KHRP / BHRC 2006situation, specifically landm<strong>in</strong>es and village guards 28 . <strong>The</strong> latter are discussed <strong>in</strong>more detail below.a. Security situationAs far as the mission believes, security forces do not specifically prevent IDPs fromreturn<strong>in</strong>g on the grounds <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> safety. Yet security forces still ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a strongpresence <strong>in</strong> the south-east, charged with protect<strong>in</strong>g national security, rather thanprotect<strong>in</strong>g the IDPs. As a result, many IDPs cite the escalation <strong>of</strong> armed activity<strong>in</strong> the region s<strong>in</strong>ce 2004 as the ma<strong>in</strong> factor which h<strong>in</strong>ders them from return<strong>in</strong>g.Further, the actions <strong>of</strong> both security forces and armed opposition groups havecaused casualties among the military, civilians and opposition. This has resulted<strong>in</strong> a real risk that those who have managed to return to their villages may be reevacuated.29Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Van branch <strong>of</strong> Göç-Der, 10 days prior to the mission’s visit to theregion, two villages were evacuated by security forces <strong>in</strong> Tunceli and Batman. <strong>The</strong>forest near one <strong>of</strong> the villages, close to Silopi, was burnt for alleged security reasons,and the fire cont<strong>in</strong>ued for around 20 days. When some villagers tried to ext<strong>in</strong>guishthe fire, they were warned <strong>of</strong>f with cannon fire. 30Further, those who do return <strong>of</strong>ten face <strong>in</strong>timidation from the security forces, <strong>in</strong>particular those who have returned voluntarily and not through the Project. İHDVan branch reported to the mission that a returned villager <strong>in</strong> Gürp<strong>in</strong>ar region, Vanprov<strong>in</strong>ce, received a threaten<strong>in</strong>g letter from the village <strong>of</strong> Hatay, which appeared tobe signed by the PKK. When he showed this letter to the military commanders,they simply took it from him and did not open an <strong>in</strong>vestigation, lead<strong>in</strong>g him andİHD to conclude that the letter was likely to have been written by the military <strong>in</strong> aneffort to discourage villagers return<strong>in</strong>g. 31 <strong>The</strong> mission heard similar evidence froman IDP family who had been evacuated from the village <strong>of</strong> Cadlıca, Çatak district<strong>in</strong> 1991, and currently live <strong>in</strong> the Bostaniçi district <strong>of</strong> Van. Last year, one member<strong>of</strong> the family had attempted to return to their village but had been deta<strong>in</strong>ed by thesecurity forces and threatened with death should he attempt to return aga<strong>in</strong>. 32 <strong>The</strong>mission was particularly concerned to hear reports <strong>of</strong> such behaviour by the statesecurity forces, s<strong>in</strong>ce this is aimed at - and to some extent successful <strong>in</strong> - not onlyh<strong>in</strong>der<strong>in</strong>g and discourag<strong>in</strong>g others from return<strong>in</strong>g but also <strong>in</strong>still<strong>in</strong>g fear <strong>in</strong> those28 <strong>Turkey</strong> 2005 Progress Report, SEC (20050 1425, Brussels, 9 November 2005), page 3929 FFM Interview with İHD Van branch, 3 July 200630 FFM Interview with Göç-Der Van branch, 3 July 200631 FFM Interview, 3 July 200632 FFM Interview, 4 July 2006, name <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviewee withheld24
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Internally</strong> <strong>Displaced</strong> <strong>Kurds</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Turkey</strong>who have returned.b. Landm<strong>in</strong>esLandm<strong>in</strong>es still pose a serious problem to those who have returned or who wish toreturn to their villages. <strong>The</strong> exact numbers and locations <strong>of</strong> landm<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>Turkey</strong>are unknown. Although <strong>Turkey</strong> has committed to address ‘problems caused bylandm<strong>in</strong>es laid by the terrorist organisations <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> returns’ 33 and accededto the Convention on the Prohibition <strong>of</strong> the Use, Stockpil<strong>in</strong>g, Production andTransfer <strong>of</strong> Anti-Personnel M<strong>in</strong>es and on their Destruction <strong>in</strong> September 2003,landm<strong>in</strong>es cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be used by both armed opposition groups and securityforces.Landm<strong>in</strong>e damage on the way to Taşnacak, July 2006Indeed, the mission visited several returned villages <strong>in</strong> the Gürpınar region <strong>of</strong> Van,and witnessed the damage caused by a landm<strong>in</strong>e which had exploded just two daysearlier. 34 Although fortunately nobody had been <strong>in</strong>jured on that occasion, the m<strong>in</strong>ehad exploded <strong>in</strong> the middle <strong>of</strong> the road and had the potential to cause much damage.Further, when pass<strong>in</strong>g through a checkpo<strong>in</strong>t, the mission was discouraged by themilitary from visit<strong>in</strong>g the region due to the presence <strong>of</strong> landm<strong>in</strong>es. Although themission believes that the real motivation beh<strong>in</strong>d this statement was to deter their visitrather than to protect them from the landm<strong>in</strong>es, it was confused why the militaryhad not been tak<strong>in</strong>g steps to clear the landm<strong>in</strong>es and to educate local occupantsabout the associated hazards, as they were clearly aware <strong>of</strong> their presence.33 Measures on the Issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>Internally</strong> <strong>Displaced</strong> Persons and the Return to Village and RehabilitationProject <strong>in</strong> <strong>Turkey</strong>, 17 August 2005, Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple B34 FFM visit to Taşnacak and Özlüce villages, 4 July 200625