11.07.2015 Views

Turkey Season Summary - Arkansas Game and Fish Commission

Turkey Season Summary - Arkansas Game and Fish Commission

Turkey Season Summary - Arkansas Game and Fish Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2006-07<strong>Turkey</strong> <strong>Season</strong> <strong>Summary</strong>2 Natural Resources DriveLittle Rock, AR 72205c=85 m=19 y=0 k=0 c=57 m=80 y=100 k=45 c=20 m=0 y=40 k=6(800) 364-4263www.agfc.comc=15 m=29 y=33 k=0 c=100 m=0 y=91 k=42 c=30 m=0 y=5 k=0


Looking OutFor <strong>Arkansas</strong>’s longbeardsConservation education is one of the mostimportant missions of the <strong>Arkansas</strong><strong>Game</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fish</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>. Thevery future of wildlife conservation hinges oneducated <strong>and</strong> informed citizens – without them,who will speak for wildlife? To help educatethe general public, we have increased educationstaff <strong>and</strong> programs, built nature <strong>and</strong> educationcenters, published award-winning Web sites <strong>and</strong>magazines, <strong>and</strong> sought innovative ways to reachout to a changing audience.We also have increased our efforts to workwith <strong>and</strong> educate <strong>Arkansas</strong> hunters <strong>and</strong>l<strong>and</strong>owners. Programs such as the DeerManagement Assistance Program, federal FarmBill programs <strong>and</strong> the National Wild <strong>Turkey</strong>Federation’s Hunting Heritage State Super Fundhave been developed <strong>and</strong> implemented, <strong>and</strong>private l<strong>and</strong>s biologists have been added to theAGFC to help l<strong>and</strong>owners with managementdecisions.Despite all the improvements in education<strong>and</strong> technology, we still look for new avenuesto inform our hunting public about the manyprograms taking place year-round to monitor theturkey population <strong>and</strong> improve wildlife habitat<strong>and</strong> hunting opportunities throughout the state.This annual report is much more than simpleharvest numbers; it is a tour through some ofthe AGFC’s many surveys as we follow the wildturkey throughout the year.If you are interested in helping conservehabitat <strong>and</strong> promoting the future of turkeyhunting in <strong>Arkansas</strong>, I encourage you to joinus in our conservation mission. We constantlyseek participants for hunting <strong>and</strong> observationsurveys <strong>and</strong> are always open to feedback from thepublic. If you would like to voice your concernsabout the turkey season or turkey habitat in<strong>Arkansas</strong>, please plan to attend one of our springturkey season public meetings in August. If youcan’t attend a meeting, we’re happy to acceptyour comments through letters <strong>and</strong> e-mailsyear-round.The wild turkey holds a special place in thehearts of many Arkansans. With the help oforganizations like the National Wild <strong>Turkey</strong>Federation <strong>and</strong> hunters throughout the state, wehope to keep it that way for the next generationof hunters.Scott Henderson, AGFC Director


C O N T E N T S<strong>Turkey</strong> <strong>Season</strong> <strong>Summary</strong>Cover photo courtesy of the National Wild <strong>Turkey</strong>Federation.2006-07 harvest summaries4 2007 Spring harvest summary8 2006 Fall harvest summary2006-07 turkey survey summaries10 2006 Brood survey summary14 2007 Gobbling survey18 2007 Spring hunting survey<strong>Turkey</strong> conservation in <strong>Arkansas</strong>22 Setting the seasons26 Habitat management through the seasons28 <strong>Turkey</strong> stocking summary29 The NWTF in <strong>Arkansas</strong>31 Enforcement32 Record turkeys33 Corn feeders34 Acknowledgements2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 3


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 H A R V E S T S U M M A R I E S2007Spring harvest summaryJakes made up 25 percentof the 2007 springharvest. Photo by MikeCartwright.IntroductionA conservative spring season was in place in2007. A three-week season began April 14 <strong>and</strong>ended May 4, with a special youth hunt April7-8 for most of the state. Some zones had arestricted two-week regular season. In Zone 17,special youth hunts were one week earlier, <strong>and</strong>the regular season was April 7-29. The regularseason was one week shorter <strong>and</strong> one week laterthan 2005 <strong>and</strong> 2006 spring seasons. It was 16Table 1. 2007 <strong>Arkansas</strong> spring season turkey harvest by region.Number harvested % Change from WMA harvestRegion (% of total) spring 2006 (% of region total)Ozarks 5,003 (45%) 22% Decrease 396 (8%)Ouachitas 2,163 (20%) 20% Decrease 228 (11%)Gulf Coastal Plain 2,679 (24%) 11% Decrease 77 (3%)Delta 1,224 (11%) 4% Decrease 125 (9%)Statewide 11,069 (100%) 18% Decrease 826 (7%)days <strong>and</strong> three weekends shorter than the liberal2004 spring season. Bag limits were unchangedfrom recent years, with a two-gobbler limit, withonly one jake (immature gobbler) allowed.Information in this report is from m<strong>and</strong>atorychecking of wild turkeys through check stations<strong>and</strong> agfc.com.Results11,069 turkeys were checked in 2007, downfrom 13,598 in 2006 (Table 1). The 2007harvest was 44.5 percent lower than the recordharvest of spring 2003. Spring turkey harvestrose dramatically following five above-averagebrood production years (1997-2001) <strong>and</strong> liberalizationof seasons from 2000 until 2006. Butharvest has dropped with below-average broodproduction beginning in 2002 (Figure 1).A total of 889 turkeys were harvested duringstatewide youth hunts prior to the regular season,down from 944 in 2006. Jakes made up 25percent of the statewide harvest, varying from 314 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


Figure 1. <strong>Arkansas</strong> spring turkey harvest, 1960-2007.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 H A R V E S T S U M M A R I E S25,00020,000Spring Harvest15,00010,0005,0000196019621964196619681970197219741976197819801982198419861988199019921994199619982000200220042006percent in the Ozarks to 14 percent in the GulfCoastal Plain. The jake harvest is on target withbrood survey results since the one-jake regulationwent into effect in 2000.Sharp County led the state with 419 turkeyschecked (Figure 2). In 2007, nine of the top 10counties were in the eastern <strong>and</strong> central Ozarks– this has been the case for the last decade(Table 2). Harvest increased from 2006 levels in18 of <strong>Arkansas</strong>’s 75 counties, mostly in the GulfCoastal Plain <strong>and</strong> Delta.Weight of wild turkeys checked in 2007increased slightly from 2006. Average weightof adult gobblers varied from a high of 20.7pounds in the Ozarks to a low of 19.08 poundsin the Gulf Coastal Plain. Average beard lengthof adult gobblers varied from 9.82 inches inthe Ozarks <strong>and</strong> Ouachitas to 9.49 inches in theDelta. Average spur length of adult gobblersvaried from 0.97 inches in the Ozarks to 0.92inches in the Gulf Coastal Plain (Table 3).Comments on the spring seasonSpring turkey harvest declined as predictedin 2007. The reduced season length is responsiblefor about one-third of the decline. Thedecline was expected primarily because turkeyshave not reproduced well in most areas of<strong>Arkansas</strong> since 2001. One or two bad hatchesusually do not impact turkey numbers or turkeyharvest drastically, but five years in a row canbe devastating. The 2005 turkey hatch wasparticularly poor, translating into very few2-year-old gobblers during 2007. The averagespur length of harvested gobblers rose in 2007.This reflects the low amount of 2-year-old birdsin the overall harvest. Because 2-year-old turkeysusually have spurs about ¾-inch long, the risein spur length indicates that older birds madeup a larger percentage of the harvest than inrecent years. Liberal seasons in place from 2001through 2006 (up to 39 days of hunting) alsolikely played a part in the rapid decline in springgobbler harvest. Data collected by the AGFCsuggests gobbler survival declined rapidly after2001, when seasons were lengthened <strong>and</strong> openedearlier.Hunters harvested 11,069 turkeys during the spring2007 season. Photo courtesy of the NWTF.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 5


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 H A R V E S T S U M M A R I E SThe conservative seasonstructure was responsiblefor only about one-thirdof the harvest decline.Photo courtesy of theNWTF.Weather conditions may have played a minorrole in the harvest decline in spring 2007.Temperatures during the youth hunt April 7-8,were as much as 20 degrees below average withlows around 15 degrees in portions of <strong>Arkansas</strong>.Table 2. Top 10 spring turkey harvest counties <strong>and</strong> WMAs in 2007.CountyWMASharp – 419 Ozark NF WMA – 91Fulton – 392 White Rock WMA – 71Baxter – 325 Sylamore WMA – 68Independence – 317 Winona WMA – 58R<strong>and</strong>olph – 315 Piney Creeks WMA – 58Izard – 314 Mt. Magazine WMA – 56Cleburne – 283 Muddy Creek WMA – 56Union – 280 White River NWR – 45Boone – 279 St. Francis NF WMA – 44Searcy – 277 Lake Greeson WMA - 19Temperatures on opening day of the regularseason were as much as 15 degrees below average.Harvest declined about 10 percent for the specialyouth hunt <strong>and</strong> about 38 percent on openingday of the regular season when compared to2006. Reduced hunting activity because of thecold may have contributed to the decline, butgobbling surveys suggest that turkeys gobbledat “normal” levels during this cold period, with asecond peak of gobbling in mid-April when theregular season opened (Page 14).Unfortunately, recent trends in <strong>Arkansas</strong>’s lowspring turkey harvest will probably continuefor at least a couple of years, as 2006 broodproduction was only average or above in theeastern Ozarks <strong>and</strong> along the Mississippi River.2007 brood production appeared fair in mostof the state. However, the ratio of gobblers tohens in the preliminary findings of the 2007Brood Survey (Page 11) increased significantly.Conservative spring turkey seasons are stillneeded to stabilize <strong>and</strong> manage spring turkeyharvest in <strong>Arkansas</strong> well into the future.6 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


