessary to depend on otheralternative timber sources to meet the current <strong>and</strong> future needs <strong>of</strong> wood. Heveabrasiliensis (HBK.) Muell. Arg. (rubber wood) with <strong>some</strong> positive attributes, meritsconsideration when we look for an alternative <strong>and</strong> cheap timber. After extractingthe latex, rubber trees are felled for replanting the area <strong>and</strong> the wood thus obtainedis being utilized now-a-days as the main source <strong>of</strong> wood for manufacturingpacking-cases.In India, not much work has been done on the effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>fungi</strong> onwood. Some studies on decay <strong>and</strong> <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>timbers</strong>, <strong>their</strong> causes <strong>and</strong> preventionwere conducted by Bakshi (1953). The cause <strong>of</strong> discolouration <strong>of</strong> rosewood(Dalbergia latifolia (Roxb.) veneers was investigated by Ananthanarayanan, (1971).Due to favourable environmental conditions such as high rainfall <strong>and</strong> humidity,<strong>sapstain</strong> is a serious problem in Kerala. However, no work has been done on<strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>commercially</strong> <strong>important</strong> <strong>timbers</strong> in the State. This was the relevance<strong>and</strong> context <strong>of</strong> the present study, attempting to find out the microorganismsresponsible for <strong>sapstain</strong> in selected <strong>timbers</strong> <strong>and</strong> possibilities <strong>of</strong> <strong>their</strong> chemical


control. Due to the commercial importance <strong>of</strong> rubber wood <strong>and</strong> its high susceptibilityto fungal attack studies were carried out to find out the <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>fungi</strong>particularly on this timber. Since Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat. was the dominantfungus causing stain on most <strong>of</strong> the <strong>timbers</strong>, studies were also undertaken toinvestigate various aspects <strong>of</strong> infection by this fungus on rubber wood.


MATERIALS AND METHODSSurveyA preliminary survey was conducted in <strong>some</strong> <strong>of</strong> the wood-based industriessuch as plywood, packing case <strong>and</strong> match factories in Trichur District <strong>and</strong>eight timber species were selected for the study, viz., Ailanthus triphysa (Dennst.),Alston (Matty), Alstonia scholaris ( Lm.) R. Br. (Ezhilam-pala), Anacardium occiden taleLinn. (Cashew), Bombax ceiba (Linn.) (Mullilavu), Erythrina stricta Roxb. (Murukku),Hevea brasiliensis (HBK.) Muell. Arg. (Rubber), Macaranga peltata (Roxb.) Muell.Arg. (Vatta) <strong>and</strong> Mangifera indica Linn. (Mango). Wood samples <strong>of</strong> these specieswere collected at monthly interval from wood based industries in Trichur Districtto isolate the mould <strong>and</strong> stain <strong>fungi</strong> growing on them. In addition, samples werealso collected from Calicut, Malappuram, Palghat, Ernakulam, Kottayam, Alleppey,Quilon <strong>and</strong> Triv<strong>and</strong>rum Districts, but only once.Isolation <strong>of</strong> microorganismsA small piece <strong>of</strong> the stained wood was surface sterilized using 0.1% HgCl 2solution, washed thoroughly in several changes <strong>of</strong> sterile distilled water <strong>and</strong>plated on potato dextrose agar (PDA). The plates were incubated at 282 2 O C <strong>and</strong>observed for the growth <strong>of</strong> any fungus. After 5 days, the fungus growing aroundthe wood sample was isolated, purified <strong>and</strong> maintained on PDA slants for furtherstudies.Identification <strong>of</strong> isolatesCultural <strong>and</strong> morphological characteristics <strong>of</strong> isolates were studied <strong>and</strong>for the confirmation <strong>of</strong> <strong>their</strong> identity, cultures were referred to the CAB InternationalMycological Institute, Kew, UK. These cultures were periodically subcultured<strong>and</strong> stored for further investigations.Susceptibility testFungi isolated from various <strong>timbers</strong> were evaluated for <strong>their</strong> ability tostain healthy wood. For inoculation, unstained sapwood blocks (7 x 5 x 1 cm)were cut from freshly harvested green timber <strong>and</strong> steam sterilized for 15 minutes.A disc <strong>of</strong> 8 mm dia taken from the edge <strong>of</strong> an actively growing culture <strong>of</strong> the testfungus was placed over the surface <strong>of</strong> each block. The ,inoculated blocks were


then placed on'glass rod supports over moistened sterile filter papers in sterilePetri dishes <strong>and</strong> these set-ups were incubated at 28 + 2°C for 15 days. Eachisolate was tested on 5 replicate blocks; controls were also maintained with plainagar discs. After the incubation period, the inoculated blocks were examined forgrowth <strong>of</strong> the <strong>fungi</strong> on the surface <strong>and</strong> internal stain after splitting them open.Weight loss due to Botryodiplodia theobromaeWeight loss in wood blocks <strong>of</strong> Ailanthus triphysa, Alstonia scholaris, <strong>and</strong>Hevea brasiliensis (widely used for making match splints/packing cases) due to theinfection by Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat., the most dominant fungus causing<strong>sapstain</strong> was studied over a period <strong>of</strong> four months following the procedure describedby Stranks (1976). Forty test blocks (5.5 x 1.5 x 0.5cm size) <strong>of</strong> each timberwere cut from clear fresh sapwood, oven dried at 105°C for a few days till theweight became constant <strong>and</strong> <strong>their</strong> initial dry weight recorded. The sample blockswere then placed over a wet filter paper in a closed damp chamber to bring themback to normal moisture equilibrium. Following steam sterilization for 15 mintwenty blocks were inoculated with 8 mm dia agar disc taken from the edge <strong>of</strong>a 5-day-old culture <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae. These blocks were incubated in large testtubes (14.0 x 25.0 cm) containing 15 ml <strong>of</strong> sterile water. The atmosphere aroundthe inoculated blocks was humidified by inserting a paper wick (2.5 x 10 cm)covering the entire length <strong>of</strong> the block. Each tube contained 15 ml <strong>of</strong> sterile waterin which the lower end <strong>of</strong> the wick was immersed; the inoculated wood blockswere kept free <strong>of</strong> direct water contact by glass supports projecting above thewater level. The tubes were closed with cotton plugs (Fig. 1). The remainingblocks were inoculated with plain agar discs <strong>and</strong> these blocks were used ascontrol. The set-ups were incubated at 28 + 2°C. Every month, five blocks eachfrom inoculated <strong>and</strong> control sets were taken out from the tubes. After removingthe mycelial growth under running tap water, the blocks were dried at 105°C fora few days <strong>and</strong> <strong>their</strong> weight recorded.Effect <strong>of</strong> wood moisture content <strong>and</strong> microclimatic factors on the growth<strong>of</strong> B. theobromaeEffect <strong>of</strong> varying moisture content (MC) <strong>of</strong> rubber wood on the growth<strong>of</strong> Botryodiplodia theobromae was studied at three different temperatures (T) <strong>and</strong>five different relative humidity (RH) regimes. Different RH levels were maintainedusing saturated solutions <strong>of</strong> various salts (O'Brien, 1948). The salt solutionsused for maintaining different relative humidities were prepared in sterilewater <strong>and</strong> each sterile Horlicks bottle contained 30 ml <strong>of</strong> solution (Table 1). Formaintaining cent percent humidity, 30 ml <strong>of</strong> sterile water was used in the bottles.Fresh oven dried rubber wood blocks (3.3 x 4.0 x 2.5 cm) were immersed in waterfor appropriate periods so that they attain approximate MC <strong>of</strong> 50, 75 <strong>and</strong> 100%.These wood blocks were then steam sterilized for 15 minutes <strong>and</strong> inoculated withan 8 mm dia disc.


