02//03 <strong>Report</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>General</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> November 2002Key Performance Features for <strong>the</strong> 3 Months Ended 30 September 2002 (Unaudited)Projects <strong>from</strong> top to bottom rightSorell Causeway Bridge and ApproachesTasmania – John HollandSt Ives Gold MineWestern Australia – <strong>Leighton</strong> ContractorsEastern Harbour Crossing Housing ProjectHong Kong – <strong>Leighton</strong> Asia (Nor<strong>the</strong>rn)Goodwill BridgeQueensland – John HollandFinancial performance information $’000Revenue– group 1,292,367– joint ventures 75,001Total Revenue 1,367,368Operating profit <strong>from</strong> ordinary activities before income tax 53,785Income tax expense (16,308)Profit <strong>from</strong> ordinary activities after tax 37,477Net profit attributable to outside equity interests (2,801)Net profit attributable to members 34,676Financial position informationTotal assets 2,178,999Total liabilities 1,332,916Net assets 846,083Net tangible assets 812,757Net tangible assets per ordinary share ($) $3.00Basic earnings per share 12.9¢Number of employees 15,526Address to ShareholdersA Presentation to <strong>the</strong> 41st <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>General</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> of<strong>Leighton</strong> <strong>Holdings</strong> <strong>Limited</strong> by <strong>the</strong> Chairman Mr John Morschel
IntroductionOn behalf of <strong>the</strong> Board of directors, I am pleased to reportthat despite <strong>the</strong> very competitive operating environmentexperienced during <strong>the</strong> last year <strong>the</strong> company hassuccessfully delivered shareholders ano<strong>the</strong>r strongperformance.Financial HighlightsThe results achieved reflect a strong contribution <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>Asian operations, an improved result <strong>from</strong> our propertydevelopment activities and a solid performance across <strong>the</strong>Group’s diversified contracting activities in Australia:•Total operating revenue increased by 20 percent to arecord level of $5.2 billion.•The Group’s success in securing some large-scaleprojects such as <strong>the</strong> Parramatta Rail Link in Sydney and<strong>the</strong> Regional Fast Rail contracts in Victoria boosted workin hand at 30 June 2002 to an all-time record level of$8.4 billion - up by 7 percent on <strong>the</strong> previous year.•Our strategy of diversification by products, geography anddelivery systems continued to yield results. This diversityreduced <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> recent construction downturnin Australia and helped lift operating profit before tax by15 percent to $227 million.•Operating profit after tax increased by 8 percent to an alltimerecord level of $169 million. This increase wasachieved after making a provision of $45 million against<strong>the</strong> future investment in Nextgen Networks. The Boardconsidered this a prudent decision given <strong>the</strong> currentinstability in <strong>the</strong> telecommunications market.The Group’s balance sheet remained strong with $524 millionof net cash and shareholders’ funds 7 percent higher at$789 million.<strong>Leighton</strong>’s average return on shareholders’ funds, at22.1 percent in 2001/2002, achieved a ranking of 8th out of<strong>the</strong> top 100 companies listed on <strong>the</strong> Australian StockExchange.Australia/Pacific OperationsOur Australia/Pacific operations made a strong contribution to<strong>the</strong> Group’s performance in <strong>the</strong> past year. Profit before tax of$141 million was up by 21 percent and total revenue of$3.9 billion was 29 percent ahead of <strong>the</strong> previous year’sresult.Thiess recorded ano<strong>the</strong>r good performance in its mining andresources activities. It made a strong contribution toprofitability whilst again increasing its level of uncompletedwork in hand.<strong>Leighton</strong> Contractors performed well and continued tobroaden its skills base and engineering capabilities intocomplex process and heavy engineering work.John Holland continued to meet its recovery program targetsand made an increased contribution to Group results for <strong>the</strong>year.<strong>Leighton</strong> Properties maintained a good level of activity in itsindustrial and commercial markets along Australia’s easternseaboard and produced a satisfactory result after completing<strong>the</strong> sale of a number of development properties.Engineering and infrastructure remained <strong>the</strong> Group’s largestsource of revenue in Australia at $1.2 billion, which was up onlast year by 19 percent. Increased activity in <strong>the</strong> rail sectorboosted by major government initiated infrastructure projectsand a continuing good level of new road constructioncontracts boosted work in hand by 79 percent to $2.1 billionat year-end.Mining and resources made a strong contribution to <strong>the</strong>Group’s performance with revenue up 46 percent to$1.0 billion. Thiess, <strong>Leighton</strong> Contractors and John Hollandwere all active participants in this market sector during <strong>the</strong>year with overall work in hand levels rising by 5 percent to$2.5 billion at 30 June 2002.While Thiess maintained its leading position in <strong>the</strong> coal sector,competitive pressures are making this a tough market inwhich to win new work.Revenue <strong>from</strong> building and property activities was strongerwith revenues up 28 percent to $916 million. Uncompletedwork in hand was up 2 percent to $626 million although thisfigure has been significantly boosted by <strong>the</strong> awarding of newwork post year-end.Revenue <strong>from</strong> telecommunications was up 40 percent to$619 million last year but <strong>the</strong> level of work in hand fell by45 percent to $522 million. This reflected <strong>the</strong> good progressmade on <strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong> Nextgen fibre-optic cablenetwork, which is expected to be completed ahead ofschedule early next year.While telecommunications is a market in which <strong>the</strong> Group willmaintain a presence <strong>the</strong> lack of new capital expenditure inthis sector is constraining opportunities for new work.Revenue <strong>from</strong> environmental services remained steady at$186 million. With conditions in <strong>the</strong> waste market remainingvery competitive, work levels reduced by 9 percent to$379 million.Asian OperationsAno<strong>the</strong>r strong performance was recorded by <strong>the</strong> Group inAsia with revenue of $1.2 billion and profit before tax of$77 million. The results were down marginally on <strong>the</strong> previousyear due to <strong>the</strong> appreciation of <strong>the</strong> Australian dollar.Contract mining in Indonesia, construction in Malaysia and railwork in Hong Kong were <strong>the</strong> major contributors to <strong>the</strong> result.