12.07.2015 Views

Oxford Falls Regional Crown Reserve Plan of Management - Land

Oxford Falls Regional Crown Reserve Plan of Management - Land

Oxford Falls Regional Crown Reserve Plan of Management - Land

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong><strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>DRAFT for Public ExhibitionPrepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> & Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityJuly 2010LJ2800/R2554


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityCardno (NSW/ACT) Pty LtdABN 95 001 145 035Level 3, 910 Pacific HighwayGordon NSW 2072AustraliaTelephone: 02 9496 7700Facsimile: 02 9499 3902International: +61 2 9496 7700sydney@cardno.com.auwww.cardno.com.auDocument ControlVersion Status Date Author Reviewer1Preliminary Draft(Working Paper)21 August 20092 Final Draft 20 July 2010Tanja Mackenzie &Shani ArcherShani Archer &Tanja MackenzieTJM &SCASCA&TJMKester Boardman &Louise CollierRay RiceIKB &LCCRAR"© 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd All Rights <strong>Reserve</strong>d. Copyright in the whole and every part <strong>of</strong> thisdocument belongs to Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproducedin whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person without the prior written consent <strong>of</strong>Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd.”20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page iH:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityExecutive SummaryThe <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> (RCR) system was established so that individual parcels <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> landcould be aggregated into a larger network <strong>of</strong> reserves for planning and management purposes. Itprovides a holistic approach to the management <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> lands on a regional basis and facilitates abalance between the competing needs <strong>of</strong> public enjoyment and use <strong>of</strong> the reserve, and the need forenvironmental protection.The <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> (OFRCR) was established by the <strong>Land</strong> and Property<strong>Management</strong> Authority (LPMA) within this context (R1012168, gazetted 25/08/06), for the publicpurposes <strong>of</strong> access and public requirements, rural services, tourism purposes and environmental andheritage conservation. The OFRCR is located within the Warringah Local Government Area (LGA)and consists <strong>of</strong> various parcels <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> located at Beacon Hill, <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>, Belrose, Inglesideand Cromer, covering an area <strong>of</strong> around 520 ha (Figure 1.1).An audit <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Reserve</strong> lands (Section 4, summarised in Section 5.1) has identified that the OFRCRretains high value and significance as a regional resource for:Environmental protection and biodiversity conservation,Catchment protection and water quality,<strong>Land</strong>scape character and visual amenity,Indigenous and non-Indigenous cultural heritage, andRecreational usage by a wide range <strong>of</strong> user groups.The key issue identified in the OFRCR <strong>Management</strong> Strategy (DoL, 2006) was the fragmented andpiecemeal approach to management <strong>of</strong> the land parcels making up the reserve. This piecemealapproach failed to provide a coordinated regional perspective to the delivery <strong>of</strong> social and economicbenefits for the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> region (DoL, 2006). This plan <strong>of</strong> management seeks to address theseissues via the establishment <strong>of</strong> a new management model for the <strong>Reserve</strong> lands and development <strong>of</strong>a strategy for managing future initiatives (Section 6.4).The proposed management model (Section 6.2) is a joint Trust arrangement between WarringahCouncil and Min Corp, that provides significant strategic and operational benefits. The managementstrategy involves an annual review <strong>of</strong> works undertaken and forward planning <strong>of</strong> activities for thecoming year through selection <strong>of</strong> management actions via a consultation and prioritisation process.This plan <strong>of</strong> management has been developed for the OFRCR in accordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong>Clause 112 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Act 1989. The <strong>Plan</strong> was developed in consultation with a SteeringCommittee (comprising Council, LPMA and DECCW) and a Consultative Committee (comprisingrepresentatives <strong>of</strong> community-based organisations).It is recommended that the Minister for <strong>Land</strong>s adopt the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Management</strong> and that a joint Trust incorporating Warringah Council and Min Corp be established toimplement the <strong>Plan</strong>.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page iiH:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityTable <strong>of</strong> ContentsExecutive Summary .............................................................................................................................. iiGlossary and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... ix1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 11.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 11.2 Requirements for the Preparation <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> ................................................. 11.3 Area to Which the <strong>Plan</strong> Applies ............................................................................................... 21.4 Context <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong> .................................................................................................................. 21.4.1 The <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Land</strong> Assessment ....................................... 21.4.2 The <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Strategy ................................ 31.5 Objectives <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong> ............................................................................................................. 41.6 Scope <strong>of</strong> Works ....................................................................................................................... 41.7 Document Structure ................................................................................................................ 52 Consultation .................................................................................................................................. 62.1 Steering Committee ................................................................................................................ 62.2 Consultative Committee .......................................................................................................... 62.3 Wider Stakeholder and Community Consultation ................................................................... 63 Legislative Environment and Policy ......................................................................................... 173.1 <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Act 1989 .......................................................................................................... 173.2 Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ning Instruments .................................................................................... 173.2.1 Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Assessment Act 1979 ..................................................... 173.2.2 Warringah Local Environment <strong>Plan</strong>............................................................................... 183.2.3 Warringah Development Control <strong>Plan</strong>........................................................................... 233.2.4 State Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ning Policies ......................................................................... 243.3 Other Relevant Legislation .................................................................................................... 253.3.1 Local Government Act 1993 .......................................................................................... 253.3.2 Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Rights Act 1983 ................................................................................... 253.3.3 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 ............................................................................ 253.3.4 Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 ................................................................ 263.3.5 Native Vegetation Act 2003 ........................................................................................... 2620 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page iiiH:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority3.3.6 Heritage Act 1977.......................................................................................................... 263.3.7 Other Relevant State Legislation .................................................................................. 273.4 Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ............ 283.5 Related Policies and <strong>Plan</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> ......................................................................... 293.5.1 Related Policies............................................................................................................. 293.5.2 Related <strong>Plan</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> ...................................................................................... 324 Description <strong>of</strong> the Study Area .................................................................................................... 344.1 <strong>Land</strong> Tenure .......................................................................................................................... 344.2 Topography, Geology and Soils ............................................................................................ 434.2.1 Topography ................................................................................................................... 434.2.2 Soils ............................................................................................................................... 434.2.3 Geology ......................................................................................................................... 444.3 Hydrology, Hydraulics and Flooding ..................................................................................... 454.3.1 Hydrology and Hydraulics ............................................................................................. 454.3.2 Flooding ......................................................................................................................... 464.4 Ecological Processes ............................................................................................................ 464.4.1 Flora .............................................................................................................................. 464.4.2 Fauna ............................................................................................................................ 494.5 Bushfire Risk ......................................................................................................................... 504.6 Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................................... 514.6.1 Aboriginal Heritage ........................................................................................................ 514.6.2 Non-Indigenous Heritage .............................................................................................. 514.7 <strong>Land</strong> Usage ........................................................................................................................... 524.7.1 Existing Recreational Amenity and Access ................................................................... 524.7.2 Future Recreational Demands ...................................................................................... 554.7.3 Visitation and Tourism ................................................................................................... 564.7.4 Commercial Operators .................................................................................................. 574.8 Visual Amenity and <strong>Land</strong>scape Character ............................................................................ 584.9 Existing Infrastructure and Assets......................................................................................... 584.10 Rapid Spatial Assessment .................................................................................................... 5920 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page ivH:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority4.10.1 Limitations ..................................................................................................................... 604.10.2 Environmentally Sensitive <strong>Land</strong>s .................................................................................. 614.10.3 Less Environmentally Sensitive <strong>Land</strong>s.......................................................................... 615 <strong>Management</strong> Study ..................................................................................................................... 625.1 Values and Significance ........................................................................................................ 625.1.1 Catchment Protection .................................................................................................... 625.1.2 Environmental Protection – Flora and Fauna ............................................................... 635.1.3 Visual Character ............................................................................................................ 645.1.4 Cultural and Recreational Values .................................................................................. 645.1.5 Summary <strong>of</strong> Values ....................................................................................................... 645.2 Existing <strong>Management</strong> Model ................................................................................................. 665.3 <strong>Management</strong> Issues .............................................................................................................. 685.4 <strong>Management</strong> Goals ............................................................................................................... 765.5 <strong>Management</strong> Options ............................................................................................................ 776 The <strong>Plan</strong> ....................................................................................................................................... 786.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 786.2 Proposed <strong>Management</strong> Model .............................................................................................. 786.3 <strong>Management</strong> Actions ............................................................................................................ 796.4 Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation .......................................................................... 806.4.1 Implementation Strategy ............................................................................................... 806.4.2 Decision Support Tools ................................................................................................. 817 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 858 References ................................................................................................................................... 8620 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page vH:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityList <strong>of</strong> TablesTable 3.1: <strong>Land</strong> Use Localities for the Study Area ............................................................................... 18Table 3.2: Draft LEP <strong>Land</strong> Use Zonings for the Study Area ................................................................. 20Table 3.3: Definitions under Warringah Draft LEP ................................................................................ 22Table 3.4: Relevant State Legislation ................................................................................................... 27Table 3.5: Relevant Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> Policies .......................................................... 29Table 3.6: Relevant State Policies ........................................................................................................ 30Table 4.1: Summary <strong>of</strong> Tenures for OFRCR <strong>Land</strong>s ............................................................................. 36Table 4.2: Soil Erosion Hazard <strong>of</strong> Mapping Areas (After: DoL, 2005) .................................................. 44Table 4.3: Classification <strong>of</strong> Creeks Located in Close Proximity to the OFRCR (After: MontgomeryWatson Harza, 2002) ............................................................................................................................ 45Table 4.4: Site Drainage and Creek Catchments for Mapping Areas (After: DoL, 2005) ..................... 46Table 4.5: Vegetation Communities and Threatened Flora Species and Communities within theOFRCR (After: Smith and Smith, 2002, and DoL, 2005) ...................................................................... 48Table 4.6: Bushfire Classification <strong>of</strong> Mapping Areas (After: DoL, 2005) .............................................. 50Table 4.7: Primary <strong>Land</strong>-Based Recreational Activities Undertaken in and around the OFRCR (AfterDoL, 2005)............................................................................................................................................. 53Table 4.8: Examples <strong>of</strong> Primary Recreational Locations and Associated Activities within and aroundthe OFRCR............................................................................................................................................ 56Table 4.9: Commercial Tenures within the OFRCR (After DoL, 2005) ................................................. 57Table 4.10: Summary <strong>of</strong> Attributes used in Rapid Spatial Assessment ............................................... 59Table 5.1: Significance and Values <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR and Surrounding Areas ........................................ 64Table 5.2: <strong>Management</strong> Issues Identified for the OFRCR .................................................................... 69Table 5.3: <strong>Management</strong> Goals .............................................................................................................. 76Table 6.1: Precinct Statements ............................................................................................................. 