12.07.2015 Views

Vol 6 - Dumfriesshire & Galloway Natural History and Antiquarian ...

Vol 6 - Dumfriesshire & Galloway Natural History and Antiquarian ...

Vol 6 - Dumfriesshire & Galloway Natural History and Antiquarian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

^le camp is British. This is obvious for the following reasons •Transactions. 3915 to 16 feet wide. On the south-west it again deepens, <strong>and</strong> hereIt measures 14 feet, <strong>and</strong> so it continues to the south, where italtogether disappears.of It,The second fosse, or rather what remainscommences at the north-east, being fairly marked on the sidenext the ditch, <strong>and</strong> reaching an extreme elevation of 8 feet <strong>and</strong>sweeps to the north-west. At the west it is, however, barelytraceable. But on the south-west aspect it again becomes markedespecially towards the ditch, <strong>and</strong> finally it ends at the south.This outer rampart is fast disappearing under the plough, <strong>and</strong> in afew years I fear no trace of it will remain. The gateway throughthis rampart, as shewn on the ordnance survey, has disappearexlbut was situated about 70 feet north of the inner gateway. Thegreatest diameter of what remains of the camp is 370 feet. Thisruns from the south-west to the ,north-east. The ramparts areconstructed of large loose stones, on which there is neither themark of chisel nor trace of mortar. These boulders are coveredwith earth, dressed into a military shape.Having thus describedthe position, measurements, appearance, <strong>and</strong> construction of thecamp, I pass to a consideration of its origin. Beyond all doubtFirst. It IS circular. The fortresses of the ancient Britons arealways found to consist of concentric circles of stones, whereasthose of the Romans are invariably square. Hill Burton insistson tiie sameness of Roman camps in all parts of the world (p 73of <strong>History</strong> of Scotl<strong>and</strong>), <strong>and</strong> says that inconstruction they evince" an extremity of immutability." And both he <strong>and</strong> Chalmers use" circular <strong>and</strong> British " <strong>and</strong> " square <strong>and</strong> Roman " as synonymousterms. Second. The ramparts are not of Roman constructionAccoi^ing to Chalmers (Caledonia <strong>Vol</strong>. I, p. 25) the ramparts ofLritish forts " were composed of dry stones <strong>and</strong> earth, witliout anyappearance of mortar or cement."Maclagan deals largely on thisbut in a more extended form. This is the construction of "thelines" at Wood Castle. Third. The gateways through thedifferent ramparts in a British strength are placed in a zi-za-"Tf "°* ' ^^.t ^' "' ^"°'*'" "" ^^'^ '^''^''^y «PP««ite each otheit-Pjde Hill Burton, p. 84-86, <strong>Vol</strong>. I. Fourth. The ancientBritons often chose lakes for fortresses. Now the position ofW ood Castle is very peculiar. At the time of its construction itmust have been a peninsular stronghold. On the soutli-cast is theMill Loch, on the south-west the Upper Loch, an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!