Chapter 1 General Government - The California Performance Review

The California Performance ReviewGeneral Fund(dollars in thousands)Fiscal Year Savings Costs Net Savings (Costs) Change in PYs2004–05 $0 $0 $0 02005–06 $0 $0 $0 02006–07 $11,672 $11,672 $0 (233)2007–08 $11,672 $2,128 $9,544 (233)2008–09 $11,672 $0 $11,672 (233)Note: The dollars and PYs for each year in the above chart reflect the total change for that year from2003–04 expenditures, revenues and PYs.Local Funds(dollars in thousands)Fiscal Year Savings Costs Net Savings (Costs) Change in PYs2004–05 $0 $0 $0 02005–06 $0 $0 $0 02006–07 $7,781 $7,781 $0 02007–08 $7,781 $1,419 $6,362 02008–09 $7,781 $0 $7,781 0Note: The dollars and PYs for each year in the above chart reflect the total change for that year from2003–04 expenditures, revenues and PYs.Endnotes1Overview of Board of Equalization, April 15, 2004 and Franchise Tax Board (April 19, 2004).2California State Board of Equalization, “State Board of Equalization 2001–02 Annual Report” (Sacramento, California,May 2003 letter from Executive Director, Jim Speed to The Honorable Gray Davis, Governor of California).3California Franchise Tax Board, “California Franchise Tax Board—2000 Annual Report” (introduction, p. 1).4Employment Development Department, Feasibility Study Report for Document Management Refresh and Consolidation(DMRC) (February 24, 2004).5Interview with Dade Powers, Chief, Administrative Support Division, Board of Equalization (April 15, 2004); interviewwith Jennifer Sallee, Reengineer the Pipeline (RTP) Project Manager, Franchise Tax Board (April 19, 2004); interviewwith Jerry Clark, Chief, Goethe Tax Operations, Employment Development Department (April 20, 2004).A Government for the People for a Change 19