11.07.2015 Views

Chapter 1 General Government - The California Performance Review

Chapter 1 General Government - The California Performance Review

Chapter 1 General Government - The California Performance Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GG 06Increase Lottery Sales andFunding to Public Education<strong>The</strong> <strong>California</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Review</strong>Summary<strong>The</strong> state’s fiscal crisis and the public’s reluctance to increase taxes requires that the stateconsider all available sources of additional funding for our public schools. <strong>The</strong> Lottery is oneof these sources. Even though the Lottery generates about $1 billion a year for publiceducation, it ranks at the bottom of the list in per capita sales when compared to the otherlarge state lotteries in the nation. 1 This is because state laws prevent the lottery from offeringthe best lottery products.Background<strong>California</strong>’s lottery was created in 1984 when 58 percent of the electorate approvedProposition 37—<strong>The</strong> <strong>California</strong> State Lottery Act (<strong>The</strong> Lottery Act). <strong>The</strong> Lottery is the only forprofitbusiness run by the state. All of the Lottery’s funding is derived from the sale of lotterytickets, not the state <strong>General</strong> Fund. <strong>The</strong> Lottery has two basic products; computer generateddraw games like SuperLOTTO Plus and instant scratch-off games known as Scratchers ® .<strong>The</strong> lottery’s purpose is to provide supplemental funding for public education. <strong>The</strong> Lottery Actstates that the Lottery must be run in a manner that makes the most money for education. Inother words, the mandate of the voters is for the lottery to operate at maximum profitability.That mandate has yet to be fully realized.A February 2004 analysis conducted by the world’s largest provider of lottery systemsconcluded that: “<strong>The</strong> general consensus among national lottery experts is that <strong>California</strong>operates an under-producing lottery which currently grosses approximately $3 billion inannual revenues, when it should be earning twice that much or $6 billion annually.” 2Lottery sales have been flat since Fiscal Year 2000–2001. Lottery officials believe that the onlyway to bring the lottery up to its full revenue generating potential and to ensure that revenuesdo not go down, is by changing state laws that prevent the lottery from increasing prizepayouts, operating banked games and selling games with popular themes.A <strong>Government</strong> for the People for a Change 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!