11.07.2015 Views

the fife council - planning committee - glenrothes - Home Page

the fife council - planning committee - glenrothes - Home Page

the fife council - planning committee - glenrothes - Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

exceptional costs above and beyond what would be normally expected for thistype of development given that <strong>the</strong> building is listed. However, without adevelopment appraisal, it is not possible to give this any substantial weightwhen considering this against <strong>the</strong> required commuted sums. Lastly, membersshould also note that even in <strong>the</strong> event <strong>the</strong> application was approved withoutany commuted sums, <strong>the</strong>re is no guarantee that <strong>the</strong> development will beimplemented. Members could elect to make <strong>the</strong> permission valid for a shorterperiod, for example 12 months, which would ultimately require <strong>the</strong> works tocommence in order to keep <strong>the</strong> permission valid.2.0 Issues and Options2.1 Committee cana) Agree <strong>the</strong> recommendation and refuse <strong>the</strong> application;b) Instruct officers to attempt to continue negotiations with <strong>the</strong> applicant; orc) Approve <strong>the</strong> application without any commuted sums. Members should be awarethat <strong>the</strong>y will need to advise which material issues <strong>the</strong>y consider outweigh <strong>the</strong>need for <strong>the</strong> commuted sums being sought in <strong>the</strong> event <strong>the</strong>y wish to approve <strong>the</strong>application contrary to approved Fife Council policy.3.0 Conclusions3.1 Since members last considered this application, a fur<strong>the</strong>r 4 months have elapsedand no progress has been made in progressing <strong>the</strong> <strong>planning</strong> obligation to itsconclusion. The failure to conclude <strong>the</strong> <strong>planning</strong> obligation means that <strong>the</strong> Councilcan not secure <strong>the</strong> necessary commuted sums that would ensure <strong>the</strong> proposeddevelopment accords with <strong>the</strong> Development Plan and as such, it is recommended forrefusal as per <strong>the</strong> previous recommendation in 2012.Background PapersThe following papers were relied on in <strong>the</strong> preparation of this report in terms of <strong>the</strong> LocalGovernment (Scotland) Act, 1973: PAN 2/2010 – Affordable Housing and Housing Land Audits Fife Structure Plan 2006-2026 (2009) Adopted Mid Fife Local Plan (2012) Fife Council's SPG on Affordable Housing (2011) Committee report of 8 June 2007 (06/04322/FULL) Committee report of 21 November 2011 (06/04322/FULL)Report ContactAuthor Name: Kevin TreadwellAuthor’s Job Title: Lead OfficerWorkplace: Kingdom House, Glenro<strong>the</strong>sTelephone: 08451 55 11 22Email:development.central@<strong>fife</strong>.gov.uk10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!