Table 1 Relative humidities over saturated solutions at various temperatures(after O'Brien, 1948).Salt Relative humidity Temperature 0 CpercentageWater 100 20ZnSO 4 7H 2 O 90 20NH 4 CI 80 20NH 4 NO, 67.4 20Ca(NO 3 ) 2 4H 2 O 56.0 20Water 100 30KNO 3 91.5 30(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 81 .0 30CO(NH 2 ) 272.9 30NH 4 NO 3 60.0 30Water 100 40KNO 389.4 40KC1 82.0 40NaNO 370.5 40CO(NH 2) 268.7 40taken from an actively growing B. theobromae culture. The wood blocks wereselected r<strong>and</strong>omly <strong>and</strong> hung inside the bottles above the solution using stainlesssteel wire (Fig 2a). The controls were inoculated with plain agar discs (Fig. 2b).The inoculated <strong>and</strong> the control wood blocks were incubated for 3 months at threedifferent temperatures viz. 20,30 <strong>and</strong> 40 0 C. Each treatment had five inoculated<strong>and</strong> five control blocks. The growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>fungi</strong> over the surface <strong>of</strong> wood blocks wasexamined visually <strong>and</strong> assessed using the following rating index (Table 2) afterfour weeks <strong>of</strong> incubation. The data were subjected to analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (Snedecor<strong>and</strong> Cochran, 1967).Table 2 Rating index for assessing the fungal growth (after Plackett, 1982).RatingGrowthNo growthTrace growthLight growthMedium growthHeavy growth5


Figs. 1 - 2. la. Control block inoculated with plain agar disc. lb. Test tubes withrubber wood blocks inoculated with B. theobromae for assessing weight loss.2a. Rubber wood block inoculated with B. theobromae. 2b. Control block inoculatedwith plain agar disc.


Optimum moisture content <strong>of</strong> wood for the growth <strong>of</strong> B. theobromaeOptimum moisture content <strong>of</strong> rubber wood required for maximum growth<strong>of</strong> B. theobromae was determined. Two hundred wood blocks (7.0 x 5.0 x 1.0 cm)made from freshly sawn rubber wood were kept in an incubator maintained at35°C. Twenty sample blocks were removed each day for 10 consecutive daysfrom the incubator <strong>and</strong> steam sterilized for 15 minutes. The initial weight <strong>of</strong> 10sterilized blocks was recorded <strong>and</strong> blocks were oven dried at 105°C for theestimation <strong>of</strong> final weight. Of the remaining 10 blocks, five were inoculated with8 mm dia disc <strong>of</strong> an actively growing culture <strong>of</strong> B. theobromue <strong>and</strong> the rest withplain agar disc to serve as control. All the blocks were incubated in sterile Petridishes for 2 weeks at 28 + 2°C. Moisture content <strong>of</strong> the inoculated blocks wasdetermined by calculating the corresponding oven dry weight <strong>of</strong> blocks. After theincubation period, the inoculated blocks were observed for the growth <strong>of</strong> thefungus on the surface. The growth was assessed visually using the rating indexas given under Table 2.Chemical control <strong>of</strong> <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> mould growth(a) Evaluation <strong>of</strong> various <strong>fungi</strong>cides using sterile wood blocksThe efficacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>some</strong> <strong>of</strong> the commonly available <strong>fungi</strong>cides viz.carbendazim, carboxin, copper oxychloride, mancozeb, sodium azide, thiram <strong>and</strong>ziram were tested at 1% a.i. against stain as well as mould <strong>fungi</strong>. Further, theefficacy <strong>of</strong> sodium azide was tested at concentrations <strong>of</strong> 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 <strong>and</strong> 0.75 %Since higher concentrations were found to be effective in controlling stain <strong>and</strong>mould <strong>fungi</strong>, the chemical was also tested in lower concentrations. (10, 50, 100,250 <strong>and</strong> 500 ppm). All <strong>fungi</strong>cidal evaluations were done using freshly sawn rubberwood blocks (7.0 x 5.0 x 1.0 cm size) as rubber wood was very susceptible tomould, <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> decay <strong>fungi</strong> (Ali et al., 1980).Sterile wood blocks were dipped in <strong>fungi</strong>cidal solution for 30 seconds <strong>and</strong>excess solution drained completely before placing inside the Petri dishes forinoculation. The test wood blocks were inoculated with 8 mm dia disc fromactively growing cultures <strong>of</strong> Botryodiplodia theobromae, Ceru tocystis fimbriata Ellis &Halstead, Acremoniunr spp., Fusarium sp., Scytalidium lignicola Pesante, Aspergillusniger Van Tieghem, Aspergillus flavus Link ex Gray, Trichoderma viride Pers. exGray, <strong>and</strong> Memnoniella echinata (Riv.) Galloway. Wood blocks dipped in distilledwater served as control <strong>and</strong> blocks dipped in solutions containing 0.5% sodiumpentachlorophenoxide (NaPCP) plus 1.5% borax as st<strong>and</strong>ard (Butcher, 1980). Foreach <strong>fungi</strong>cidal treatment, there were six replicate wood blocks. The Petri disheswere incubated at 28 + 2°C for 2 weeks. The fungal growth observed on theblocks was visually assessed using the rating index (Table 2) <strong>and</strong> the percentageinhibition <strong>of</strong> fungal growth over control calculated.