8320 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page viH:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityList <strong>of</strong> FiguresFigure 1.1Figure 1.2Figure 1.3Figure 3.1Figure 3.2Figure 3.3Figure 4.1Figure 4.2Figure 4.3Figure 4.4Figure 4.5Figure 4.6Figure 4.7Figure 4.8Figure 4.9Figure 4.10Figure 4.11Figure 5.1Figure 5.2Figure 5.3Figure 6.1Figure 6.2Study AreaMapping AreasPreferred <strong>Land</strong> Use<strong>Land</strong> Use ZoningPublic Open SpaceProposed <strong>Land</strong> Use ZoningTenureTopographySlopeSoilsAcid Sulfate SoilsGeologyFlood ExtentsThreatened Flora and FaunaBushfire Prone <strong>Land</strong><strong>Land</strong> Currently used for RecreationRapid Spatial AssessmentCurrent <strong>Management</strong> Model [embedded in report]Current <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Distribution <strong>of</strong> IncomeProposed <strong>Management</strong> Model [embedded in report]<strong>Management</strong> Precincts20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page viiH:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityAppendicesAppendix AAppendix BAppendix CAppendix DAppendix EAppendix FAppendix G<strong>Land</strong> Parcels SummaryStakeholder Consultation ResponsesSite Investigations PhotologRapid Spatial Assessment Results<strong>Management</strong> OptionsEconomic Assessment<strong>Management</strong> Actions20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page viiiH:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityGlossary and AbbreviationsAmenityThose features <strong>of</strong> an area that foster its use for variouspurposes.AnthropogenicRelated to human activities.AHIMSAboriginal Heritage Information <strong>Management</strong> SystemAHOAboriginal Heritage OfficeARIAverage Recurrence IntervalASSAcid Sulfate Soil(s)BiotaLiving organisms.BirdAny bird that is native to, or is <strong>of</strong> a species that periodically oroccasionally migrates to Australia, and includes the eggs andthe young there<strong>of</strong> and the skin, feathers or any other part.CAMBAChina-Australia Migratory Bird AgreementCatchmentThe area draining to a site. This always relates to a particularlocation and may include the catchments <strong>of</strong> tributary streamsas well as the main stream.CGCCromer Golf ClubCL Act <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Act 1989DCPDevelopment Control <strong>Plan</strong>DECC (now DECCW)Department <strong>of</strong> Environment and Climate ChangeDECCW (formerly DECC)Department <strong>of</strong> Environment, Climate Change and Water(incorporating NPWS and EPA)DEWHACommonwealth Department <strong>of</strong> Environment, Water, Heritageand the Arts.DIIDepartment <strong>of</strong> Industry and InvestmentDoL (now LPMA)Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>sDoPDepartment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning (Previously DIPNR)DPDeposited <strong>Plan</strong>DPIDepartment <strong>of</strong> Primary Industries (now Department <strong>of</strong> Industryand Investment)Ecosystem A community <strong>of</strong> living organisms, together with theenvironment in which they live and with which they interact.EP&A Act Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Assessment Act, 1979EECEndangered Ecological Community under the ThreatenedSpecies Conservation Act, 1995EPAEnvironment Protection AuthorityEPBC ActEnvironmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act,1999.EpiphyticA plant that grows on another plant, but does not derive anynourishment from it.EutrophicationThe over-enrichment <strong>of</strong> a water body with nutrients, leading tothe excessive growth <strong>of</strong> plants and plankton and the depletion<strong>of</strong> oxygen.FaunaAny mammal, bird, reptile, amphibian or fish.FishAll or any <strong>of</strong> the varieties <strong>of</strong> marine, estuarine or freshwaterfishes (whether indigenous or not) and their young, fry andspawn and unless contrary intention be expressly stated, or thecontext otherwise requires, includes crustacea, oysters and allmarine, estuarine and freshwater animal life.FM Act Fisheries <strong>Management</strong> Act 199420 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page ixH:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityFoNLFriends <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen LagoonGISGeographical Information SystemHabitatThe places in which an organism or community lives.IEMAInstitute <strong>of</strong> Environmental <strong>Management</strong> and Assessment(United Kingdom)InvertebrateAnimal without a backbone or notochord.JAMBAJapan-Australia Migratory Bird AgreementLALCLocal Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> CouncilLEPLocal Environment <strong>Plan</strong>LG Act Local Government Act, 1993LGALocal Government AreaLPMA (formerly DoL)<strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityMSLMean Sea LevelMWKCManly Warringah Kayak ClubNBARCNorthern Beaches Anti-Roadkill CommitteeNBENorthern Beaches EnvirolinkNoBMoBNorthern Beaches Mountain Biking GroupNPANational Parks AssociationNPWSNational Parks and Wildlife Service (part <strong>of</strong> DECCW)NSWNew South WalesNSWISNSW Institute <strong>of</strong> SportOFRCR<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>PASSPotential Acid Sulfate SoilsPoEO Act Protection <strong>of</strong> Environment Operations Act, 1997PoM<strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>RCR<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>ReptileA snake, lizard, crocodile, tortoise, turtle or other member <strong>of</strong>the class reptilian (whether native, introduced or imported), andincludes the eggs and the young there<strong>of</strong> and the skin or anyother part there<strong>of</strong>.RFSNSW Rural Fire ServiceRiparian VegetationVegetation growing along banks <strong>of</strong> rivers.Run<strong>of</strong>fThat proportion <strong>of</strong> rainfall that drains <strong>of</strong>f the lands surface.SedimentationThe act or process <strong>of</strong> depositing sediment, especially bymechanical means <strong>of</strong> matter suspended in a liquid.SEPPState Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ning Policy.SewageRefuse liquids or waste matter carried <strong>of</strong>f by sewers.Threatened Flora/FaunaProtected fauna <strong>of</strong> a species under Schedule 1 or 2 <strong>of</strong> theThreatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 or underSchedules 4 and 5 <strong>of</strong> the Fisheries <strong>Management</strong> Act, 1994.SMCMASydney Metropolitan Catchment <strong>Management</strong> AuthoritySMWSSydney Metropolitan Wildlife ServicesTidesThe regular rise and fall <strong>of</strong> the sea level in response to thegravitational attraction between the sun, moon and Earth.TSC Act Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995VertebrateAnimal with a backbone or notochord.WIRESNSW Wildlife Information Rescue Education Service20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page xH:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority1 IntroductionThe NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority (formerly the NSW Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s (DoL)engaged Cardno to prepare this plan <strong>of</strong> management (PoM). The PoM applies to the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong><strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>, being <strong>Crown</strong> land (R1012168, gazetted 25/08/06), which is made up <strong>of</strong> anumber <strong>of</strong> individual parcels summing to a total <strong>of</strong> approximately 520ha <strong>of</strong> land.1.1 Background<strong>Crown</strong> land is land vested in the <strong>Crown</strong> and managed by the NSW LPMA under the <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s(CL) Act 1989. Under the CL Act 1989 <strong>Crown</strong> lands may be:Held under tenure (lease, licence or permit) for public purposes;Community managed reserves;<strong>Reserve</strong>d for environmental purposes;<strong>Crown</strong> public roads; orManaged reserved lands.The LPMA’s land management philosophy directly relates to the principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> landmanagement as defined under the CL Act 1989. They are:That environment protection principles be observed in relation to the management andadministration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land;That the natural resources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land (including water, soil, flora, fauna and scenicquality) be conserved wherever possible;That public use and enjoyment <strong>of</strong> appropriate <strong>Crown</strong> land be encouraged;That, where appropriate, multiple uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land be encouraged;That, where appropriate, <strong>Crown</strong> land be managed and used in such a way that both the landand its resources are sustained in perpetuity; andThat <strong>Crown</strong> land be occupied, used, sold, leased, licensed or otherwise dealt with in the bestinterests <strong>of</strong> the State consistent with the above principles.Further detail on the principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land management under the <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Act 1989 isprovided in Section 3.1.The <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> (RCR) system was established so that individual parcels <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> landcould be aggregated into a larger network <strong>of</strong> reserves for planning and management purposes.RCRs ensure that <strong>Crown</strong> land management remains relevant to modern needs and continues to fulfilthe LPMA’s commitment to ensuring that <strong>Crown</strong> land is managed for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the people <strong>of</strong> NSW(S.10 CL Act 1989). The establishment <strong>of</strong> RCRs does not revoke existing reservations under the CLAct 1989.The RCR system provides a holistic approach to the management <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> lands on a regional basisand facilitates a balance between the competing needs <strong>of</strong> public enjoyment and use <strong>of</strong> the reserve,and the need for environmental protection.1.2 Requirements for the Preparation <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>A plan <strong>of</strong> management is the document which defines the values, uses, management practices andintent to implement the broad public purpose for which the land has been reserved or dedicated.Under Clause 112 <strong>of</strong> the CL Act 1989, the Minister may cause a draft plan <strong>of</strong> management to beprepared for a reserve. Additionally, a reserve trust may, with the consent <strong>of</strong> the Minister, prepare a20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 1H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authorityplan <strong>of</strong> management when it deems it appropriate. The document will remain a draft plan <strong>of</strong>management until adopted by the Minister for <strong>Land</strong>s under S.114 <strong>of</strong> the Act. This is the legislativecontext <strong>of</strong> the preparation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> RCR PoM.A PoM must be undertaken in accordance with the relevant provisions in the CL Act, as summarisedbelow (DoL, 2007):Direction to prepare PoM issued by the Minister (S.112);Brief for PoM is prepared;Draft PoM is prepared;Draft PoM is exhibited to the public for at least 28 days as directed by the Minister (S.113);Amendments to draft PoM, if necessary; andMinister adopts PoM, amends draft then adopts PoM, or takes no action (S.114).1.3 Area to Which the <strong>Plan</strong> AppliesThe <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> (OFRCR) was formed as R1012168 for the public purpose<strong>of</strong> access and public requirements, rural services, tourism purposes and environmental and heritageconservation.The OFRCR is located within the Warringah Local Government Area (LGA) and consists <strong>of</strong> variousparcels <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> located at Beacon Hill, <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>, Belrose, Ingleside and Cromer. It coversan area <strong>of</strong> around 520 ha, and is bounded by Forest Way to the west, Warringah Road to the south,South Creek to the east and Garigal National Park to the North. The reserve is located within theNarrabeen Lagoon catchment.The study area is shown in Figure 1.1. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this PoM, each land parcel within theOFRCR have been numbered individually. These identification numbers can be found in Figure 1.1.The correlation <strong>of</strong> this identification system with Lot and DP numbers for each land parcel can befound in Appendix A. Details relating to the management and tenure <strong>of</strong> the individual lots can alsobe found in Appendix A.It is noted that, subsequent to gazettal <strong>of</strong> R1012168, ownership <strong>of</strong> some parcels <strong>of</strong> land has beentransferred to private individuals/organisations (e.g. Metropolitan Local Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Council) andtherefore these land parcels no longer form part <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR.1.4 Context <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong>This section provides some context for the plan <strong>of</strong> management by identifying and discussing studiespreviously undertaken for the OFRCR.1.4.1 The <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Land</strong> AssessmentA <strong>Land</strong> Assessment was undertaken by DoL in 2005 in accordance with Part 3 <strong>of</strong> the CL Act 1989.The <strong>Land</strong> Assessment process aims to provide the physical, environmental and social data necessaryto make decisions about the allocation and management <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land.In the draft document, 469ha <strong>of</strong> land was considered and the OFRCR was broken down into sixmanagement units, based on suitable future land use. Each <strong>of</strong> these units was assessed individuallyon an attributes basis, with respect to the capability <strong>of</strong> these management units to sustain differenttypes <strong>of</strong> development. For example, Mapping Area 1 was determined to be suitable for environmentalprotection and recreational purposes due to its high nature and heritage conservation significance andhigh to very high catchment protection significance. In contrast, Mapping Area 5 had low suitability20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 2H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authoritywith respect to environmental protection and recreational values, and was identified as a location forpotential development.The final OFRCR land assessment considered only 464ha <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR and did not include anadditional 56ha <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land that had more recently been incorporated into the reserve. In addition,following public exhibition <strong>of</strong> the draft land assessment document, extensive changes to theboundaries <strong>of</strong> the six mapping areas were required, which resulted in the consolidation <strong>of</strong> the sixmapping areas into three. While the final land assessment document was not amended throughout,recommended suitable uses were identified for these three areas, as follows:Mapping Area 1 – Suitable for environmental protection and low intensity recreation (naturalor semi-natural). Not suitable for urban development;Mapping Area 2 – Suitable for environmental protection and recreation (natural), with low tomoderate suitability for urban development; andMapping Area 3 – Suitable for environmental protection and recreation (semi-natural; subjectto addressing environmental constraints), with low to moderate suitability for urbandevelopment.These three mapping areas are shown in Figure 1.2. The mapping area numbers and preferred landuse for each individual land parcel are also identified in Appendix A.Based on this assessment, the DoL (now LPMA) determined the preferred land use for all the landparcels making up the OFRCR. The preferred land use for all land parcels coloured green (“GreenAreas”) in Figure 1.3 was for environmental protection / community purposes, while the preferredland use for all land parcels coloured orange (“Orange Areas”) in the same figure was for furtherinvestigation with respect to consideration <strong>of</strong> disposal (i.e. sale <strong>of</strong> the land).It is noted that, subsequent to the preparation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Land</strong> Assessment (DoL, 2005), four land parcelswere transferred to the Metropolitan Local Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Council (LALC). These four land parcelsare shown in Figures 1.2 and 1.3 for completeness, because they formed part <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR at thetime the <strong>Land</strong> Assessment was undertaken. However, they no longer form part <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR andare therefore omitted from Figure 1.1.1.4.2 The <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Management</strong> StrategyIn August 2006, a <strong>Management</strong> Strategy for the OFRCR was published by DoL (2006). Thisdocument established the broad principles by which the reserve should be managed into the future,namely for the public purposes <strong>of</strong> public access and public requirements, tourism, and environmentaland heritage conservation.The key issue identified in the report was the fragmented and piecemeal approach to management <strong>of</strong>the land parcels making up the reserve. This piecemeal approach failed to provide a coordinatedregional approach in the delivery <strong>of</strong> social and economic benefits for the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> region (DoL,2006). This PoM seeks to address this issue.The desired outcomes <strong>of</strong> the management process identified in the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> RCR <strong>Management</strong>Strategy (DoL, 2006) are:Environmental protection <strong>of</strong> some 75% <strong>of</strong> the lands in the reserve;Where appropriate, development in the remaining areas <strong>of</strong> the reserve, which minimisescumulative impacts;<strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR in the public interest;<strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR in the regional context; and20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 3H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityProvision <strong>of</strong> a reserve framework that provides broad-scale benefits to the region, while alsoserving local communities.1.5 Objectives <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong>As identified within the LPMA’s brief, the overarching objectives for this PoM are to:Identify the values <strong>of</strong> the reserve to the local and broader community;Identify ways to rationalise reserve management regimes and provide a more integrated andregional focus for management;Assess and provide an inventory <strong>of</strong> significant natural features located within the RCR,including, but not limited to, threatened flora and fauna species, ecological endangeredcommunities, significant vegetation types, heritage items and Aboriginal sites;Identify any environmentally sensitive lands within the RCR that are suitable forenvironmental protection, in addition to those already identified through the managementstrategy and land assessment process;Identify the most appropriate land use, management and allocation options for <strong>Crown</strong> landswithin the OFRCR; andTo assist with the implementation <strong>of</strong> the reserve’s purpose, being access and publicrequirements, tourism purposes, and environmental and heritage conservation.1.6 Scope <strong>of</strong> WorksThe original scope <strong>of</strong> works for the development <strong>of</strong> this PoM was broken down into four tasks, assummarised below. During the engagement some changes to the original scope <strong>of</strong> works wererequired following consultation with the LPMA and these have been identified where relevant.Task 1 – Project InceptionInception meeting – the methodology and project management was confirmed by the SteeringCommittee; andSite inspection – to gain an appreciation <strong>of</strong> the study area including infrastructure,recreational uses, significant landscape features and any key heritage or ecological featuresassociated with the OFRCR.Task 2 – Data Collation and ReviewCollation and review <strong>of</strong> available data and reports – undertaken for the purposes <strong>of</strong> identifyingthe existing management framework and regulatory context <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR, as well as keyfeatures (such as current and proposed land use, land tenure, significant natural andinfrastructure features and lands subject to natural hazards); andIntegration <strong>of</strong> mapping in GIS – undertaken to integrate the available information and confirmthe findings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Land</strong> Assessment (DoL, 2005).Task 3 – <strong>Management</strong> StudyStakeholder consultation – a number <strong>of</strong> key stakeholders were contacted to assist in theidentification <strong>of</strong> management issues in the OFRCR (Section 2.3).Identification <strong>of</strong> values, management issues, goals and objectives – a comprehensive list <strong>of</strong>management issues was identified based on the outcomes <strong>of</strong> Tasks 1 and 2 (Section 5);Options development – management options were developed to address the managementissues identified; andOptions assessment - the options were assessed in terms <strong>of</strong> their compatibility with themanagement goals for the OFRCR (Section 6);20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 4H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority Economic assessment - originally, an economic assessment <strong>of</strong> a limited number <strong>of</strong> keyoptions was proposed. However, the scope <strong>of</strong> works was subsequently modified to consist <strong>of</strong>a brief economic assessment <strong>of</strong> the revenue streams and expenditures associated with<strong>Reserve</strong> lands under the current management structure.Task 4 – The <strong>Plan</strong><strong>Management</strong> strategy – The original scope <strong>of</strong> works proposed development <strong>of</strong> a managementstrategy comprising those options that ranked highly in the options assessment. However,during the consultation process with Council and the LPMA it was determined to translate thefull list <strong>of</strong> options into actions as part <strong>of</strong> the PoM. Details <strong>of</strong> the future management structure<strong>of</strong> the OFRCR are identified;Monitoring and evaluation – a framework for monitoring and evaluation <strong>of</strong> the success <strong>of</strong>implementation was proposed for inclusion in the PoM. In consultation with Council and theLPMA, it has now been determined that monitoring and evaluation will take place through anannual reporting function and as a consequence no specific guidance has been provided inthe <strong>Plan</strong>.1.7 Document StructureThis document has the following structure: Consultation – Section 2; Legislative Environment and Policy – Section 3; Description <strong>of</strong> the Study Area – Section 4; <strong>Management</strong> Study – Section 5; The <strong>Plan</strong> – Section 6; and Conclusion – Section 7.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 5H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority2 ConsultationIn accordance with the scope <strong>of</strong> works (Section 1.6), key stakeholders and communityrepresentatives have been consulted to obtain input to inform the development <strong>of</strong> this plan <strong>of</strong>management. Sections 2.1-2.3 detail the consultation activities undertaken.2.1 Steering CommitteeThe LPMA established a Steering Committee for this PoM to guide the strategic direction <strong>of</strong> the plan.The Committee included representatives from the LPMA and Warringah Council, as well as DECCW.The function <strong>of</strong> the Steering Committee was to provide direct input and technical review <strong>of</strong> the PoM.As previously discussed, this has resulted in modification to the original scope <strong>of</strong> works, with detailsprovided where relevant.2.2 Consultative CommitteeA Consultative Committee comprising a limited number <strong>of</strong> stakeholders was also established with aview to providing some direct feedback on the <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>. Those stakeholder organisationsthat accepted an invitation to sit on the Consultative Committee included:Warringah's Friends <strong>of</strong> the Bush;Friends <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon; andNorthern Beaches Envirolink.2.3 Wider Stakeholder and Community ConsultationConsultation with relevant stakeholders and community groups was initiated via letter to gain a widerunderstanding <strong>of</strong> management issues within the OFRCR. The following stakeholders were contacted:Aboriginal Heritage Office;Coastal Environment Centre, Narrabeen;Cromer Golf Club;Department <strong>of</strong> Environment and Climate Change (now DECCW);Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning;Department <strong>of</strong> Primary Industries (Fisheries) (now DII);Department <strong>of</strong> Water and Energy (water portion now DECCW);Friends <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon;Garigal District Scout Groups;Guringai Aboriginal Tribal Association;Manly-Warringah Kayak Club;Manly-Warringah Mountain Bike Club;Metropolitan Local Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Council;Narrabeen Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce;National Parks Association <strong>of</strong> NSW;Northern Beaches Envirolink;Northern Beaches Mountain Biking Group;Northern Beaches Roadkill Prevention Committee;NPWS Northern Beaches Area;NSW Rural Fire Service;<strong>Plan</strong>ning Assessment Commission;Sydney Metropolitan Catchment <strong>Management</strong> Authority;Sydney Metropolitan Wildlife Services;20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 6H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityThe Heritage Branch, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning;The Sydney Academy <strong>of</strong> Sport and Recreation;Warringah Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce;Warringah Council;Warringah Radio Control Society Incorporated;Warringah's Friends <strong>of</strong> the Bush; andNSW Wildlife Information Rescue Education Service (WIRES).Out <strong>of</strong> these 30 stakeholders, 16 responded to a request by letter for written input during the initialstages <strong>of</strong> the preparation <strong>of</strong> the plan <strong>of</strong> management.A summary <strong>of</strong> responses received can be found in Table 2.1, whilst full stakeholder responses can befound in Appendix B.