The census and the historical demographerPeter Doorn‘The census tells us who we are and where we are going as a nation’, the United States CensusBureau tells us, and: “A census tells us not only about our past, but it can help us prepare forour future”. 1 Both statements make it clear why censuses are such an interesting source fordemographic and socio-economic research. If the current census tells us where we are going,past censuses tell us where we once thought we were going. Or, as the American census putsit: “So, how do we know about our nation? To better understand where we came from, let’stake a look back at what America was like during the first census.”Historical demographers can use such old censuses to ‘predict the past’. They andsocio-economic historians were the main target groups we had in mind when we started aproject back in 1996 to digitize the Dutch historical censuses from the first national one in 1795till the last traditional census held in our country in 1971. In 1981 and 1991, no census washeld in the Netherlands, mainly because <strong>of</strong> a (feared) lack <strong>of</strong> cooperation by the population.And from 2001 onwards, Statistics Netherlands (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, CBS)organised virtual censuses based on linked <strong>of</strong>ficial registrations, with added information froma number <strong>of</strong> surveys. 2 Also in the early years there were gaps in the sequence <strong>of</strong> censuses.Since 1830 about every ten years a census was published; the Second World War causeda disruption and irregular census years (1947, 1956). It must be mentioned here, that theoriginal counting forms <strong>of</strong> the Dutch censuses have regrettably not been preserved. Only for1960 and 1971 we can avail <strong>of</strong> anonymized micro-level census information. For these yearsthe computer files have been preserved, be it that the 1960 files are not entirely complete. 3The census is indeed a basic source <strong>of</strong> information about the state <strong>of</strong> the nation, and as suchit seems to have great value for historical demographic research. Although it is a rich datasource, it also clearly has its limitations. Over his career, it seems that <strong>Frans</strong> <strong>van</strong> <strong>Poppel</strong> hasgradually moved away from using censuses as a prime source in favour <strong>of</strong> other sources forhis research. Other sources that are (1) longitudinal and (2) individual, in particular supplyinginformation on the changing position <strong>of</strong> the individual in the household, and on his or herhealth (and eventual death).1Explanation on the website <strong>of</strong> the US Census Bureau <strong>of</strong> what a census is good for. See: http://www.census.gov/2Eric Schulte Nordholt, Marijke Hartgers and Rita Gircour (eds. 2004), The Dutch Virtual Census <strong>of</strong> 2001: Analysis andMethodology (Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/Heerlen), p. 276.3About 300,000 records are missing; for an extensive report see: Michelle <strong>van</strong> den Berk and Peter Doorn (2007), ‘Eendigitale detective story: de reconstructie <strong>van</strong> de Nederlandse Volkstelling <strong>van</strong> 1960’, in: Twee eeuwen Nederlandgeteld: onderzoek met de digitale Volks- Beroeps- en Woningtellingen 1795-2001, ed. by O.W.A. Boonstra et al. (DenHaag, 2007) pp. 471-487. An English version <strong>of</strong> this paper ‘Reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the digital Dutch Populations Census <strong>of</strong>1960’ is available on http://www.volkstellingen.nl/en/documentatie/1960/index.html28
Early in his career, <strong>Frans</strong> was co-author <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the eighteen monographs published on thebasis <strong>of</strong> the 1971 census. 4 This monograph focused on nuptiality patterns in the Netherlands,starting with an extensive historical analysis, based on the censuses since 1889. Of course thetables were not yet available in digital form at that time, so I assume that <strong>Frans</strong> had to key inthe data he needed from the published census books himself. Of the last population censuses(1960 and 1971, and also <strong>of</strong> the economic censuses since the 1930 s as well), more detailedinformation than ever published survived, which is available in original hand-written form ontransparencies in the CBS archives, <strong>of</strong> which a copy was made for use in the CBS library. 5 Inthe past few years, many <strong>of</strong> these fragile originals have been scanned, and part <strong>of</strong> the tableshave also been transcribed as tables and are now available online. 6The Dutch census <strong>of</strong> 1899 was one <strong>of</strong> the most extensively published censuses, and it wasthe first census that became available in the form <strong>of</strong> about 10,000 pages <strong>of</strong> digital tablesin 1999. 7 It was only natural to invite <strong>Frans</strong> as one <strong>of</strong> the authors <strong>of</strong> a volume <strong>of</strong> articlesthat was produced on the occasion. 