3 4 MR. QUINN: Good afternoon, Sir. Mr. John - The Tribunal of ...

5015:52:351 of that. Whether that there weren't invoices and in fact I think I wrote2 subsequently in July or some time to Mr. Leo Fleming asking him what issues3 were outstanding. I think it is highly unlikely that if I was told that there4 was a problem with these or in fact if there was a problem with those that I15:52:545 would I ever written to Mr. Fleming asking him to say hopefully that he had all6 of the information. If this was the only thing holding up the accounts and7 this was something wrong, clearly I'd have got back an answer saying these were8 issues which would have highlighted it. The mere fact that I wrote the letter9 asking for the information makes it clear in my own mind that I certainly15:53:1410 didn't think that there was anything wrong nor was I told that there was11 anything wrong.1213 JUDGE FAHERTY: Sorry to interrupt, Mr. Quinn. I just want to get the14 sequence in order, Mr. Deane. I understood your letter to Mr. Fleming was15:53:3115 prior to the 3rd of May 1993?16 A. Sorry, that was my letter, Judge, asking what was outstanding.1718 JUDGE FAHERTY: Details of queries?19 A. Yes, but then if you look forward from this, after the June board meeting I15:53:4320 think I wrote in July.2122 Q. 308 MR. QUINN: 22nd of June '93, at 9786, I think there's a letter, Mr. Deane, in23 fairness to you?24 A. No sorry a subsequent one again.15:53:532526 JUDGE FAHERTY: That's what I want to find out. What date is that?27 A. There is a subsequent one i think again in July.28 Q. 309 MR. QUINN: Yes we'll find that letter, Mr. Deane.29 A. It's important because it shows that in July after the board meeting after the15:54:0730 letter of May, after the board meeting in June, that I wrote -- so I think itPremier Captioning & Realtime Limitedwww.pcr.ie Day 881