Figure 2. Spring 2007 turkey harvest by county.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 H A R V E S T S U M M A R I E STable 3. Physical characteristics of adult gobblers by region, 2007.Region Weight (lbs.) Beard length (in.) Spur length (in.)Ozarks 20.70 9.92 0.97Ouachitas 19.28 9.92 0.95Gulf Coastal Plain 19.08 9.86 0.91Delta 20.10 9.49 0.922 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 7


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 H A R V E S T S U M M A R I E S2006-07Fall harvest summaryFall firearms turkeyseasons are availableonly where populationsmay support them. Photocourtesy of the NWTF.Unlike many Southeastern states, <strong>Arkansas</strong>hunters may enjoy a limited fall turkeyhunting season. Spring turkey hunting is moreof a tradition in <strong>Arkansas</strong>, but some huntersenjoy fall hunting immensely. According to themost recent information, only a few thous<strong>and</strong>Arkansans specificallypursue turkeysin fall with firearms.While even fewerspecifically pursueturkeys with archeryequipment becauseof the extreme difficultyof the hunt, many bowhunters pursuingdeer become “incidental” turkey hunters whenbirds approach their st<strong>and</strong>s.Fall gun turkey season<strong>Arkansas</strong> has a very conservative fall gunturkey season. Under the Strategic Wild <strong>Turkey</strong>Management Plan (available at agfc.com), onlyMany bowhunters pursuing deerbecome “incidental” turkey hunterswhen birds approach their st<strong>and</strong>s.turkey zones with a spring harvest greater than0.5 turkeys per square mile of forest are open tofall gun turkey hunting. In fall 2006, zones 2, 3,6, 7 <strong>and</strong> 17 met this criterion <strong>and</strong> were open tohunting Oct. 23-29, 2006, with a limit of oneturkey (either sex).A checked harvestof 297 turkeys wasrecorded, down 32percent from 437checked in 2005.(The record fallgun season harvestwas 3,137 in 1987when seasons ran throughout October.) IzardCounty led the state with 28 turkeys checked(Figure 1), followed by Sharp (24), R<strong>and</strong>olph(23), Fulton (20) <strong>and</strong> Garl<strong>and</strong> (14) counties.Most of these counties are in the eastern Ozarks,which typically leads the state in spring harvest.On public hunting areas, Mount MagazineWildlife Management Area led the state with8 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 H A R V E S T S U M M A R I E Sseven turkeys, followed by White Rock WMA(five), Caney Creek WMA (four), Winona WMA(three), Ed Gordon Point Remove WMA (three)<strong>and</strong> Shirey Bay Rainey Brake WMA (three).Thirty-six percent of the fall gun harvest wasmale turkeys; 64 percent was female. Juvenileturkeys made up 47 percent of the harvest, upfrom 37 percent in 2005. Juvenile hens <strong>and</strong>juvenile males made up 29 <strong>and</strong> 18 percent ofthe harvest, respectively. Adult hens <strong>and</strong> adultgobblers made up 36 <strong>and</strong> 18 percent of theharvest, respectively.Fall archery turkey seasonThe season ran Oct. 1, 2006-Feb. 28, 2007,with a limit of one turkey (either sex). Nearlythe entire state was open to fall archery turkeyhunting.A total of 145 turkeys were checked in thearchery harvest. This harvest declined 44 percentfrom 257 turkeys checked during 2005-06.Sharp County led the state with 12 turkeyschecked (Figure 2), followed by Cleburne (10),Pope (nine), Fulton (seven) <strong>and</strong> R<strong>and</strong>olph(seven) counties. No turkeys were checked in 32of the 75 counties in <strong>Arkansas</strong>. <strong>Turkey</strong>s werechecked on 11 WMAs or NWRs, led by FortChaffee WMA <strong>and</strong> Bald Knob NWR with twoeach.Sex of birds harvested was the reverse of thefall gun season: 59 percent were male <strong>and</strong>41 percent were female. Thirty-nine percentwere adult gobblers, followed by adult hens at27 percent, juvenile males at 20 percent <strong>and</strong>juvenile females at 14 percent.Figure 1. <strong>Arkansas</strong> 2006 fall gun season turkey harvest by county.Figure 2. <strong>Arkansas</strong> 2006-07 fall archery/crossbow season turkeyharvest by county.Comments on fall seasonsSeveral factors probably contributed to thedecline in fall turkey harvests in 2006-07.Abundant mast over most of <strong>Arkansas</strong> scatteredturkeys <strong>and</strong> made them more difficult to hunt.Continuing declines in turkey numbers frombelow-average reproduction since 2002 alsoundoubtedly contributed to the decline in fallharvest. Lack of interest in fall hunting becauseof decreased turkey numbers also played a part.Based on criteria in the Strategic Wild <strong>Turkey</strong>Management Plan, several more turkey zones areslated for closure to gun hunting in fall 2008.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 9


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E S2006Brood survey summaryThe average statewidehatch date for 2006 wasJune 7. Photo courtesyof the NWTF.Reproduction was better in2006 than it was in 2005, butstill remains below average ona statewide basis.<strong>Turkey</strong>s are relatively short-lived animals.Because of this short lifespan, annual reproductionis very important to the total population.Several years of good reproduction canresult in abundant turkey numbers, while severalpoor years can result in falling turkey numbers.Long-term data collection in <strong>Arkansas</strong> has shownthat turkey harvest is strongly related to annualpoult production.The AGFC hasworked with manyorganizations toconduct the annualWild <strong>Turkey</strong> BroodSurvey since 1982.The survey evaluatesturkey stockingsuccess, examinesspread <strong>and</strong> growth ofexisting populations, <strong>and</strong> determines trends inturkey numbers. Five hundred twenty-five surveyforms were returned to the AGFC in 2006.One thous<strong>and</strong> individual turkey observationsfrom 259 respondents were recorded, down fromthe survey record of 1,305 observations in 1998.Reproduction was better in 2006 than it wasin 2005, but still remains below average on astatewide basis. 2006 was the first year since2001 in which more than 3,000 poults werereported (Figure 1). However, 4,000-5,000poults were reported during the above-averagereproduction years of the late 1990s <strong>and</strong> early2000s. The poult/hen index of 1.81 (Table 1) for2006 was much better than the 1.39 recorded in2005, but remains below the long-term averageof 3.28 poults/hen. In 2006, 46 percent of henswere seen with poults, down from around 60percent in above-average years.Gobblers reported on the survey were downfrom the previous year, with 668 reported in2006 <strong>and</strong> 746 reported in 2005. The gobbler/hen index has declined steadily since 2001,<strong>and</strong> is the lowest it has been statewide since1995. This index is especially low in the Ozarks1 0 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E S<strong>and</strong> Gulf Coastal Plain, suggesting carryoverof gobblers into the spring 2007 season wasminimal. The low number of gobblers followsthe record low poult/hen index of 2005 (1.39)<strong>and</strong> the low spring jake harvest of 2006 (17percent of gobblers taken). Figure 1 illustratesthe close link between poult production <strong>and</strong>gobbler carryover in following years.The primary reason for these declines has beenbelow-average hatches since 2001, but liberalspring seasons during 2001-2006 have speededthe decline.Table 1. 2006 wild turkey brood survey results by physiographic region.Surveys Hens Number Number Poults GobblersRegion returned Gobblers with poults without poults poults broods per hen per henOzark 132 206 319 259 1185 222 2.06 0.358Ouachitas 123 108 111 145 481 100 1.88 0.422Gulf Coastal Plain 119 161 199 331 664 132 1.25 0.304Delta 151 213 143 186 726 123 2.21 0.647State 525 688 772 921 3056 577 1.81 0.406Figure 1. Reproductive <strong>and</strong> gobbler carryover indices in <strong>Arkansas</strong>, 1982-2006.86Poults/HenPoults x 100Gobblers/Hens x 104201982198419861988199019921994199619982000sneak peek2002200420062007 Brood survey results<strong>Turkey</strong> reproduction during summer 2007 was verysimilar to previous years. The poult/hen index of1.78 was down slightly from 1.81 in 2006 while thenumber of broods reported (557) was down slightlyfrom the 577 reported in 2006. Total poult numbersalso were down from 3,056 to 2,769. These numbersindicate that statewide turkey reproduction was belowaverage for the sixth consecutive year.However, the total number of gobblers reported<strong>and</strong> the gobbler/hen index rose significantly in 2007,suggesting that carryover of gobblers through the2007 spring season was good. The gobbler/hen indexhad been falling since 2001 – the year spring seasonswere liberalized to 35 days of hunting. Better gobblersurvival should help mitigate the effects of continuedbelow-average reproduction during the 2008 springseason. The conservative 2007 spring turkey seasonappears to be the primary reason for increased gobblersurvival <strong>and</strong> carryover. Conservative seasons shouldhelp stabilize future spring harvests.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 1 1