As captafol had been found to be very effective against stain <strong>and</strong> decay<strong>fungi</strong> (Butcher, 1980) three different concentrations (1.0%, 1.5% <strong>and</strong> 2.0% a.i.) <strong>of</strong>this <strong>fungi</strong>cide were also tested.(b) Evaluation <strong>of</strong> sodium azide against stain <strong>and</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong> using freshnonsterile wood blocksSince sodium azide has proved to be a promising chemical for the control<strong>of</strong> stain <strong>and</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong> even at very low concentrations, <strong>some</strong> more detailedstudies involving this chemical were attempted. The efficacy <strong>of</strong> sodium azide toprotect fresh nonsterile rubber wood blocks from fungal growth was studied overa period <strong>of</strong> one month. Twenty five freshly cut unstained rubber wood blockswere dipped in sodium azide solution <strong>of</strong> 0.1,0.25,0.5 <strong>and</strong> 0.75% concentration for30 seconds <strong>and</strong> kept inside nonsterile Petri dishes moistened with filter papers tomaintain humidity. Fungal growth over the blocks was recorded after four weeks.The percentage <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> fungal growth was calculated by counting infected<strong>and</strong> healthy wood blocks.(c) Evaluation <strong>of</strong> sodium azide against stain <strong>and</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong> using preincubatednonsterile wood blocksThe effect <strong>of</strong> sodium azide to control mould <strong>and</strong> stain <strong>fungi</strong> was testedusing nonsterile preincubated wood blocks. Twenty five freshly cut rubber woodblocks were kept in open air at the saw mill for an hour. These blocks were thentransferred to a humid chamber for 2 days so that the spores <strong>of</strong> the mould as wellas stain <strong>fungi</strong> fallen over the blocks grew <strong>and</strong> established over the wood blocks.These wood blocks were dipped in sodium azide solutions <strong>of</strong> 0.25,0.5, <strong>and</strong> 0.75%concentration for 30 seconds <strong>and</strong> incubated in Petri dishes. Observations weretaken at weekly intervals for one month. The growth <strong>of</strong> the fungus over theblocks was assessed visually. The efficacy <strong>of</strong> the chemical was calculated bycounting the number <strong>of</strong> infected <strong>and</strong> healthy wood blocks <strong>and</strong> the data on thepercentage <strong>of</strong> inhibition <strong>of</strong> fungal growth at the end <strong>of</strong> the fourth week tested byst<strong>and</strong>ard normal deviate test.(d) Effect <strong>of</strong> dipping time on the control <strong>of</strong> fungal growth over the wood blocksFreshly cut rubber wood blocks were dipped in sodium azide solutions<strong>of</strong> 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 % concentration for 10, 20 <strong>and</strong> 30 minutes. The excess solutionwas drained <strong>of</strong>f from the wood blocks <strong>and</strong> incubated in Petri dishes for fourweeks. Control blocks were dipped in sterile water for 10, 20 <strong>and</strong> 30 minutes.Weekly observations on fungal growth over the wood blocks were taken for aperiod <strong>of</strong> one month. The percentage <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> fungal growth was calculatedby recording the number <strong>of</strong> infected <strong>and</strong> noninfected wood blocks <strong>and</strong> the dataanalysed statistically using st<strong>and</strong>ard normal deviate test.


Treatment 1 : Dipping <strong>and</strong> stacking without spaceThe rubber wood planks were dipped in bacterial suspension for 10 seconds,drained completely to remove excess solution <strong>and</strong> then piled one above theother. Each pile comprised <strong>of</strong> four individual planks <strong>and</strong> for each observationthere were four replicates. Control planks were dipped in water <strong>and</strong> stacked inthe same manner.Treatment 2 : Dipping <strong>and</strong> stacking with spaceAfter dipping in bacterial suspension the planks were stacked one abovethe other, but separated from each other by a reeper <strong>of</strong> size 15 x 6 x 1.0 cm soas to have <strong>some</strong> air space in between the planks. Controls dipped in water werealso stacked in the same way.Treatment 3 : Spraying <strong>and</strong> stacking without spaceThe wood planks were uniformly sprayed with the bacterial suspensionusing a sprayer. Controls sprayed with water were also maintained. Planks werethen stacked without any space in between.Treatment 4 : Spraying <strong>and</strong> stacking with spacePlanks were stacked one above the other after spraying with bacterialsuspension, but separated individually using a reeper. Controls were maintainedby spraying with water.Observations on fungal growth were recorded fortnightly for a period <strong>of</strong>two months. At each observation, samples were taken r<strong>and</strong>omly <strong>and</strong> outline <strong>of</strong>fungal growth on either side <strong>of</strong> the planks was marked <strong>and</strong> drawn on a paper.The area covered by fungal growth as marked on the paper was then determinedusing a 'Licor' leaf area meter. The data obtained at the end <strong>of</strong> the fourth weekwere subjected to analysis <strong>of</strong> variance.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe common stain causing <strong>fungi</strong> isolated from different timber speciessuch as Hevea brasiliensis, Ailanthus triphysa, Bombax ceiba, Alstonia scholaris, Mangiferaindica, Anacardium occiden tale, Macaranga peltata <strong>and</strong> Erythrina s tricta wereBotryodiplodia theobrontae, Ceratocystis fimbriata, Acremoniumspp., Scytalidium lignicola<strong>and</strong> Fusarium spp. <strong>of</strong> which B. theobromae was the most dominant on causing stain(Figs. 3, 4). B. theobrontae was reported as the most prevalent <strong>sapstain</strong> fungus ontropical woods (Cartwright <strong>and</strong> Findlay, 1958; Ol<strong>of</strong>inboba, 1974; Hong, 1976). Itwas also known to cause <strong>sapstain</strong> in rubber wood in Malaysia (Ali et al., 1980).