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 7H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityTable 2.1: Summary <strong>of</strong> Received Stakeholder ResponsesNo. Organisation Contact Summary <strong>of</strong> ResponseThe Aboriginal Heritage Office (AHO) can see the potential benefits in a POM for the OFRCRand noted that:1Aboriginal HeritageOfficeDavid Watts› There are recorded Aboriginal sites within the <strong>Reserve</strong> and there is a high potential thatunrecorded sites exist within the area;› The listing or mapping <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal heritage items should be carefully considered;› Aboriginal sites are protected by law (National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974) and siteinformation and locations are subject to restricted access.Cromer Golf Club Association made the following comments:› Exotic weed growth is a problem on the eastern side <strong>of</strong> South Creek, particularly at the corner<strong>of</strong> Toronto Ave and South Creek Rd;2Cromer Golf ClubAssociationRod Davies› Public access to the walking track (that is adjacent to the Golf Club) is via the wall <strong>of</strong> a weirwhich presents a hazard to the public, particularly children. Access from the other direction isvia the Sports Academy which has a “no-entry” sign thereby restricting public access;› The Club is mindful <strong>of</strong> public safety (e.g. being hit with golf balls) and has signs in place tohelp reduce risk. The Club has recommended to Council that the public be provided with awalking track on the eastern side <strong>of</strong> South Creek (rather than on the golf course side) as itwould reduce the risk <strong>of</strong> the public being hit with golf balls over a 250 metre stretch <strong>of</strong> land.DoP advised that the POM should address the following:› The heritage significance <strong>of</strong> the area;3Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning(Heritage Branch)Vincent Sciari› Various heritage items that are listed:› On the State Heritage Register;› With the National Trust <strong>of</strong> Australia;› Under the EPBC Act 1999;› Under Warringah Council’s LEP; and› On the Register <strong>of</strong> the National Estate.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 8H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo. Organisation Contact Summary <strong>of</strong> ResponseDoP (Heritage (Cont.)Both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal heritage items should be addressed, as well as the potentialfor archaeological resources to be uncovered.DoP (Heritage Branch) also noted that the subject area is in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> a major project listedunder Part 3A <strong>of</strong> the EP&A Act, for a Seniors Living Resort on <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Road, andreferenced the comments provided for that proposal in 2006.NSW DPI (Fisheries) recommended that the OFRCR POM should:› Acknowledge the value <strong>of</strong> the largely undeveloped, vegetated area <strong>of</strong> land within thecatchment <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon;› Seek to maintain and improve the value <strong>of</strong> the land, consistent with re-vegetation activities byCouncil, especially in riparian areas;› Seek to avoid any negative impacts <strong>of</strong> the management <strong>of</strong> land on water quality andenvironmental condition <strong>of</strong> waterways within the <strong>Reserve</strong>.NSW DPI (Fisheries) also noted that:4Department <strong>of</strong> PrimaryIndustries (Fisheries)(now DII)Carla Ganassin &Marcel Green› They would be interested in having representation <strong>of</strong> any sub-committees established underthe new <strong>Reserve</strong> Trust model developed for the OFRCR;› Narrabeen Lagoon, Middle Creek and South Creek are considered by NSW DPI to be KeyFish Habitat;› Fish and macroinvertebrates should be included in any investigations undertaken within theOFRCR;› DPI has a preference for <strong>of</strong>f-line sediment basin rather than online systems;› Developments within riparian zones will need to be assessed by NSW DPI and under theFisheries <strong>Management</strong> Act 1994; and› Any proposed waterway crossings are designed to mitigate impacts on fish passage andconsultation <strong>of</strong> the following documents (available online) is recommended:› Policy and Guidelines for Fish Friendly Waterway Crossings (NSW DPI, 1999); and› Why Do Fish Need to Cross the Road? Fish Passage Requirements for WaterwayCrossings (Fairfull and Witheridge, 2003).20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 9H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo. Organisation Contact Summary <strong>of</strong> ResponseFriends <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon provided the following comments:› The RCR forms an important part <strong>of</strong> the bushland in this catchment by providing crucial linksfor wildlife and seed dispersion as well as containing valuable Aboriginal heritage;› In planning for climate change and sustainability, protecting and maintaining linkages <strong>of</strong>natural heritage becomes very important;5Friends <strong>of</strong> NarrabeenLagoonFriends <strong>of</strong> NarrabeenLagoon (Cont.)Tony Carr and JudithBennett› Friends <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon are interested in investigating the feasibility <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Regional</strong> Parkin the catchment <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon that may perhaps incorporate other lands in addition tothe lands currently gazetted within the OFRCR.Points from the POM subcommittee meeting that was held 12 November 2007:› Documents <strong>of</strong> relevance were suggested, such as:› <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> (R1012168) <strong>Management</strong> Strategy (DoL, 2006)› Draft Assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> at Belrose, Cromer and <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> (DoL 2003);› Final Assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> at Belrose, Cromer and <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> (DoL, 2005);› Warringah <strong>Regional</strong> Multiple-Use Trail Strategy (Warringah Council, 2007).› The provision <strong>of</strong> clear, easily interpreted maps <strong>of</strong> land tenure and land parcels is crucial;› Values and Issues were presented (same as in Northern Beaches Envirolink section – RowNo. 10 in this Table);› The Dee Why Valley & South Creek Corridor <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> is also referenced.The Manly Warringah Kayak Club is concerned that development <strong>of</strong> the RCR will impact on thedepth <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon, the quality <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f and sediment entering the lagoon andsurrounding creeks and any development or encroachments on the foreshores.6Manly Warringah KayakClubGe<strong>of</strong>f Horsnell› Silting has occurred in many areas including Mactier St, Wakehurst Parkway and in the areasfronting the Sydney Academy <strong>of</strong> Sport and Recreation;› Any development in the RCR should include plans to catch silt before it enters the lagoon(such as through the use <strong>of</strong> run-<strong>of</strong>f traps) and plans to remove existing silt from within thelagoon.The Manly Warringah Kayak Club also submitted a document that had been prepared for theproposed dredging <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 10H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo. Organisation Contact Summary <strong>of</strong> ResponseThe Society highlighted the main issues in the area as being:7Manly-Warringah RadioControl SocietyColin Simpson› Access; and› Silt.These issues are interrelated since crushed sandstone is used for maintenance <strong>of</strong> the accesswaywhich consequently causes silting up <strong>of</strong> areas nearby. Some other previous issues, suchas control <strong>of</strong> weeds (e.g. pampas grass etc.) and re-vegetation from the former state <strong>of</strong> site(which used to be a quarry) have already been dealt with and fixed.The National Parks Association (NPA) provided the following comments:The NPA owns a portion <strong>of</strong> land in Wheeler Creek Valley (under a company called NaturalAreas Ltd) which is managed as a flora and fauna reserve and shares boundaries on two sideswith OFRCR land.8National ParksAssociationAndrew Cox and JudithBennett› Wheeler Creek Valley has particularly high ecological diversity. The Minister for theEnvironment has signed a Voluntary Conservation Agreement with Natural Areas Ltd for thisland, and as such, NPA is <strong>of</strong> the position that the surrounding land should therefore also beconserved and protected;› Five lots <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> were to be sold for development in April 2005, however MinisterDebus and Minster Kelly intervened and the properties were taken <strong>of</strong>f the market (NPAsubsequently agreed to the sale <strong>of</strong> two lots <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> within the residential zoning onMaybrook Ave).› It is the position <strong>of</strong> NPA that as many parcels as possible <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> adjacent to GarigalNational Park be transferred to the Park.NPA also made reference to a detailed submission to DoL for the Assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>between Belrose and Cromer which included recommendations for land contained within theOFRCR.9Northern Beaches Anti-Roadkill CommitteeJacqui MarlowThe Northern Beaches Anti-Roadkill Committee is <strong>of</strong> the position that development <strong>of</strong> the RCRwould fragment it by causing a loss <strong>of</strong> habitat by construction and fragmentation by roads andprovided the following comments:› The Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment provides connectivity from the Sydney Harbour Catchmentto the Hawkesbury River Catchment;› If RCR land was developed for housing, other major landholders (such as the MetropolitanAboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Council and the Catholic Church) would also be likely to develop their lands,20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 11H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo. Organisation Contact Summary <strong>of</strong> Responseresulting in more fragmentation;Northern Beaches Anti-Roadkill Committee(Cont.)› The Northern Beaches Anti Roadkill Committee have been monitoring the roadkill alongWakehurst Parkway since 2004 and have recorded threatened species being killed (e.g.Rosenbergs Goanna, Grey-Headed Flying Fox and Osprey) as well as a huge number <strong>of</strong> nonthreatenedspecies;› It is crucial that a systematic biodiversity survey for the Narrabeen Lagoon Catchment beundertaken since the only areas that have had a repeated scientific study are the MiddleCreek and Deep Creek catchments;› Studies have suggested that the area is already losing local fauna populations and that localextinctions may be in the pipeline since species that were common in the 1992 fauna survey(Taronga Zoo Fauna Survey Team,1992) were absent in the Smith and Smith (2005a) Surveyfor Warringah Council;› The OFRCR contains old-growth native bush and represents a large carbon sink. To developit would turn the area from a carbon sink to a carbon emitter and make a negative contributionto our society's attempt to reduce CO 2 emissions.The Northern Beaches Envirolink recommended that the following issues be addressed by theOFRCR POM:Northern BeachesEnvirolinkRichard Michell› Ensuring connections between bush areas;› Managing weeds and exotic plants both terrestrial and aquatic;› Ecologically managing fire;10› Controlling erosion;› Controlling the levels <strong>of</strong> light and noise;› Managing recreation – numbers <strong>of</strong> visitors, levels <strong>of</strong> impact;› Regulating trail bike and mountain bike adventure activities;› Setting aside areas for adventure sports;› Protecting diverse soil types upon which ecosystems depend;› Protecting landform from destruction;› Ensuring maintenance <strong>of</strong> scenic amenity;20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 12H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo. Organisation Contact Summary <strong>of</strong> Response11Northern BeachesEnvirolink (Cont.)Northern BeachesMountain Biking Group(NobMob)Robin Rainton› Limiting impacts from tops <strong>of</strong> catchment – managing each catchment;› Managing leaseholder activities and impacts;› Preventing “death by 1,000 cuts” - ensuring a sustainable management <strong>of</strong> bushland;› Regulating horse riding to reduce ho<strong>of</strong> damage and nutrient-rich droppings;› Controlling access to bushland;› Providing clear signage regarding non-permissible uses <strong>of</strong> the bush and tracks;› Ensuring Morgan Road and Wakehurst Parkway do not become major through-roads (this isto reduce levels <strong>of</strong> roadkill <strong>of</strong> wildlife); and› Upgrading the levels <strong>of</strong> protection against roadkill.The Northern Beaches Mountain Biking Group provided the following comments:The recreational riders represented by the NoBMoB community are concerned that recent trailclosures, residential development approvals and changing land management attitudes arelimiting access to existing trails and encouraging the proliferation <strong>of</strong> un<strong>of</strong>ficial trail building in thearea.› Somewhere in the order <strong>of</strong> 10,000 mountain bike users appear to be accessing existing trailsin the Northern Beaches area;› The NoBMoB community would like to work with the relevant land managers to develop a trulysustainable trail network and management strategy for the site to provide equitablerecreational access that respects the natural and Aboriginal heritage value <strong>of</strong> the area;› Compared to other cities in Australia and New Zealand, Sydney has deficient supply <strong>of</strong> readilyaccessible trails;› <strong>Land</strong> that was previously used for cross country races in the 1990s (and by recreational ridersuntil early 2008) has now wholly become part <strong>of</strong> Garigal National Park following a shift in legalboundaries;› The last <strong>of</strong>ficial racing in the area concluded around 2002 due to pressure on land ownersfrom environmental groups and a lack <strong>of</strong> co-operation from other local user groups;› The downhill area is still very popular for after work training and weekend recreational ridersbut is now under threat because it is understood that (whilst the council and local residentshave objected) a developer has gained Part 3A approval to develop this land;20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 13H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo. Organisation Contact Summary <strong>of</strong> Response› There are vast economic benefits associated with mountain bike riding (e.g. employment atbike shops, patronage at local cafes, bakeries and other establishments), and social benefits(e.g. increased fitness and weight-loss, increased youth participation, increased mentalhealth, increased social networking, decreased alcohol consumption and decreased stresslevels); andNorthern BeachesMountain Biking Group(Cont.)› Potential economic benefits in the future could include revenue from national and internationalMountain Biking events.Areas were suggested for a possible mountain bike park, potential trail riding area and a multiusetransport corridor.In regards to future trail development:› Sustainable trail design can be employed (in accordance with guidelines from theInternational Mountain Biking Association or IMBA) to control surface water run<strong>of</strong>f and soilerosion;› Trails could be maintained, in part, by the mountain biking community, so that the cost <strong>of</strong>maintaining the trails is minimised;› Official trails can be closed for maintenance/rehabilitation/in bad weather more readily thanun<strong>of</strong>ficial trails;› The availability <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> riding locations (or, at least, access points) is key to ensuringthat traffic management and parking issues do not become a significant problem; and› The safety <strong>of</strong> other users can be managed by developing a give way rule and including it onthe trail signage. Further design considerations such as the provision <strong>of</strong> separate walking andcycling tracks through fast or technical sections helps to mitigate the risk <strong>of</strong> user conflict,whilst maintaining the enjoyment for both parties;The NSW RFS raised no issues for consideration within the proposed plan, but recommendedconsideration <strong>of</strong> the following:12 NSW Rural Fire Service Corey Shackleton› The site is identified as bush fire prone on the Warringah Bush Fire Prone <strong>Land</strong> map; and› Any development applications for subdivision <strong>of</strong> special fire protection purpose developmentson or surroundings these lands will be subject to the requirements <strong>of</strong> Section 100B <strong>of</strong> theRural Fires Act 1997 and <strong>Plan</strong>ning for Bushfire Protection 2006.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 14H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo. Organisation Contact Summary <strong>of</strong> ResponseThe SMCMA referenced a 2008 Rapid Fauna Habitat Assessment <strong>of</strong> the CMA area. ThisAssessment notes that:› Of the 50 sites assessed, Garigal-<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> was ranked in the “Very High” category andNarrabeen Lakes in the “Highest” category in terms <strong>of</strong> fauna values;13 Sydney MetropolitanCatchment<strong>Management</strong> AuthorityKaren Kennedy› Narrabeen Lakes and the Garigal-<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> areas should be managed as a single unit tomaintain biodiversity values;› The maintenance <strong>of</strong> a continuous habitat link between the northern edge <strong>of</strong> the site and Kuring-gaiNP in the Ingleside–Tumbledown Dick area and between the western edge <strong>of</strong> the siteand the western block <strong>of</strong> Garigal NP in the Belrose area is necessary to maintain the currentbiodiversity values <strong>of</strong> the area, such as maintenance <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> the endangeredSouthern Brown Bandicoot; and› Mona Vale Road and Forest Way form major barriers to the movement <strong>of</strong> many fauna speciesand measures are required for habitat links to be effective to allow fauna movements acrossthese high traffic volume roadways.Sydney Metropolitan Wildlife Services is <strong>of</strong> the view that possible housing development on<strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>, particularly parcels adjacent to Garigal NP, would generate a severe reduction innative fauna habitat and food sources, as well as an increase in the contact <strong>of</strong> native fauna withhumans and companion animals (domesticated species) which are likely to kill native species.Also, homeowners regularly remove native bush or trees from their land which causes furtherstress for wildlife. Continual loss <strong>of</strong> wildlife through roadkill is also a cause for great concern.14Sydney MetropolitanWildlife ServicesEira BattagliaWarringah Council provided the following comments:15Warringah CouncilDavid KerrCouncil strongly supports the conservation <strong>of</strong> natural and biodiversity values within the <strong>Oxford</strong><strong>Falls</strong> Valley Locality and is <strong>of</strong> the view that the future management <strong>of</strong> all land within the Localitymust be considered holistically. Council seeks the support <strong>of</strong> all stakeholders in upholding thestrategic directions for the area that are embodied in its environmental planning instrument.Council gave a general background <strong>of</strong> the area:› The 1974 Interim development Order No. 51 (IDO51) was gazetted and introduced inresponse to concerns about the impacts <strong>of</strong> rapid residential expansion on Narrabeen Lagoon;20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 15H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo. Organisation Contact Summary <strong>of</strong> ResponseWarringah Council(Cont.)