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E SFigure 2. Statewide reproductive success based on 2006 <strong>Arkansas</strong> wild turkey brood surveyresults.Nesting successReproduction in the Boston Mountains of thewestern Ozarks appeared below average, whilereproduction appeared average or above averagefor the north-central <strong>and</strong> eastern Ozarks. The<strong>Arkansas</strong> River Valley appeared to have averagereproduction in the western half <strong>and</strong> belowaveragereproduction in the eastern half. TheOuachitas appeared to have average reproductionin northwestern areas, but below-averagereproduction in southern <strong>and</strong> eastern areas.Most of the Gulf Coastal Plain appeared to havebelow-average reproduction, although southernareas near the Ouachita River appeared better.The Delta appeared to have a “mixed bag,” withnortheastern <strong>Arkansas</strong> showing good reproductionadjacent to the Ozarks, poor reproductionnorth of West Memphis, above-averagereproduction along the lower White River <strong>and</strong>excellentreproduction in the southern part of zone 17.These categorizations are subjective <strong>and</strong> basedon limited data in some areas.Hatch datesThe average statewide hatch date for 2006 wasJune 7. Regionally, the average hatch date wasJune 10 in the Ozarks, June 7 in the Ouachitas,May 28 in the Gulf Coastal Plain <strong>and</strong> June 10 inthe Delta. The average hatch occurred June 10north of Interstate 40, <strong>and</strong> June 4 south of theinterstate. The one-week difference in averagehatch dates between north <strong>and</strong> south <strong>Arkansas</strong> ismore than most years, <strong>and</strong> is primarily the resultof a good late hatch in northern areas.Hatch dates are figured by back-dating poultsbased on size. These data were examined by weekon a statewide <strong>and</strong> regional basis. Statewide, theweek of June 18-24 was best, with 67 broodsrecorded to have hatched during this week.The statewide hatch in 2006 began to peakduring the week of May 14-20 (59 broods) <strong>and</strong>continued to be good (from 47 to 67 broodseach week) until the week of June 18-24 (67broods). It appears that there was a good early1 2 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E SBrood counts increasedslightly in 2006 with1.81 poults seen foreach turkey hen. Photocourtesy of the NWTF.Brood production in the OuachitasA C a s e H i s t o r yIn the 1970s, the Ouachita Mountains inwest-central <strong>Arkansas</strong> had one of the best turkeypopulations in the nation. However, severedrought in 1980 led to a decline in turkeynumbers in the Ouachitas for several years.Populations did recover <strong>and</strong> checked harvestin 1987 was about the same as it had been inthe late 1970s. Then the bottom fell out – sixconsecutive years of poor hatches occurred in theOuachitas from 1988 to 1993. <strong>Turkey</strong> harvestplummeted, <strong>and</strong> hunters began to worry aboutthe future of this once-fertile flock.A turkey research projectwas initiated in 1993 toexamine the reasons for poorbrood production in theOuachitas. During the firstyear of the study, 40 radioequippedhen turkeys bred<strong>and</strong> laid eggs. None of thenesting attempts resulted inany poults hatching. Theprimary cause of nest failurein the study was from nestpredators such as raccoons.5,0004,0003,0002,0001,0000198219841986Fur prices declined dramatically in the late 1980s<strong>and</strong> furbearer numbers had spiked upward froma lack of trapping <strong>and</strong> hunting pressure.Cycles in animal populations are common,<strong>and</strong> a distemper outbreak soon brought raccoonnumbers down dramatically. By 1995 almost 40percent of radio-equipped hens hatched broods.This trend continued for several years untilresearch ended in 1997. Even with successfulnesting, six years of poor reproduction had takena toll. Spring turkey harvests did not recover to1987 levels for 12 years (Figure 3).Figure 3. Spring harvest <strong>and</strong> brood counts in the Ouachitas,1982-2006.PoultsSpring Harvest1988199019922 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 1 31994199619982000200220042006


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E S2007Spring gobbling surveyStudies indicate that gobbling is uniform throughout the state. Photo courtesyof the NWTF.The AGFC received many complaints in2006 about turkeys being “gobbled out”before the conservative opening day of April 8.However, surveys done in the late 1980s <strong>and</strong>early 1990s indicated two peaks of gobblingactivity in northern <strong>Arkansas</strong> – April 1 <strong>and</strong>April 15. Various Mississippi Department ofWildlife, <strong>Fish</strong>eries <strong>and</strong> Parks turkey reports alsoindicated that hunters hear most gobbling fromthe last week in March through the third weekin April. The AGFC Wild <strong>Turkey</strong> Team decidedto perform a new statewide gobbling survey todetermine if timing of peak gobbling in <strong>Arkansas</strong>had changed in the last decade.MethodsGobble counts were run on 19 areas across<strong>Arkansas</strong> in spring 2007 (Figure 1). The surveywill continue for three years to get a clear pictureof gobbling activity. Large areas of turkey habitatthat aren’t hunted are rare in <strong>Arkansas</strong>. Five areas– Wedington WMA <strong>and</strong> Cherokee Village in theOzarks, Fort Chaffee ranges <strong>and</strong> Hot SpringsVillage in the Ouachitas, <strong>and</strong> Village Creek StatePark in the Delta were identified. Because thesetypes of areas are so rare, other areas were chosen<strong>and</strong> identified according to hunting pressure.Lightly hunted areas included the Blass ScoutReservation near Damascus <strong>and</strong> Holla BendNWR in the Ozarks, U of A Pine Tree WDA,Big Lake WMA <strong>and</strong> Choctaw Isl<strong>and</strong> WMA inthe Delta, <strong>and</strong> Dr. Lester Sitzes III Bois D’ArcWMA <strong>and</strong> Rick Evans Gr<strong>and</strong>view PrairieWMA in the Gulf Coastal Plain. Moderatelyhunted areas included Camp Robinson WMAin the Ouachitas <strong>and</strong> Felsenthal NWR in the1 4 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E SGulf Coastal Plain. Five heavily hunted areaswere selected to compare hunting pressure togobbling rates: Sylamore WMA (Ozarks), MountMagazine WMA (Ouachitas), White River NWR(Delta), Poison Springs WMA <strong>and</strong> Moro BigPine Natural Area WMA (Gulf Coastal Plain).Gobble counts ran twice a week March 1-May23 on most sites during mornings with no rain<strong>and</strong> light wind. Stops on these routes were 1 mileapart with 5-minute listening periods beginning30 minutes before sunrise.At each stop, gobbler groups, total gobblersheard <strong>and</strong> total gobbles heard were recorded.Stimulation (owl hooting, for example) was notallowed. Temperature, wind speed, cloud cover<strong>and</strong> barometric pressure were recorded at thebeginning of the survey, <strong>and</strong> all but barometricpressure were recorded at the end of the survey.Common vegetation was selected <strong>and</strong> data wascollected on bud break, green-up <strong>and</strong> full-leafconditions.Data was collected on 17 of the 19 sites <strong>and</strong>325 total surveys were completed. No turkeyswere heard at two sites during March; these areaswere dropped from the survey in 2007.ResultsThe magnitude of data collected is too largeto report in detail in this summary. Somenoteworthy descriptions of gobbling chronologyat individual sites will be presented, but graphsthat are presented are averages from similar sites(same zone, etc.). For the rest of this survey, visitagfc.com/data-facts-maps/reports.aspx#turkey.Figure 1. 2007 gobble chronology/phenology survey sites. 1 – sites that weren’t hunted.2 – lightly hunted sites. 3 – moderately hunted sites. 4 – heavily hunted sites. N – areas thatwere dropped from the survey.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 1 5


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E SWhen the data from all 17 sites was combined,two distinct peaks of gobbling appeared in2007. The first peak was around April 1, <strong>and</strong> thesecond, almost-identical peak was around April15. The peaks are almost identical to those foundin the late 1980s <strong>and</strong> early 1990s in northern<strong>Arkansas</strong>.Very little gobbling occurred before March22. After April 18, gobbling decreased to half ofpeak activity, but still well above early March.Gobbling dropped April 5-11. This was thesame time temperatures plummeted 30 to 40degrees across the state. Average temperaturesduring that period were about 20 degreesbelow normal. This dip in gobbling activitymay have been influenced by the temperature.Similar declines from the 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s wereattributed to the gobblers being surrounded byhens, breeding instead of gobbling.Northern <strong>and</strong> southern <strong>Arkansas</strong> had verysimilar results during spring 2007 (Figures 2 <strong>and</strong>3). Both areas had two gobbling peaks. Moregobblers were heard in southern <strong>Arkansas</strong> duringthe later peak, but individual gobbling activitydiminished slightly.Of the test sites only White River NWR <strong>and</strong>Poison Springs WMA showed any trend oflow gobbling activity after early April. In fact,many areas showed better gobbling rates duringhunting seasons than before the season. CampRobinson <strong>and</strong> Choctaw Isl<strong>and</strong> WMAs are twoexamples. <strong>Turkey</strong>s were still gobbling well atboth these sites when the survey ended onMay 23.Figure 2. Northern <strong>Arkansas</strong> (north of Interstate 40) gobbling chronology results for non-,lightly <strong>and</strong> moderately harvested areas combined for six sites, spring 2007.654321March 1April 1May 1Average Gobblers/StopAverage Gobbles/StopAverage Gobbles/Gobbler0Mar 1-7Mar 8-14Mar 15-21Mar 22-28Mar 29-Apr 4Apr 5-11Apr 12-18Apr 19-25Apr 26-May 2May 3-9May 10-16May 17-23Figure 3. Southern <strong>Arkansas</strong> (south of Interstate 40) gobbling chronology results for non-,lightly <strong>and</strong> moderately harvested areas combined for six sites, spring 2007.43.532.521.510.50March 1Mar 1-7Mar 8-141 6 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R YMar 15-21Mar 22-28Mar 29-Apr 4April 1Apr 5-11Apr 12-18Apr 19-25Apr 26-May 2May 1May 3-9May 10-16May 17-23Average Gobblers/StopAverage Gobbles/StopAverage Gobbles/Gobbler