Ceratocystis fimbriata was prominently found causing stain in rubber wood duringrainy season in Kerala. Ceratocystis coerulescens was reported as the most <strong>important</strong>stain fungus on hardwoods in the southern USA (Verrall, 1941). In Russia,Cera tocystis spp. were responsible for the discolouration <strong>of</strong> the wood (Vanin,1932). C. picea, normally a nonstaining fungus on conifers in the western USA,caused stain in red Alder (Alnus rubra) (Morrell, 1987). Several species <strong>of</strong> Ceratocystiswere reported to cause stain on pine wood in Spain (Troya <strong>and</strong> Navarrete, 1989).The <strong>fungi</strong> isolated from the surface <strong>of</strong> different timber species surveyedwere Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, Penicillium spp., Trichoderma viride, Memnoniellaechinata, Syncephalastrum racemosum Cohn ex Schrot., Cladosporium sp., Mucor sp.,<strong>and</strong> Absidia corymbifera (Cohn) Sacc. & Trotter, <strong>of</strong> which Aspergillus spp., Penicilliumspp., T. viride, S. racemosum <strong>and</strong> Mucor sp., were the dominant ones (Fig. 5).M. echinata was seen more on rubber wood (Fig. 6).The results <strong>of</strong> the survey indicated that there was no definite pattern inthe occurrence <strong>of</strong> mould <strong>and</strong> <strong>sapstain</strong> on different timber species collected. Alltimber species surveyed were found to be susceptible to B. fheobromae; H. brasiliensisbeing the most severely <strong>and</strong> frequently affected. Based on the frequency <strong>of</strong>isolation <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae, it can be concluded that <strong>timbers</strong> such as H. brasiliensis,A. occidentale, Artocarpus spp. <strong>and</strong> A. triphysa were the most susceptible ones whileM. indica, B. ceiba <strong>and</strong> E. stricta moderately susceptible; least susceptible <strong>timbers</strong>were A. scholaris, <strong>and</strong> M. peltata (Table 3).Table 3.Frequency percentage <strong>of</strong> Botryodiplodia theobromae in fungalisolations made from various <strong>timbers</strong> <strong>of</strong> Kerala.Timber Total No.<strong>of</strong> Frequency <strong>of</strong> Number <strong>of</strong> monthsspecies isolations infection samples collectedpercentage in a yearAilanthus triphysaAlstonia scholarisAnacardium occidentaleArtocarpus spp.Bombax ceibaCeiba pent<strong>and</strong>raErythrina strictaHevea brasiliensisMacaranga pelta taMangifera indica1311131143756622357018777540426081275776647533149


A survey conducted in various wood industries <strong>of</strong> Trichur District revealedthat there was no clear pattern <strong>of</strong> attack <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae on rubber woodthroughout the year. The incidence was observed to be more than 50% in all themonths <strong>of</strong> collection (Table 4). Even in drier months cent percent infection wasnoted.Table 4Percentage isolation <strong>of</strong> Botryodiplodia theobromae on rubber woodfrom various places in Trichur District during the year 1987.Locality Month Percent isolation <strong>of</strong> B. theobromaeOllurChiyyaramPudukkadAlurOllur011 urKodakaraKalletumkaraOllurChi yyaramMarathakaraJanuaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember67100100507010010010010010070Susceptibility testIn the artificial inoculation trial, the test fungus grew from the culture disc<strong>and</strong> spread over the upper side <strong>of</strong> the wood block within five days. After fifteendays, the whole block was covered by fungal mycelium. When the superficialmycelia were scraped using a scalpel blade, surfaces <strong>of</strong> the test blocks <strong>of</strong> different<strong>timbers</strong> were found to be stained. In the case <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae, the stainingpenetrated to a depth <strong>of</strong> 4 to 8 mm inside as seen after splitting the blocks. Thecontrol samples remained unstained.Weight loss due to Botryodiplodia theobromaeStudies revealed that there was a weight loss in rubber wood in the firstmonth which increased to 12.2% by the end <strong>of</strong> fourth month (Table 5). In the case<strong>of</strong> Ailanthus triphysa the weight loss increased from 4.3% in the first month to10.1% in the fourth month. In Alstonia scholaris there was no weight loss notedin the first three months, but at the end <strong>of</strong> fourth month a weight loss <strong>of</strong> 4.5%occurred. The results clearly showed that rubber wood is the most susceptibleto <strong>sapstain</strong> caused by B. theobromae while A. scholaris is the least. These resultsalso confirm the findings <strong>of</strong> the survey.


Table 5Percentage <strong>of</strong> weight loss due to B. theobromae on different woodspecies for a period <strong>of</strong> four months.Months <strong>of</strong> incubation A. triphysa A.scholaris H. brasiliensis12344.3 0.0 8.05.0 0.0 8.39.9 0.0 8.510.1 4.5 12.2The attack <strong>of</strong> <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>fungi</strong> on the physical <strong>and</strong> strength properties <strong>of</strong>wood has not been studied earlier in detail. Findlay <strong>and</strong> Pettifor (1939) reportedthat a loss <strong>of</strong> 30-40% in toughness <strong>and</strong> 20% in bending strength was noted inobechi (Triplochiton scleroxylon) stained heavily with B. theobromae. Pinheiro (1971)also recorded a decrease in bending strength <strong>of</strong> poplar wood due to the attack bythe same organism. Umezurike (1969) showed that the blue stain fungus, B.theobroniae was capable <strong>of</strong> degrading cellulose in wood <strong>of</strong> Bombax buonopozense P.Beauv., particularly after utilizing starch <strong>and</strong> soluble carbohydrates. The mode<strong>of</strong> degradation <strong>of</strong> wood blocks <strong>of</strong> Gossweilerodendron balsamiferum(Verm.). Harms.,a tropical forest tree extensively used for construction work in Nigeria, by B.theobromae has been studied under laboratory conditions by Umezurike (1978).He recorded a 5-7% weight loss <strong>of</strong> infected wood blocks. The pattern <strong>of</strong> invasion<strong>of</strong> wood blocks by B. theobromae has been found to be similar to those <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t rot<strong>fungi</strong> (Krapivina, 1960; Levy, 1967; Umezurike, 1969). As both s<strong>of</strong>t rot <strong>and</strong> bluestain <strong>fungi</strong> are capable <strong>of</strong> forming chains <strong>of</strong> cavities in the S2 layer <strong>of</strong> the secondarycell wall <strong>of</strong> wood, the main difference between these two groups <strong>of</strong> <strong>fungi</strong> lies,apparently, in the ability <strong>of</strong> blue stain <strong>fungi</strong> to synthesise pigment material bysecondary metabolism. The weight loss <strong>of</strong> rubber wood <strong>and</strong> A. triphysa reportedhere may be due to the degradation <strong>of</strong> cellulose. The susceptibile nature <strong>of</strong> rubberwood to B. theobromae may be either due to high percentage <strong>of</strong> starch content inthe tissues or the presence <strong>of</strong> any chemical which promotes the fungal growth.However, this was not verified. Fougerousse (1985) reported that susceptibility toblue stain depends on the predominance <strong>of</strong> parenchymatic tissues or the physiologicalcondition like higher percentage <strong>of</strong> starch in the tree at the time <strong>of</strong> felling.Effect <strong>of</strong> wood moisture content <strong>and</strong> microclimatic factors on the growth <strong>of</strong> B.theobromaeAt relative humidity (RH) 60,70 <strong>and</strong> 80% no fungal growth was recordedat 20 0 C (T) even at cent percent moisture content (MC) <strong>of</strong> timber. But fairly goodgrowth occurred at 100% RH in three moisture content levels. At 30 0 C, pr<strong>of</strong>usegrowth <strong>of</strong> the fungus was noted at 90% <strong>and</strong> 100% RH; the fungal growth was notmuch influenced by the moisture content <strong>of</strong> timber. At 40 0 C, in all combinations


