Growth of the rabbitfish Siganus randalli Woodland - University of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Frequency of feedingFrequency of feeding has been reported to influence growth and conversion efficiencyfor some species (Grayton and Beamish, 1977; Charles et aI., 1984; Piper et aI., 1982), butwe found that the growth rates of juvenile S. randalli were not affected by the frequency offeeding. Carlos (1988) showed that feeding frequency , between I and 5 times per day, didnot affect the growth of juvenile bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis). The effect of feedingfrequency, the number of feedings per day, on the apparent food conversion ratio is likely tobe dependent on the rate of feeding, the amount fed per day. De Silva et al. (1986) foundthat feeding frequency did not significantly affect growth rate or feed conversion efficiency ofjuvenile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) that were fed a fixed ratio of 3% of their body weightper day; but for fish that were fed ad libitum, growth rate increased and feed conversionefficiency decreased as feeding frequency increased. Andrews and Page (1975) found thatgrowth of catfish fed at satiation levels was lower if they were fed only once per day.However, they found that feed conversion efficiency was not affected by feeding frequencyand attributed affects on growth to the effect of feeding frequency on the amount ingested perday. Feeding frequency would be more likely to influence growth if the fish were fed at orabove satiation at each feeding and if food consumption increases at higher feedingfrequencies. Additional work in developing feeding regimes for the production of juvenilesiganids and for pond grow-out is needed to define more clearly the relations between feedingrate and feeding frequency.21
FIELD GROWTH TRIALSTo allow farmers an opportunity to evaluate the growth of rabbitfish in ponds, juvenileS. randalli produced in the hatchery were provided to two commercial fish farms on Guam.Two of the ponds of Inarajan Aquaculture Enterprises (rAE) were stocked. These ponds werealso being used for culturing milkfish. One pond belonging to Liu Island farm was alsostocked. This pond was also being used for the experimental culture of grey mullet MugUcephalus. Because of mass mortalities in the culture ponds, in one case (Liu Island farm) asa result of low oxygen content and in another (IAE) as a result of a typhoon, only one of thepond growth trials was successful. The trial and its results are described below.MATERIALS AND METHODSInarajan Aquaculture Enterprise, a fish farming operation owned by Mr. George Tsai,was provided with 1400 juvenile siganids, ranging from 4.7 to 10.0 cm in standard length, onSeptember II, 1990. The fish were stocked in a pond that was being used for the culture ofmilkfish. The procedures used in the culture of milkfish on Guam have been describedpreviously (Nelson, 1990). Fishes in the ponds were fed with the commercial feed formulatedfor catfish, the same feed as that used in the tank culture trials described above. A sample of60 fish was taken the day before they were stocked in the pond. The standard length of eachfish was measured to the nearest millimeter, and each fish was weighed on an electronicbalance to the nearest 0.1 gram.The fish were harvested for transfer to another pond on December 5, 1990, and at thistime, a sample of 20 fish was collected, and the individual fish were measured and weighed.A typhoon (Typhoon Russ) in December 1990 caused severe damage to the southernarea of Guam, and all of the fish in the IAE ponds were lost. The losses included thesiganids that had been previously stocked in one pond and those that had been recentlysampled and transferred. Therefore, we were able to obtain data for only one relatively shortgrow-out period.RESULTSThe samples of fish stocked and harvested are described by the statistical summaryshown in Table 13. The fish averaged 6.09 cm in standard length and 9.46 g in weight atstocking and averaged 14.5 cm in standard length and 100.23 g in weight at harvest. The fishwere smaller at harvest than most siganids found in the markets on Guam; but, even so, theywere of marketable size, as evidenced by the fact that they were all sold from the rAE retailoutlet less than 30 minutes after they were made available to consumers. The pond owner,Mr. Tsai, commented that, in his opinion, the growth of the siganids was acceptable forcommercial production. He also noted that the siganids in the pond were smaller and less22
Page 1 and 2: Growth of the rabbitfish Siganusran
Page 3 and 4: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis work was suppo
Page 5 and 6: Figure 1. Adult of Siganus randal/i
Page 7 and 8: for the larvae. Twelve to fourteen
Page 9 and 10: TABLE 1. Generalized pattern of dev
Page 11 and 12: TABLE 2. Composition of the commerc
Page 13 and 14: groups until three tanks had been a
Page 15 and 16: TABLE 5. Mean initial and final wei
Page 17 and 18: TABLE 8. Mean initial and final sta
Page 19 and 20: TABLE 12. Calculation of apparent f
Page 21 and 22: 3.253.00.........>.0"'0~ 2.75'-'CD+
Page 23: DISCUSSIONComparison of dietsBetter
Page 27 and 28: Since, in our study, the juvenile r
Page 29 and 30: The major problems encountered in t
Page 31 and 32: LITERATURE CITEDAndrews, 1.W. and 1
Page 33: Woodland, D.J. 1983. Zoogeography o

Growth of the rabbitfish Siganus randalli Woodland - University of ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?