12.07.2015 Views

Promoting the Benefits of social Housing - The Irish Council for ...

Promoting the Benefits of social Housing - The Irish Council for ...

Promoting the Benefits of social Housing - The Irish Council for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Editorial:Could private sector slowdown provide an opportunity <strong>for</strong> <strong>social</strong> housing?Indications are that private residential construction is slowing down based on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> starts and planning permissionsgranted. <strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, this surplus capacity should now be transferred to boost <strong>the</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> <strong>social</strong> housing in <strong>the</strong> new NationalDevelopment Plan (NDP) and in turn meet <strong>the</strong> targets agreed by <strong>the</strong> Social Partners in <strong>the</strong> national agreement Towards 2016.In addition to delivering new <strong>social</strong> rented homes, transferring surplus capacity will ensure better value <strong>for</strong> money in <strong>the</strong> statefunding <strong>of</strong> <strong>social</strong> housing as well as providing a ‘s<strong>of</strong>ter’ landing in <strong>the</strong> residential construction sector. While private housingoutput hit record levels in <strong>the</strong> last NDP, <strong>social</strong> housing output always struggled to creep above 10%. Providing <strong>social</strong> housingthrough housing associations and local authorities has both <strong>the</strong> obvious <strong>social</strong> benefits in addressing housing need but also asignificant economic benefit <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Irish</strong> economy.Service Indicators in Local Authorities 2006In January 2004, a system <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal per<strong>for</strong>mancemeasurement across 42 indicators was implementedthroughout <strong>the</strong> local authority system. This meant thatper<strong>for</strong>mance results <strong>for</strong> each local authority could becompiled and published in a report to <strong>the</strong> Minister <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>Environment, Heritage and Local Government in 2005. <strong>The</strong>results were verified by an independent assessment panel.This is a first in <strong>Irish</strong> public service.<strong>The</strong> third report was published in July 2007 by <strong>the</strong> LocalGovernment Management Services Board (LGMSB) andcontains <strong>the</strong> results <strong>for</strong> each indicator <strong>for</strong> 2006, <strong>the</strong> reportalso compares results at a national level <strong>for</strong> 2004 to 2006. Asummary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main findings is presented below.Total number <strong>of</strong> dwellings <strong>of</strong> local authority stock in managementYearNo <strong>of</strong> Dwellings2004 111,4572005 113,6882006 115,386Current Status <strong>of</strong> Local Authority Social <strong>Housing</strong> Stock<strong>The</strong> national total <strong>of</strong> all local authorities has increased by3.5% in two years. Across all local authorities 5,265 (4.6%)<strong>of</strong> dwellings are empty compared with 3.9% <strong>of</strong> all dwellingsin 2004. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se empty dwellings are those subjectto major refurbishment schemes which will increase <strong>the</strong>quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> housing stock. <strong>The</strong> figures also show a smallimprovement in <strong>the</strong> average time taken to re-let dwellingsfrom 4 weeks in 2004 to 3.8 weeks in 2006. <strong>The</strong>re is also anincrease <strong>of</strong> 3% in <strong>the</strong> average number <strong>of</strong> repairs completedin 2006 relative to 2004. In 2006 <strong>the</strong> average percentage <strong>of</strong>repairs completed was 87.8% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> valid repairrequests received.Average time (days) to in<strong>for</strong>mapplicants <strong>of</strong>: 2004 2006Shared Ownership 14 8.7<strong>Housing</strong> Loan 15 8Local Authority <strong>Housing</strong> 28 29.5Dealing with Applications <strong>for</strong> Social <strong>Housing</strong><strong>The</strong> average times taken to in<strong>for</strong>m applicants has marginallyimproved since 2004, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> time takento in<strong>for</strong>m applicants <strong>of</strong> local authority housing, as can beseen from <strong>the</strong> table below.It is clear from <strong>the</strong>se results that <strong>the</strong> assessment andverification processes vary greatly, moreso in <strong>the</strong> averagetime to in<strong>for</strong>m applicants <strong>of</strong> local authority housing. InFingal County <strong>Council</strong>, <strong>the</strong> average is reported as 270 dayswith <strong>the</strong> explanation that <strong>the</strong>re was a significant increasein <strong>the</strong> housing list in 2006. <strong>The</strong> average time is nowreported as down now to 28 days. Galway County <strong>Council</strong>and Kerry County <strong>Council</strong> reported on average 104.9 and121.3 days respectively.Per<strong>for</strong>mance Management <strong>for</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> AssociationsEnsuring that proper standards continue to be achievedis also a key objective <strong>for</strong> voluntary housing associations.<strong>The</strong> ICSH undertook a two phased pilot project known asHAPM – <strong>Housing</strong> Association Per<strong>for</strong>mance Managementto assist in developing a framework <strong>for</strong> measuringper<strong>for</strong>mance in housing management <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector.<strong>The</strong> main areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> framework that member housingassociations agreed to measure included <strong>the</strong> followinghousing management functions:• Rent Control• Allocations / Lettings• Vacancies / Voids• Repairs & Maintenance• Landlord / Tenant Relations• Customer Service<strong>The</strong> ICSH are currently examining <strong>the</strong> roll out <strong>of</strong> a refinedHAPM framework comprising <strong>of</strong> 10 Key Per<strong>for</strong>manceIndicators <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector. <strong>The</strong>se KPIs are based on thoseelements <strong>of</strong> housing management that are <strong>of</strong> interestto both tenants and o<strong>the</strong>r stakeholders and that provide<strong>the</strong> most appropriate in<strong>for</strong>mation on how well <strong>the</strong>housing service is managed. It is anticipated that, in time,per<strong>for</strong>mance results <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> voluntary sector can alsobe reported on an ongoing basis. <strong>The</strong> objective at somestage would be to gain some comparison on housingmanagement outcomes between local authorities andhousing associations.ICSH Social <strong>Housing</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!