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E SThe timing of peakgobbling remainedrelatively unchanged fromprevious studies. Photo byMike Cartwright.Bud break <strong>and</strong> green-up were relativelyuniform across <strong>Arkansas</strong> in spring 2007 withmost sites reaching bud break by the fourth weekof March <strong>and</strong> green-up by the second week ofApril. Observations suggest that leaf-out had littleto do with gobbling activity during the survey.DiscussionThis survey suggests that turkey gobblingdoesn’t begin any earlier in southern <strong>Arkansas</strong>than the northern part of the state. In fact,many northern <strong>Arkansas</strong> sites had better Marchgobbling than many southern sites. This trendwill be monitored in future surveys as well.The survey also suggests that turkeys donot “gobble out” before the season or, for thatmatter, during the season or during most of May.<strong>Turkey</strong> gobbling did decline at a rapid pace aftermid-April on heavily hunted areas, but this resultis not surprising.In 2007, the AGFC opened the regular springturkey season April 14, which correspondedquite well with the second peak of gobbling.This was the latest date <strong>Arkansas</strong> has openedthe regular season <strong>and</strong> was intended to allow asmany hens as possible to breed before the seasonstarted.Although we did not take a detailed look atthe effects of weather on gobbling activity, ourobservations suggest that weather had little influenceon gobbling in spring 2007. Even with anextremely warm March followed by a severe coldsnap in April, there was very little change fromtrends in previous surveys.“Hunting the first gobbling peak only hurtshunting opportunities <strong>and</strong> could be disastrousto the long-term health of the turkey populationif illegal hen mortality becomes significant.If seasons are truly designed to protecthens <strong>and</strong> provide hunting opportunity, thenthe opening day should be closer to the secondpeak of gobbling. Don’t gamble with the longtermhealth of your state’s turkey population bysupporting an ill-advised turkey season.”– Dr. James Earl Kennamer“A Time to Kill,”<strong>Turkey</strong> Call Magazine,July/August 20062 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 1 7


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E S2007Spring hunting surveyRespondents hunted anaverage of 7.75 days in<strong>Arkansas</strong> during the 2007spring season. Photocourtesy of the NWTF.The spring gobbler hunting survey wasinitiated in 2007 to gather information onhunter activity, gobbling activity, turkey observations<strong>and</strong> hunting success throughout the springturkey season <strong>and</strong> will provide valuable informationto wildlife managers for years to come.The AGFC used a survey form similar to thatused in Mississippi – a small booklet with spacefor data on each hunt, including <strong>Arkansas</strong> <strong>and</strong>out-of-state hunts. About 2,500 survey formswere distributed in 2007 to be returned at theend of turkey season.Hunter parametersTwo hundred fifty-nine usable survey formswere returned to the AGFC. Forty-four surveyswere retuned from hunters in the Ozarks; 74from the Ouachitas (including the Little Rockmetropolitan area); 60 from the Gulf CoastalPlain <strong>and</strong> 75 from the Delta. Five out-of-statehunters participated.These hunters reported on 2,927 turkey hunts– 2,322 in <strong>Arkansas</strong> <strong>and</strong> 605 out-of-state. Theaverage hunter had 8.95 hunts in <strong>Arkansas</strong> <strong>and</strong>2.3 out-of-state hunts for a total of 11.3 huntsper respondent. Respondents reported huntingan average of 7.75 days in <strong>Arkansas</strong> <strong>and</strong> 2 daysin other states, for a total of 9.78 hunting days.Even though most participants were from theDelta <strong>and</strong> Gulf Coastal Plain, most hunts tookplace in the Ozarks (749). Five hundred sixtyeightwere conducted in the Ouachitas, 675 inthe GCP <strong>and</strong> 330 in the Delta. Delta hunters,in particular, hunted in other regions, mostly theOzarks.Seventy-one participants (27 percent) reportedhunting out-of-state: 48 of those hunters huntedin one other state; 15 in two; three in three <strong>and</strong>five in four other states. Respondents journeyedto 15 other states in spring 2007 with Missouri(30 hunters/155 hunts), Kansas (17/65) <strong>and</strong>Texas (15/71) leading all other states. Becausesample size is so low in all of these states,comparisons to <strong>Arkansas</strong> hunts must be made1 8 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E Son a regional basis. <strong>Arkansas</strong> hunters primarilytraveled to Plains states (49 hunters/234 hunts),followed by the Midwest (35/203), the Southeast(30/164) <strong>and</strong> the West (1/4).Gobbling <strong>and</strong> harvest activityHunters in this survey reported hearing 3,118turkeys gobble 27,584 times for an average of12.2 gobblers heard <strong>and</strong> 108.2 gobbles heardper hunter. These data indicate that <strong>Arkansas</strong>hunters heard an average of 1.57 gobblers <strong>and</strong>13.96 gobbles per hunting day. Hunters reportedkilling 175 turkeys in <strong>Arkansas</strong>, averaging 0.69turkeys per hunter.More turkeys were heard in the Ozarks during10 hours of hunting than any other region ofthe state, but more gobbles were heard in theDelta (Figure 1). Gobbling indices were onlyslightly lower in the Ouachitas than the Ozarks.Gobblers <strong>and</strong> gobbles heard were lowest in theGulf Coastal Plain. Harvest per 100 hours ofhunting varied from 1.66 in the Delta to 2.02in the Ozarks, with the Gulf Coastal Plain onlyslightly behind at 1.97. Even though gobblingactivity was lower in the Gulf Coastal Plain,harvest indices were in the upper range observed(Figure 1).Fifty-two percent of the hunts during theregular turkey season occurred in the first week.The Delta <strong>and</strong> the Ouachitas reported similarlevels of gobblers heard throughout the regularturkey season, while the Ozarks <strong>and</strong> Gulf CoastalPlain reported similar gobbler activity the firsttwo weeks of the season followed by a steepdecline the third week.Gobbling activity <strong>and</strong> harvest matched upwell for all three weeks of the regular season,except in the Ozarks <strong>and</strong> Ouachitas. Harvestin the Ozarks remained good the third week ofthe season even though the number of gobblersheard fell considerably, while harvest levels inthe Ouachitas fell dramatically the third weekdespite good gobbling activity.*More turkeyswere heard in theOzarks during10 hours ofhunting thanany other regionof the state.Figure 1. Regional gobbling <strong>and</strong> harvest indices for <strong>Arkansas</strong> hunts.4.543.532.521.510.50Ozarks Ouachitas Gulf Coastal Plain DeltaGobblers/10 HoursGobbles/HourKill/100 HoursMost respondents whoturkey hunted in otherstates traveled to theGreat Plains. Photocourtesy of the NWTF.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 1 9


