- Page 2 and 3:
Prof. L MakhubuPresidentTWOWSTriest
- Page 4 and 5:
DOSIMETRIC TECHNIQUES FOR MAMMOGRAP
- Page 6 and 7:
ABSTRACTScreening of asymptomatic w
- Page 8 and 9:
materials. In current practice diam
- Page 10 and 11:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSI would like to ren
- Page 12 and 13:
CONTENTTitle page .Declaration.....
- Page 14 and 15:
Chapter 1GENERAL INTRODUCTION
- Page 16 and 17:
(Siemens, 2004). In the screening p
- Page 18 and 19:
Xeromammography and screen-film mam
- Page 20 and 21:
target produces characteristic X-ra
- Page 22 and 23:
while maximizing the focal spot-to-
- Page 24 and 25:
et al. (1996) concluded that for al
- Page 26 and 27:
An accurate knowledge of the output
- Page 28 and 29:
determine the dose (K,) to the entr
- Page 30 and 31:
equation (Tucker et aI., 1991) in o
- Page 32 and 33:
simulates the experimental setup an
- Page 34:
REFERENCESAdam W. et al. (RD42 Coll
- Page 37 and 38:
GLOBOCAN (2000). Cancer incidence,
- Page 39 and 40:
Plankskoy B. (1980). Evaluation ofd
- Page 42 and 43:
Chapter 2COMPARISON OF MAMMOGRAPHYR
- Page 44 and 45:
ut this accounts for less than 1% o
- Page 46 and 47:
calculated (Calicchia et al., 1996)
- Page 48 and 49:
current-exposure time product (tube
- Page 50 and 51:
2.2.6. Contrast measurementsFilm co
- Page 52 and 53:
values using a factor 0.873 (Wolbar
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 2.1: The HVL values of the ma
- Page 56 and 57:
Table 2.2: Comparison of ESAK and M
- Page 58 and 59:
without collimation (Figures 2.4 an
- Page 60 and 61:
100 r"--------------;:====:=:;__,I:
- Page 62 and 63:
0.45[_20rnnPMMA--G-30mnPMMAO'i _40r
- Page 64 and 65:
2.5. CONCLUSIONThe study has shown
- Page 66 and 67:
Dance D. R., Skinner C. L., and Car
- Page 68 and 69:
Wu X., Barnes G.T., and Tucker D.M.
- Page 70 and 71: ELSEVIERAvailable online at www.sci
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 3SEGMENTED MULTIFIT OF POLY
- Page 74 and 75: 2 M Assiamah et al. I Radiation Phy
- Page 76 and 77: 4.,.,M. Assiamah et af. I Radiation
- Page 78 and 79: 6 M Assiamah et al. I Radiation Phy
- Page 80 and 81: PERGAMONAvailable online at www.sci
- Page 82 and 83: M Assiamah et al: I Radiation Physi
- Page 84 and 85: M. Assiamah e! aJ. J Radiation Phys
- Page 86 and 87: aorEi!lM. Assiamah et al. I Radiati
- Page 88 and 89: M Assiamah et a/. I Radiation Physi
- Page 90 and 91: At. Assiamah et al. I Radiation Phy
- Page 92 and 93: At. Assiamah et al. I Radiation Phy
- Page 94 and 95: Chapter 5SYNTHETIC DIAMOND AS A RAD
- Page 96 and 97: The mass density ofdiamond is 3.515
- Page 98 and 99: 5.2. Selection ofexposnre geometry
- Page 100 and 101: absorption levels of both exposure
- Page 102 and 103: evolutions per minute. The polished
- Page 104 and 105: just over 1 micron. In the measurem
- Page 106 and 107: characterized by the quantum number
- Page 108 and 109: (200 A)/gold (2000 A), in an ultra
- Page 110 and 111: 5.7.1. Selection of polarizing volt
- Page 112 and 113: ~:j12010080/~"~s 60"-0~: "402040 80
- Page 114 and 115: 6055•"~-e,5045&40~0iFc 35'"3025
- Page 116 and 117: 180160140120F:j 100F40200 0 30~00 "
- Page 118 and 119: 180160140120~~100~~~c 80a 0.Beforea
- Page 122 and 123: No. Descrintion Material No. Descri
- Page 124 and 125: Figure 5.21 : Photograph of Mark UA
- Page 126 and 127: examination reduces radiation dose
- Page 128 and 129: Lightowlers E.C. and Dean P.J. (196
- Page 130 and 131: Chapter 6COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF MEA
- Page 132 and 133: (Briesmeister, 1993) and PENELOPE (
- Page 134 and 135: density functions and thus on the c
- Page 136 and 137: 6.4.1 Geometry definition fileSimul
- Page 138 and 139: construction of the probe was suppl
- Page 140 and 141: The parameters Nabs, Na and N] are
- Page 142 and 143: Table 6.1: Comparison oftotal depos
- Page 144 and 145: 6.5.1.3. Edge-on geometry versus fl
- Page 146 and 147: Table 6.4: Comparison oftotal depos
- Page 148 and 149: The results ofthe calculations have
- Page 150 and 151: shows a 2D display of the geometry
- Page 152 and 153: occurred, resulting in reduced numb
- Page 154 and 155: Table 6.8: Calculated deposited ene
- Page 156 and 157: Table 6.10: Calculated deposited en
- Page 158 and 159: Table 6.12: Calculated deposited en
- Page 160 and 161: Suggested furthermore is a method w
- Page 162 and 163: ~ "" 0 0-~"~" ;>.~1.2• Measured1.
- Page 164 and 165: Briesmeister J.F. (1993). MNCP- A g
- Page 166 and 167: Sempau J., Acosta E., Baro 1., Fema
- Page 168 and 169: Radiation doses from mammography X-
- Page 170 and 171:
Radiation dose from mammography X-r
- Page 172 and 173:
their influences. An alternative me
- Page 174 and 175:
Appendix 1APPLIED UNCERTAINTIES IN
- Page 176 and 177:
ii) Tube loading (mAs) meter accura
- Page 178 and 179:
Name:Type:Dimension:Mass:Thickness:
- Page 180:
42"" Congress and Winter School oft