11.07.2015 Views

Quantum Gravity

Quantum Gravity

Quantum Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

174 QUANTUM GEOMETRODYNAMICS] [Ĥg µ , Ĥg ν =iÛµνĤg λ λ . (5.170)As shown in Barvinsky (1993b), the fact that (5.170) holds follows from theclassical gravitational constraints (5.165) by replacing the momenta p k with thefunctional covariant derivatives D k /i—covariant with respect to the Riemannconnection based on the DeWitt metric (5.168)—and by adding a purely imaginarypart (anti-Hermitian with respect to the L 2 inner product): the functionaltrace of structure functions, iUµν ν /2. With this definition of covariant derivatives,it is understood that the space of three-metrics q is regarded as a functional differentiablemanifold, and that the quantum states |Ψ(q)〉 are scalar densities ofweight 1/2. Thus, the operator realization for the full constraints including thematter parts has the formĤ ⊥ = − 12m 2 G⊥ ik D iD k + V ⊥ + iP2 U ⊥ν ν + Ĥm ⊥ , (5.171)Ĥ a = 1 i ∇i aD i + i 2 U ν aν + Ĥm a . (5.172)The imaginary parts of these operators are either formally divergent (being thecoincidence limits of delta-function type kernels) or formally zero (as in (5.171)because of vanishing structure-function components). We shall, however, keepthem in a general form, expecting that a rigorous operator regularization willexist that can consistently handle these infinities as well as the correspondingquantum anomalies (see Section 5.3.5).The highest order of the semiclassical approximation leads to a wave functionalof the form (5.153). It is sometimes convenient to consider a two-pointobject (‘propagator’) instead of a wave functional—one can, for example, easilytranslate the results into a language using Feynman diagrams. This will be donein the next subsection. We shall, therefore, consider a two-point solution K(q, q ′ )of the Wheeler–DeWitt equation. One can construct a closed expression for theone-loop pre-exponential factor of a solution which is of the semiclassical formcorresponding to (5.153) (see Barvinsky and Krykhtin (1993))K(q, q ′ )=P (q, q ′ )e im2 P S(q, q′ ) . (5.173)Here, S(q, q ′ ) is a particular solution of the Hamilton–Jacobi equations withrespect to both arguments—the classical action calculated at the extremal ofequations of motion joining the points q and q ′ ,H g µ(q, ∂S/∂q) =0. (5.174)The one-loop (O(m 0 P )partofthe1/m2 P -expansion) order of the pre-exponentialfactor P (q, q ′ ) here satisfies a set of quasi-continuity equations which follow from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!