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E SFigure 2. <strong>Arkansas</strong> gobbling <strong>and</strong> harvest by l<strong>and</strong> ownership.43.532.521.510.50Gobblers/10 Hours Gobbles/Hour Kill/100 HoursPrivatePublicClub*In general,hunting clubl<strong>and</strong>s had slightlybetter gobbling<strong>and</strong> harvest rates.Figure 3. U.S. regional gobbling <strong>and</strong> harvest indices.9876543210All ARHuntersAvid ARHuntersSoutheast Great Plains Midwest WestMinor differences in gobbling activity <strong>and</strong>harvest indices were found according to l<strong>and</strong>ownership (Figure 2). In general, hunting clubl<strong>and</strong>s had slightly better gobbling <strong>and</strong> harvestrates. Gobblers heard per hunt, gobbles per hunt<strong>and</strong> kill per hunt were almost identical betweenthe three l<strong>and</strong>-ownership categories, but publicl<strong>and</strong>hunters tended to hunt about one hourlonger per hunt.Figure 3 indicates <strong>Arkansas</strong> gobbling <strong>and</strong>harvest rates were lower than other regions,particularly the Plains <strong>and</strong> Midwest. Gobblingactivity was two to three times better in Plains<strong>and</strong> Midwest states, <strong>and</strong> harvest rates were muchhigher in Plains states.<strong>Arkansas</strong> gobbling <strong>and</strong> harvest indices canalso be compared to published data from similarsurveys in Mississippi <strong>and</strong> West Virginia. Thisis definitely an “apples to oranges” comparisonbecause <strong>Arkansas</strong>’s 2007 data will be comparedto data from earlier years in the other two states.Hunting on public l<strong>and</strong> between the three statesGobblers/10 HoursGobbles/HourKill/100 Hourswas quite comparable in gobbling activity <strong>and</strong>harvest. However, hunting on private l<strong>and</strong> inMississippi in 2004 would appear to be muchbetter than on <strong>Arkansas</strong> private l<strong>and</strong> in 2007.We were also able to compare <strong>Arkansas</strong>’sharvest to data from several recent state statusreports from the Southeast Director’s Wild<strong>Turkey</strong> Committee Annual Report. <strong>Arkansas</strong>harvest rates from this survey ranged from 2.23to 1.72 gobblers per 100 hours of hunting(Figure 2) on club <strong>and</strong> public l<strong>and</strong>, or about oneturkey per 9.7 to 12.6 days of hunting, respectively.In Alabama, from 8-11 man-days <strong>and</strong>from 13-19 man-days were needed to harvest agobbler statewide <strong>and</strong> on WMAs, respectively,from 1995 through 2004. In Louisiana, 14“hunter efforts” were needed to harvest a gobbleron WMAs in 2006. In Virginia, 13.3 man-dayswere needed to harvest a gobbler statewide in2004. These data suggest that 2007 <strong>Arkansas</strong>harvest rates are better than those of many otherSoutheastern states.2 0 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S U R V E Y S U M M A R I E S<strong>Turkey</strong> observationsSurvey participants recorded all adult gobblers,jakes, hens <strong>and</strong> unknown turkeys observed whilehunting. In 2007, the number of gobblers seenper 100 hours of hunting was similar in theDelta, GCP <strong>and</strong> Ozarks, but considerably less inthe Ouachitas (Figure 4). The number of jakes<strong>and</strong> hens observed was highest in the Ozarks<strong>and</strong> lowest in the Ouachitas. The high numberof jakes in the Ozarks compares favorably withabove-average reproduction recorded during the2006 turkey brood survey. However, this surveysuggested Delta areas, particularly turkey zone17, also had above-average brood productionin 2006 – but those jakes do not appear in thisyear’s observations.<strong>Arkansas</strong> turkey observations also havebeen compared to observations in other statesby <strong>Arkansas</strong> hunters. Far more turkeys wereobserved in Plains states than in any otherregion. While turkey numbers may be higher inthis region than any other, two other factors mayhave contributed to the high observation rate –turkeys are much more visible in open, lightlywooded habitats found in Plains states, <strong>and</strong> mostof the turkeys in this region are Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>esubspecies, which have different behavior thaneastern turkeys. Rios tend to roost in large flocksin river bottom habitats <strong>and</strong> are often seen inlarge groups after flydown.Comments <strong>and</strong> suggestionsSlightly less than half of the 259 participantsin this survey provided suggestions <strong>and</strong>comments. Most of the suggestions that werereceived revolved around including preseasonscouting gobbling activity in the survey <strong>and</strong>including additional weather or hunting information(birds called to, birds shot at, etc.).Comments on the current turkey season <strong>and</strong>/or turkey management were quite varied. At least29 hunters commented that turkey numbersappeared down in the area they hunted, whilefive said they were up or steady. Support forrecent conservative seasons was somewhat evenlydivided, with 30 hunters expressing supportfor the 2007 season, 14 expressing support,but asking for an earlier opening date, <strong>and</strong> 34hunters expressing no support for the season,primarily because it was “too late.” Many hunterssaid they want further restrictions to seasons orbag limits.DiscussionGiven <strong>Arkansas</strong>’s current turkey population,gobbling <strong>and</strong> harvest rates compared relativelywell to those of other states <strong>and</strong> regions acrossthe country.Data from <strong>Arkansas</strong> hunters on out-of-statehunts resulted in some interesting conclusions.Few <strong>Arkansas</strong> hunters, other than those fromthe Delta, appear to be going to Southeasternstates to hunt. Anecdotal observations suggestthis was not always the case; several decades ago,Mississippi <strong>and</strong> Alabama were destinations formany <strong>Arkansas</strong> hunters. The current trend seemsto be for most Arkansan out-of-state hunts to bein Plains <strong>and</strong> Midwestern states, even with morerestrictive seasons <strong>and</strong> bag limits.Figure 4. <strong>Arkansas</strong> observation indices.302520151050Ozarks Ouachitas Gulf Coastal Plain DeltaGobbler observationsJake observationsHen observations2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 2 1


T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A SContinued conservative seasonsshould result in better gobblersurvival <strong>and</strong> more hens being bred.Photo courtesy of the NWTF.Setting the seasonshow does it work?Overview: spring season regulations processCreating <strong>and</strong> adjusting regulations for each turkeyseason is a year-round process. As soon as oneseason ends, the harvest numbers are examined <strong>and</strong>population surveys are conducted. Spring harvestnumbers are only a part of the total data used todetermine season recommendations. Gobbling surveys,hunting surveys, brood counts <strong>and</strong> other research toolsare analyzed as well. Even though harvest totals maystabilize, poor reproduction can still cause the populationto decline.Survey results are reviewed by members of theWildlife Management Division’s <strong>Turkey</strong> Team duringsummer. Team members meet in August to discussSummer months <strong>Turkey</strong> Teammembers collect <strong>and</strong> review surveyresultsAugust Team members discuss preliminaryrecommendations <strong>and</strong> present to chiefof Wildlife Management DivisionAugust Public meetings held todiscuss probable changes <strong>and</strong> getpublic inputpreliminary spring season recommendations <strong>and</strong> topicsof concern for public meetings. A summary of theteam’s meeting <strong>and</strong> recommendations is then providedto the chief of the Wildlife Management Division forapproval.The preliminary regulations package is sentto commissioners <strong>and</strong> public meetings are heldthroughout the state to discuss probable changes <strong>and</strong>gather public response. After public review, proposalsare formally presented to the <strong>Commission</strong> during itsSeptember meeting. After another period of publicreview, commissioners approve or amend the proposalsat the <strong>Commission</strong>’s October meeting.September <strong>Commission</strong> meetingProposed regulations presented to<strong>Commission</strong>October <strong>Commission</strong> meeting<strong>Commission</strong>ers amend or approveproposed regulationssummer late summer fall2 2 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


2007 spring turkey regulationsThe <strong>Turkey</strong> Team presented its preliminaryseason recommendation <strong>and</strong> material forpublic meetings at the <strong>Commission</strong>’s Augustbriefing. The team stressed that spring turkeyharvest was probably going to continuedeclining, based on continued poor turkeybrood production <strong>and</strong> poor gobbler survival.Public meeting overviewPublic meetings were held at 11 locationsacross the state Aug. 29, 2006. Presentationssummarized the data relevant to the recommendationfor a conservative 2007 season.Biological information such as recent declinesin spring turkey harvest trends, below averagebrood production for the last 4-5 years, variationsin spring season length, recent declinesin gobbler/hen ratios (an index to gobblercarryover), peak gobbling <strong>and</strong> breeding dates<strong>and</strong> many other variables were explained. Thepresentation also included a harvest modelindicating where our turkey population wouldst<strong>and</strong> had more conservative seasons been usedduring recent years with poor reproduction.T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A SOne hundred out of 131 respondents to public meetings were in favor of a conservative2007 spring season. Photo courtesy of the NWTF.Ninety-four people attended the meetings.Participants were specifically asked whether theywould support a three-week season (instead offour weeks) <strong>and</strong> a later opening date. Thirtyfiveparticipants responded, either orally or inwriting, with about 85 percent in favor of theshorter season <strong>and</strong> almost as many in favor ofa later opening date. Many who commentedrequested more conservative seasons or baglimits than those proposed (a two-week season,one-bird limit, etc.). A total of 131 commentswere received at public meetings <strong>and</strong> throughe-mails or letters. Slightly more than 100 ofthose who commented were in favor of theproposed conservative season (or a more conservativeseason), while 29 were opposed (mostlyrequesting earlier opening dates).2007 spring season recommendation:September commission meetingThe Wildlife Management Division’s 2007spring season recommendations were for specialyouth turkey hunts to be open April 14-15,followed by the regular season to open April 16<strong>and</strong> continue throughMay 7, 2007 in mostturkey zones (April16-29 in zones 1A,4, 4A, 5A, 9A). Thedivision recommendedthat zone 17 open thespecial youth huntApril 7-8, followedby a regular seasonApril 9-29. This seasonformat was unanimouslyendorsed bythe <strong>Turkey</strong> Team at itsAugust meeting. TheWildlife ManagementDivision stressedthroughout the processthat the only real wayto effect turkey harvestis to reduce the seasonlength. Delaying the*The WildlifeManagementDivision stressedthroughout thewhole processthat the only realway to effectturkey harvestis to reduce theseason length.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 2 3


T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A SFall archery season is allowed statewide because of the limited success of archers pursuing the wild turkey. Photocourtesy of the NWTF.opening date was intended to let more hensbreed before hunters took to the woods. Thisrecommendation was released to the public byvarious media, <strong>and</strong> public comment was invited.After season recommendations were releasedto the public, 19 additional comments werereceived, including a letter of support from theNational Wild <strong>Turkey</strong> Federation’s <strong>Arkansas</strong>State Chapter Board of Directors. Sevencomments supported shorter, later turkeyseasons, five supported shorter seasons (but notlater), four were against shorter, later seasons<strong>and</strong> three commented on other topics. BryanHendricks also wrote an article in the <strong>Arkansas</strong>Democrat-Gazette <strong>and</strong> the editors of that paperwrote a short editorial in support of the conservativerecommendation.Meanwhile, the <strong>Commission</strong> requested twooptions to the season. The first option wouldmove the youth season earlier by one week(April 7-8), with the regular season startingthe following Saturday (April 14). The secondoption would change the bag limit to one legalturkey during the first week of the season inzones 1, 2, 6, 7 <strong>and</strong> 8.2007 spring season approval:October commission meetingThe <strong>Commission</strong> set the 2007 spring turkeyseason Oct. 19. Youth hunts were set for April7-8, with the regular season in most zones setfor April 14-May 4. Restricted zones had aseason from April 14-27. Youth hunts in zone 17were set for March 31-April 1, with the regularseason set for April 7-29. Bag limits remainedunchanged.2 4 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