<strong>of</strong> RH <strong>and</strong> MC, the growth <strong>of</strong> the fungus was not very much restricted, butcomparatively better growth was noted at 100% RH. It is presumed that thegrowth <strong>of</strong> the fungus on wood blocks was influenced by higher percentage <strong>of</strong>relative humidity. Statistical analysis showed significant difference between thetreatments (Table 6). Treatments (T, MC, RH), 20" C, 100%, 100%; 30" C, 75%,100% <strong>and</strong>300C, 100%, 100% were found to be significant as compared to all othertreatments. Hong (1980) studied the temperature tolerance <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae onagar medium as well as on wood blocks. He found that the optimum temperaturefor growth <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae on malt agar was very close to 30°C. But on woodblocks the fungus could survive at higher temperatures. In the present study also,30°C was found to be the ideal temperature for good growth <strong>of</strong> the fungus.Viitanen <strong>and</strong> Paajanen (1988) studied the growth <strong>of</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong> such asAspergillus versicolor, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, Penicillium sp. <strong>and</strong> Aureobasidiumpullullans in different RH <strong>and</strong> temperature. He found that the moulds grewrapidly in higher humidities (RH > 96%) <strong>and</strong> the lowest humidity for slow growthwas 80%. Generally most <strong>of</strong> the <strong>fungi</strong> grow well in higher humidities (95% ormore) (Cochrane, 1958). From the present study, it was clear that when thehumidity was high, the wood blocks having low moisture content, absorbedmoisture from the surroundings <strong>and</strong> enhanced the growth <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae onwood blocks.Table 6Growth rate index <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae grown on rubber woodblocks <strong>of</strong> different moisture contents (MC) incubated at varioustemperatures <strong>and</strong> relative humidity (RH).200 300 400Moisture content Moisture content Moisture content50 75 100 50 75 100 50 75 10060 o a *o a O a O a 0 a O a 0 a 0 a 0 a70 0 a O a O a 0.2 a 0.4 a O.8 a 0 a 0 a 0 a80 0 a O a O a O a 1.4 a 1.6 a 0 a 0.2 a 1.6 a90 1.2 b l.8 b 3.3 c 2.8 b 3.4 c 3.0 b 0.2 a 0.4 a 1.2 b100 3.4 c 3.4 c 3.8 c 3.4 c 3.6 c 4.0 C 0.2 a 1.0 a 2.8 b* Values superscribed by the same letter are not statistically differentOptimum moisture content for the growth <strong>of</strong>B. theobromaeGrowth rating <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae on rubber wood at different moisturecontents is given in Table 7. Above 29% moisture content, heavy growth <strong>of</strong> the


Table 7Growth rating <strong>of</strong> B.theobromae at different moisture contents (MC)<strong>of</strong> woodS1.No. MC% Rating*1 65.63 42 46.05 3.83 29.49 44 27.02 2.45 27.04 2.26 25.79 1.47 25.86 1 .08 23.83 0.09 16.18 0.010 15.85 0.0* For explanation see Table 2.fungus was seen on the wood blocks. In 27% moisture content, light growth <strong>of</strong>B. theobromae was noted where as in 25% only traces <strong>of</strong> fungal growth was observed.Below 25% the fungal growth was found to be very restricted. This studyhas confirmed earlier reports on the lowest moisture content <strong>of</strong> wood essential forthe fungal growth. Pinheiro (1971) studied the maximum <strong>and</strong> minimum moisturecontents <strong>of</strong> poplar wood which favoured blue stain attack by B. theobromae. Hefound that the lowest moisture content which permitted the growth <strong>of</strong> the funguswas 24%. Colley <strong>and</strong> Rumbold (1930) also found that the lower limit for staindevelopment in loblolly pine by Ceratocystis pilifera was 24%. From this study alsoit was clear that if the moisture content <strong>of</strong> the wood is reduced to


Table 8Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>fungi</strong>cides for the efficacy against various staining <strong>and</strong>mould <strong>fungi</strong> (Percent inhibition).ChemicalsConcentrationAf An Me Tv Bt Cf Fs As Sl%a.i.Carbendazim 1 00 90 00 00 00 00 85 90 50Sodium azide 1 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Carboxin 1 00 00 100 00 100 25 100 00 100Thiride 1 00 50 90 00 90 00 50 00 00Copperoxychloride l 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 50 25Ziram 1 00 00 90 00 90 00 00 50 50Mancozeb 1 00 00 100 00 50 00 00 00 00Captafol 1 90 90 100 00 10 00 90 90 100/I"1.5 95 95 100 00 00 00 90 90 1002 95 95 100 10 00 00 90 90 100NaPCP+Borax 0.5+1.5 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Control 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00Af - Aspergillus flavusTv - Trichoderma virideFs - Fusarium solaniAn - Aspergillus nigerBt - Botryodiplodia theobromaeAs - Acremonium strictumMe - Memnoniella echinataCf - Ceratocystis fimbriataSl - Scytalidiuni lignicolaSodium pentachlorophenoxide (NaPCP) is widely used as a preservativefor the control <strong>of</strong> <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>fungi</strong>, moulds <strong>and</strong> decay <strong>fungi</strong>. A concentration <strong>of</strong> 0.4to 0.5% a.i. is suggested to control <strong>sapstain</strong> (Anon, 1972). During the last fewyears much work has been carried out to find out a suitable substitute for NaPCPwhich has high mammalian toxicity. In the field tests conducted in Brazil, Busan,a <strong>fungi</strong>cide at 1.5% a.i. proved to be effective against <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong>(Milano, 1981). In the field tests for a period <strong>of</strong> five months Plackett (1982) provedthat Busan 1.2% a.i. was effective against <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong>. Undervarious trade names, copper-8-quinolinolate has been tested in the laboratory orin the field. In laboratory tests against several <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong> Cassens<strong>and</strong> Eslyn (1981) obtained rather poor results with 0.02% a.i. on yellow poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) at 0.02% a.i., the highest tested concentration; while Butcher(1980) found it effective on Pinus radiata against <strong>sapstain</strong>, mould <strong>and</strong> decay <strong>fungi</strong>at 0.025% a.i. concentration.Many studies have been reported on the efficacy <strong>of</strong> preservatives for thecontrol <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae causing <strong>sapstain</strong> (Tan et al., 1980; Hong, 1981). Ali et al.,(1980) have screened 11 <strong>fungi</strong>cides against B. theobromae, Aspergillus sp., <strong>and</strong> Penicilliumsp., on rubber wood. They found that captafol was effective to all the three<strong>fungi</strong> at 1-2% a.i. Gnanaharan (1983) made tests on rubber wood boards treated


