11.07.2015 Views

Commercial Mortgage Delinquency, Foreclosure and Reinstatement

Commercial Mortgage Delinquency, Foreclosure and Reinstatement

Commercial Mortgage Delinquency, Foreclosure and Reinstatement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

contemporaneous loan-to-value ratio <strong>and</strong> the interest rate were positive <strong>and</strong> significant. The debtcoverage ratio was not significant, but the value at loan origination was used, not thecontemporary value. The property type <strong>and</strong> the borrower type also had significant effects.V<strong>and</strong>ell argues that the significance of the borrower type is evidence that transaction costs havean influence on default.There has been a recent explosion in work on the empirical estimation of commercialmortgage default, including Ciochetti et al (2002), Ambrose <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong>ers (2001), Archer et al.(2002), Chun <strong>and</strong> Deng (2002) <strong>and</strong> Goldberg <strong>and</strong> Capone (2002). These studies differ in theirdata sources, estimation technologies, set of independent variables <strong>and</strong> definition of default.The current study uses data from a single large commercial mortgage lender, as doesCiochetti et al. (2002), although they use a different, American firm. Other studies usecommercial mortgage backed securities data (Ambrose <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong>ers (2001) <strong>and</strong> Chun <strong>and</strong> Deng(2002)) or multifamily mortgages (Archer et al. (2002) <strong>and</strong> Goldberg <strong>and</strong> Capone (2002)).The critical independent variable suggested by option theory is a measurement of theborrower’s equity, the loan-to-value ratio. Goldberg <strong>and</strong> Capone’s (2002) findings suggest thatcash flow considerations, measured as the debt coverage ratio, also play a role in default. Archeret al. (2002) <strong>and</strong> Ambrose <strong>and</strong> S<strong>and</strong>ers (2001) both confirm the lack of a relationship betweeninitial loan-to-value ratio <strong>and</strong> default, while Ciochetti et al. (2002) find that contemporaneousloan-to-value ratio <strong>and</strong> debt coverage ratio are significantly positive <strong>and</strong> negative, respectively.Other variables used as independent variables in these studies include borrower characteristics,property location <strong>and</strong> market conditions. This research is the first to consider the presence of aguarantee.In most of these studies, a mortgage is considered to be in default at the time when theloan terminates through foreclosure. 1But work by Ambrose <strong>and</strong> co-authors explicitly recognizethat default <strong>and</strong> foreclosure are not synonymous. In Ambrose <strong>and</strong> Capone (1996), costs <strong>and</strong>1 An exception is Archer et al. (2002) who define default as 90-days delinquent.4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!