› In 1998-2000, Council produced its Residential Development Strategy which proposes aconcentrated approach to growth rather than a dispersed one, encouraging additional housinggrowth within and near to established urban centres, medium density areas and transportcorridors rather than at urban fringes; and› In early 2009, the <strong>Plan</strong>ning Assessment Commission declined a number <strong>of</strong> developmentrequests and advised that Council is to carry out a number <strong>of</strong> studies in the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>Valley in conjunction with major land holders, before Council can determine appropriate areasto be zoned for environmental protection and, if appropriate, any areas suitable for urbandevelopment.Council is <strong>of</strong> the position that, in the short term, there is no need for land release in the <strong>Oxford</strong><strong>Falls</strong> Valley to accommodate housing growth in Warringah. Council is also <strong>of</strong> the view thatpublicly owned land in the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Valley should remain in public ownership as disposal <strong>of</strong>public land may prejudice future options and result in pressure for inappropriate development.WIRES provided the following comments:WIRES supports any plans to conserve the bush in this <strong>Reserve</strong> from destruction andfragmentation, as it supports a diverse range <strong>of</strong> fauna species. WIRES identify five threatenedspecies have been found in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR and they are being confined to smallerareas with ongoing development <strong>of</strong> the area.16 WIRES Christine RandA major issue within the reserve is the frequent conflicts between traffic and wildlife and thisissue needs to be addressed. The Northern Beaches Road Kill Committee has been set up fromthe RTA, the NPWS, Warringah Council, Pittwater Council, NSW Police Service, SydneyWildlife and Dr Dan Ramp <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> NSW, plus local politicians and other interestgroups and stakeholders. This Committee has identified road kill black spots along WakehurstParkway and initiated the installation <strong>of</strong> a wallaby fence along both sides <strong>of</strong> the road, and alsoaims to raise further funds for Swamp Wallaby research in the area.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 16H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority3 Legislative Environment and PolicyThis section <strong>of</strong> the report provides context on the legislative and policy framework relevant to themanagement <strong>of</strong> OFRCR lands. This framework provides guidance as to the type <strong>of</strong> activities that willlikely be compatible with and permissable under the approvals process.3.1 <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Act 1989<strong>Crown</strong> lands are dealt with in the best interests <strong>of</strong> the State: S.10 <strong>of</strong> the CL Act 1989 requires <strong>Crown</strong>land to be managed to the “benefit <strong>of</strong> the people <strong>of</strong> NSW”. In particular, management must haveregard to the principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land management (S.11), namely:That environmental protection principles be observed in relation to the management andadministration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land;That the natural resources <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land (including water, soil, flora, fauna and scenicquality) be conserved wherever possible;That public use and enjoyment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land be encouraged;That, where appropriate, multiple use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land be encouraged;That, where appropriate, <strong>Crown</strong> land be used and managed in such a way that both the landand its resources are sustained in perpetuity; andThat <strong>Crown</strong> land be occupied, used, sold, leased, licensed or otherwise dealt with in the bestinterests <strong>of</strong> the State consistent with the above principles.In accordance with S.11(f) <strong>of</strong> the Act, <strong>Crown</strong> land may be occupied, used, sold, leased, licensed orotherwise dealt with in the best interests <strong>of</strong> the State. The proposed use, development andmanagement practices <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR must be in accordance with the notified public purpose <strong>of</strong> theRCR and individual reserve purposes as applicable.The Act and associated departmental policies encourages appropriate commercial use <strong>of</strong> reserved<strong>Crown</strong> land. Any revenue raised from activities on <strong>Crown</strong> reserves must be applied by the appointedreserve trust towards the management <strong>of</strong> the reserve/s for which it is responsible, unless otherwisedirected by the Minister (DoL, 2009). Revenue-generating activities within the OFRCR are <strong>of</strong>important to ensure the ongoing and long-term sustainable management <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Reserve</strong> (DoL, 2006).3.2 Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ning InstrumentsThis section provides an overview <strong>of</strong> the key environmental planning instruments that apply to theOFRCR lands. Any development or activities within the OFRCR will require the relevantenvironmental assessment as outlined under the Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Assessment Act 1979(Section 3.2.1) and will need to be consistent with the local (Sections 3.2.2-3.2.3) and State planningcontrols (Section 3.2.4).3.2.1 Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ning and Assessment Act 1979The NSW environmental planning system operates under the Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ning andAssessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act) which aims to encourage proper management, development andconservation <strong>of</strong> natural and artificial resources to ultimately promote the environment and theeconomic and social welfare <strong>of</strong> the community. It also seeks to promote the sharing <strong>of</strong> responsibilitybetween state and local government and facilitate public involvement in the planning and assessmentprocess. The EP&A Act is the primary legislation controlling development activity in the State <strong>of</strong> NSWand is administered by the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning, Council and other consent or determiningauthorities. Under the Act, appropriate authorities must assess environmental impacts <strong>of</strong>development before it commences.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 17H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority3.2.2 Warringah Local Environment <strong>Plan</strong>Warringah Local Environment <strong>Plan</strong> 2000The Warringah Local Environmental <strong>Plan</strong> (WLEP2000) sets out the standards and regulations fordevelopment in Warringah and has been in operation since 5 December 2000.Rather than traditional “zones”, the WLEP2000 uses 74 “localities” which have been identified bydistinctive or characteristic features <strong>of</strong> the natural and built environment. These localities are thebasis for determining the land uses and development types that are permissible in different locationsacross the LGA. A Future Character Statement is given for each locality and incorporates objectivesfor future development in the locality, future character and the type and form <strong>of</strong> new development thatis permissible within the locality, the categories <strong>of</strong> land uses that are or may be consistent with thedesired future character, standards to control the built form <strong>of</strong> development in that Locality and alsolists heritage items contained in the locality (Warringah Council, 2009a).Any development or activities proposed for the land parcels comprising the OFRCR will need to beconsistent with the relevant character statements in the LEP.<strong>Land</strong>s comprising the OFRCR fall predominantly within the land use zoning B2 – <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Valley,with some isolated lots falling with lands zoned B1 – Frenchs Forest East, B7 – Narrabeen LakesSuburbs and B10 – Narrabeen Lake, as shown in Figure 3.1. The characteristics <strong>of</strong> these land usezonings are provided in Table 3.1.Table 3.1: <strong>Land</strong> Use Localities for the Study Area<strong>Land</strong> Use LocalityB1 – Frenchs Forest EastDescriptionThe Frenchs Forest locality will remain characterised by detachedstyle housing in landscaped settings interspersed by a range <strong>of</strong>complementary and compatible uses. The relationship <strong>of</strong> the locality tothe surrounding bushland will be reinforced by protecting andenhancing the spread <strong>of</strong> indigenous tree canopy and preserving thenatural landscape including rock outcrops, remnant bushland andnatural watercourses.Development for the following purposes is prohibited within thislocality:Brothels,Extractive industries,Heliports,Potentially hazardous industries, andVehicle body repair shops.Canal estate development is also prohibited within this locality.B2 – <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> ValleyThe present character <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Valley will remainunchanged, except for new detached style housing and low intensity,low impact uses. The natural landscape including landforms andvegetation will be protected and, where possible, enhanced. A densebushland buffer will be maintained along Forest Way and WakehurstParkway. Development in the locality will not create siltation orpollution <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon and its catchment and will ensure thatecological value <strong>of</strong> water courses are maintained.Development for the following purposes is prohibited within thislocality:Brothels,20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 18H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority<strong>Land</strong> Use LocalityB7 – Narrabeen LakesSuburbsB10 – Narrabeen LakeDescriptionExtractive industries,Housing for older people or people with disabilities,Potentially hazardous industries, andVehicle body repair shops.Canal estate development is also prohibited within this locality.The Narrabeen Lakes Suburbs will remain characterised by detachedstyle housing in landscaped settings interspersed by a range <strong>of</strong>complementary and compatible uses which are compatible with theresidential nature <strong>of</strong> the locality. <strong>Land</strong> occupied by the Cromer GolfClub will continue to be used only as a recreational facility. The spread<strong>of</strong> indigenous tree canopy will be enhanced where possible andpreserving the natural landscape including rock outcrops, remnantbushland and natural watercourses.Development for the following purposes is prohibited within thislocality:Brothels,Extractive industries,Heliports,Potentially hazardous industries, andVehicle body repair shops.Canal estate development is also prohibited within this locality.The Narrabeen Lake locality will be preserved in its natural statesurrounded by areas <strong>of</strong> open space which complement the lake.Maintenance dredging and minor low intensity structures, such asviewing and fishing platforms may occur within the locality. In addition,foreshore areas comprising community land may be developed only ina manner that is consistent with the relevant community land plan <strong>of</strong>management.No other development is permitted in this locality.In keeping with the rural residential / low to medium density residential nature <strong>of</strong> the study area,minimum lot sizes are fairly large (e.g. one dwelling for 600m 2 <strong>of</strong> site area or one dwelling per 20ha <strong>of</strong>site area).There are a number <strong>of</strong> parks and reserves within the RCR, which are designated by Council as beingsuitable for community use and public recreation. Those areas that are identified under theWarringah LEP 2000 as being reserved for public open space are mapped in Figure 3.2. Clause 17<strong>of</strong> the LEP contains some provisions relating to the control <strong>of</strong> these public open space areas. Clause17 includes a provision that states that public open space can be developed for any purpose that isconsistent with a plan <strong>of</strong> management applying to that public open space. In this instance, a plan <strong>of</strong>management includes those prepared and approved in accordance with the Local Government Act1993, National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 or the CL Act 1989. Therefore, once this plan <strong>of</strong>management for the OFRCR is adopted by the Minister, any development <strong>of</strong> designated open spaceareas within the OFRCR will need to be consistent with the objectives <strong>of</strong> this plan.Further information on existing plans <strong>of</strong> management prepared by Council under the LocalGovernment Act 1993 is provided in Section 3.5.2.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 19H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityDraft Warringah LEP 2009The Standard Instrument (Local Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>s) Order 2006 under the Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ningand Assessment Act 1979 was introduced to prescribe the form and content <strong>of</strong> Council LEPdocuments to create a standard instrument within NSW. Warringah Council has since prepared adraft LEP in accordance with the standard instrument (including the application <strong>of</strong> standard zones),and the document has gone through several iterations thus far (Warringah Council, 2009b):13 November 2007 – Council adopted the draft LEP for the purposes <strong>of</strong> forwarding it to theDirector General <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning for certification;14 December 2007 – the NSW Government gazetted Amendment No 2 to the StandardInstrument Order. Council amended the draft LEP in accordance with the format <strong>of</strong> the mostcurrent version on the standard instrument;25 January 2008 – the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning provided feedback to Council, identifyingmultiple suggested changes to the draft LEP. Suggested changes to the draft LEP weremade without significantly altering the content or intent <strong>of</strong> the draft LEP;22 April 2008 – the draft LEP was noted and endorsed by Council at its meeting, to allow itsre-submission to the Director General <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning for certification; and12 October to 30 December 2009 - the draft LEP was placed on public exhibition.Once certification is received by the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>ning, Council will place the draft LEPon public exhibition.The draft LEP zones the majority <strong>of</strong> lands within the OFRCR E3 Environmental <strong>Management</strong>, withsome land parcels zoned RE1 Public Recreation (Figure 3.3). The relevant zone objectives anddetails <strong>of</strong> permitted and prohibited development are provided in Table 3.2.Table 3.2: Draft LEP <strong>Land</strong> Use Zonings for the Study Area<strong>Land</strong> Use LocalityRE1 – Public RecreationDescriptionThe zone objectives are:To allow land to be used for public open space or recreationalpurposes.To provide a range <strong>of</strong> recreational settings and activities andcompatible land uses.To protect and enhance the natural environment forrecreational purposes.To protect, manage and restore land that is ecological, cultural,scientific or aesthetic value.To prevent development that could destroy, damage orotherwise have an adverse effect on those values.Development permitted without consent includes environmentalfacilities, environmental protection works and roads.Development permitted with consent includes boat repair facilities, boatsheds, signs, child care centres, community facilities, earthworks,recreation areas, recreational facilities (indoor/outdoor/major),restaurants and water recreation facilities.Any development <strong>of</strong> a type not specific above is prohibited.E3 – Environmental<strong>Management</strong>The zone objectives are:To protect, manage and restore areas with special ecological,cultural, scientific or aesthetic values.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 20H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority<strong>Land</strong> Use LocalityE3 – Environmental<strong>Management</strong> (cont.)SP2 - InfrastructureDescriptionTo provide for a limited range <strong>of</strong> development that does havean adverse effect on those values.To ensure that development, by way <strong>of</strong> its character, design,location and materials <strong>of</strong> construction, is integrated into the siteand its natural surroundings, complements and enhances thenatural environment and has minimal visual impact.To protect and enhance the natural landscape by preservingremnant bushland and rock outcrops and by encouraging thespread <strong>of</strong> indigenous tree canopy.To protect and enhance visual quality by promoting densebushland buffers adjacent to major traffic thoroughfares.Development permitted without consent includes home occupationsand home-based child care.Development permitted with consent includes aquaculture, bed andbreakfast accommodation, signs, community facilities, dwellinghouses, earthworks, environmental facilities, environmental protectionworks, extensive agriculture, farm buildings, homebusiness/industries, horticulture, recreation areas and roads.Prohibited development includes industry, multi-dwelling housing,residential flat buildings, retail premises, seniors housing, servicestations, warehouse or distribution centres, or any development <strong>of</strong> atype not previously specified with reference to permitted development.The zone objectives are:To provide for infrastructure and related uses.To prevent development that is not compatible with or that maydetract from the provision <strong>of</strong> infrastructure.No development is permitted without consent in this zone.Development permitted with consent includes any development that isordinarily incidental or ancillary to development for that purpose,environmental protection works and roads.Prohibited development includes any development not previouslyspecified with reference to permitted development.‘Environmental facilities’, as defined under the draft LEP, are buildings or places that provide for therecreational use or scientific study <strong>of</strong> natural systems, and includes walking tracks, seating, shelters,boardwalks, observation decks, bird hides or the like, and associated display structures.‘Environmental protection works’ include works associated with the rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> land towards itsnatural state and includes bush regeneration works, wetland protection works, erosion protectionworks, dune restoration works and the like. Therefore, the types <strong>of</strong> operations and maintenanceactivities that are proposed in the OFRCR PoM would be permitted on land parcels zoned either RE1or E3.However, the types <strong>of</strong> recreational activities that are permitted on lands zoned RE1 or E3 is a morecomplex issue. The definitions provided in the draft LEP for different types <strong>of</strong> recreational uses areoutlined in Table 3.3.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 21H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityTable 3.3: Definitions under Warringah Draft LEPType <strong>of</strong> Activity /DevelopmentRecreation areaDescriptionA place used for outdoor recreation that is normally opento the public, and includes:a) a children’s playground, orb) an area used for community sporting activities, orc) a public park, reserve or garden or the like,ZoningTables:Permittedwith consentin both RE1and E3Recreation facility(indoor)Recreation facility(outdoor)Recreation facility(major)and any ancillary buildings, but does not include arecreation facility (indoor), recreation facility (major) orrecreation facility (outdoor).A building or place used predominantly for indoorrecreation, whether or not operated for the purposes <strong>of</strong>gain, including a squash court, indoor swimming pool,gymnasium, table tennis centre, health studio, bowlingalley, ice rink or any other building or place <strong>of</strong> a likecharacter used for indoor recreation, but does not includean entertainment facility, a recreation facility (major) or aregistered club.A building or place (other than a recreation area) usedpredominantly for outdoor recreation, whether or notoperated for the purposes <strong>of</strong> gain, including a golf course,golf driving range, mini-golf centre, tennis court, paint-ballcentre, lawn bowling green, outdoor swimming pool,equestrian centre, skate board ramp, go-kart track, riflerange, water-ski centre or any other building or place <strong>of</strong> alike character used for outdoor recreation (including anyancillary buildings), but does not include an entertainmentfacility or a recreation facility (major).A building or place used for large-scale sporting orrecreation activities that are attended by large numbers <strong>of</strong>people whether regularly or periodically, and includessports stadiums, showgrounds, racecourses and motorracing tracks.Permittedwith consentin RE1.Prohibited inE3.Permittedwith consentin RE1.Prohibited inE3.Permittedwith consentin RE1.Prohibited inE3.The types <strong>of</strong> recreational activities currently undertaken on OFRCR lands, including bushwalking,picnicking, jogging and mountain biking, may continue under the draft LEP because they would beconsistent with the types <strong>of</strong> activities that may be undertaken in ‘recreational areas’, which ispermitted on lands zoned RE1 or E3. Development activities targeting more intensive recreationaluses such sporting events or those that require specific sporting facilities, would only be permitted onthose OFRCR lands zoned RE1 under the Draft LEP. While these land use zonings are notinconsistent with the objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land management, they do limit the types <strong>of</strong> revenue raisingactivities that may be undertaken within the OFRCR.However, there are some inclusions within the draft LEP that would permit a wider range <strong>of</strong> uses <strong>of</strong>the lands within the OFRCR than those currently identified in the land use tables for lands zoned RE1or E3. Clause 2.6b <strong>of</strong> the draft LEP provides for the temporary use <strong>of</strong> land for a limited time periodprovided it “does not compromise the future development <strong>of</strong> the land, or have detrimental economic,social, amenity or environmental effects on the land.” This clause overrides the land use zonings andwould permit the temporary use <strong>of</strong> OFRCR lands for special events (e.g. a mountain biking event),including those that might raise revenue through the issue <strong>of</strong> a temporary licence or lease. However,it is noted that any such an activity would need to go through the Development Application process.