y the boron diffusion process <strong>and</strong> found that 0.5% NaPCP was effective against<strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> moulds. Butcher <strong>and</strong> Drysdale (1974) screened various chemicalsagainst <strong>sapstain</strong> in New Zeal<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> reported that captafol 0.2 to 0.3% a.i. wassuperior to NaPCP. Later, Butcher (1980) found that 0.15% captafol was adequatefor long-term protection <strong>of</strong> pine timber. But in the present study captafol evenat 2% was not at all effective against B. theobromae in the laboratory screening.Evaluation <strong>of</strong> sodium azide at 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 <strong>and</strong> 0.75% revealed that thechemical was 100% effective at all concentrations tested on sterile wood blocks.When further tested the chemical was effective at 250 <strong>and</strong> 500 pprn only (Table 9).b) Evaluation <strong>of</strong> sodium azide against stain <strong>and</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong> using freshnonsterile <strong>and</strong> preincubated wood blocks.The results indicated that 80% control <strong>of</strong> fungal growth was noted at theend <strong>of</strong> the 4th week in fresh nonsterile wood blocks dipped in sodium azidesolution <strong>of</strong> 0.75%, whereas in preincubated wood blocks only 60% inhibition <strong>of</strong>fungal growth was noted (Table 10). These two treatments were found statisticallysignificant from all other treatments. It is presumed that, in preincubatedwood blocks <strong>some</strong> <strong>fungi</strong> which might have established over the wood blocks priorto the treatment, continued to grow during the incubation period even after thetreatment. But in fresh nonsterile ones, since the dipping was done immediatelyafter cutting, the <strong>fungi</strong> might not have got favourable conditions or chance toestablish. From this it is clear that a prophylatic treatment immediately afterfelling or cutting will always be better rather than controlling the stain after theinfection has occurred.Table 9Efficacy <strong>of</strong> sodium azide against staining <strong>and</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong> atdifferent concentrations (Percentage <strong>of</strong> inhibition).Sodium azideconcentration Af An Me Tv Bt Cf Fs As Sl10 ppm 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0050 ppm 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0100 ppm 00. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00250 ppm 85 100 100 100 90 100 100 100 100500 ppm 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100Af - Aspergillus flavusTv - Trichoderma virideFs - Fusarium solaniAn - Aspergillus niger Me - Memnoniella echinataBt - Botryodiplodia theobromae Cf - CeratocystisfinibriataAs - Acremonium strictum Sl - Scytalidium lignicola


~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~Table 10 Percent control <strong>of</strong> fungal growth on unsterile <strong>and</strong> preincubated woodblocks dipped in sodium azide solution.Period <strong>of</strong> incubation (weeks)Concentration % Is t 2nd 3rd 4th0.25 32 32 32 28Fresh nonsterile 0.5 32 32 32 320.75 88 88 80 80control 0 0 0 00.25 28 12 12 12Preincubated 0.5 56 48 28 280.75 68 64 60 60control 0 0 0 0c) Effect <strong>of</strong> dipping time on the control <strong>of</strong> fungal growth over the wood blocksIn the wood blocks dipped in 0.5% sodium azide for 30 minutes, 100%inhibition was noted at the end <strong>of</strong> the fourth week whereas in 10 <strong>and</strong> 20 minutesdipping, inhibition was 60 <strong>and</strong> 92% respectively (Table 11). Two treatments, suchas dipping in 0.5% concentration <strong>of</strong> sodium azide for 20 or 30 minutes were foundsignificantly different from all other treatments. When the dipping time wasincreased, the percentage <strong>of</strong> inhibition <strong>of</strong> fungal growth also increased. Thisincrease in inhibition <strong>of</strong> growth may be due to the diffusion <strong>of</strong> more chemicalsolution during long dipping periods.The use <strong>of</strong> sodium azide as a preservative chemical against mould <strong>and</strong><strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>fungi</strong> has not been reported earlier. However, it has been used effectivelyto control a few fungal diseases. Row et al., (1974) reported thatCylindrocladium black rot <strong>of</strong> peanuts was effectively controlled by applying sodiumazide in the soil. Similarly 10 ppm solution <strong>of</strong> potassium azide inhibitedthe germination <strong>of</strong> microsclerotia <strong>of</strong> Cylindrocladium floridanum (Weaver, 1971).Sodium azide was found to be effective in controlling the nursery diseases <strong>of</strong>eucalypts (Sharma <strong>and</strong> Mohanan, 1991). They have found that in laboratoryevaluation, sodium azide (0.05 <strong>and</strong> 0.1%) was 100% effective against Cylindrocladiumquinqueseptatum, C. ilicicola, C. floridanum, C. parvum <strong>and</strong> C. camelliae. All thesereports indicate that sodium azide is an effective chemical for controlling fungalgrowth. However, only after studying the toxicity <strong>and</strong> testing the efficacy in thefield, it can be recommended as a preservative against stain <strong>and</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong>.


Table 11 Percent control <strong>of</strong> fungal growth on wood blocks dipped in sodiumazide solution for 10, 20 <strong>and</strong> 30 minutes.Period <strong>of</strong> incubation (weeks)Dipping time Concentration 1st 2nd 3rd 4th(minutes) %10 0.1 100 100 80 400.25 100 100 100 480.5 100 100 100 60control 0 0 0 0200.1 100 100 70 600.25 100 80 80 800.5 100 100 100 92control 0 0 0 030 0.1 100 100 72 600.25 100 100 100 800.5 100 100 100 100control 0 0 0 0Biological control(a) Testing <strong>of</strong> the bacterium on culture mediumThe bacterium, Bucilliis subtilis inhibited the growth <strong>of</strong> all <strong>fungi</strong> testedexcept Pythium sp. (Table 12). The maximum inhibitory zone was noted in thecase <strong>of</strong> B. theobromae (Figs. 7, 8) followed by Memnoniella echinata, Scytalidiumlignicola, Trichoderttia viride, Acremonium recefei, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus <strong>and</strong>Cerutocystis fimbriata Among the pathogens tested, Pestulotiopsis sp., the commonfoliar pathogen had shown the inhibitory zone upto 17 mm.Testing <strong>of</strong> the bacterium on wood blocksThe wood blocks <strong>of</strong> three timber species, Hevea brasiliensis, Ailanthus triphysA<strong>and</strong> Alstonia scholaris treated with the suspension <strong>of</strong> B. subtilis were found to bedevoid <strong>of</strong> any fungal growth (Figs. 9,l0). On the control blocks the fungus grewwell <strong>and</strong> covered the entire surface <strong>of</strong> wood <strong>and</strong> also resulted in internal stain.


