11.07.2015 Views

Abstract Book - International Academy of Law and Mental Health

Abstract Book - International Academy of Law and Mental Health

Abstract Book - International Academy of Law and Mental Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the measure has shifted somewhat from treatment to safety. In order to avoid a TBS-order,defendants refuse psychological evaluation, with fewer impositions <strong>and</strong> less treatment as a result.This shows how changes in the execution <strong>of</strong> sanctions affect the practice <strong>of</strong> evaluation.Psychological Evidence in the Legal PerspectivePaul Mevis, Erasmus University Rotterdam (v<strong>and</strong>erwolf@law.eur.nl)In this contribution, a legal perspective will be given on the integration <strong>of</strong> psychologicalevidence within both the criminal procedure <strong>and</strong> the decision-making within the execution <strong>of</strong>sentences. Recent developments have led to a shift <strong>of</strong> emphasis from disorder to risk. Thedominance <strong>of</strong> risk assessment instruments leads to discussions within legal practice.Psychological Evidence in the Psychological PerspectiveHjalmar van Marle, Erasmus University Rotterdam (h.j.c.vanmarle@erasmusmc.nl)The mentioned developments in the preceeding contribution will also be addressed from apsychological perspective. They lead also to ethical reflections within the pr<strong>of</strong>essional group <strong>of</strong>behavioural scientists. The contribution that risk assessment has within the legal system will bediscussed as well as the influence <strong>of</strong> the neurosciences <strong>and</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> neuro-imaging withinexpert testimony in criminal cases.12. Best Practices in Use <strong>of</strong> ForceWhy the Traditional “Alpha Bravo” Approach to De-Escalation DoesNot Work in Police Encounters with People in Psychiatric CrisisStuart Thomas, Monash University (stuart.thomas@monash.edu)Concerns have long been expressed that police may be using excessive force to resolveencounters with people in psychiatric crisis. While a number <strong>of</strong> reasons have been proposed forthis, these have generally focused on assessments <strong>of</strong> increased risk based either on reportsprovided to police en route to the scene or on observable behaviours witnessed by police duringthe encounter itself. As such, issues around perceived dangerousness, aggression <strong>and</strong> impulsivityhave dominated the popular literature. More recently, however, some scholars <strong>and</strong> oversightbodies have started to consider the impact <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard approach <strong>and</strong> engagement style <strong>of</strong>police <strong>and</strong> questioned whether these traditional methods could actually be aggravating thesituation when the suspect is in a state <strong>of</strong> psychiatric crisis. This presentation will critique the32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!