11.07.2015 Views

news bulletin - NFIFWI

news bulletin - NFIFWI

news bulletin - NFIFWI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORGANISATIONAL ROUND – UPThe Letters sent by the Secretary General to theChairman and MD regarding CLIA & Bi-lateral discussions<strong>NFIFWI</strong>/ 07/ 2008-1019 th June’2008The ChairmanLife Insurance Corporation of IndiaCentral Office, ‘Yogakshema’,Mumbai-400 021Ref: Discussions held on 22 nd of May 2008, 19 thJune ’08 and representation in the matter of CLIA.Dear Sir,We were shocked to see the managementgoing ahead with the concept of supervisory agencythrough a circular on Chief Life Insurance Advisorscheme on the 12 th of April 2008. We have studiedthe scheme in detail and taken feedbacks from allacross the country. We are of the opinion that thisis totally unfair and a unethical decision on thepart of the management . Our stand on CLIAScheme is that Professionally, this is a scheme tryingto create a parallel marketing force diversifying theclub member agents and disturbing the entiremarketing force. Legally, this scheme is in violationto the various provisions of Law governing theInsurance sector, LIC Of India and appointmentof Intermediaries. Our stand is based on thefollowing facts and points:1. The CLIA Scheme is a big blow to the goodperforming Development officers who weremotivated to nurture and groom agents tobecome professional agents and club membersand MDRT’s. This scheme will create a lot ofinfighting and disturb the harmoniousmarketing force of LIC. After fine groomingand nurturing , such Development officers arepenalized by diversifying these professionalagents.2. The Development officer is expected to workat a particular cost norm and this business hasto be procured through one’s own unit agents.When such is the case it is unfair on the part ofthe management to diversify our unit agentsfor the same life insurance business but throughanother channel.3. The management expects growth fromDevelopment officer’s, whereas there is nogrowth requirement from the CLIA agents. AChairman’s club member becoming a CLIA cancontinue as a CLIA even if they become adivisional managers club member or performat lower level of NB figures. The CLIA is notrequired to perform at the same New Businesslevels(On No: of Lives, FPI and SFYPI andsum assured) , bring growth and maintain thesame club membership levels. This is in totalcontradiction of LIC’s direction and policy. Thiscontradiction affects the Development officerand LIC adversely.4. The CLIA who is being allowed to recruit theirrelatives as a agent will only promote benamiagency to earn more commissions. Themanagement is knowingly encouraging benamiagency thereby encouraging reduction ofperformance by the existing club members.Through this scheme the management has alsofacilitated the CLIA agents to earn morecommissions on the life insurance businesscompared to the commission the club memberagent would have otherwise earned. This willdirectly reduce the business in the Developmentofficer’s unit.5. The close relatives of an agent staying underone roof is permitted to take up agency only11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!