<strong>Leighton</strong> Asia was recently restructured into two businesshubs with <strong>the</strong> formation of <strong>Leighton</strong> Asia (Sou<strong>the</strong>rn) based inKuala Lumpur and <strong>Leighton</strong> Asia (Nor<strong>the</strong>rn) based in HongKong. This restructure will facilitate <strong>the</strong> continued expansionof <strong>the</strong> Group’s operations throughout <strong>the</strong> region.DividendDirectors were pleased to announce an increased finalordinary dividend of 26 cents per share. This dividend wasfranked to <strong>the</strong> extent of 70 percent and was paid toshareholders on 30 September 2002.When added to <strong>the</strong> interim ordinary dividend of 16 cents pershare paid in March 2002, which was also franked at70 percent, <strong>the</strong> total ordinary dividend for <strong>the</strong> year rose by8 percent to 42 cents per share. The dividend payout ratiowas 67 percent.<strong>Leighton</strong>’s objective is to provide superior total shareholderreturns and in this regard over <strong>the</strong> last 10 years <strong>the</strong> Group’stotal shareholder return has exceeded returns providedby <strong>the</strong> All Ordinaries Accumulation Index by more than300 percent.Corporate GovernanceI would like to take a few minutes to talk about corporategovernance.<strong>Leighton</strong> has long recognised <strong>the</strong> need to have in place acomprehensive corporate governance policy.Now more than ever, being ethical, acting with integrity and,above all, being accountable and transparent, are essentialingredients of any company’s business polices. For this reasonI would like to briefly outline some of <strong>the</strong> key elements of<strong>Leighton</strong>’s corporate governance practices to demonstrate <strong>the</strong>Board’s determination to ensure that appropriate and highstandards are maintained in <strong>the</strong> company.In <strong>Leighton</strong>, where people play such a fundamental role inensuring <strong>the</strong> company’s success, one of <strong>the</strong> prerequisites fora good corporate governance structure is <strong>the</strong> Board’s role insetting and communicating standards for ethical behaviour.The <strong>Leighton</strong> Board is committed to maintaining a strongethical culture throughout <strong>the</strong> Group and has had acomprehensive and realistic Code of Ethics in place since1995. As ethics is an evolving discipline <strong>the</strong> Code of Ethics isan evolving document. Individual Group operating companieshave adapted and expanded <strong>the</strong> Code of Ethics into <strong>the</strong>ir owncodes, which focus more specifically on <strong>the</strong> ethical challenges<strong>the</strong>y face. The enforcement of <strong>the</strong>se codes is overseen by aseries of ethics committees formed at both <strong>the</strong> holding andoperating company levels. Future developments to assist <strong>the</strong>Board in monitoring <strong>the</strong> Group’s ethical performance include<strong>the</strong> establishment of an ethical dimension reporting system.This is being undertaken in conjunction with <strong>the</strong> St JamesEthics Centre and will place <strong>Leighton</strong> at <strong>the</strong> leading edge ofAustralian companies in this area.It is Board policy that <strong>the</strong> Board should comprise a majority ofnon-executive directors. Currently 10 of <strong>the</strong> 12 directors on<strong>the</strong> Board are non-executive directors. Commencing <strong>from</strong>September this year it is also Board policy that all Boardcommittees dealing with corporate governance matters,except <strong>the</strong> nominations committee, are to be constituted witha majority of non-executive directors.The Board continually monitors <strong>the</strong> business environment forbest practice in corporate governance and has consistentlyimplemented new initiatives in this regard. For example,<strong>Leighton</strong> was one of <strong>the</strong> first companies in Australia toestablish an Audit Committee in 1990 to assist <strong>the</strong> Board infulfilling its responsibilities under <strong>the</strong> Corporations Act inrelation to financial reporting, risk management and internalcontrol. More recently amendments were made to <strong>the</strong> termsof reference for <strong>the</strong> Audit Committee. Membership of <strong>the</strong>Committee now comprises a majority of non-executivedirectors and <strong>the</strong> non-executive members of <strong>the</strong> Committeemeet with <strong>the</strong> external auditors on at least two occasionseach year without management in attendance.KPMG is <strong>the</strong> Group’s principal auditor and was reappointed tothat position by shareholders at last year’s <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>General</strong><strong>Meeting</strong>. KPMG’s engagement partner responsible for <strong>the</strong><strong>Leighton</strong> Group audit rotates at least every seven years with<strong>the</strong> last rotation occurring in February 2001.KPMG has confirmed to <strong>the</strong> Board that <strong>the</strong>y have maintained<strong>the</strong>ir independence throughout <strong>the</strong> financial year by enforcingstrict internal rules and policies and that <strong>the</strong>y were free <strong>from</strong>conflicts of interest when discharging <strong>the</strong>ir professionalresponsibilities as statutory auditor for <strong>the</strong> year ended30 June 2002.