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 22H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityThere is also another inclusion in the draft LEP under which other types <strong>of</strong> revenue raising activitiesmight be possible. Schedule 2 <strong>of</strong> the draft LEP, which identifies exempt development, includes“outdoor areas <strong>of</strong> community land used for commercial purposes”. This would allow the use <strong>of</strong>community land for something like a market or festival without consent, provided the relevant permit isobtained from Council’s Parks and Recreation section.It is noted that the draft LEP may undergo change prior to finalisation and adoption by Council. Priorto implementation <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the actions identified in this plan <strong>of</strong> management, it is recommended thata review <strong>of</strong> the LEP status be undertaken.3.2.3 Warringah Development Control <strong>Plan</strong>Development Control <strong>Plan</strong>s (DCPs) typically supplement local environmental plans by providingadditional regulations for the management <strong>of</strong> development within the LGA. DCPs provide a greaterlevel <strong>of</strong> planning control and guidance in relation to a number <strong>of</strong> specific matters.DCPs Currently in ForceThe current DCPs for the Warringah LGA include the:Warringah Development Control <strong>Plan</strong> which contains provisions in relation to public exhibitionand notification requirements as well as the location <strong>of</strong> mobile phone base stations. Councilenvisages that additional matters may be addressed through the Warringah DCP as the needarises; andWarringah Development Control <strong>Plan</strong> - Belrose Road Corridor (which applies only to land inthe C11 Belrose Road Corridor Locality) was adopted by Council in July 2008 andsupplements the provisions <strong>of</strong> the WLEP 2000.Draft Warringah DCP 2009A draft Warringah DCP 2009 has been prepared in accordance with the standard instrument waspublicly exhibited at the same time as the Draft LEP. The Draft DCP contains local provisions anddevelopment control requirements in addition to those outlined in the Draft LEP (Warringah Council,2009b).There are a number <strong>of</strong> specific development controls that will be triggered for some land parcelswithin the OFRCR. Those development controls that are particularly relevant to lands within theOFRCR include those relating to:B13 National Parks Setback,D1 <strong>Land</strong>scaped Open Space and Bushland Setting (some lots),E3 Threatened species, populations, ecological communities listed under State andCommonwealth legislation, or High Conservation Habitat,E4 Wildlife Corridors,E5 Native Vegetation,E8 Waterways and Riparian <strong>Land</strong>s,E10 <strong>Land</strong>slip Risk, andE11 Flood Prone <strong>Land</strong> (some lots).Should any development or activities be proposed within the OFRCR, it would need to consider therequirements <strong>of</strong> the DCP.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 23H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority3.2.4 State Environmental <strong>Plan</strong>ning PoliciesSEPP (Infrastructure)This Policy aims to facilitate the effective delivery <strong>of</strong> infrastructure across NSW. Key provisionsinclude the following (DoL, 2009):Additional uses are permitted on certain State land (including some classes <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land)which would otherwise be prohibited under an LEP;Exempt development categories relevant to <strong>Crown</strong> reserves include access ramps, bush fireprotection, car parks, fencing, landscaping, lighting, signage and boundary adjustments;Infrastructure planning provisions (including works and activities on <strong>Crown</strong> land) such asemergency services facilities, bushfire hazard reduction, parks and public reserves, floodmitigation works, port, wharf and boating facilities, waterway or foreshore managementactivities, etc.;Consultation requirements when undertaking development subject to the SEPP;Development for any purpose may be carried out without consent on a <strong>Crown</strong> reserve by oron behalf <strong>of</strong> the appointed trustee where the development relates to the implementation <strong>of</strong> aplan <strong>of</strong> management adopted under the <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Act 1989;Where local councils are Trust managers, they are permitted to carry out a range <strong>of</strong> worksincluding roads, cycleways and outdoor recreation facilities; andThe SEPP does not remove any existing requirements to obtain relevant approvals underother legislation such as the National Parks & Wildlife Act 1974, Rural Fires Act 1997 etc.SEPP 19 – Bushland in Urban AreasThis Policy is in place to protect and preserve bushland within urban areas in NSW. Warringah LGAis included in Schedule 1 <strong>of</strong> this SEPP and therefore this SEPP applies to the OFRCR. UnderSections 6 and 7 <strong>of</strong> the SEPP, consent is required for the disturbance <strong>of</strong> any bushland in urban areaszoned or reserved for public open space.SEPP 71 – Coastal ProtectionThis Policy aims to protect and manage the natural, cultural, recreational and economic attributes <strong>of</strong>coastal areas <strong>of</strong> NSW. The policy applies to land within the ‘coastal zone’ as defined in section 4A <strong>of</strong>the Coastal Protection Act 1979 (CP Act). Parts <strong>of</strong> the eastern side <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR (near NarrabeenLagoon) are located in the declared NSW Coastal Zone to which this SEPP applies.SEPP 44 – Koala Habitat ProtectionThis Policy aims to encourage the proper conservation and management <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> naturalvegetation that provide habitat for koalas to ensure a permanent free-living population over theirpresent range and reverse the current trend <strong>of</strong> koala population decline. The SEPP applies to theWarringah Council LGA and land parcels within the OFRCR.SEPP 32 – Urban Consolidation (Redevelopment <strong>of</strong> Urban <strong>Land</strong>)This Policy aims to promote the orderly and economic use and development <strong>of</strong> land by enablingurban land which is no longer required for the purpose for which it is currently zoned or used to beredeveloped for multi-unit housing and related development, particularly in areas where there areexisting public infrastructure, transport and community facilities. The Policy encourages increasedopportunities for people to live in a locality which is close to employment, leisure and otheropportunities and also encourages reductions in the rate at which land is released for development onthe fringe <strong>of</strong> existing urban areas.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 24H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthoritySEPP 55 – Remediation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>The object <strong>of</strong> this Policy is to provide for a State-wide planning approach to the remediation <strong>of</strong>contaminated land. The remediation <strong>of</strong> contaminated land for the purpose <strong>of</strong> reducing the risk <strong>of</strong>harm to human health or any other aspect <strong>of</strong> the environment is <strong>of</strong> particular importance.3.3 Other Relevant Legislation3.3.1 Local Government Act 1993This Act provides the legal framework for an effective, efficient, environmentally responsible and opensystem <strong>of</strong> local government in New South Wales and sets out the roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong>Councils for the management, improvement and development <strong>of</strong> the resources within their jurisdictionand in accordance with the principles <strong>of</strong> ecologically sustainable development. Under Section 68 <strong>of</strong>the Act, Council is given the power to control local activities through an approvals process.3.3.2 Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Rights Act 1983As the traditional land holders <strong>of</strong> Australia, Australian land is <strong>of</strong> spiritual, social, cultural and economicimportance to Aboriginal people. It is accepted that as a result <strong>of</strong> past Government decisions theamount <strong>of</strong> land set aside for Aborigines has been progressively reduced without compensation.This Act makes provisions with respect to the land rights <strong>of</strong> Aborigines, including provisions for, orwith respect to, the constitution <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Councils, the vesting <strong>of</strong> land in those Councils.Under the Act, vacant <strong>Crown</strong> land not required for an essential purpose or for residential use, isreturned to Aboriginal people.This Act aims to:Provide land rights for Aboriginal persons in New South Wales;Provide for representative Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Councils in New South Wales;Vest land in those Councils;Provide for the acquisition <strong>of</strong> land, and the management <strong>of</strong> land and other assets andinvestments, by or for those Councils and the allocation <strong>of</strong> funds to and by those Councils;andProvide for the provision <strong>of</strong> community benefit schemes by or on behalf <strong>of</strong> those Councils.Section 36 <strong>of</strong> the Act pertains to land claims to <strong>Crown</strong> lands, and in particular specifies that a claimmay be made by Local Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Councils for <strong>Crown</strong> land that is “not lawfully used oroccupied”.Claims <strong>of</strong> this nature have been granted in the area and the Metropolitan Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Councilcurrently owns four parcels <strong>of</strong> land which were previously located in the OFRCR (Section 4.1.2).3.3.3 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974The National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NPW Act), administered by DECCW, is the primarylegislation for the management <strong>of</strong> national parks and the protection <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal cultural heritage inNSW (Part 6 <strong>of</strong> the Act provides specific protection for Aboriginal objects and places). The objects <strong>of</strong>the Act are:The conservation <strong>of</strong> nature, including the conservation <strong>of</strong> habitat, ecosystems and ecosystemprocesses, biological diversity, landforms <strong>of</strong> significance, landscapes and natural features <strong>of</strong>significance;20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 25H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityThe conservation <strong>of</strong> objects, places or features <strong>of</strong> cultural value within the landscape,including places, objects and features <strong>of</strong> significance to Aboriginal people, places <strong>of</strong> socialvalue to the people <strong>of</strong> New South Wales and places <strong>of</strong> historic, architectural or scientificsignificance;Fostering public appreciation, understanding and enjoyment <strong>of</strong> nature and cultural heritageand their conservation; andProviding for the management <strong>of</strong> land reserved under this Act in accordance with themanagement principles applicable for each type <strong>of</strong> reservation.Garigal National Park lies adjacent to a number <strong>of</strong> parcels <strong>of</strong> land contained in the OFRCR. Ku-ringgaiChase National Park lies to the west <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR but does not share any common boundaries.3.3.4 Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995The Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 relates to the conservation <strong>of</strong> threatened species,populations and ecological communities <strong>of</strong> animals and plants and is administered by DECCW(National Parks and Wildlife Service). This Act aims to:Conserve biological diversity and promote ecologically sustainable development,Prevent the extinction and promote the recovery <strong>of</strong> threatened species, populations andecological communities,Protect the critical habitat <strong>of</strong> those threatened species, populations and ecologicalcommunities that are endangered,Eliminate or manage certain processes that threaten the survival or evolutionary development<strong>of</strong> threatened species, populations and ecological communities,Ensure that the impact <strong>of</strong> any action affecting threatened species, populations and ecologicalcommunities is properly assessed, andEncourage the conservation <strong>of</strong> threatened species, populations and ecological communitiesby the adoption <strong>of</strong> measures involving co-operative management.The provisions <strong>of</strong> this Act must be complied with in the management <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR with particularreference to any development proposals that have the potential to affect any threatened species,populations or ecological communities.A number <strong>of</strong> threatened species and ecological communities listed under Schedule 1 and Schedule 2<strong>of</strong> the Act are known to exist within the OFRCR (Section 4.4).3.3.5 Native Vegetation Act 2003This Act repeals the Native Vegetation Conservation Act 1997 and aims to provide for, encourage andpromote the management <strong>of</strong> native vegetation on a regional basis in keeping with the social,economic and environmental interests <strong>of</strong> NSW. Urban areas listed in Schedule 1 <strong>of</strong> the Act areexempt from the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act.Warringah Council is listed as an LGA under Schedule 1 and therefore this Act does not apply to theOFRCR.3.3.6 Heritage Act 1977The Heritage Act 1977 provides protection for natural and cultural heritage by providing for the listing<strong>of</strong> heritage items or places on the State Heritage Register and providing for the making <strong>of</strong> interimheritage orders for the protection <strong>of</strong> heritage items or places. Under the Act, it is an <strong>of</strong>fence to harmrelics protected by Interim Heritage Orders, the State Heritage Register or environmental planninginstruments. The Heritage Amendment Act 2009 has now been adopted and provides amendments tothe Heritage Act 1997. Key changes include the definition <strong>of</strong> a “relic” under the Act and the addition<strong>of</strong> Section 79C which relates to stop work orders to restrict harm to heritage items.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 26H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityState heritage places exist within the Warringah LGA (Section 4.6.2).3.3.7 Other Relevant State LegislationThere are other Acts under State law are relevant to this <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>. Table 3.4 gives asummary <strong>of</strong> this legislation.Table 3.4: Relevant State LegislationAct/RegulationDetailsSoil Conservation Act1938The Soil Conservation Act 1938 is associated with the preservation <strong>of</strong> soilsand prevention <strong>of</strong> erosion within a parcel <strong>of</strong> land. The appointment <strong>of</strong> aconservation commissioner is primarily to control and protect; proclaimedworks, notified catchment areas, rivers, lakes, dams, creeks, lagoons andmarshes from the effects <strong>of</strong> soil erosion, land degradation, siltation andsedimentation. Notice may be issued if the commissioner is <strong>of</strong> the opinionthat the land holder has done or is likely to do something that will ultimatelylead to land degradation.Rural Fires Act 1997This Act aims to make provision for the prevention, mitigation andsuppression <strong>of</strong> rural fires and define the functions <strong>of</strong> the NSW Rural FireService. Provisions include the co-ordination <strong>of</strong> bush fire prevention andbush fire fighting throughout the State to reduce damage to life andproperty. The <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> is classified as bushfire prone land under Warringah Council’s Bush Fire Prone <strong>Land</strong> Map(Warringah Council, 2003)Noxious Weeds<strong>Management</strong> Act 1993The Noxious Weeds <strong>Management</strong> Act 1993 provides for the identification,classification and control <strong>of</strong> noxious weeds within NSW. The objects <strong>of</strong> thisAct include reducing the negative impact <strong>of</strong> weeds on the economy,community and environment by establishing weed control mechanisms andproviding for the monitoring <strong>of</strong> and reporting on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> weedmanagement in NSW.Water <strong>Management</strong> Act2000The Water <strong>Management</strong> Act 2000 regulates all construction activities inproximity to waterways and aims to control the extraction and use <strong>of</strong> waterwithin NSW. Principles set out in the Act generally aim to preserve and/orrestore water sources, floodplains, and water dependant ecosystems(including groundwater and wetlands). The Act also encompasses theprotection <strong>of</strong> habitats, animals and plants which benefit from water or arepotentially affected by managed activities. Furthermore, the quality <strong>of</strong> allwater sources must be protected and where possible enhanced. The Actcreates mechanisms for protecting and restoring water sources and theirdependent ecosystems, improved access rights to water, andpartnership arrangements between the community and the government forwater management.A controlled activity approval is required from the Department <strong>of</strong>Environment, Climate Change and Water for any works to be carried out onland within a prescribed distance from a waterfront (40 metres).20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 27H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityAct/RegulationDetailsFisheriesAct 1994<strong>Management</strong>The Fisheries <strong>Management</strong> Act 1994 aims to conserve, develop and sharethe fishery resources <strong>of</strong> NSW. It includes provisions for the conservation <strong>of</strong>fish stocks, key fish habitats, threatened species, populations andecological communities <strong>of</strong> fish and marine vegetation. It also promotesappropriate sharing arrangements between viable commercial fishing andaquaculture industries and quality recreational fishing opportunities so as toprovide social and economic benefits for the wider community inaccordance with ecologically sustainable development, including theconservation <strong>of</strong> biological diversity.Protection <strong>of</strong> theEnvironment OperationsAct 1997The Protection <strong>of</strong> Environment Operations Act 1997 (PoEO Act 1997) isadministered by The Department <strong>of</strong> Environment, Climate Change andWater (DECCW) and ultimately aims to protect, enhance and restore thequality <strong>of</strong> the environment in New South Wales, to reduce risk to humanhealth and promote mechanisms that minimise environmental degradationthrough a strong set <strong>of</strong> provisions and <strong>of</strong>fences. Noise pollution is alsoregulated by this Act. A licence would be required from DECCW if any <strong>of</strong>the future development proposals or management actions within theOFRCR are determined to be a “scheduled activity” under Schedule 1 <strong>of</strong> theAct.Coastal Protection Act1979This Act aims to provide for the protection <strong>of</strong> the coastal environment <strong>of</strong> theState for the benefit <strong>of</strong> both present and future generations. Some parts <strong>of</strong>the eastern side <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR (near Narrabeen Lagoon) are located in thedeclared NSW Coastal Zone to which this Act applies.Contaminated <strong>Land</strong><strong>Management</strong> Act 1997The Contaminated <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Act 1997 outlines the assessmentcriteria and management <strong>of</strong> contaminated land which poses significant riskto human health or the environment. Under the Act, a person or persons(or a public authority) will be held responsible as an outcome <strong>of</strong> landcontamination. DECCW is responsible for declaring the land as‘Contaminated’ and will give notice to end the declaration, once satisfiedthat the land poses no further risk. Contaminated lands are not expected topose a significant hazard in the management <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR. Informationon contaminated land can be found in Section 4.2.2.3.4 Commonwealth Environmental Protection and BiodiversityConservation Act 1999The Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC) providesfor the protection and conservation <strong>of</strong> aspects <strong>of</strong> the environment that are matters <strong>of</strong> nationalenvironmental significance, such as threatened species and heritage places listed on the Register <strong>of</strong>the National Estate (RNE). A search on the EPBC Matters <strong>of</strong> National Environmental Significancedatabase website revealed that within a 40 square km area around the OFRCR, the following areknown to exist (DEWHA, 2009):24 threatened species;14 migratory species; and3 places on the RNE (including one Indigenous and two natural places).20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 28H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityOf the 24 nationally significant threatened species, at least four have been sighted within the OFRCR:Glandular Pink-bell (Tetratheca glandulosa);Caley’s Grevillea (Grevillea caleyi);Spotted-tail Quoll (Dasyurus maculatus maculatus), SE mainland population; andGrey-headed Flying-fox (Pteropus poliocephalus).Threatened fauna and flora species are discussed in Section 4.4.3.5 Related Policies and <strong>Plan</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>3.5.1 Related PoliciesLPMA – <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Policies<strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Policies, developed by the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s (now <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong>Authority), need to be complied with in the ongoing management <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR. A list <strong>of</strong> relevantPolicies is given in Table 3.2.Table 3.5: Relevant Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> PoliciesPolicy<strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Policy forMarinas and WaterfrontCommercial Tenures(2005)DetailsThis Policy was developed to guide the creation <strong>of</strong> new and renewedtenures for marinas and waterfront commercial facilities in accordancewith the requirements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Act 1989, the principles <strong>of</strong><strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, and the wider considerations such ascompetition and probity (DoL, 2005). It sets out considerations that applyto existing <strong>Crown</strong> tenures, as well as new development sites.<strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s NSWBusiness Directive 2004for Commercial Leasingand Licensing <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong><strong>Land</strong>Food and BeverageOutlets on <strong>Crown</strong><strong>Reserve</strong>s 2004The objectives <strong>of</strong> this document are to provide a consistent frameworkand clear direction to <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s NSW management, staff and clientsfor the commercial leasing <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land to ensure:› Compliance with legislative obligations, and government policies,› Leasing <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land occurs through an open, fair and impartialprocess,› The NSW community benefits from leasing in terms <strong>of</strong> improved social,economic and environmental outcomes,› Leasing is carried out on equitable terms and conditions consistent withprobity standards in line with government policy, National CompetitionPolicy,› (NCP) principles and Independent Commission Against Corruption(ICAC) guidelines,› Improved client awareness <strong>of</strong> government policy,› The process <strong>of</strong> leasing <strong>Crown</strong> land is based on sound business andcommercial principles.This Policy provides guidance for assessing the merit <strong>of</strong> proposals forfood and beverage outlets on <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>s and identifies the facilitiesthat may be acceptable and those that may not be acceptable on <strong>Crown</strong><strong>Reserve</strong>s.Restaurants are acceptable within most public purpose reserves but maynot be identified as permissible on land zoned open space under the20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 29H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityPolicyFire Protection Policy forCaravan Parks on<strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>s andLeasehold <strong>Land</strong> 2005DetailsCouncil LEP.This policy is provided for park managers to ensure compliance with firesafety requirements within caravan parks particular in bush fire proneareas. The general section <strong>of</strong> the policy is applicable to all caravan parkson <strong>Crown</strong> land as all land managers have obligations under the RuralFires Act 1997 and the Local Government (Caravan Parks, CampingGrounds and Moveable Dwellings) Regulation 1995.This Policy is not currently relevant as there are no Caravan Parks withinthe OFRCR, however this may change in the future.Investment Policy forTrust Boards Managing<strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>s andCommons 2005This policy applies to <strong>Crown</strong> reserves and commons managed by a trustboard. Trusts managed by a corporation should also use this policy as aguide. The Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s requires that a trust board should onlyinvest its funds in certain areas which are relatively low-risk.<strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Policy forTourist & AssociatedFacilities on <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>(2006)This Policy provides guidance on the manner in which tenures <strong>of</strong>commercial premises, including tourist and related facilities on <strong>Crown</strong>land, will be created and administered under the provisions <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Crown</strong><strong>Land</strong>s Act 1989. It sets out considerations that apply to existing <strong>Crown</strong>tenures, as well as new development sites.Other relevant State policies, including strategies and guidelines are given in Table 3.6. Necessaryprecautions in accordance with the below policies are required in the ongoing management <strong>of</strong> theOFRCR.Table 3.6: Relevant State PoliciesPolicyDetailsBiodiversity <strong>Plan</strong>ningGuide for NSW LocalGovernment 2001This Guide aims to assist Local Councils in carrying out biodiversityconservation as part <strong>of</strong> their day-to-day functions, especially relating toplanning and development. A “good practice guide” for biodiversityplanning is provided for Council’s use.Coastal DesignGuidelines for NSW(2003)The Coastal Design Guidelines for NSW have been prepared withreference to the NSW Government’s Coastal Policy 1997 and complementthe Government’s Coastal Protection Package released on 26 June 2001and SEPP 71 which came into effect in November 2002. The coastaldesign guidelines are based on the principles <strong>of</strong> ecologically sustainabledevelopment.Estuary <strong>Management</strong>Manual and Estuary<strong>Management</strong> PolicyThe Estuary <strong>Management</strong> Policy is defined in the Estuary <strong>Management</strong>Manual (NSW Government, 1992). The policy outlines a structuredmanagement process leading to the implementation <strong>of</strong> an Estuary<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>. This document provides the overarching frameworkfor this Estuary <strong>Management</strong> Study and <strong>Plan</strong>.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 30H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityPolicyDetailsFlood Prone <strong>Land</strong> PolicyThe policy promotes the use <strong>of</strong> a merit approach, which balances social,economic, environmental and flood risk parameters to determine whetherparticular development or use <strong>of</strong> the floodplain is appropriate andsustainable.Managing UrbanStormwater GuidelinesThis manual provides guidelines to minimise land degradation and waterpollution at urban development sites in New South Wales.National Strategy forEcologically SustainableDevelopmentThe National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development (NSESD)provides broad strategic directions and framework for governments todirect policy and decision-making. The Strategy facilitates a coordinatedand co-operative approach to ecologically sustainable development (ESD)and encourages long-term benefits for Australia rather than short-termgains.NSW BiodiversityStrategyThe previous Strategy expired in 2003, and a new Biodiversity Strategy iscurrently in the early stages <strong>of</strong> preparation. DECCW and the Department<strong>of</strong> Industry and Investment (DII) are currently taking public submissions forthe Biodiversity Strategy for New South Wales - Discussion Paper whichwill be the first step towards developing a new NSW Biodiversity Strategy(DECC, 2009a).NSW Coastal Policy(1997)The NSW Coastal Policy provides a framework for the balanced andcoordinated management <strong>of</strong> the coastal zone in accordance with theprincipals <strong>of</strong> ecologically sustainable development. Parts <strong>of</strong> the OFRCRare located within the coastal zone and therefore this policy applies.NSW State Rivers andEstuaries Policy (1993)This Policy was created to assist in the improved management <strong>of</strong> riversand estuaries and their floodplains so as to ensure these waterways cancontinue to support sustainable economic and social uses in the longterm. The Policy is based on the fundamental principle that governmentagencies, private landholders, resource users and the community ingeneral must all share responsibility for managing natural resources.NSW Water Quality andRiver Flow ObjectivesThis document outlines the Water Quality and River Flow Objectives fordifferent catchments. In this case, the Objectives for Sydney Harbour andParramatta River apply. The Water Quality and River Flow Objectivesaims to assist in the improvement <strong>of</strong> poor water quality and themaintenance <strong>of</strong> existing good water quality.NSW Wetlands<strong>Management</strong> Policy(1996)This Policy is aimed at assisting the protection <strong>of</strong> wetlands in goodcondition, rehabilitate degraded wetlands where feasible, and support theappreciation <strong>of</strong> wetlands by:› Protecting wetland biodiversity, functions and services;› Protecting social and economic benefits <strong>of</strong> wetlands;20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 31H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityPolicyDetails› Protecting the cultural heritage and spiritual significance <strong>of</strong> wetlands;› Providing flow regimes that mimic natural conditions, where possible;› Providing wetlands with water <strong>of</strong> appropriate volume and quality;› Limiting further fragmentation and reconnecting wetland systems;› Preventing or limiting catchment activities that impact upon wetlands;› Rewarding wetland managers who improve the condition <strong>of</strong> wetlands;and› Promoting the importance <strong>of</strong> wetlands to the community.<strong>Plan</strong>ning for BushfireProtection (2006)This document provides the necessary planning considerations whendeveloping areas for residential use in residential, rural residential, ruraland urban areas when development sites are in close proximity to areaslikely to be affected by bushfire events and replaces <strong>Plan</strong>ning for BushfireProtection 2001.Policy and Guidelinesfor Aquatic Habitat<strong>Management</strong> and FishConservation 1999This document has been prepared by NSW Fisheries in order to improvethe conservation and management <strong>of</strong> aquatic habitats in NSW. It istargeted at local and state government authorities, proponents <strong>of</strong>developments and their advisors, and individuals or organisationsconcerned with the planning and management <strong>of</strong> our aquatic resources,including conservation organisations.Policy and Guidelinesfor Fish FriendlyWaterway Crossings2004This document provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the specific legislation and policyrequirements that must be observed by those intending to plan design andconstruct waterway crossings in NSW.SydneyCoastalStrategy<strong>Regional</strong><strong>Management</strong>This Strategy was developed by the Sydney Coastal Councils Groupwhich was established in 1989 and now comprises 15 member councils(firstly Warringah, Manly, Waverley, Randwick, Sutherland, andWoollahra, and then Botany, City <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Hornsby, Leichhardt,Mosman, North Sydney, Pittwater, Rockdale and Willoughby). Thestrategy promotes coordination between member councils in thesustainable management <strong>of</strong> the coastal urban environment and aims toassist the resolution <strong>of</strong> environmental and natural resource managementissues in these areas.3.5.2 Related <strong>Plan</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Warringah Council <strong>Plan</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>As discussed in Section 3.2.2, Council is required to prepare plans <strong>of</strong> management for all communityland in accordance with Division 2 <strong>of</strong> Part 2 <strong>of</strong> Chapter 6 <strong>of</strong> the Local Government Act 1993. Thismay include the preparation <strong>of</strong> plans for significant <strong>Crown</strong> reserves.A number <strong>of</strong> Council plans <strong>of</strong> management are relevant to the management <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR. Theseinclude:20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 32H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority Red Hill & Golden Grove Parks <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (Warringah Council, 2000); Coastal <strong>Land</strong>s <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – A Generic <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (Warringah Council,2002a); Community <strong>Land</strong> Categorised as General Community Use (Including Miscellaneous <strong>Crown</strong><strong>Reserve</strong>s) Generic <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – 24 May 2002 (Warringah Council, 2002b); Sportsgrounds <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – December 2007 (Warringah Council, 2007); Generic Parks <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – November 2008 (Warringah Council, 2008a); and Dee Why Valley and South Creek Open Space Corridor <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (WarringahCouncil, 2008b).Other plans <strong>of</strong> management have been adopted by Warringah Council but do not apply to land withinthe OFRCR.National Parks <strong>Plan</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Under S.72 <strong>of</strong> Part 5 <strong>of</strong> the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, the Director-General requires that aplan <strong>of</strong> management be prepared for National Parks. Although not applying to land within theOFRCR, plans <strong>of</strong> management exist for National Parks in the vicinity, namely: Garigal National Park <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – November 2008 (NPWS, 2008); and Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, 1971 (NPWS, 1971).A proportion <strong>of</strong> Garigal National Park lies directly to the north <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR. The Garigal NationalPark <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> is likely to be <strong>of</strong> particular relevance in the management <strong>of</strong> those OFRCRland parcels that share a common boundary with the Park.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 33H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority4 Description <strong>of</strong> the Study AreaThis section <strong>of</strong> the report presents the findings <strong>of</strong> the data collation and review undertaken inaccordance with Task 2 <strong>of</strong> the scope <strong>of</strong> works (Section 1.6). It provides an overview <strong>of</strong> the keyfeatures, updates the findings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Land</strong> Assessment (DoL, 2005), and integrates mapping currentlyavailable for lands in the OFRCR. It considers: <strong>Land</strong> tenure (Section 4.1), Topography, geology and soils (Section 4.2), Hydrology, hydraulics and flooding (Section 4.3), Ecological processes (Section 4.4), Bushfire risk (Section 4.5), Cultural heritage (Section 4.6), Human usage <strong>of</strong> OFRCR lands (Section 4.7), Visual amenity and landscape character (Section 4.8), and Existing infrastructure and assets (Section 4.9).The information provided in Section 4 is has been compiled based on a review <strong>of</strong> available data,mapping, studies and reports, as well as observations made on the day <strong>of</strong> the site inspections. Siteinspections were conducted over a period <strong>of</strong> two days (26 March 2009 and 15 April 2009) in order tovisit as many <strong>of</strong> the land parcels comprising the OFRCR as possible. A site photolog is provided inAppendix C.The information provided in Sections 4.1-4.9 has also been used to undertake a rapid spatialassessment <strong>of</strong> the lands comprising the OFRCR (Section 4.10).4.1 <strong>Land</strong> TenureWhen referring to <strong>Crown</strong> lands, tenure is defined as the holding <strong>of</strong> land under the CL Act. There arethree general types <strong>of</strong> arrangements under which <strong>Crown</strong> land may be held under tenure:Lease – form <strong>of</strong> tenure generally for exclusive occupation and use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land for aspecific term and under specific conditions as outlined under the provisions <strong>of</strong> the CL Act.Leases are designed with terms to suit the purpose <strong>of</strong> the lease. A lease may be forfeited fornon-compliance <strong>of</strong> conditions, or may expire because the term has lapsed. A lease is alsotransferrable with the consent <strong>of</strong> the Minister. Generally, leases will require landassessments.Licence – provides the right to occupy or use <strong>Crown</strong> land under the provisions <strong>of</strong> CL Act. Alicence may not necessarily confer exclusive use by a licensee. It is not transferrable andmay be revoked at the will <strong>of</strong> the Minister without compensation.Permissive Occupancy (PO) – PO agreements with the Minister are pursuant to the CL(Continued Tenures) Act 1989. Under the CL Act, only leases or licences will be issued in thefuture and permissive occupancies will be progressively terminated in favour <strong>of</strong> a licence orlease.Where an individual or organisation proposes to undertake an activity or build a structure or use<strong>Crown</strong> land, they are required to apply for a tenure from the LPMA. LPMA may issue a licence orlease to an individual or organisation for a range <strong>of</strong> purposes, including:The construction <strong>of</strong> waterfront structures (land below the mean high water mark is <strong>Crown</strong>land);Grazing <strong>of</strong> stock;Extractive industry (e.g. quarrying);Agriculture and cultivation;20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 34H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityWater supply and access (e.g. pipelines for irrigation); andShort-term purposes, such as for sporting events or minor extractive operations.<strong>Crown</strong> land may be leased to permit exclusive use over a particular piece <strong>of</strong> land for a specified timeperiod, and in some cases a lease will be more appropriate than providing a licence (which does notconfer exclusive use). In general, leases are sought over land for which long-term security is aconsideration, such as where commercial uses are proposed and/or a major financial outlay isrequired.Figure 4.1 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the tenure status OFRCR lands. Those lands under the ownership<strong>of</strong> the Metropolitan LALC previously formed part <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR and were included in the <strong>Land</strong>Assessment (DoL, 2005), as discussed in Section 1.4.1. For this reason, these land parcels have notbeen included in this study.Table 4.1 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> all land parcels for which a licence or lease has been granted. Fulldetails <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Reserve</strong> Trust and <strong>Reserve</strong> Trust <strong>Management</strong> can be found for each land parcel undertenure in Appendix A. <strong>Land</strong> parcels under lease or licence are also indicated in Figure 4.1. Currentuses <strong>of</strong> OFRCR lands held under tenure were inferred based on information provided in DoL (2005)and observations made on the day <strong>of</strong> the site inspection. Income details for land parcels held undertenure are provided in the economic review (Section 8).Activities currently being undertaken on leased land do not always reflect the stated purpose,although specific licence conditions and lease arrangements were not available for review in thisstudy. Nonetheless, an effort was made to assess the current use <strong>of</strong> tenured land against the<strong>Reserve</strong> Purpose (Table 4.1) and the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the relevant land parcel(s) (Table 4.1). Basedon this assessment, it is recommended that a review <strong>of</strong> all OFRCR lands held under tenure should beundertaken to ensure that the Tenure Purpose (Table 4.1) is consistent with the <strong>Reserve</strong> Purpose,commensurate with the environmental sensitivities <strong>of</strong> the land parcel in question.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 35H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityTable 4.1: Summary <strong>of</strong> Tenures for OFRCR <strong>Land</strong>sLotNo.DP No.<strong>Land</strong>ParcelID No.TenureTenurePurpose1334 752038 85 L146139 Extraction<strong>Reserve</strong>PurposePublicRecreation &UrbanServices<strong>Reserve</strong>Trust<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong><strong>Reserve</strong> Trust<strong>Reserve</strong>TrustManagerMinisterialCorporationCurrent Use(after DoL, 2005)Used for Council worksdepot and stockpiling <strong>of</strong>materials.Comment onCompatibility <strong>of</strong>Tenure Purpose withCurrent <strong>Land</strong>Characteristics*It is understood thatthere are threatenedspecies & habitatconservation areas onthis land parcel thatshould be retained.183 752038 45L156030,L6678Grazing, damand pipelineFuture PublicRequirementsNo trust -Used for grazing 3-4horses. Rubbish/materials scatteredacross the site. Thefence between Lot 183& the neighbouring Lot2517 is missing allowingthe horses to access Lot2517. Sign on theproperty suggests use <strong>of</strong>the land for agistment.Area <strong>of</strong> possible pastsand extraction.This land parcel islocated within a riparianbuffer zone &considerations for thisshould be made (e.g.minimising fertiliseruse).1082 752038 91 L168445 Grazing - - -Shed constructed, usedas a weekender. Nograzing.This parcel comprisesthreatened habitat &may not be suited to thetenure purpose.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 36H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityLotNo.DP No.<strong>Land</strong>ParcelID No.TenureTenurePurpose<strong>Reserve</strong>Purpose<strong>Reserve</strong>Trust<strong>Reserve</strong>TrustManagerCurrent Use(after DoL, 2005)Comment onCompatibility <strong>of</strong>Tenure Purpose withCurrent <strong>Land</strong>Characteristics*1053 752038 1191047 752038 120L174235StoragepurposesPublicRecreation &UrbanServices<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong><strong>Reserve</strong> TrustMinisterialCorporationVegetation has beencompletely removedfrom one section &fenced with sedimentfencing.