2007-08 fall turkey regulationsFall turkey seasons <strong>and</strong> the turkey planThe Strategic Wild <strong>Turkey</strong> Management Planguides turkey management in <strong>Arkansas</strong>. Fallarchery/crossbow hunting is mentioned brieflyin this plan:“Because fall archery/crossbow seasons havehad minimal if any impact on populations in<strong>Arkansas</strong>, these seasons should be allowablestatewide, except under special circumstances tobe determined on a case-by-case basis.”123Three criteria are included in the plan for fallfirearms seasons:The previous year’s spring season harvestshould be used to determine openseasons. <strong>Turkey</strong> zones recommended foropen seasons should have maintaineda harvest more than 0.5 turkeys persquare mile of forest for the twoprevious spring turkey seasons.Combined fall harvests should notexceed one-third of the previous springharvest during any year in any giventurkey zone.A majority of hunters (greater than 50percent) should indicate that their fallturkey season satisfaction level wasexcellent or good <strong>and</strong> the majority ofspring <strong>and</strong>/or fall turkey hunters shouldsupport fall turkey seasons as determinedby hunter opinion surveys.Preliminary recommendationsInitially, only turkey zones 2, 3, 6 <strong>and</strong> 17 wererecommended for open fall gun turkey seasonbased on spring harvest. All turkey zones metcriterion two, with 2005-06 fall turkey harvestranging from 0 to 7 percent of 2006 springharvest. No hunter opinion surveys have beenmade since 1998, so no data were available todetermine if the third criterion above was beingmet.T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A SPublic meetingsMeetings were held Jan. 9, 2007, at 11 sites in<strong>Arkansas</strong>, <strong>and</strong> had very poor attendance. Only ah<strong>and</strong>ful of comments on fall turkey seasons – afew for <strong>and</strong> a few against – were received at thismeeting, or later as season recommendationswere being made, distributed by the media <strong>and</strong>reviewed by the public.Final recommendations <strong>and</strong>season approvalWildlife Management Division staff met<strong>and</strong> reviewed public comments <strong>and</strong> preliminaryseason recommendations Jan. 11-12.Additionally, a meeting was held with U. S. <strong>Fish</strong><strong>and</strong> Wildlife Service refuge managers to coordinateseasons on national wildlife refuges.The final season recommendations weremade by the chief of the Wildlife ManagementDivision to the <strong>Commission</strong> at the Februarymeeting. A re-analysis of forested acreage byturkey zone was completed, <strong>and</strong> resulted in somecorrections to data that had been used previously.The new data resulted in turkey zones1, 2, 3, 5B, 6, 7 <strong>and</strong> 17 meeting the minimumspring harvest per forested acre criterion. A fallgun turkey season was proposed for Oct. 22-28,2007, in turkey zones 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 <strong>and</strong> 17. Thisseason was passed by the <strong>Commission</strong> at itsMarch meeting.Illegal kills <strong>and</strong> crippling losses around cornfeeders from archery season were discussed in anopen <strong>Commission</strong> meeting during fall 2006. Inthe final analysis, the recommendation for thisseason was left unchanged. The <strong>Commission</strong>approved a statewide season for Oct. 1, 2007-Feb. 29, 2008.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 2 5


T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A S<strong>Turkey</strong>s require openareas as well as timberl<strong>and</strong>.Photo courtesy ofJan Self.*<strong>Turkey</strong>s are aforest species,so proper timbermanagementis vital to theirsurvival.Habitat managementis a year-round jobIdeal turkey habitat can be described as aseveral thous<strong>and</strong>-acre area with permanentwater sources <strong>and</strong> about 50 percent matureforest, 30 percent grassy openings, 15 percentold fields or brushy areas <strong>and</strong> 15 percent smallgrain fields. <strong>Turkey</strong>s thrive in areas where thesepercentages vary, such as zone 17 along theMississippi River, but ideal habitat usually hasall four of these components. These areas areactually rare in <strong>Arkansas</strong> because most habitatsare too heavily wooded or too open. AGFCbiologists <strong>and</strong> technicians stay busy year-roundworking on these l<strong>and</strong>s to improve the habitatfor turkeys <strong>and</strong> other game species.Wildlife openingsWithin days of receiving approved budgetsin mid-summer, wildlife management areamanagers begin working long hours maintainingopenings on virtually all upl<strong>and</strong> wildlife managementareas in the state. In most cases, plots ofcereal grain <strong>and</strong> clover mix are planted, fertilized<strong>and</strong> limed. For example, Muddy CreekWMA in the Ouachita National Forest has 160wildlife openings totaling 320 acres, plantedon a two-year rotation. These openings providecritical late-winter food for turkeys <strong>and</strong> deer, aswell as insect-rich feeding grounds for broodsduring summer. Suitable sites also are plantedwith native warm-season grasses for bobwhitequail <strong>and</strong> turkey nesting habitat during spring.The AGFC devotes more than $500,000 tomaintaining thous<strong>and</strong>s of acres of openings everyyear.Timber management<strong>Turkey</strong>s are a forest species, so proper timbermanagement is vital to their survival. MostAGFC <strong>and</strong> USDA Forest Service cooperativeWMAs are heavily forested with second growthforests, many the result of “high-grading” fromhistorical timber harvests. While spring turkeyhunters like to hunt these st<strong>and</strong>s, these matureforests are generally in decline, are lacking indiversity <strong>and</strong> are relatively poor year-roundhabitats for deer <strong>and</strong> turkey.The AGFC uses a variety of scientificmanagement techniques to enhance wildlifehabitat <strong>and</strong> promote long-term forest health.These techniques include tree plantings,thinnings, selective harvests, clear cuts <strong>and</strong> oakregeneration.2 6 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A SSt<strong>and</strong> inventory, marking, tree planting <strong>and</strong>harvest are all on-going habitat managementpractices on state <strong>and</strong> federal l<strong>and</strong>s. Revenueis generated from the sale of harvested timber,helping offset costs associated with these timberprescriptions. The Forest Service recentlyadopted a new program, Forest Stewardship,that allows them to reinvest timber revenue inwildlife habitat enhancements on federal l<strong>and</strong>s(See Page 30).Prescribed firePrescribed burning is the most economicaltool in the manager’s toolkit to enhance turkeyhabitat. Vigorous herbaceous growth afterprescribed fires creates excellent brood habitat inheavily timbered areas.Recent catastrophic wildfires in Western stateshave resulted in federal legislation letting theForest Service increase prescribed fire on federall<strong>and</strong>s. Frequent, controlled burns eliminate thebuild-up of leaves <strong>and</strong> other fuels <strong>and</strong> reduce thechances of major fire events. This increase in fireuse has been welcomed by wildlife biologists, butsome changes have been made to accommodatethe new goal. Prescribed fires are now larger<strong>and</strong> the burning season is longer, sometimesextending into the early portion of turkeyseason <strong>and</strong> turkey nesting activities. Biologists<strong>and</strong> habitat managers work hard to accomplishprescribed fire objectives while minimizingconflicts.Private l<strong>and</strong>s programsThe AGFC has about a dozen private l<strong>and</strong>sbiologists on staff to assist private l<strong>and</strong>ownerswith habitat enhancement projects. Byproviding free, sound management strategies tol<strong>and</strong>owners, the AGFC has been able to increasethe public’s knowledge of the habitat needs ofgame <strong>and</strong> non-game animals.In the 1970s, the AGFC started with aflagship private l<strong>and</strong>s program, Acres forWildlife, but biologists now deliver morethan 30 programs as well as informal habitatmanagement advice to l<strong>and</strong>owners. Mostof these programs benefit wild turkeys, butthe <strong>Arkansas</strong> Forestry <strong>Commission</strong>’s ForestStewardship program <strong>and</strong> Farm Bill programsthat result in reforestation of row crop farml<strong>and</strong>sare particularly important. The AGFC assistswith the wildlife portion of management plansin Forest Stewardship. Farm Bill reforestationprograms such as the Wetl<strong>and</strong> Reserve Program,Conservation Reserve Program <strong>and</strong> ContinuousConservation Reserve Program have resulted inseveral hundred thous<strong>and</strong> acres of reforestationin the Delta region of <strong>Arkansas</strong>. Many of theseareas are now mature enough to support turkeypopulations, <strong>and</strong> many more acres will reach thisstatus soon.nnnnnn2007 highlights17,500 acres of prescribed burns on AGFC l<strong>and</strong>525,000 dollars spent on wildlife openingson AGFC l<strong>and</strong>5,500 acres of timber management activitieson AGFC l<strong>and</strong>More than 200,000 current acres of WRP reforestationin <strong>Arkansas</strong>Two part-time prescribed fire bosses hired63 WMAs with wildlife opening projectsnnn93 Forest Stewardshipplans with wildlife asan objective.More than 1.5 millionacres enrolled in Acresfor Wildlife40,000 dollars spenton Acres for WildlifeseedMore than $500,000 is devoted tomaintaining wildlife openings onWMAs annually. Photo courtesy ofthe NWTF.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 2 7