016


-Table 12 Inhibitory zone (in mm) produced by antagonisticagainst various <strong>fungi</strong>.Bacillus subtilisNo. Fungi tested Clear zone1 Aspergillus flavus 62 A. niger 73 Trichoderma viride 94 Meninoniella echinata135 Botryodiplodia theobromae186 Acremoniuni recefei97 Scytalidium lignicola118 Cera tocys tis fim bria ta59 Fusarium solani1410 Corticium salnionicolor1411 Sclerotium rolfsii912 Pestalotiopsis sp.1713 Rhizoctonia solani1414 Collectotrichum gloeosporioides1015 Pythium sp.00(c) Field testing <strong>of</strong> the bacteriumThe maximum control <strong>of</strong> fungal growth was recorded on rubber woodplanks sprayed with bacterial suspension <strong>and</strong> piled one above the other withoutleaving any space in between. The analysis <strong>of</strong> variance showed significant differencebetween treatments at p = 0.01 (Table 13). Treatment 3 was found to besignificant when compared to all other treatments.Table 13 Analysis <strong>of</strong> variance <strong>of</strong> data on inhibition <strong>of</strong> fungal growth onrubber wood planks treated with Bacillus sub tilis suspension.--- -_I--Sources ss DF MSS FTreatments 639443.180 7 91349.026 8.4221**Replication 28163.804 3 9387.935 0.8655( ns)Residual 227772.598 21 10846.314Total 895379.582 31______---__-----_I_________________II___---------------------------------------------------------** Significant at p = 0.01 ns = non-significant-


Biological control <strong>of</strong> plant pathogens, free from hazards, is a difficult but<strong>important</strong> necessity. The antagonistic potential <strong>of</strong> certain bacteria can be quiteeffective <strong>and</strong> if well regulated, provide an industrially useful method for woodprotection. Among the various bacterial antagonists tested Bacillus subtilis hasbeen reported to control several plant pathogens (Dunleavy; 1955; Aldrich <strong>and</strong>Baker, 1970; Broadbent et al., 1971; Swinburne <strong>and</strong> Brown, 1976; Singh <strong>and</strong> Deverall,1984). Results <strong>of</strong> this study are in agreement with earlier reports on the efficacy<strong>of</strong> Bacillus subtilis in controlling <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> mould on various timber species.Laboratory studies were successfully carried out to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong>bacteria as a biological control agent against 5 brown rot <strong>and</strong> 3 white rot <strong>fungi</strong>(Benko <strong>and</strong> Highley, 1990). Tests were also carried out in Australia to screenbacteria effective against <strong>fungi</strong> causing blue stain (Benko, 1988). Bacillus subtilisstrain 186 inhibited the growth <strong>of</strong> three sapwood inhabiting <strong>fungi</strong> on agar <strong>and</strong>prevented colonisation <strong>of</strong> spruce blocks placed on agar plates (Bernier et al.,1986). More detailed studies with the same strain <strong>of</strong> bacterium revealed that itcan be used as a potential biological control agent for <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> mould growthon unseasoned timber (Seifert et al., 1987). All these reports indicate that B.subtilis can be used in the biological control <strong>of</strong> <strong>sapstain</strong>. However, large scale pilottrials are necessary to work out the economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> this method.


CONCLUSIONS1. Botryodiplodia theobromae is the predominant <strong>sapstain</strong> fungus <strong>of</strong> economically<strong>important</strong> <strong>timbers</strong> <strong>of</strong> Kerala such as Hevea brasiliensis (Rubber), Ailan thustriphysa (Matty), Bombax ceiba (Elavu), Alstonia scholaris (Ezhilam-pala), Mangiferaindica (Mango), Anacardium occidentale (Cashew), Macaranga peltata (Vatta) <strong>and</strong>Erythrina stricta (Murukku).2. Sapstain caused by B. theobromae effects weight loss in <strong>timbers</strong>. Weight lossin rubber wood after a period <strong>of</strong> four months was 12.2%.3. If the wood moisture content is reduced to


REFERENCESAldrich, J. <strong>and</strong> Baker, R. 1970. Biological control <strong>of</strong> Fusariumroseum f. sp. dianthiby Bacillus subtilis. Plant. Dis. Rptr. 54: 446-448.Ali, S; Tan, A.G. <strong>and</strong> Stevens, M. 1980. Some studies on fungal deterioration <strong>of</strong>rubber wood (Hevea brasiliensis). International Research Group on Wood PreservationDocument No. IRG/WP/2140. 6p.Ananthanarayanan, S. 1971. Investigations on the cause <strong>of</strong> discolouration <strong>of</strong> <strong>some</strong>rosewood (Dalbergia latifolia) veneers. J. Ind. Acad. Wood. Sci. 2: 27-31.Anonymous 1972. Timber preservative plant operator’s manual. Borax ConsolidatedLimited, London. 21p.Bakshi, B. K. 1953. Decay <strong>and</strong> <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>of</strong> timber, <strong>their</strong> causes <strong>and</strong> prevention. Indian.For. 79: 108-114.Benko, R. 1988. Bacteria as possible organisms for biological control <strong>of</strong> blue stain.International Research Group on Wood Preservation Document No. IRG/WP/1339: 12p.Benko, R. <strong>and</strong> Highley, T. L. 1990. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> bacteria for biological control <strong>of</strong>wood decay. International Research Group on Wood Preservation Document No.IRG/WP/1426: 7p.Bernier, R. Desrochers, M. <strong>and</strong> Jurasek, L. 1986. Antagonistic effect betweenBacillus subtilis <strong>and</strong> wood staining <strong>fungi</strong>. J. Inst. Wood Sci. 10, 214-216.Broadbent, P., Baker, K.F. <strong>and</strong> Waterworth, Y. 1971. Bacteria <strong>and</strong> actinomycetesantagonistic to fungal root pathogens in Australian soils. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 24:925-944.Butcher, J. A. <strong>and</strong> Drysdale, J. 1974. Field trials with captafol, an acceptableanti<strong>sapstain</strong> chemical. For. Prod. J. 24(11), 28-30.Butcher, J. A. 1980. Commercial anti<strong>sapstain</strong> chemicals in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. InternationalResearch Group on Wood Preservation Document No. IRG/WP/3142:11pCartwright, K. St. G. <strong>and</strong> Findlay, W. P. K. 1958. Decay <strong>of</strong> timber <strong>and</strong> its prevention.Chemical Publishing Co., HMSO, London: 282-320.Cassens, D. L. <strong>and</strong> Eslyn, W. E. 1981. Fungicides to prevent <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> mouldon hard wood timber. For. Prod. J. 31 (9): 39-42.Cochrane, V. W. 1958. Physiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>fungi</strong>. John Wiel <strong>and</strong> Sons, Inc. New York<strong>and</strong> London:524p.