<strong>Land</strong> parcels 120 & 125are located within ariparian buffer zone & isassociated with a non-Indigenous heritageplace. These featuresshould be affordedprotection.1046 752038 1251053 752038 1191047 752038 1201051 752038 121L403361AccessPublicRecreation &UrbanServices<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong><strong>Reserve</strong> TrustMinisterialCorporationUnauthorisedencroachment <strong>of</strong>building materialrecycling business ontoland from adjoiningfreehold land. Twodams are present alongwith skip bins & piles <strong>of</strong>bulldozed vegetation.Some unauthorisedfilling <strong>of</strong> this area mayhave occurred. Over 15Emus are kept within aA wildlife corridor runsthrough these lots &should be protected.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 37H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityLotNo.DP No.<strong>Land</strong>ParcelID No.TenureTenurePurpose<strong>Reserve</strong>Purpose<strong>Reserve</strong>Trust<strong>Reserve</strong>TrustManagerCurrent Use(after DoL, 2005)fenced enclosure.Overstorey vegetationlargely cleared from landparcel no. 119.Comment onCompatibility <strong>of</strong>Tenure Purpose withCurrent <strong>Land</strong>Characteristics*2627 752038 89 L192632Grazing,market gardenand orchardParish<strong>Reserve</strong> forFuture PublicRequirementsNo Trust. -Not used for marketgarden or grazing. Oldshack type weekenderon land. No powerconnected. Water tanksrusted out. Broken fibrodumped around land.This parcel is locatedwithin a wildlife corridor& comprises areas <strong>of</strong>threatened habitat whichneed protection.181 752038 44 L199849Grazing,nursery,storage shedFuture PublicRequirementsNo Trust. -Held under tenure forthe purpose <strong>of</strong> 3 storagesheds, nursery garden &grazing. A large dam, 3horse enclosures withshelter sheds, a horsearena & a storage shedare all located on theland. An adjoining<strong>Crown</strong> road has alsobeen enclosed withinthe property withoutapproval & a “privatedriveway” sign erected.This parcel is locatedwithin a wildlife corridor& comprises areas <strong>of</strong>threatened habitat whichneed protection.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 38H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityLotNo.DP No.<strong>Land</strong>ParcelID No.TenureTenurePurpose1047 752038 120 L199961 Pipeline<strong>Reserve</strong>PurposePublicRecreation &UrbanServices<strong>Reserve</strong>Trust<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong><strong>Reserve</strong> Trust<strong>Reserve</strong>TrustManagerMinisterialCorporationCurrent Use(after DoL, 2005)Vegetation has beencompletely removedfrom one section &fenced with sedimentfencing. Two dams, skipbins & piles <strong>of</strong> bulldozedvegetation. Someunauthorised filling <strong>of</strong>this area may haveoccurred. Over 15 emusare kept within a fencedenclosure within thisarea.Comment onCompatibility <strong>of</strong>Tenure Purpose withCurrent <strong>Land</strong>Characteristics*This land parcel islocated within a riparianbuffer zone &considerations for thisshould be made.Riparian vegetationshould be protected.1084 752038 90 L302720Dam andpipeline- - -Dam no longer used.Storage & grazing <strong>of</strong> 1goat in a small clearing.This parcel comprisesthreatened habitat whichshould be protected.1084 752038 90 L431972Dam andpipeline- - - See above. See above.2517 752038 34 L316041 -Future PublicRequirements- -Old disused sheds &enclosures, a dam, 2large sheds & recentlyconstructed vine trellisare located on the landThis land parcel islocated within a riparianbuffer zone &considerations for thisshould be made.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 39H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityLotNo.DP No.<strong>Land</strong>ParcelID No.Tenure1062 752038 78 L321023TenurePurposeBuildings,environmentalprotection,residence<strong>Reserve</strong>PurposeFuture PublicRequirements<strong>Reserve</strong>TrustNo Trust. -<strong>Reserve</strong>TrustManagerCurrent Use(after DoL, 2005)A house, several sheds& an animal enclosureare constructed on theland. The houseappears to have beenrecently extended. Alarge proportion <strong>of</strong> theLot has been cleared <strong>of</strong>natural vegetation &appeared to havepreviously been used forkeeping animals,landscaping &agriculture uses, but isnow overgrown withlong grass and weeds.Comment onCompatibility <strong>of</strong>Tenure Purpose withCurrent <strong>Land</strong>Characteristics*Current land use iscompatible with landcharacteristics.192 752038 462640 752038 73L346092EnvironmentalprotectionFuture PublicRequirementsNo Trust. -See below for notes onland parcel 73.See below for notes onland parcel 73.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 40H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityLotNo.DP No.<strong>Land</strong>ParcelID No.Tenure2640 752038 73 L76239TenurePurposePig farm,poultry<strong>Reserve</strong>PurposeFuture PublicRequirements<strong>Reserve</strong>TrustNo Trust. -<strong>Reserve</strong>TrustManagerCurrent Use(after DoL, 2005)About 25 cattle grazedon the land. Structuresinclude three largesheds (one storing alarge boat currentlybeing restored by a thirdparty), one former shednow converted into aresidence, one brick &tile home, &severalsmall grazing paddocks.All stock are hand fed.Unauthorised filling hasoccurred on adjoining<strong>Crown</strong> road reserveusing imported material.Comment onCompatibility <strong>of</strong>Tenure Purpose withCurrent <strong>Land</strong>Characteristics*This land parcel islocated within a riparianbuffer zone &considerations for thisshould be made.153 752038 372858 48272 422857 48272 38117 752038 39L74946SportingfacilitiesFuture PublicRequirementsNo Trust. -Facilities for the ManlyWarringah RadioControl Society.These land parcels arelocated within closeproximity to (oradjoining) GarigalNational Park.109 752038 4020 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 41H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityLotNo.DP No.<strong>Land</strong>ParcelID No.964 752038 56TenureSeveralLicencesTenurePurposeMobile phonetowers<strong>Reserve</strong>PurposePublicRecreation<strong>Reserve</strong>TrustNo Trust. -<strong>Reserve</strong>TrustManagerCurrent Use(after DoL, 2005)Recreational reserve, aswellastelecommunicationstowers.Comment onCompatibility <strong>of</strong>Tenure Purpose withCurrent <strong>Land</strong>Characteristics*This parcel makes upPerentie Park.*”<strong>Land</strong> Characteristics” refer to those aspects used in the Constraints and Opportunities section (Section 4.10), including riparian buffer zones and wildlife corridors. It isassumed that the above parcels are affected by slope and bushfire hazard.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 42H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority4.2 Topography, Geology and Soils4.2.1 TopographyThe topography <strong>of</strong> the larger study area grades from low lying lands around Narrabeen Lagoon ataround 0m elevation up to heights <strong>of</strong> 200m, which occur predominantly in the northern part <strong>of</strong> thelarger study area. Many <strong>of</strong> the land parcels comprising the OFRCR are located at higher elevations,as shown in Figure 4.2.A slope analysis was also undertaken (Figure 4.3) which indicates that many <strong>of</strong> the land parcels aresituated on sloping land, highlighting the function <strong>of</strong> these areas for catchment protection and waterquality. The value <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR for catchment protection purposes has previously been identified(DoL, 2005; DoL, 2006).4.2.2 SoilsSoil <strong>Land</strong>scapesSoil landscapes from the Sydney Soil <strong>Land</strong>scape sheet (Chapman and Murphy, 1989) have beenmapped in Figure 4.4. The predominant soil landscapes characterising the OFRCR are theHawkesbury and Lambert landscapes. Details about the different soil landscapes found in the studyarea are provided below:Deep Creek (dc): Level to gently undulating alluvial floodplain draining the HawkesburySandstone. Limitations include flooding, extreme soil erosion hazard, sedimentation hazard,very low fertility and permanently high water tables;Gymea (gy): Undulating to rolling rises and low hills on Hawkesbury Sandstone. Limitationsinclude localised steep slopes, high soil erosion hazard, rock outcropping, shallow highlypermeable soil and very low soil fertility;Hawkesbury (ha): Rugged, rolling to very steep hills on Hawkesbury Sandstone. Limitationsinclude extreme soil erosion hazard, mass movement (rock fall) hazard, steep slopes, rockoutcropping, shallow, stony, highly permeable soils and low soil fertility;Hornsby (ho): Gently undulating rises to steep low hills on deeply weathered basalticbreccia. Limitations include highly plastic, low wet-strength, highly reactive subsoil, occasionalsteep slopes with an extreme soil erosion hazard and localised mass movement hazard;Lambert (la): Undulating to rolling low hills on Hawkesbury Sandstone. Limitations includevery high soil erosion hazard, rock outcropping, seasonally perched water tables, shallow,highly permeable soil and very low soil fertility;<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> (<strong>of</strong>): Hanging valleys on Hawkesbury Sandstone. Limitations include very highsoil erosion hazard, perched water tables and swamps, highly permeable soils, very low tolow soil fertility and localised rock outcrops;Somersby (so): Gently undulating to rolling rises on deeply weathered HawkesburySandstone. Limitations include localised permanently high water tables, areas <strong>of</strong> laterite andstony soil, very low soil fertility and highly permeable soil;Watagan (wn): Rolling to very steep hills on fine-grained Narrabeen Group sediments.Limitations include mass movement hazard, steep slopes, severe soil erosion hazard andoccasional rock outcrops; andDisturbed (xx): Level plain to hummocky terrain, extensively disturbed by human activities,including complete disturbance, removal or burial <strong>of</strong> soil. Limitations include localisedflooding and run-on, high water tables and highly permeable soil.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 43H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityA key constraint associated with the predominant soil groups within the OFRCR is the high potentialfor erosion. This necessitates careful consideration <strong>of</strong> water cycle management for any sitesproposed for development or disposal. Table 4.2 indicates the hazard level <strong>of</strong> soil erosion in eachMapping Area from the study by DoL (2005).Table 4.2: Soil Erosion Hazard <strong>of</strong> Mapping Areas (After: DoL, 2005)Mapping Area Soil Erosion Hazard (Non-concentratedFlows)Soil Erosion Hazard(Concentrated Flows)1 Low to extreme Low to extreme2 Low to very high Low to extreme3 Low to very high High to extremeAcid Sulfate SoilsAcid sulfate soils (ASS) risk mapping prepared by DIPNR (now DECCW) was investigated and a highprobably <strong>of</strong> occurrence was mapped for locations coincident with Middle Creek (near WakehurstParkway), South Creek (near South Creek Road) and Narrabeen Lagoon (Figure 4.5).ASS are widespread among low lying coastal areas <strong>of</strong> NSW, in estuaries, floodplains and coastallowlands. These are naturally occurring sediments and soils containing iron sulfides (mostly pyrite).Where these are exposed to the air by drainage <strong>of</strong> overlying water or excavation, the iron sulfidesoxidise and form sulfuric acid. Significant water quality issues can result from the disturbance <strong>of</strong> ASSand, in addition, ASS may also impact negatively on below-ground infrastructure. This issue requiresconsideration for any development proposed for any land parcels coinciding with sediments thought tohave the potential for ASS.Contaminated <strong>Land</strong>A search <strong>of</strong> the EPA’s record <strong>of</strong> notices issued under the Contaminated <strong>Land</strong>s <strong>Management</strong> Act 1997was conducted on 5 April 2009. The search revealed three sites for which the notices had beenissued, although all three sites were located outside <strong>of</strong> the study area. A voluntary remediationproposal was submitted in May 2003 by the NSW Department <strong>of</strong> Education and Training for the NSWInstitute <strong>of</strong> Sport site (i.e. the Narrabeen Sports Academy). The affected lots are Lot 1 DP 74818 andpart <strong>of</strong> Lot 869 DP 752038, Lot 870 DP 752038 and Lot 881 DP 752038. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this<strong>Plan</strong> it has been assumed that the contamination does not extend to <strong>Crown</strong> land on the opposite side<strong>of</strong> Middle Creek and Wakehurst Parkway.4.2.3 GeologyGeological mapping obtained from the DoP for the wider study area, is shown in Figure 4.6. Anexplanation <strong>of</strong> the geological characteristics <strong>of</strong> these units is provided below (Geological Survey <strong>of</strong>NSW, 1983):Qha – Quaternary period silty to peaty quartz sand, silt and clay. Ferruginous and humiccementation. Common shell layers;Jv – Jurassic period volcanic breccia, varying amounts <strong>of</strong> sedimentary breccia and basalt;Rh – Hawkesbury Sandstone. Triassic period medium to coarse-grained quartz sandstone,very minor shale and laminite lenses;Rhs – Triassic period shale, laminite;Rnbu – Bulgo Sandstone. Triassic period fine to medium-grained quartz-lithic sandstone withlenticular shale interbeds; and20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 44H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityRnn – Newport Formation and Garie Formation interbedded laminate shale and quartz tolithic-quartz sandstone: minor red claystone north <strong>of</strong> Hawkesbury River. Clay pelletsandstone (Garie Fm) south <strong>of</strong> Hawkesbury River.4.3 Hydrology, Hydraulics and Flooding4.3.1 Hydrology and HydraulicsThe OFRCR lies within the overall catchment <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lakes. OFRCR land parcels lay within thesub-catchments <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> creeks including <strong>Oxford</strong>, Middle, South, Deep, Wheeler and SnakeCreeks. Water quality within the catchment is influenced primarily by nearby land uses includingresidential, commercial and semi-rural operations. The Narrabeen Lagoon catchment is influenced bya number <strong>of</strong> factors which can have broadscale impacts on the hydrology, ecology and consequentlyrecreational use <strong>of</strong> the catchment. Human inputs into the natural system which can affect thecatchment as a whole include (Warringah Council, 2009a):Sedimentation and increased turbidity;Nutrient enrichment which encourages algae and weed growth;Displacement <strong>of</strong> native flora species with noxious weed species which can restrict flowregimes and reduce natural habitat diversity; andChemical and other pollutant inputs which can be toxic and/or bioaccumulate, particularly athigh concentrations.The Warringah Creek <strong>Management</strong> Strategy (Montgomery, Watson and Harza, 2002) was preparedon behalf <strong>of</strong> Warringah Council to review existing and future development pressures and to providerecommendations for the long-term management <strong>of</strong> creeks in the area (Montgomery, Watson andHarza, 2002). The strategy classified Warringah’s creeks into three groups on the basis <strong>of</strong> currentecological values and catchment land uses (Table 4.3).Table 4.3: Classification <strong>of</strong> Creeks Located in Close Proximity to the OFRCR (After: Montgomery WatsonHarza, 2002)Classification Description CreeksABCVery high ecological value; with less than 10%connected impervious area.Some degradation in the upper catchments, buthigh ecological value downstream; generally 10-15% connected impervious area.Generally <strong>of</strong> low to moderate ecological value withmoderate to highly developed catchments - 15-50%connected impervious area.Wheeler and Deep CreeksSnake and <strong>Oxford</strong> CreeksMiddle and South CreeksThis indicates that Middle and South Creeks are <strong>of</strong> relatively low ecological value, however anotherstudy by Smith and Smith (2008) has indicated that despite having extensive urban inputs, MiddleCreek still supports a diversity <strong>of</strong> native flora and fauna, including a number <strong>of</strong> features <strong>of</strong> highconservation significance (Smith and Smith, 2008) (Section 4.4).Site DrainageSite drainage within the OFRCR varies depending on a range <strong>of</strong> factors such as underlying geology,topography and vegetation. Table 4.4 sets out a broad classification <strong>of</strong> site drainage for mappingareas 1, 2 and 3. <strong>Land</strong> parcels within each mapping area can be found in the catchments <strong>of</strong> Deep,<strong>Oxford</strong>, Middle and South Creeks (in addition to sub-catchments <strong>of</strong> Wheeler and Snake Creeks).20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 45H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityTable 4.4: Site Drainage and Creek Catchments for Mapping Areas (After: DoL, 2005)MappingArea123Creek CatchmentsDeep, <strong>Oxford</strong>, Middle andSouth CreeksDeep, <strong>Oxford</strong>, Middle andSouth CreeksDeep, <strong>Oxford</strong>, Middle andSouth CreeksSite DrainageMostly very good, with the exception <strong>of</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong>Sandstone Swamp, Swamp Oak Forest and WaterFern Swamp which all have very poor drainage,and the Coachwood Rainforest, Palm Woodlandand Bangalay Alluvial Forest which have moderateto good drainage.Mostly very goodVery good4.3.2 FloodingThe incidence <strong>of</strong> flooding depends on numerous interrelated factors and can vary greatly betweenrainfall events. Figure 4.7 presents flood extent provided by Warringah Council and shows the 100years Average Recurrence Interval (ARI) and the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) extents for thestudy area. Projected sea-level rise due to climate change is not represented in Figure 4.7 as data isnot available. It is likely that low-lying OFRCR land parcels would be affected by climate change (sealevel rise) impacts.The majority <strong>of</strong> the land parcels within the OFRCR are not subject to flooding due to their elevation.Two parcels subject to considerable risk <strong>of</strong> flooding are the Narrabeen foreshore land parcels 173 and174, which would be inundated during the 100 years ARI event. Other parcels which may be at risk <strong>of</strong>flood include land parcels 100 and 102-110 which lie adjacent to South Creek.4.4 Ecological ProcessesAs outlined above, land parcels <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR lie within the Narrabeen Lagoon catchment. TheNarrabeen Lagoon catchment is comprised <strong>of</strong> many varying vegetation communities includingEndangered Ecological Communities (EECs) protected under the TSC Act such as SwampSclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains (Smith and Smith 2005b). The catchment providessignificant habitat for a range <strong>of</strong> terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna species, including threatenedspecies. The lagoon itself provides significant aquatic habitat (such as seagrass beds) for aquaticspecies.Tributary creeks (Section 4.3.1) also have high levels <strong>of</strong> species diversity and abundance. Smith andSmith (2008) indicated that Middle Creek, for example, supports a rich biodiversity <strong>of</strong> flora and faunadespite heavy urban inputs.4.4.1 FloraDue to urban and other land uses, land parcels within the OFRCR are not always represented bynatural vegetation communities. Table 4.5 outlines the remaining vegetation communities for eachMapping Area and gives details on natural vegetation degradation and any rehabilitative efforts whichhave occurred.The Middle Creek biodiversity assessment by Smith and Smith (2008) indicated the following werepresent in and around the creek:Nine native vegetation communities including Swamp Oak Forest, Bangalay Alluvial Forest,Water Fern Swamp and Estuarine Paperbark Scrub – the last three <strong>of</strong> which are all forms <strong>of</strong>20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 46H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthoritySwamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains (Endangered Ecological Community underthe TSC Act);Two regionally significant communities (Seagrass Meadow and Coachwood Rainforest);Three other communities (Peppermint-Angophora Forest, Bloodwood-Scribbly GumWoodland and Sandstone Heath); andA total <strong>of</strong> 313 native plant species including:o Three rare Australian species (Angophora crassifolia, Darwinia procera andLomandra fluviatilis);o 23 species considered threatened in northern Sydney;o Four species considered threatened in Warringah; ando Eight biogeographically significant species.Threatened FloraTwo nationally significant threatened species have been sighted within the OFRCR (NPWS, 2009):Glandular Pink-bell (Tetratheca glandulosa); andCaley’s Grevillea (Grevillea caleyi).Threatened flora species are further described in Table 4.5 and sightings are mapped in Figure 4.8.It is noted that the mapping <strong>of</strong> threatened flora species is based upon data provided by the NSWWildlife Atlas (DECCW). Data are contributed to the Wildlife Atlas from a range <strong>of</strong> sources and willcontain some sampling bias (i.e. some locations may have been sampled intensively, while othersmay not have been sampled at all). Therefore, the mapping provided in Figure 4.8 should not beconsidered a complete record <strong>of</strong> all threatened species occurring in the study area.