T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A S2006-07 wild turkey stockingsWild turkeys were abundant when Europeansettlers arrived in <strong>Arkansas</strong>. By the early1900s, however, turkeys had been eliminatedfrom most of the state. When the AGFC wascreated in 1915, regulations protecting turkeyswere implemented, but populations continued todecrease.Efforts to restore turkeys began soon after theAGFC was formed. Harvest of hen turkeys wasbanned in 1918; state game refuges were builtin the 1920s; <strong>and</strong> pen-raised wild turkeys (manyraised at state hatcheries) were released beginningin the 1930s. None of these or other earlyefforts resulted in restoration of turkeys on astatewide basis, <strong>and</strong> turkey populations reachedtheir lowest point in history in the 1930s. By themid-1940s an estimated 7,000 turkeys remainedin <strong>Arkansas</strong>, mostly in the Gulf Coastal Plain<strong>and</strong> along the Mississippi River.The perfection of cannon-netting techniquesin the 1950s allowed wildlife managers tocapture large groups of wild turkeys <strong>and</strong>efficiently restock depleted areas. Since 1932,nearly 7,000 wild-trapped turkeys have beenstocked in 73 of <strong>Arkansas</strong>’s 75 counties, withmost birds relocated between 1960-90. Effortshave resulted in turkeys being restored to almostall suitable habitats in the state. While stockingefforts continue, they are low-priority projects,mostly on large tracts of reforested l<strong>and</strong>s ineastern <strong>Arkansas</strong>.<strong>Turkey</strong> stocking requests from the public <strong>and</strong>within the AGFC are reviewed annually by theWild <strong>Turkey</strong> Team <strong>and</strong> staff of the WildlifeManagement Division. Twelve stocking requestswere reviewed in 2006 through site visits <strong>and</strong>aerial photography. Five sites were recommendedfor stocking (Table 1). The remaining seven siteswere declined because habitat was rated insufficientor marginal for turkeys.The AGFC attempts to trap wild turkeys fromareas with high densities of birds <strong>and</strong> in areaswhere hunting is either restricted or not allowed.Distance between sites <strong>and</strong> available trappers areadditional factors used to decide where to trapturkeys.In winter 2006-07, AGFC personnel hada difficult time capturing turkeys, primarilybecause of a good acorn crop in central <strong>and</strong>northern <strong>Arkansas</strong> <strong>and</strong> feral hog use of baitsites on Choctaw Isl<strong>and</strong> WMA. Forty-oneturkeys captured with six rocket net shots werestocked on four sites. Three sites were consideredfinished, <strong>and</strong> two will be completed in 2007-08.<strong>Turkey</strong> trappers included David Henley, AltonCase, Matt Mourot, Kiah Gardner <strong>and</strong> MikeWidner. Others, including numerous NationalWild <strong>Turkey</strong> Federation (NWTF) volunteers <strong>and</strong>AGFC personnel, assisted with baiting, trapping,transport <strong>and</strong> release of birds. Mr. Ben Mense,Refuge Manager, graciously allowed trappers totake 18 wild turkeys from Holla Bend NWR forrestoration efforts.Table 1. Wild turkeys stocked in <strong>Arkansas</strong> during winter 2006-07.Adult Juvenile Adult JuvenileCounty Site male male female female Total Status* Source**<strong>Arkansas</strong> Hampton Reservoir 2 3 5 2 12 C 1, 2<strong>Arkansas</strong> Benson Lake 2 1 6 2 11 C 1, 2Lee Dutch Slough 4 0 11 0 15 C 1, 3Chicot Big Creek 0 3 0 0 3 I 2Crittenden Horseshoe Lake - - - - - I -Totals 8 7 22 4 41* Releases designated C are complete; those designated I are incomplete <strong>and</strong> will be stocked next winter.** Sources (trap sites) include: 1 = Camp Robinson, Pulaski <strong>and</strong> Faulkner Counties (12 gobblers), 2 = Holla Bend NWR,Pope County (3 gobblers, 15 hens), 3 = Jamestown WMA, Independence County (11 hens)Figure 1. Wild turkey stockings in <strong>Arkansas</strong>.l 1990sl 2000-06H Winter 2006-072 8 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


The National Wild <strong>Turkey</strong> Federation, inEdgefield, S.C., is a nonprofit conservation<strong>and</strong> education organization dedicatedto conserving wild turkeys <strong>and</strong> preservinghunting traditions. More than 584,000 outdoorenthusiasts have joined the NWTF in localchapters throughout the United States, Canada<strong>and</strong> Mexico. The NWTF <strong>and</strong> its conservationpartners have raised <strong>and</strong> spent more than$258 million to uphold hunting traditions <strong>and</strong>conserve more than 11.3 million acres of wildlifehabitat.Funds raised by local chapters support theHunting Heritage Super Fund, the driving forceT U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A SThe National Wild <strong>Turkey</strong>Federation in <strong>Arkansas</strong>More than 17,000 acres of wildlife openings have been maintained through theNWTF’s Super Fund Program in <strong>Arkansas</strong>. Photo courtesy of the NWTF.behind NWTF conservation <strong>and</strong> educationprograms. Super Fund projects include habitatmanagement, outdoor education for women,youth <strong>and</strong> people with disabilities, hunter safety,restoration (trap <strong>and</strong> transfer of wild turkeys),l<strong>and</strong> acquisition, enforcement, research <strong>and</strong>equipment purchases.Super Fund projects are jointly administeredby the NWTF, its state chapters <strong>and</strong> respectivewildlife agencies. Administration at the statelevel enables local stakeholders to have a sayin money allocation <strong>and</strong> ensures that projectsenhance the state’s long-range natural resourcemanagement plans <strong>and</strong> hunting heritage.National HuntingHeritage Super Fundprojects also includegrants to supportuniversity <strong>and</strong> wildlifeagency researchprojects, regionalhabitat programs <strong>and</strong>funds for publicationsthat can be usedby government <strong>and</strong>corporate biologists asmanagement referencetools.<strong>Arkansas</strong> chapterThe <strong>Arkansas</strong>chapter of theNational Wild <strong>Turkey</strong>Federation is a grassrootsorganizationthat supports scientificwildlife managementon public, private<strong>and</strong> corporate l<strong>and</strong>s,as well as wild turkeyhunting as a traditionalhunting sport.More than 18,520<strong>Arkansas</strong> chaptercontactsGary WattsState PresidentP. O. Box 68Subiaco, AR 72865(479) 934-4399garywatts@magtel.comMark BadgwellState Vice PresidentP. O. Box 1369Malvern, AR 72104(501) 844-5044markbadgwell@yahoo.comBrent JonesState TreasurerP. O. Box 945Perryville, AR 72126(501) 889-3270brent.jones@edwardjones.comJason MajorsState Secretary2223 Hickory Creek CircleAlex<strong>and</strong>er, AR 72002(501) 316-1771jmajors@stephens.comMike WidnerState Board <strong>Turkey</strong>Program Coordinator213A, Highway 89-SMayflower, AR 72106(877) 470-3650, ext. 205mwidner@agfc.state.ar.usJudy StorySenior Regional Director780 Jenny LaneStar City, AR 71667(870) 628-1222jastory@seark.netSteve ColeSenior Regional FieldSupervisor31 Bell Branch RoadPerryville, AR 72126(501) 333-2201nwtfcole@windstream.net2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 2 9


T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A S*More than 17,000acres of wildlifeopenings havebeen maintained<strong>and</strong> more than41,000 acres havebeen burned toimprove habitatfor turkeys <strong>and</strong>other wildlife.members support 64 local chapters across thestate. Local chapters started contributing to the<strong>Arkansas</strong> Hunting Heritage Super Fund in 1985.During the last 22 years, local NWTF chaptershave raised <strong>and</strong> spent more than $1.9 million onhabitat improvement projects in <strong>Arkansas</strong>. Theseprojects have improved habitat for turkeys <strong>and</strong>many other wildlife species on 125,271 acres.Projects span 17 wildlife management areas,three national forests <strong>and</strong> many lakes, rivers <strong>and</strong>national wildlife refuges.More than 17,000 acres of wildlife openingshave been maintained <strong>and</strong> more than 41,000acres have been burned to improve habitat forturkeys <strong>and</strong> other wildlife. Beyond conservation,the <strong>Arkansas</strong> chapter has spent $254,636on education programs <strong>and</strong> literature <strong>and</strong> morethan $74,900 to introduce the state’s youth tooutdoor activities, conservation <strong>and</strong> hunting.In 2007, local chapters contributed more than$120,000 to the <strong>Arkansas</strong> Super Fund. Fromthese contributions, $93,076 was spent onhabitat improvements, scholarships, educationalmaterials, outreach programs <strong>and</strong> local wildlifelaw enforcement support. Super Fund projectsimproved habitat for wild turkeys on morethan 2,500 acres of public <strong>and</strong> private l<strong>and</strong>s.Local chapters awarded 44 scholarships, hosted17 Jakes events, hosted seven Women in theOutdoors events, provided educational materialsto public schools, supported hunting heritageprograms such as 4-H shooting sports teams,<strong>and</strong> supported local law enforcement throughreward payments.For more information on the NWTF<strong>and</strong> how you can help the future of turkeyhunting in America, visit www.nwtf.org. Tolearn more about local NWTF chapters <strong>and</strong>events in <strong>Arkansas</strong>, visit www.nwtfchapter.org/arkansasstatechapter.Stewardship contracts in <strong>Arkansas</strong>The National Wild <strong>Turkey</strong> Federation supports theuse of stewardship contracts to improve wildlifehabitat on national forests <strong>and</strong> grassl<strong>and</strong>s throughoutthe nation. These contracts combine natural resourcemanagement work with timber sales, <strong>and</strong> enable federall<strong>and</strong> managers to exchange goods for services. Perhapsthe most meaningful aspect of stewardship contractingis the opportunity for collaboration between l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>resource management professionals, private business interests<strong>and</strong> individuals concerned with improving wildlifehabitat on public l<strong>and</strong>s. To learn more about stewardshipcontracting, visit www.forests<strong>and</strong>rangel<strong>and</strong>s.gov/stewardship/index.shtml.Raspberry timber saleIn 2005, the Ozark-St. Francis National Forest BigPiney Ranger District developed the first stewardshipcontract in <strong>Arkansas</strong>. The Raspberry timber sale was developedas part of the Middle Fork Ecosystem RestorationProject. This project was designed to restore <strong>and</strong> maintainfire-dependent ecosystems on a portion of the nationalforest. The NWTF purchased the Raspberry timber sale asa stewardship contract. As primary contractor, the NWTFwas responsible for timber harvest <strong>and</strong> all connectedresource management activities with the sale. Treatmentsincluded thinning 141 acres of oak/hickory forest, 141acres of understory removal, 117 acres of wildlife st<strong>and</strong>improvement <strong>and</strong> 46 acres of timber st<strong>and</strong> improvement.These treatments resulted in improved forest health <strong>and</strong>improved habitat for wild turkey <strong>and</strong> other wildlife. Thestewardship contract indirectly supported prescribedburning planned for the area through construction of 2.3miles of permanent fire lanes. Hazardous snags near thefire lanes were removed as well.Shotgun timber saleThe second stewardship contract developed as part ofthe Middle Fork Ecosystem Restoration Project was theshotgun timber sale purchased by Bibler Brothers LumberCompany of Russellville, Ark. The NWTF continuedits collaborative work with the USDA Forest Service asa sub-contractor, implementing 212 acres of understoryremoval <strong>and</strong> 34 acres of wildlife st<strong>and</strong> improvementplanned as resource management treatments. This treatmentresulted in improved habitat for turkeys on theOzark/St. Francis National Forest.3 0 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A S2007 wild turkey violationsHunting turkeys over bait 42Resident turkey license requirements 6Special youth hunt restrictions 3Prohibited methods of taking turkeys 1Wild turkey hen restrictions 1Domestic turkey stocking prohibited 1Total violations 542006-07 enforcement reportYear-round hunting nearly eliminated thewild turkey in <strong>Arkansas</strong>. When professionalwildlife management began, the regulationseliminating year-round hunting had to bestrictly enforced. New enforcement officers hadto be trained <strong>and</strong> devoted to wildlife regulations.Wildlife officers were an essential componentof successful reintroduction of wild turkeys tomost of <strong>Arkansas</strong>, as restoration would not havesucceeded without protection of turkey flocks.Protection of turkeys is still important.Illegal turkey harvest can reduce overall turkeynumbers. The AGFC’s Enforcement Divisionis the front line of defense in protection of allwildlife.The National Wild <strong>Turkey</strong> Federation workswith the Enforcement Division to reduceWildlife Officer RyanWarner from the CalicoRock Regional Officewon the 2006 <strong>Arkansas</strong>National Wild <strong>Turkey</strong>Federation Wildlife Officerof the Year award.poaching. “H<strong>and</strong>s-on” conservation <strong>and</strong> huntingeducation programs such as Jakes, Women inthe Outdoors <strong>and</strong> Wheelin’ Sportsman teachnewcomers to the sport about ethical hunting<strong>and</strong> the excitement available in the outdoors.The NWTF will also match (up to $500) AGFCrewards for the conviction of turkey poachersthough the Turn in Poachers (TIP) program.Illegal hunting before the spring season <strong>and</strong>hunting over bait are the two most commonturkey regulation violations. The exact amountof preseason hunting cases is not known becausethe same code enforces hunting out of seasoncases throughout the year for all species.2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 3 1


