11.07.2015 Views

3 4 MR. QUINN: Good afternoon, Sir. Mr. John - The Tribunal of ...

3 4 MR. QUINN: Good afternoon, Sir. Mr. John - The Tribunal of ...

3 4 MR. QUINN: Good afternoon, Sir. Mr. John - The Tribunal of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2815:06:321 previous draft accounts was also included at 10842 on foot <strong>of</strong> the letter <strong>of</strong>2 October '92, isn't that right?3 A. I'm just not that familiar with the accounts to be able to comment on all <strong>of</strong>4 those individuals ones. But I think Clare probably dealt with that when she15:06:485 was here.6 Q. 165 Yes. Also included in that letter <strong>of</strong> the 15th <strong>of</strong> December '92, at 8792, was a7 schedule <strong>of</strong> ten items.8 A. That's correct.9 Q. 166 And you would be familiar with this schedule?15:06:5910 A. Not at that stage, no.11 Q. 167 Yes. Yes. And included amongst the ten items set out in that schedule were12 items No. 7, which -- sorry No. 6 which are described as follows. "Three13 amounts paid to Shefran Limited from the Riga subordinated loan on the14 following dates: 16th May '91, 25,000; 30th <strong>of</strong> May '91, 40,000; 13th <strong>of</strong> June15:07:2615 '91, 15,000. And they are the Shefran payments in '91.16 A. That's correct.17 Q. 168 And then at item No. 8 there is reference to two amounts <strong>of</strong> 10,000 pounds each18 described as "sundry" in the Riga reimbursement from the AIB No. 2 account on19 the 24th <strong>of</strong> January '92, which were apparently paid to Tom Gilmartin 20,000?15:07:4620 A. That's correct.21 Q. 169 This is information being provided by <strong>Mr</strong>. Leo Fleming to <strong>Mr</strong>. Lucey with copies22 to <strong>Mr</strong>. Gilmartin, <strong>Mr</strong>. O'Callaghan and the bank?23 A. That's correct.24 Q. 170 And it's, there are two items, items six and item eight are items included in15:08:0425 this schedule being a schedule <strong>of</strong> payments/transactions for which Deloitte &26 Touche had received no supporting documentation.27 A. Yes.28 Q. 171 And therefore until those matters were resolved obviously the accounts couldn't29 be signed <strong>of</strong>f on, isn't that right?15:08:1830 A. That would appear to be the case, yes.Premier Captioning & Realtime Limitedwww.pcr.ie Day 881

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!