Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Y.z.DWIW/CHILD CAN BE THE UNDERLYING FELONY IN A FELONYMURDERCHARGE 124INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER PRIOR MAY NOT BE USED TOENHANCEADWITOAFELONY.. 124XXV. COLLATERALESTOPPEL/DOUBLEJEOPARDY ..124A. JUSTICE COURT FINDINGS . 124B. PROBATION REVOCATION HEARINGS . 125C. ALR HEARINGS-NO DOUBLE JEOPARDY . 1251. ALRSUSPENSIONS BASED ON BREATH TESTS . 1252. ALRSUSPENSIONS BASED ON BREATH TEST REFUSALS 125D. ALR HEARINGS: NO COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL . . . . 126E. NO DOUBLE JEOPARDY BAR TO PROSECUTING DEFENDANT FOR BOTH . . . . 1271. DWI & DWLS . 1272. DWI& FSRA 1273. FELONY DWI & INTOXICATION ASSAULT . . 1274. DWI & CHILD ENDANGERMENT 128F. OCCUPATIONAL DRIVER'S LICENSE/ALR SUSPENSIONS 128G. NO CONFLICT BETWEEN "DUI'AND"DWI'STATUTE 128H. NO CONVICTION FOR BOTH INTOXICATION ASSAULTAND AGGRAVATEDASSAULTSBI . 129I. EFFECT OF LOSING ONE BT THEORY AT FIRST TRIAL ONSUBSEQUENT TRIAL . 129J. COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL BARS INTOXICATION MANSLAUGHTERTRIAL ON DIFFERENT INTOXICANT 129K. NO DOUBLE JEOPARDY WHERE FAULTY UNDERLYING DWIPRIOR ALLEGATION DENIES COURT JURISDICTION . . 130XXVI. PUTTING DEFENDANT BEHIND THE WHEEL . . . . . 130A. DEFENDANT STATEMENTHAT HE WAS DRIVER = SUFFICIENTLYCORROBORATED 130B. SUFFICIENT CORROBORATION OF'DRIVING/OPERATING" . 131c. INSUFFICIENT CORROBORATION OF "DRIVING/OPERATING' 139D. EVIDENCE OF INTOXICATIONTIME DEFENDANT WAS DRIVING 1391. INSUFFICIENT .. 1392. SUFFTCTENT .... 140XXVII. CONDITIONS OF PROBATION. LIMITATIONS140A. STAY OUT OF BARS-CHANGE JOB = OK .140B. DEN|ALoFPRoBAT|oNDUEToLANGUAGEBARR|ER-PRoPER.'.. 140XXVIII. NO J.N.O.V. IN CRIMINAL CASES141XXIX. COURT OF APPEAL SHOULD NOT RE.WEIGH EVIDENCE . .. .. 141XXX. MISDEMEANOR APPEAL BOND CONDITIONS 141XXXI. INTERLOCK DEVICES . 142A. ASAPRE-TRIALBONDCONDITION .......142B. ASACONDITIONOFPROBATION. .......142C. AS PROOF OF PROBATION VIOLATION 142XXXII. JUDGE MAY CHANGE JURY SENTENCE OF JAIL TIME TO PROBATION . . . .. . 143x1
INhEYIt! 9Ln144TABLE OF AUTHORITIES146xl_ l_
Page 1 and 2: Driving While IntoxicatedCase Law U
Page 3 and 4: 3. TOMAKEARRESTFORDWI .......164. F
Page 5 and 6: xt.xil.xilt.c.D.E.F.G.SMELL & TASTE
Page 7 and 8: H.t.J.K.L.M.N.o.P.o.R.S.T.U.10. COM
Page 9 and 10: G.H.t.J.K.L.M.N.o.5. NOTNECESSARYTO
Page 11: J.K.L.M.N.o.P.o.R.S.T.U.V.W.X.6. JU
Page 15 and 16: fhe basis of a finding that appella
Page 17 and 18: case a/so reaffirms that a juror ma
Page 19 and 20: IV.TRAFFIC VIOLATIONSYou will often
Page 21 and 22: Eliqibilitv for Occupational Driver
Page 23 and 24: State v. Fudqe, 42 S.W.3d 226 (Tex.
Page 25 and 26: 6. ANONYMOUS TIP FROM TRUCK DRIVERG
Page 27 and 28: 1. APPLIESChilman v. State, 22 S.W.
Page 29 and 30: (b)STOPS MADE AFTER 9-01-05 = YESAr
Page 31 and 32: (c)HOT PURSUITYeaqer v. State, 104
Page 33 and 34: Curtis v. State, 209 S.W.3d 688, (T
Page 35 and 36: State v. Tarvin ,972 S.W .2d 910 (T
Page 37 and 38: was speeding. There was no evidence
Page 39 and 40: defendant made the lane change pres
Page 41 and 42: 2. NOT AN ENCOUNTERStatev. Carter,
Page 43 and 44: Sinsleton v. State.91 S.W.3d 342 (T
Page 45 and 46: 4. THE DEFENDANT'S HOMEGallups v. S
Page 47 and 48: Kalisz v. State, 32 S.W.3d718 (Tex.
Page 49 and 50: 6. FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS ARE NON-TES
Page 51 and 52: 2. POST.ARRESTMever v. State, 78 S.