T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A S<strong>Arkansas</strong> record turkeysThe AGFC does not maintain a list of record wild turkeys. However, the National Wild <strong>Turkey</strong>Federation has records similar to Boone <strong>and</strong> Crockett <strong>and</strong> Pope <strong>and</strong> Young club registries. Acomplete list of those records <strong>and</strong> registration information can be found at www.nwtf.org/all_about_turkeys/turkey_records.php.*Wild turkeys are scoredby the followingformula:Weight + (beard lengthx 2) + (combined spurlength x 10) =total scoreMultiple-beardedturkeys are scored as“atypical” <strong>and</strong> singlebeardbirds are scoredas “typical.”TieName (state of residence) Type (no. of beards) Score Kill date CountyTotal ScoreChick Shaddox Jr. (Mo.) Atypical (7) 183.75 5-1-86 BentonJustin White (Ark.) Atypical (8) 140.495 4-10-00 WhiteTravis Reynolds (Ark.) Atypical (5) 132.3125 4-7-97 SharpJustin Pardue (La.) Best Typical 79.50 3-27-04 UnionBeard LengthStephen Overton (Ark.) Atypical (4) 17.625 in. 4-10-00 SharpKevin Wiles (Ark.) Typical 12.9375.in. 4-17-90 IzardChick Shaddox, Jr. (Mo.) Atypical (7) 12.75 in. 5-1-86 BentonSpur LengthDarin Hearyman (Ark.) Typical 1.75 in. 4-6-93 Mississippi[John M. Hundley (Ark.) Typical 1.75 in. 4-19-86 ChicotJustin Pardue (La.) Typical 1.625 in. 3-27-04 UnionWeightW. V. “Bill” Johnson (Ark.) Typical 33.375 lb. 4-20-87 BaxterLowell E. Johnson (Ark.) Typical 30.4375 lb. 4-6-03 CarrollChick Shaddox, Jr. (Mo.) Atypical (7) 27.5 lb. 5-1-86 BentonJohnny Vaughn ofQuitman harvested thisunusual eight-beardedturkey in spring 2003.Photo courtesy of JohnnyVaughn.3 2 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


T U R K E Y C O N S E R V A T I O N I N A R K A N S A SFeeders not for the birdsMany Arkansans use corn feeders for deerhunting <strong>and</strong> wildlife viewing. But feedersaren’t always the best practice for outdoorsenthusiasts interested in wild turkeys <strong>and</strong> otherbirds.Ever wonder why corn bagged as “deer corn”is usually cheaper than corn at the local farmerscoop? Often, it’s because the grain has beenrejected for domestic livestock or humansbecause of high levels of aflatoxins (>20 ppb forhumans or dairy cows), so it’s bagged <strong>and</strong> sold asdeer corn.Aflatoxins are produced by fungi that growon corn under certain conditions. These toxinscan cause liver damage in humans <strong>and</strong> areparticularly toxic to birds. Large-scale die-offsof ducks <strong>and</strong> other birds have been traced toaflatoxin-laced grains. Research with domestic<strong>and</strong> wild turkeys has shown that moderate levelsof aflatoxins cause liver damage, immune systemdamage <strong>and</strong> death. For this reason, wildlifemanagers do not recommend feeding anythingother than corn sold as domestic livestock feed.This corn should be kept dry <strong>and</strong> fed in smallamounts to prevent fungus. Feeders shouldalso be moved often to cut down on diseasetransmission.Many biologists discourage the use of feedersbecause of the disadvantages associated withthem (listed below). Food plots including graincrops, such as corn, soybeans <strong>and</strong> milo, <strong>and</strong>other habitat management is more beneficial <strong>and</strong>cost effective to wildlife in the long run.Corn feeders may be convenient, but food plots providemuch better nutrition throughout the year. Photo byJeff Williams.Feeder benefits1. Attract wildlife2. Provide supplemental food3. Provide high-energy food4. Grow larger deer with larger anglers5. Improve selectivity of wildlife harvest6. Improve reproductive condition7. Keep wildlife on the property8. Reduce stress on wildlifeFeeder disadvantages1. Aflatoxin poisoning or death2. Potential poaching at feeders3. <strong>Turkey</strong> harvest is illegal over bait4. Nest predators (raccoons) benefit5. Domestication of turkeys <strong>and</strong> wildlife6. Increased predation near feeders7. Disease transmission potential increased8. Ethical issues with hunting over bait2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y 3 3


A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T SAcknowledgements<strong>Commission</strong>ersSonny Varnell, ChairmanSt. PaulFreddie Black, Vice ChairmanLake VillageBrett MorganScottCraig CampbellLittle RockGeorge Dunklin Jr.DeWittRon PierceMountain HomeRick WatkinsLittle RockKim Smith, Ph.D.U of A – FayettevilleWildlife Management DivisionDoyle ShookChief, Wildlife Management DivisionBrad CarnerAssistant Chief, WMDRicky ChastainAssistant Chief, WMDMatt HodgesAssistant Chief, WMDMike Widner<strong>Turkey</strong> Program CoordinatorHanna FordSpatial Data Support Technician<strong>Turkey</strong> TeamDavid Covington, BrinkleyMark Hooks, MonticelloBrady Baker, CamdenBrad Townsend, PerrytownWade Walker, Hot SpringsKevin Lynch, Ft. SmithBob McAnally, RussellvilleDavid Henley, Calico RockCommunicationsNancy LedbetterDirector, Communications DivisionKeith StephensAssistant Chief, Communications DivisionJeff WilliamsEditorR<strong>and</strong>y ZellersEditorAngela SanchezDesignerNWTF <strong>Arkansas</strong> State ChapterGary Watts, PresidentSubiacoMark Badgwell, Vice PresidentMalvernBrent Jones, TreasurerPerryvilleSteve Cole, Sr. Regional Field SupervisorPerryvilleJudy Story, Sr. Regional DirectorStar CitySteve Osborne, Regional BiologistRussellvilleThis report would not have been possiblewithout the efforts <strong>and</strong> cooperation of variouspersonnel from the Wildlife Management,Enforcement <strong>and</strong> Communications divisions.The <strong>Arkansas</strong> chapter of the National Wild<strong>Turkey</strong> Federation deserves special recognitionfor its relationship with the AGFC <strong>and</strong> forapproving the use of Hunting Heritage StateSuper Fund dollars to help print <strong>and</strong> distributethis report. Finally, <strong>Arkansas</strong>’s turkey huntersdeserve thanks for their contributions to wildturkey programs through data collection, letters,comments <strong>and</strong> concern for the wild turkeyresource in The Natural State.3 4 2 0 0 6 - 0 7 T U R K E Y S E A S O N S U M M A R Y


2 Natural Resources DriveLittle Rock, AR 72205c=85 m=19 y=0 k=0 c=57 m=80 y=100 k=45 c=20 m=0 y=40 k=6(800) 364-4263www.agfc.comc=15 m=29 y=33 k=0 c=100 m=0 y=91 k=42 c=30 m=0 y=5 k=0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!