8 In his contribution, <strong>Frans</strong> describes how the Dutchpopulation developed from 5.1 million in 1899 to 16 million a century later. But already thenit is apparent that the census was in itself not rich enough for him, and that he used a variety<strong>of</strong> other sources as well, ranging from annual reports <strong>of</strong> the Central Statistical Committee tomortality tables and genealogical data.A few years later, in 2006, we managed to publish the tables <strong>of</strong> the remaining census yearsonline. A symposium organised on that occasion brought together a substantial group<strong>of</strong> specialists, both from Statistics Netherlands and from the academic community <strong>of</strong>socio-economic historians and historical demographers. The ultimate aim was to producea second book <strong>of</strong> papers on two centuries <strong>of</strong> the Netherlands in numbers. Of course, <strong>Frans</strong>was also invited. Although we tried to seduce him to collaborate in almost heart-breakingways, he politely declined. He only could contribute if he were allowed to base himself onthe population register, without using any census data at all. 9 Here the breach between thedemographer and the census was complete.4Frinking, G.A.B. and <strong>Poppel</strong>, F.W.A. <strong>van</strong>, Een sociaal-demografische analyse <strong>van</strong> de huwelijkssluiting in Nederland1979 VT Monografie no. 6.5Several years ago <strong>Frans</strong> confided me that he had a number <strong>of</strong> these originals in his <strong>of</strong>fice at <strong>NIDI</strong>. I can only hope thathe has returned them since then, and if not, may his retirement be a good occasion for returning them to the CBS6The handwritten materials <strong>of</strong> the censuses <strong>of</strong> 1947, 1956 and 1960 have been scanned; the labour force census <strong>of</strong> 1947is also available as spreadsheets. See: https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/ui/datasets/id/easy-dataset:43969 or urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-ggb-xtr7The original 1999 website is accessible at http://www.volkstelling1899.nl/; this was later updated as http://www.volkstellingen.nl/nl/volkstelling/jaarview/1899/index.html; the information is archived at https://easy.dans.knaw.nl/ui/datasets/id/easy-dataset:38770 or urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-988-0dq8<strong>Frans</strong> <strong>van</strong> <strong>Poppel</strong> (2001), ‘Van vijf naar 16 miljoen. De groei <strong>van</strong> de Nederlandse bevolking in de afgelopen eeuw’, in:J.G.S.J. <strong>van</strong> Maarseveen en P.K. Doorn (eds.), Nederland een eeuw geleden geteld. Een terugblik op de samenlevingrond 1900 (IISG, Amsterdam), pp. 65-87.9E-mail correspondence between Jacques <strong>van</strong> Maarseveen, Luuk Schreven, René <strong>van</strong> Horik and <strong>Frans</strong> <strong>van</strong> <strong>Poppel</strong>,November 2006.29
- Page 2 and 3:
- Page 4 and 5: Publication:Nederlands Interdiscipl
- Page 6: Religious and socio-economic determ
- Page 10 and 11: 8IntroductionOn 27 December 2012 Fr
- Page 13: Part IScope and Impact
- Page 17: of further aspects of marriage, div
- Page 20 and 21: ever-changing societal and normativ
- Page 22 and 23: supposed ‘quality-quantity trade-
- Page 24 and 25: The impact of a historical demograp
- Page 26 and 27: and theoretical contributions, but
- Page 29: Part IIData and Methods
- Page 34 and 35: 32Sex ratios in global historical p
- Page 36 and 37: appeared early, as in some southern
- Page 38 and 39: available on female labour in India
- Page 40 and 41: Kurosu, Satomi (1994), Sex ratios a
- Page 42 and 43: adjustments and reactions are the s
- Page 44: the extent of fertility recuperatio
- Page 47 and 48: 25 Years of collaboration: The Hist
- Page 49 and 50: Since 1995 numerous volunteers have
- Page 51 and 52: Part IIIFertility and Nuptiality
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 1. GDP per capita, unemploym
- Page 55 and 56: while the GDP continued to grow som
- Page 57 and 58: Map 1. Communities covered by the C
- Page 59 and 60: Above all, our empirical study demo
- Page 61 and 62: The proportion of consanguineous ma
- Page 63 and 64: Earlier studies have shown that par
- Page 65 and 66: Verzuiling (‘pillarisation’), o
- Page 67: The crumbling of the Roman Catholic
- Page 70 and 71: In the 1970 s , exemption from serv
- Page 72 and 73: DataTo examine this issue, I use da
- Page 74 and 75: ConclusionThese results confirm the
- Page 76 and 77: confirmed for one dependent variabl
- Page 78 and 79: ReferencesBlau, Peter M. and Otis D
- Page 80 and 81:
78Origins of the ‘western Europea
- Page 82 and 83:
ReferencesGoldberg, P.J.P. (1992),
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 1. Fertility, mortality, and
- Page 86 and 87:
century Nakahara. 1 Nevertheless, i
- Page 88 and 89:
86Are we getting sick of low income
- Page 91 and 92:
Neither alone nor neglected:The eld
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 3. Percentage widowers cores
- Page 95 and 96:
Spouse n.i. n.i. n.i.absent 0,50 1
- Page 97 and 98:
Childbearing and longevity - the co
- Page 100 and 101:
98Excess mortality during the Dutch
- Page 102 and 103:
Table 1. Available vital statistics
- Page 104 and 105:
Mededeelingenvan het bureauvoor sta
- Page 106 and 107:
gender, and in selected age groups
- Page 108 and 109:
Divergence of life expectancy and t
- Page 110 and 111:
a. MenTable 1. Variation in life ex
- Page 112 and 113:
absolute terms current disparities
- Page 114 and 115:
ReferencesLeon, D.A., V.M. Shkolnik
- Page 116 and 117:
climate change and secondly, that t
- Page 118 and 119:
Browning, Christopher R., Danielle
- Page 120 and 121:
populations where life expectancy a
- Page 122 and 123:
120Demographic systems and populati
- Page 125 and 126:
The impact of the 1911 heat wave on
- Page 127 and 128:
in the effect of heat on mortality.
- Page 129 and 130:
ReferencesCapellmann, Carl (1877),
- Page 131 and 132:
Biography of the authorsGeorge Alte
- Page 133 and 134:
Jan Kok (1959) studied social histo
- Page 135 and 136:
His thesis, published in 1997 as AA