- Page 1 and 2: Driving While IntoxicatedCase Law U
- Page 3 and 4: 3. TOMAKEARRESTFORDWI .......164. F
- Page 5 and 6: xt.xil.xilt.c.D.E.F.G.SMELL & TASTE
- Page 7 and 8: H.t.J.K.L.M.N.o.P.o.R.S.T.U.10. COM
- Page 9 and 10: G.H.t.J.K.L.M.N.o.5. NOTNECESSARYTO
- Page 11 and 12: J.K.L.M.N.o.P.o.R.S.T.U.V.W.X.6. JU
- Page 13 and 14: INhEYIt! 9Ln144TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
- Page 15 and 16: fhe basis of a finding that appella
- Page 17 and 18: case a/so reaffirms that a juror ma
- Page 19: IV.TRAFFIC VIOLATIONSYou will often
- Page 23 and 24: State v. Fudqe, 42 S.W.3d 226 (Tex.
- Page 25 and 26: 6. ANONYMOUS TIP FROM TRUCK DRIVERG
- Page 27 and 28: 1. APPLIESChilman v. State, 22 S.W.
- Page 29 and 30: (b)STOPS MADE AFTER 9-01-05 = YESAr
- Page 31 and 32: (c)HOT PURSUITYeaqer v. State, 104
- Page 33 and 34: Curtis v. State, 209 S.W.3d 688, (T
- Page 35 and 36: State v. Tarvin ,972 S.W .2d 910 (T
- Page 37 and 38: was speeding. There was no evidence
- Page 39 and 40: defendant made the lane change pres
- Page 41 and 42: 2. NOT AN ENCOUNTERStatev. Carter,
- Page 43 and 44: Sinsleton v. State.91 S.W.3d 342 (T
- Page 45 and 46: 4. THE DEFENDANT'S HOMEGallups v. S
- Page 47 and 48: Kalisz v. State, 32 S.W.3d718 (Tex.
- Page 49 and 50: 6. FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS ARE NON-TES
- Page 51 and 52: 2. POST.ARRESTMever v. State, 78 S.
- Page 53 and 54: them. The Court found there was no
- Page 55 and 56: alcoholic beer. Test was properly d
- Page 57 and 58: C. EMPLOYMENT AND DISCIPLINARY HIST
- Page 59 and 60: Hernandez v. State, 107 S.W.3d 41 (
- Page 61 and 62: 2. INADMISSIBLE,'CUSTODIAL INTERROG
- Page 63 and 64: XV.FIELD SOBRIEry TESTSA. HORIZONTA
- Page 65 and 66: 6. VERTICAL GFZE NYSTAGMUS/RESTING
- Page 67 and 68: C. WALK AND TURN = LAY WITNESS TEST
- Page 69 and 70: XVI. SPECIFIC ELEMENTSA. PUBLIC ROA
- Page 71 and 72:
C. PROOF OF "MOTOR VEHICLE"Turner v
- Page 73 and 74:
alcoholconcentrationwasworking prop
- Page 75 and 76:
e some showing of a causal connecti
- Page 77 and 78:
Martin v. Department of Public Safe
- Page 79 and 80:
t.BREATH TEST NOT COERCED1. EXTRAWA
- Page 81 and 82:
that because fhe statutory warning
- Page 83 and 84:
4. REFUSAL BASED ON INTOXICATION IS
- Page 85 and 86:
2. NO NEEDTO REPEATON 2NDTESTState
- Page 87 and 88:
of Criminal Appeals remands back to
- Page 89 and 90:
Garcia v. State, 112 S.W.3d 839 (Te
- Page 91 and 92:
4. EXTRAPOLATION TESTIMONY IS ADMIS
- Page 93 and 94:
Bhakta v. State, 124 S.W.3d 738 (Te
- Page 95 and 96:
B. ARREST AT THE HOSPITAL1. RESTRAI
- Page 97 and 98:
3. USE OF ALCOHOL SWAB BEFORE BLOOD
- Page 99 and 100:
2. OBTAINING RECORDS BY SUBPOENATap
- Page 101 and 102:
he and other doctors routinely reli
- Page 103 and 104:
appeal is whether the implied conse
- Page 105 and 106:
XIX. EXPER TESTIMONYA. STATE EXPERT
- Page 107 and 108:
Moncivais v. State , 20O2WL 1445200
- Page 109 and 110:
McKinnon v. State, 709 S.W.2d 805 (
- Page 111 and 112:
B. ALTERNATIVE CAUSATION = NO CHARG
- Page 113 and 114:
jury to convict if they found the d
- Page 115 and 116:
Davis v. State, 964 S.W.2d 352 (Tex
- Page 117 and 118:
M. NO MEDICAL EXCUSE INSTRUCTIONBur
- Page 119 and 120:
Beaslev. State, 810 S.W.2d 838, (Te
- Page 121 and 122:
could be allowed to comment on the
- Page 123 and 124:
2. DPS RECORDS ALONE WITHOUT J & S
- Page 125 and 126:
.2DWl PRTORS ARE ADMTSSTBLE rN GU|L
- Page 127 and 128:
concerning the range of punishmentf
- Page 129 and 130:
J. OPEN CONTAINER1. SUFFICIENT PROO
- Page 131 and 132:
The problem here was not with the f
- Page 133 and 134:
3. THE 10 YEAR RULE FOR OFFENSES FR
- Page 135 and 136:
Procedure that right applies only t
- Page 137 and 138:
Hollin v. State,227 S.W.3d 117 (Tex
- Page 139 and 140:
D. ALR HEARINGS: NO COLLATERAL ESTO
- Page 141 and 142:
4. DWI & CHILD ENDANGERMENTBaqbv v.
- Page 143 and 144:
K. NO DOUBLE JEOPARDY WHERE FAULTY
- Page 145 and 146:
Watson v. State, 2008 WL 5401497 (T
- Page 147 and 148:
Peters v. Texas Department of Publi
- Page 149 and 150:
3)4)evidence showed car had been at
- Page 151 and 152:
Revnolds v. State,744S.W.2d 156 (Te
- Page 153 and 154:
McCaffertv v. State, 748 S.W.2d 489
- Page 155 and 156:
7)8)e)1a)11)Operate no motor vehicl
- Page 157 and 158:
INDEX10 YEAR RULE 120ALRHEARTNGS ..
- Page 159 and 160:
TABLE OF AUTHORITIESAbbrinq v. Stat
- Page 161 and 162:
Block v. State, 1997 WL 530767 (Tex
- Page 163 and 164:
Davis v. State, 964 S.W.2d 352 (Tex
- Page 165 and 166:
Farmer v. State,2006 WL 3844169 (Te
- Page 167 and 168:
Gomez v. State, 35 S.W.3d 746 (Tex.
- Page 169 and 170:
Howardv.State,744S.W.2d640(Tex.App.
- Page 171 and 172:
Leos v. State, 883 S.W.2d 209 (Tex.
- Page 173 and 174:
Mulderv. State,707 S.W.2d 908 (Tex.
- Page 175 and 176:
Quinnev. State, 99 S.W.3d 853 (Tex.
- Page 177 and 178:
Smithv. State,65S.W.3d332 (Tex.App.
- Page 179 and 180:
State v. Melendes, 877 S.W.2d 502 (
- Page 181 and 182:
TexasDept. APublicSafetvv.Moore.175
- Page 183:
Yokomv.State,2004WL742888(Tex.App.-