Colley, R. H. <strong>and</strong> Rumbold, C. T. 1930. Relation between moisture content <strong>of</strong> thewood <strong>and</strong> blue stain in Loblolly pine. J. Agric. Res. 4: 389-399.Dunleavy, J. 1955. Control <strong>of</strong> damping-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> sugarbeet by Bacillus subtilis.Phytopathol. 45: 252-258.Findlay, W. P. K. <strong>and</strong> Pettifor, C. B. 1939. Effect <strong>of</strong> blue stain on the strength <strong>of</strong>Obeche (Triplochiton scleroxylon). Emp. For. J. 18: 259-267.Fougerousse, M. 1985. Protection <strong>of</strong> logs <strong>and</strong> sawn timber. In. Preservation <strong>of</strong>Timber in the Tropics. Ed. Findlay, W. P. K. Martinus Nijh<strong>of</strong>f/Dr. W.Junk Publishers, Netherl<strong>and</strong>s: 75-119.Gnanaharan, R. 1983. Preliminary note on the fungal problem <strong>of</strong> rubber wood.International Research Group on Wood Preservation Document No. IRG/WP/3246: 7p.Hong, L. T. 1976. A blue stain organism <strong>of</strong> Jelutong (Dyera costulata Hk. f.) Malay.For. 39: 177-188.Hong L. T. 1980. Temperature tolerance <strong>and</strong> its significance in the control <strong>of</strong><strong>sapstain</strong> caused by Botryodiplodia theobromae. Malay. For. 43: 528-531.Hong, L. T. 1981. Screening <strong>of</strong> preservatives against <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong>from tropical hardwoods. I. Laboroatory tests against isolates from rubber wood(Hevea brasiliensis). Malay. For. 44: 116-121.Krapivina, I. G. 1960. Destruction <strong>of</strong> the secondary layer <strong>of</strong> the cell wall by bluestaining <strong>fungi</strong>. Commonwealth Scientific <strong>and</strong> Industrial Research Organisation,Australia, Tranalation no. 5329.Levy, J. F. 1967. Decay <strong>and</strong> degrade <strong>of</strong> wood by s<strong>of</strong>t rot <strong>fungi</strong> <strong>and</strong> other organism.Records <strong>of</strong> the Annual Convention <strong>of</strong> the British Wood Preservation Association,147-1 75.Milano, S. 1981. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>some</strong> microbiocides against the development <strong>of</strong>moulds <strong>and</strong> <strong>sapstain</strong> in Pinus elliottii. International Research Group on WoodPreservation Document No. IRG/WP/3169:11p.Morrell, J. J. 1987. A reddish purple stain <strong>of</strong> red alder by Ceratocystis picea <strong>and</strong> itsprevention. For. Prod: J. 37. (2): 18-20.O 'Brien, F. E. M. 1948. The control <strong>of</strong> humidity by saturated salt solutions. J. Sci.Instruments. 25: 73-76.Ol<strong>of</strong>inboba, M. 0. 1974. Sapstain in Antaris africana an economically <strong>important</strong>white wood. Nature. 249: 173-179.


Pinheiro, A. C. A. 1971. Blue stain in poplar wood. Mat. U. Organ. 6: 93-100.Plackett, D. V. 1982. Field evaluation <strong>of</strong> alternative anti<strong>sapstain</strong> chemicals. InternationalResearch Group on Wood Preservation Document No. IRG/WP/3198:10pRow, R. C., Beute, S., Wells, J. C. <strong>and</strong> Wynne, J. C. 1974. Incidence <strong>and</strong> control<strong>of</strong> cylindrocladium black rot <strong>of</strong> peanuts in North Carolina during 1973. Plant Dis.Rptr. 58(4): 348-352.Seifert, K. A., Hamilton, W. E., Breuil, C. <strong>and</strong> et Best, M. 1987. Evaluation <strong>of</strong>Bacillus subtilis C186 as a potential biological control <strong>of</strong> <strong>sapstain</strong> <strong>and</strong> mould onunseasoned lumber. Can. J. Microbiol. 33: 1102-1107.Sharma, J. K. <strong>and</strong> Mohanan, C. 1991. Epidemiology <strong>and</strong> control <strong>of</strong> diseases <strong>of</strong>Eucalyptus caused by Cylindrocladium spp. in Kerala. KFRI Research Report No.70: 155.Singh, V. <strong>and</strong> Deverall, B. J. 1984. Bacillus subtilis as a control agent against fungalpathogens <strong>of</strong> citrus fruit. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 83: 487-490.Snedecor,G. W. <strong>and</strong> Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. Oxford & IBHPublications Co., New Delhi:553p.Stranks, D. W. 1976. Scytalidin, Hyalodendrin, Cryptosporiopsin-antibioticsthe prevention <strong>of</strong> blue stain in white pine sapwood. Wood Sci. 9:110-112.Swinburne, T. R. <strong>and</strong> Brown, A. E. 1976. A comparison <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> Bacillussubtilis with conventional <strong>fungi</strong>cides for the control <strong>of</strong> apple canker Nectria galligena.Ann. Appl. Biol. 82:365-368.Tan, A. G., Chong, K. F. <strong>and</strong> Tam, M. K. 1980. Control <strong>of</strong> fungal attack in rubberlogs. Malay. For. 43: 516-521.Troya, M. T. <strong>and</strong> Navarrete, A. 1989. Blue stain <strong>fungi</strong> (Ceratocystis spp.) found inspain on pine wood. International Research Group on Wood Preservation DocumentNo. IRG/WP/1410:8p.Umezurike, G. M. 1969. Cellulolytic activities <strong>of</strong> Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat.Ann. Bot. 33: 451-462.Umezurike, G. M. 1978. Staining <strong>and</strong> degradation <strong>of</strong> wood blocks <strong>and</strong> agar mediaby Botryodiplodiu theobromae Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 71: 328-332.Vanin, S. I. 1932. Materials relating to the study <strong>of</strong> the discoloration <strong>of</strong> woodcaused by <strong>fungi</strong> <strong>and</strong> chemical effects. Izvestija Leningradskogo Instituta Bor’by sVrediteljami v Sel’skom i Lesnom Hozjajstve. 3: 3-37.for


Verrall, A. F. 1941. Fungi associated with chemically treated green lumber.Phytopathology. 31: 270-274.Viitanen, H. <strong>and</strong> Paajanen, L. 1988. The critical moisture <strong>and</strong> temperature conditionfor the growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>some</strong> mould <strong>fungi</strong> <strong>and</strong> the brown rot fungus Coniophoraputeana on wood. International Research Group on Wood Preservation documentNo. IRG/WP/l369:14p.Weaver, D. J. 1971. Control <strong>of</strong> Cylindrocladium floridanum with potassium azide insoil. Plant Dis. Reptr. 55: 1094-1096.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!