Page 53 and 54: them. The Court found there was no
Page 55 and 56: alcoholic beer. Test was properly d
Page 57 and 58: C. EMPLOYMENT AND DISCIPLINARY HIST
Page 59 and 60: Hernandez v. State, 107 S.W.3d 41 (
Page 61 and 62: 2. INADMISSIBLE,'CUSTODIAL INTERROG
Page 63 and 64:
XV.FIELD SOBRIEry TESTSA. HORIZONTA
Page 65 and 66:
6. VERTICAL GFZE NYSTAGMUS/RESTING
Page 67 and 68:
C. WALK AND TURN = LAY WITNESS TEST
Page 69 and 70:
XVI. SPECIFIC ELEMENTSA. PUBLIC ROA
Page 71 and 72:
C. PROOF OF "MOTOR VEHICLE"Turner v
Page 73 and 74:
alcoholconcentrationwasworking prop
Page 75 and 76:
e some showing of a causal connecti
Page 77 and 78:
Martin v. Department of Public Safe
Page 79 and 80:
t.BREATH TEST NOT COERCED1. EXTRAWA
Page 81 and 82:
that because fhe statutory warning
Page 83 and 84:
4. REFUSAL BASED ON INTOXICATION IS
Page 85 and 86:
2. NO NEEDTO REPEATON 2NDTESTState
Page 87 and 88:
of Criminal Appeals remands back to
Page 89 and 90:
Garcia v. State, 112 S.W.3d 839 (Te
Page 91 and 92:
4. EXTRAPOLATION TESTIMONY IS ADMIS
Page 93 and 94:
Bhakta v. State, 124 S.W.3d 738 (Te
Page 95 and 96:
B. ARREST AT THE HOSPITAL1. RESTRAI
Page 97 and 98:
3. USE OF ALCOHOL SWAB BEFORE BLOOD
Page 99 and 100:
2. OBTAINING RECORDS BY SUBPOENATap
Page 101 and 102:
he and other doctors routinely reli
Page 103 and 104:
appeal is whether the implied conse
Page 105 and 106:
XIX. EXPER TESTIMONYA. STATE EXPERT
Page 107 and 108:
Moncivais v. State , 20O2WL 1445200
Page 109 and 110:
McKinnon v. State, 709 S.W.2d 805 (
Page 111 and 112:
B. ALTERNATIVE CAUSATION = NO CHARG
Page 113 and 114:
jury to convict if they found the d
Page 115 and 116:
Davis v. State, 964 S.W.2d 352 (Tex
Page 117 and 118:
M. NO MEDICAL EXCUSE INSTRUCTIONBur
Page 119 and 120:
Beaslev. State, 810 S.W.2d 838, (Te
Page 121 and 122:
could be allowed to comment on the
Page 123 and 124:
2. DPS RECORDS ALONE WITHOUT J & S
Page 125 and 126:
.2DWl PRTORS ARE ADMTSSTBLE rN GU|L
Page 127 and 128:
concerning the range of punishmentf
Page 129 and 130:
J. OPEN CONTAINER1. SUFFICIENT PROO
Page 131 and 132:
The problem here was not with the f
Page 133 and 134:
3. THE 10 YEAR RULE FOR OFFENSES FR
Page 135 and 136:
Procedure that right applies only t
Page 137 and 138:
Hollin v. State,227 S.W.3d 117 (Tex
Page 139 and 140:
D. ALR HEARINGS: NO COLLATERAL ESTO
Page 141 and 142:
4. DWI & CHILD ENDANGERMENTBaqbv v.
Page 143 and 144:
K. NO DOUBLE JEOPARDY WHERE FAULTY
Page 145 and 146:
Watson v. State, 2008 WL 5401497 (T
Page 147 and 148:
Peters v. Texas Department of Publi
Page 149 and 150:
3)4)evidence showed car had been at
Page 151 and 152:
Revnolds v. State,744S.W.2d 156 (Te
Page 153 and 154:
McCaffertv v. State, 748 S.W.2d 489
Page 155 and 156:
7)8)e)1a)11)Operate no motor vehicl
Page 157 and 158:
INDEX10 YEAR RULE 120ALRHEARTNGS ..
Page 159 and 160:
TABLE OF AUTHORITIESAbbrinq v. Stat
Page 161 and 162:
Block v. State, 1997 WL 530767 (Tex
Page 163 and 164:
Davis v. State, 964 S.W.2d 352 (Tex
Page 165 and 166:
Farmer v. State,2006 WL 3844169 (Te
Page 167 and 168:
Gomez v. State, 35 S.W.3d 746 (Tex.
Page 169 and 170:
Howardv.State,744S.W.2d640(Tex.App.
Page 171 and 172:
Leos v. State, 883 S.W.2d 209 (Tex.
Page 173 and 174:
Mulderv. State,707 S.W.2d 908 (Tex.
Page 175 and 176:
Quinnev. State, 99 S.W.3d 853 (Tex.
Page 177 and 178:
Smithv. State,65S.W.3d332 (Tex.App.
Page 179 and 180:
State v. Melendes, 877 S.W.2d 502 (
Page 181 and 182:
TexasDept. APublicSafetvv.Moore.175
Page 183:
Yokomv.State,2004WL742888(Tex.App.-
show all

Driving While Intoxicated Case Law Update - Texas District ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?