A new BMC strategyFive Drivers to SuccessWhat does the BMC do?What is it purpose?What does it use to judge its success?Where do I fit in?How can this be communicated insideand outside the organisation?These are some of the questions thathave been asked over the years of theBMC and they are questions thecommittee have asked over recentmonths. It has been decided there is aneed to simply state what we do, whywe do it and how we measure what weare doing. It is easy to makeassumptions about what we do andshould do, both for those inside theorganisation and outside. It is alsoconsidered important that the club hasa point of reference, so that whoevercomes and goes, there is always someconsistency about what we should bedoing. We have therefore embarked ondrawing up a strategy to guide ouractivities over the coming years.What’s in it?We have established ‘Five Drivers’ thatwill form the framework for our strategy.Underneath these comes the detail andin essence the important bit. We arehalfway working through this detail andover the next six months we hope tocomplete this and publish the completedocument in the next BMC News.Your views?Have a look at the Drivers below andlet us know what you think. Also if youget time, you can view the strategy inmore detail atwww.britishmilersclub.com. Againviews on this are welcome. The BMCprides itself on being a members club –serving their interests, so please docomment.Email your comments todavidreader@britishmilersclub.comBMC Strategy & Focus – Five Drivers to SuccessOBJECTIVE:To raise the standard of middlerunning in BritainDRIVER 1:DRIVER 2:DRIVER 3:DRIVER 4:DRIVER 5:Provide tailoredcompetitionSupport and educatecoachesSustain and developactivities of the BMCby providing soundfinancial planningand controlTo provide a series ofopportunities fordeveloping athletesTo conduct aneffectivecommunicationprogrammeHOW WILL WE DO THIS?WHAT WILL BE SUCCESS IN2008 AND BEYOND?WHO WILL LEAD?28 BMC News : <strong>Autumn</strong> <strong>2007</strong>
OsakaWomen’s 800All three girls, Jenny Meadows (2:00.14), Jenny Simpson(2:00.47) and Marilyn Okoro (2:01.79) qualified in secondplace in their opening heats. (Temp 31oC and humidity65%). Note that all three were close to their personal bests.Next day they faced the second round (semi-finals) in thesame temp but somewhat easier humidity, 54%. In the firstsemi Jenny Simpson found the opposition electric with threefinding personal bests and one a seasons best…all ahead ofher! Her 2:00.48 only good enough for sixth. In the secondrace Marilyn found a 1:59.63 for fourth place but even thisPB wqs not enough! Lastly Jenny Meadows drew the frontrunning Jepkosgei so it was “hold on to your hats”! 26.71then 56.54……Jenny dug deep for a PB of 1:59.39 but itwas only for fifth place. Not surprisingly the two fastestlosers were in this race. A 1:58.62 did not go through(firstsemi).Women’s 1500Both <strong>British</strong> girls moved from the opening heats with someease, being clear of other qualifiers who were some distancebehind them. Abby Westley found her semi perplexing. Thefirst lap was 74.07 and she found herself last. Sheconfessed in a post race interview that she did not knowwhat to do! But she plugged on to run 4:16.21 which wouldhave been a PB at the start of the season but here servedonly good enough for eighth. Lisa Dobriskey , in her semi,ran within a couple of seconds of her season’s best but therace was run much faster and she found herself tenth andout with 4:08.39.There can be no criticism of any, whilst probably ourstrongest event , the girls did all that could be asked ofthem. The next step must be , hopefully, to clock regular1:58’s so that when its needed a sub 1:58 can be dug out.Men’s 800Michael Rimmer in 29oC and 71% humidity ran close to hisbest time in a heat led at 51.08 to gain second place in1:45.6. Two days later (27oC.63%h) he found himself liningup in semi-final three. With only two fastest losers to gothrough it was therefore possible that four men couldprogress. The opening laps of the other races were 50.33and 51.57 with winning times of 1:44.54 and 1:44.92respectively. At this point 1:45.35 would be needed to getthrough outside the first two. As he toed the line he was , on<strong>2007</strong> times, the sixth fastest of the eight. Would they as agroup emulate the fast start and between them go for thefour finalist places open to them, an advantage to being inthe last race. Sadly no, Michael went off hard but he wasalone and he found himself some distance ahead of the field.Going through the bell in 51.42 he was matching the otherraces but ultimately the effort of running solo proved toomuch and he was reined in to finish sixth in 1:47.39.A brave effort, he has now climbed half way up the ladderand we must hope he can mount the next several rungs nextyear.Men’s 1500Andrew Baddeley ran in the second, and fastest, heat.Qualifying comfortably in fifth place with 3:39.60. The finalhad greater pace, an opening lap of 58.63 was followed byan 800 metre time of 1:58.08, not sensational and itallowed all to keep within ten metres or so of each other.The bell rung at 2:41.51, our man was toward the rear ofthe field at 1200 metres, reached by the leader in 2:55.21,as all upped the pace. He was able to close to ninth spot,just 1.18 behind the winner , running in my view the last400 at least as fast as the winner and possibly faster.Creditable but he has shown, through the season that moreis possible.BMC News : <strong>Autumn</strong> <strong>2007</strong> 29