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 47H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityTable 4.5: Vegetation Communities and Threatened Flora Species and Communities within the OFRCR (After: Smith and Smith, 2002, and DoL, 2005)MappingArea1Natural Vegetation Communities / Species RemainingSilvertop Ash-Brown Stringybark Forest, Bloodwood-Scribbly GumWoodland, Peppermint-Angophora Forest, Sandstone Heath,Angophora Woodland, Sandstone Swamp, Yellow-top Ash Mallee,Swamp Oak Forest, Coachwood Rainforest, Bangalay Alluvial Forest,Water Fern Swamp and Palm Woodland.Threatened flora and EECsSilvertop Ash-Brown Stringybark Forest is significant as representingthe typical form <strong>of</strong> the Duffys Forest EEC.Endangered species <strong>of</strong> flora present is Persoonia hirsuta.Vulnerable species <strong>of</strong> flora present are Eucalyptus camfieldii (HeartleavedStringy Bark) Pimelia curviflora var. curviflora and Tetrathecaglandulosa. Tetratheca glandulosa (protected under both state andnational legislation) has previously been recorded within OFRCR landparcel 35.ROTAP species have also been recorded – Genoplesium baueri(within land parcel 172).Silvertop Ash-Brown Stringybark Forest is significant as representingthe typical form <strong>of</strong> the Duffys Forest EEC.23Silvertop Ash-Brown Stringybark Forest, Bloodwood-Scribbly GumWoodland, Peppermint-Angophora Forest, Sandstone Heath and asmall area <strong>of</strong> Angophora Woodland and Yellow-top Ash Mallee.Bloodwood-Scribbly Gum Woodland and Sandstone Heath. Upperstorey species include Allocasuarina littoris, A. torulosa, Corymbiagummifera, C. maculata, Eucalyptus pilularis ssp. pilularis, and E.haemastomaGrevillea caleyi (protected under both state and national legislation) isknown to exist within land parcel 28.Endangered species <strong>of</strong> flora present is Persoonia hirsuta.Vulnerable species <strong>of</strong> flora present are Eucalyptus camfieldii (HeartleavedStringy Bark) Pimelia curviflora var. curviflora and Tetrathecaglandulosa. Tetratheca glandulosa (protected under both state andnational legislation) has previously been recorded within land parcel23.Threatened species have been recorded on land parcels 85 and 92.ROTAP species have also been recorded – Boronia fraseri (withinland parcel 125).20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 48H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority4.4.2 FaunaA fauna study conducted by Smith and Smith (2005a) within the Warringah LGA (and outside theNational Parks) recorded the following:A total <strong>of</strong> 408 fauna species (and four additional subspecies) consisting <strong>of</strong>:o 16 frog species;o 45 reptile species;o 304 bird species (four <strong>of</strong> which are known to be represented by two subspecieseach); ando 43 mammal species.A more specific biodiversity study by Smith and Smith (2008) indicated the following were present inand around Middle Creek:A total <strong>of</strong> 138 native fauna species consisting <strong>of</strong>:o Five frog species;o 18 reptile species;o 100 bird species; ando 15 mammal species.NSW Fisheries (DII) has identified Key Fish Habitat within the study area, including NarrabeenLagoon, Middle Creek and South Creek.Threatened FaunaThreatened fauna records sourced from the NSW Wildlife Atlas are shown in Figure 4.8. Aspreviously discussed, the mapping provided in Figure 4.8 should not be considered a completerecord <strong>of</strong> all threatened species occurring in the study area.Two nationally significant threatened species have been sighted within the OFRCR (NPWS, 2009):Spotted-tail Quoll (Dasyurus maculatus maculatus), SE mainland population; andGrey-headed Flying-fox (Pteropus poliocephalus).According to DoL (2005), Mapping Areas 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 were not found to contain threatened fauna,whilst within Mapping Area 3, the following species were recorded or had been previously recorded :Rosenbergs Goanna (Varanus rosenbergi);Glossy Black Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami);Red-crowned Toadlet (Pseudophyrne australis); andPowerful Owl (Ninox strenua).According to the NSW NPWS Wildlife Atlas (NPWS, 2009) seven threatened fauna species havebeen recorded within the OFRCR. These include: Rosenburgs Goanna (Varanus rosenbergi) (e.g. land parcel 16); Red <strong>Crown</strong>ed Toadlet (Pseudophyrne australis) (e.g. land parcel 19); Black Bittern (Ixobrychus flavicollis ) (land parcel 163); Glossy Black Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus lathami) (land parcel 58); Spotted-tail Quoll (Dasyurus maculatus) (land parcel 143); Grey-headed Flying Fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) (land parcel 60); and Eastern Bentwing Bat (Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis) (land parcel 167).The Middle Creek Biodiversity Assessment by Smith and Smith (2008) indicated the presence <strong>of</strong>species similar to NPWS (2009), with nine threatened species being recorded as present in and20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 49H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authorityaround the creek. In addition to some <strong>of</strong> those recorded by NPWS (2009), the following were alsorecorded:Giant Burrowing Frog (Heleioporus australiacus);Osprey (Pandion haliaetus);Powerful Owl (Ninox strenua); andEastern Bentwing Bat (Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis).4.5 Bushfire RiskBushfire hazard is an important consideration for determining the capability <strong>of</strong> the land within theOFRCR and adjacent sites for development purposes. The Warringah LGA Bushfire Prone <strong>Land</strong> Map(NSW Rural Fire Service, 2003) indicates the following in relation to OFRCR land parcels Category 1 (highest category) – The majority <strong>of</strong> land parcels within the OFRCR are locatedwithin this category; Category 2 (intermediate category) – Three OFRCR land parcels (land parcels 24, 19 and 30)are located within Category 2 land; and Uncategorised <strong>Land</strong> (lowest category) - Two parcels (land parcels 12 and 62) are located onuncategorised land. Parcel 174 is also located primarily on uncategorised land (but alsoincorporates a small section <strong>of</strong> Category 2 land).Figure 4.9, which shows all bushfire prone land (Category 1 or 2 inclusive <strong>of</strong> buffer), indicates that themajority <strong>of</strong> OFRCR land parcels are located on bushfire prone land and that there are only very smallareas <strong>of</strong> unclassified land (parcels 12, 62 and 99).The bushfire hazard and risks identified for the three Mapping Areas by DoL (2005) are set out inTable 4.6.Table 4.6: Bushfire Classification <strong>of</strong> Mapping Areas (After: DoL, 2005)MappingAreaPart <strong>of</strong> MappingAreaBush Fire Hazard1 Whole High Major2 Whole High Major3<strong>Land</strong> parcel 12 (Lot1 DP 700298)<strong>Land</strong> parcel 62 (Lot971 DP 752038)EnvironmentalRiskCleared (urban) Insignificant MajorCleared (urban), Insignificant MinorCommunity RiskInsignificant ormoderate.Small areas along thebushland / urbaninterface on <strong>Crown</strong>land - majorInsignificant ormoderate.Small areas along thebushland / urbaninterface on <strong>Crown</strong>land - major20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 50H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityMappingArea3 (cont.)Part <strong>of</strong> MappingAreaPart <strong>of</strong> parcel 70and 71 (Lots 1008and 1009 DP752038)Parcel 92 (Lot 7034DP 93795)Bush Fire HazardEnvironmentalRiskCleared (non-forest) Insignificant MajorCommunity RiskCleared (non-forest) Insignificant InsignificantOther areas High MajorInsignificant ormoderateSmall areas along thebushland / urbaninterface on <strong>Crown</strong>land - major4.6 Cultural HeritageThe <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> area comprises a number <strong>of</strong> heritage items and places which are <strong>of</strong> cultural andspiritual significance.4.6.1 Aboriginal HeritageThe traditional land owners within the Warringah LGA are the Guringai (Ku-ring-gai) people.Cultural heritage sites found within the Warringah area give evidence <strong>of</strong> the past occupation <strong>of</strong> theland by Aboriginal people and provide insight into the traditional culture <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal people. AnAboriginal place at Cromer Heights is heritage listed as a Registered Place on the Register <strong>of</strong> theNational Estate. There were also some 88 Aboriginal heritage items referenced by the onlineAboriginal Heritage Information <strong>Management</strong> System (AHIMS), including rock engravings, middensand shelters with art when an online database search was conducted for the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>, Belroseand Cromer areas (DECC, 2009a). OFRCR land parcels which comprise or are in close proximity toAboriginal sites include land parcels 3, 4, 48, 59, 82, 84, 110, 112 & 113.Since the DoL (2005) study, the Sydney Metropolitan LALC has taken ownership <strong>of</strong> a portion <strong>of</strong> theland previously identified as <strong>Crown</strong> land (Section 4.1.2).4.6.2 Non-Indigenous HeritageNational Heritage ListingsA search on the Australian Heritage Database (DEWHA, 2009b) returned 28 results for the WarringahLGA. Those located around the OFRCR area are as follows (all listed as either Registered orIndicative places on the Register <strong>of</strong> the National Estate): Bantry Bay Public Magazine Flat Rock Track Killarney Heights, NSW, Australia -(Registered); Bantry Bay <strong>Reserve</strong> Area (former) Wakehurst Parkway Killarney Heights, NSW, Australia(Registered); Beacon Hill and Governor Phillip Lookout <strong>Reserve</strong>s Willandra Rd Beacon Hill, NSW, Australia(Registered); Belrose Grevillea Caleyi Site Belrose, NSW, Australia (Indicative Place); Betty Moloney Garden 18 Hurdis Av Frenchs Forest, NSW, Australia (Indicative Place);20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 51H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityDeep and Middle Creeks Area Wakehurst Pwy Narrabeen, NSW, Australia (Indicative Place);andNarrabeen Lagoon Catchment Wakehurst Pwy Narrabeen, NSW, Australia (Indicative Place).NSW Heritage ListingsA search on the State Heritage Database for NSW (DoP Heritage Branch, 2009) returned two resultsfor the Warringah LGA for Heritage items protected under the NSW Heritage Act. These are:Bantry Bay Explosives Depot, Killarney HeightsManly Dam, King Street (near) Manly ValeNeither <strong>of</strong> these heritage items are located within or adjacent to the OFRCR.Local Heritage ListingsThe Warringah Local Environmental <strong>Plan</strong> 2000 (WLEP2000) has a listing <strong>of</strong> approximately 150 itemsand areas which have local heritage significance, ranging from private dwellings, public buildings,gardens, reserves, commercial and industrial buildings, rock pools, landscape features to bus sheltersand memorials (Warringah Council, 2009b).A search on the State Heritage Database for NSW (DoP Heritage Branch, 2009a) returned 168results for heritage sites and places in the Warringah LGA listed by Local Government. Only six <strong>of</strong>these are located in the nearby suburbs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>, Wheeler Heights and Beacon Hill, and arelisted as follows:Governor Phillip Lookout <strong>Reserve</strong>, cnr Warringah Road and Willandra Road, Beacon Hill;James Wheeler Grave, 1 James Wheeler Place, Wheeler Heights;<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Heritage Conservation Area, Adjacent Wakehurst Parkway and <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>Road, <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>;<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Public School, cnr Dreadnought Road and Wakehurst Parkway, <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>;Ruins <strong>of</strong> Wheeler Homestead, War Veteran's Home <strong>Land</strong>, Wheeler Heights; andWarringah Reservoir (WS 0131), Government Road, Beacon Hill.The two heritage items within the suburb <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> are <strong>of</strong> particular relevance to this plan <strong>of</strong>management due to proximity to the OFRCR. <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> (the waterfall) which lies within land parcel122, makes up part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Heritage Conservation Area, whilst <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Public Schoollies within the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Peace Park in close proximity to land parcels 82-85.No locally listed heritage items were returned for Cromer, Cromer Heights or Belrose.4.7 <strong>Land</strong> Usage4.7.1 Existing Recreational Amenity and AccessThere are a range <strong>of</strong> local recreational groups that utilise land within the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Area. Commonland-based recreational activities that are undertaken within the OFRCR are outlined in Table 4.7 andmapped in Figure 4.10.For several land parcels, the types <strong>of</strong> recreational uses that are permitted on that land parcel areunclear.There is also a management issue relating to the differing management practices for <strong>Crown</strong> land andNational Parks land. It is noted that some types <strong>of</strong> recreational activities are permitted on <strong>Crown</strong> land,but not on National Parks land. On the ground, the boundaries between <strong>Crown</strong> land parcels and20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 52H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authorityadjoining lands (e.g. Garigal National Park which is managed by DECCW) are not always clearlydefined or delineated, and this can cause confusion for recreational users. Where sign posting is notprovided, recreational users may inadvertently engage in non-permitted activities, being unaware thatthey have crossed the boundary between these two types <strong>of</strong> lands. This represents a managementissue for both LPMA and DECCW.Any recreational usage <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> land is permitted under the CL Act. Therefore, there are no specificrestrictions on recreational usage <strong>of</strong> OFRCR lands. However, trail bike riding is considered to beinappropriate within the OFRCR due to the environmental sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Reserve</strong> lands. WithinNational Park lands, recreational usage is more restricted. Walking and picnicking are permitted,while mountain biking and horse riding are not permitted - except on designated management tracks.Trail bike riding is not permitted in the National Park.The current use <strong>of</strong> parcel 92 as an informal bike track is not permitted under the Warringah LEP andthis situation will continue under the draft LEP due to the land use zoning. This is a particular issuegiven the presence <strong>of</strong> threatened vegetation on the site.Table 4.7: Primary <strong>Land</strong>-Based Recreational Activities Undertaken in and around the OFRCR (After DoL,2005)ActivityWalking,bushwalking,jogging<strong>Land</strong> Parcel IDNo.Lot and DP Numbers46 Lot 192 DP 752038 Yes108, 110, 113 &114Lot 7036 DP 93795 and Lots 825,829 & 830 DP 75203816, 20 & 21 Lots 161, 165 & 166 DP 752038(Five Mile Creek Trail)63 & 64 Lots 978 DP 752038 & Lot 2 DP808682Authorised Use?YesYesYes134, 135 & 142 Lot 1015, 1029 & 1030 DP 752038 Yes122 Lot 1043 DP 752038 (<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>Waterfall)83 & 84 Part Lots 1 and 2 DP 853151 andpart Lot 2869 DP 824056 (<strong>Oxford</strong><strong>Falls</strong> Peace Park)174 Unsurveyed <strong>Crown</strong> land adjoiningCromer Golf CourseYesYesYes173 Lot 7061 DP 93798 Yes137 Lot 1132 DP 752038 Yes138 Lot 198 DP 752038 (at waterfall) YesPicnicking 173 Lot 7061 DP 93798 Yes138 Lot 198 DP 752038 (at waterfall) YesDog exercising 173 Lot 7061 DP 93798 Yes20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 53H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityActivityHorse riding andhorse training<strong>Land</strong> Parcel IDNo.Lot and DP Numbers35 & 46 Lots 179 and 192 DP 752038 YesAuthorised Use?14 Lot 146 DP 752038 Unauthorised horsearena81 Lot 1064 DP 752038 Unauthorised horsearena13 Lot 6 DP 700298 Yes134, 135 & 142 Lots 1015, 1029 & 1030 DP 752038 Yes128 Lot 1034 DP 752038 Yes44 Lot 181 DP 752038 Yes126 Lots 1036 DP 752038 Yes137 Lot 1132 DP 752038 YesMountain biking(pedal)35 & 46 Lots 179 and 192 DP 752038 Yes108, 110, 113 &114Lot 7036 DP 93795 and Lots 825,829 & 830 DP 752038Yes16, 20 & 21 Lots 161, 165 & 166 DP 752038(Five Mile Creek Trail)Yes92 Lot 7034 DP 93795 No*134, 135 & 142 Lot 1015, 1029 & 1030 DP 752038 Yes128 Lot 1034 DP 752038 Yes38-42 Lots 2857 & 2858 DP 48272, Lots109 & 117 DP 752038, Lot 7029 DP1030769No126 Lots 1036 DP 752038 Yes137 Lot 1132 DP 752038 YesTrail biking(motorised)35 & 46 Lots 179 and 192 DP 752038 Yes92 Lot 7034 DP 93795 No*108, 110, 113 &114Lot 7036 DP 93795 and Lots 825,829 & 830 DP 752038Yes16, 20 & 21 Lot 1015, 1029 & 1030 DP 752038 Yes38-42 Lots 2857 & 2858 DP 48272, Lots109 & 117 DP 752038, Lot 7029 DP1030769No126 Lots 1036 DP 752038 Yes137 Lot 1132 DP 752038 Yes20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 54H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityActivity<strong>Land</strong> Parcel IDNo.Lot and DP NumbersAuthorised Use?radio-Flyingcontrolledaircraft38-42 Lots 2857 & 2858 DP 48272, Lots109 & 117 DP 752038, Lot 7029 DP1030769Yes (under licence)*LPMA has attempted to negotiate the use <strong>of</strong> this land parcel (predominately by bike users), through avenuessuch as consideration <strong>of</strong> a lease arrangement.Other recreational activities that are carried out within the OFRCR and surrounding areas which wereless defined in previous studies include:Bird watching;Fishing;Kayaking, canoeing and rowing;Swimming;Power boating;Windsurfing and kitesurfing; andSailing.Water-based recreational activities are likely to be carried out in Narrabeen Lagoon, and although notpart <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR, water-based recreational users may be likely to utilise OFRCR land parcels,particularly those adjoining Narrabeen Lagoon (land parcels 173 and 174).Current recreational amenities exist within land parcel 173 at Middle Creek <strong>Reserve</strong> and includepublic toilets, picnic benches and barbeques.Recreational Clubs in the area include:Northern Beaches Mountain Biking Group;Manly Warringah Mountain Bike Club;Warringah Radio Control Society;Narrabeen Lagoon Sailing Club;Garigal District Scouts; andGarigal Rovers.4.7.2 Future Recreational DemandsA Recreation Strategy <strong>Plan</strong> was produced for the Warringah LGA (Suter and Associates, 1998) toprovide strategic direction for Council in regard to the provision and management <strong>of</strong> recreation withinWarringah. The below points are relevant to the current and future recreational management <strong>of</strong> theOFRCR. In relation to current and future recreational demands, the strategy identified that there is aneed for the following (Suter and Associates, 1998):A greater emphasis on less structured recreation areas, particularly:o Walking and cycling trails that create and improve linkages between open space andcommunity facilities;o Picnic and barbecue areas;o Grassed areas available for casual play and use;More structured and unstructured recreation opportunities for young people, including:o Multi-purpose skating and rollerblading facilities;o Hard surface areas for ball games and general activity;o Places to meet and socialise;o Information on and access to recreation activities;20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 55H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityProvision <strong>of</strong> accessible areas and facilities, particularly with the trend towards an ageingcommunity;Emphasis on upgrades to existing facilities rather than development <strong>of</strong> new facilities,including:o Warringah Aquatic Centre;o Sporting and public amenity buildings;o Community centres;o Local playgrounds;o Rock pools;o Sporting grounds (particularly irrigation and drainage upgrades);A more coordinated approach to managing Council-owned facilities, with an emphasis onensuring access to the broad community and the provision <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> recreationopportunities;Protection and enhancement <strong>of</strong> the natural environment so that it can continue to provideunique and appreciated settings for recreation;Warringah Council to continue being the catalyst for community participation in recreation bytaking an active role in initiating and guiding recreation programs and activities;A greater emphasis on recreation programs and activities to meet changing communitydemographics and needs, particularly:o Outdoor and less structured activities, e.g. walking, surfing etc.;o Health and fitness;o Cultural and arts activities;o Addressing the needs <strong>of</strong> specific target groups, e.g. youth, older adults etc.;o Improved design and promotion <strong>of</strong> information on recreation opportunities; andFormation <strong>of</strong> stronger partnerships with the community, adjoining Councils and other levels <strong>of</strong>government, in the provision and management <strong>of</strong> community facilities and services.Commensurate with LEP zonings, a range <strong>of</strong> recreational activities may be undertaken within the<strong>Reserve</strong> in the future, including:Skate board ramp;Paint-ball centre;Mini-golf centre;Go-kart track;Equestrian centre;Lawn bowling green; and/orWater-ski centre.4.7.3 Visitation and TourismThe OFRCR and surrounding areas enjoy a prime coastal location which can be an attractivedestination for visitors and tourists from local areas and other regions in NSW and beyond. Theproximity <strong>of</strong> the area to the Sydney CBD also plays a part in this. Locations that are likely to beprimary visitation areas within and around the OFRCR are outlined in Table 4.8:Table 4.8: Examples <strong>of</strong> Primary Recreational Locations and Associated Activities within and around theOFRCRLocationNarrabeen Lagoon foreshores, includingMiddle Creek <strong>Reserve</strong> and Jamison Park<strong>Reserve</strong>.Example <strong>of</strong> ActivitiesBushwalking along Narrabeen Lagoon foreshore,kayaking, swimming.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 56H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityLocation<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>Lizard RockBeacon Hill <strong>Reserve</strong> and Governor PhillipLookoutGarigal National ParkNorthern BeachesExample <strong>of</strong> ActivitiesBushwalking to the waterfall.Bushwalking nearby.Picnicking, dog walking and bushwalking.Bushwalking on one <strong>of</strong> many tracks.Picnicking/BBQ, swimming and surfing.A number <strong>of</strong> events are held within the Warringah LGA including:Warringah Council’s Possum Magic Festival;Warringah Art Exhibition;Warringah’s National Tree Day;Performances and shows at the Glen Street Theatre, Belrose;Narrabeen Beach Challenge (ocean kayaking); andFenn Cup Series (ocean kayaking).The Sydney Academy <strong>of</strong> Sport and Recreation provides camps and activity programs for communitygroups and families which are likely to draw people from a range <strong>of</strong> areas. Programs include outdooreducation, corporate team-building and sports science.Cromer Golf Course held the NSW Golf Association 2009 NSW Foursomes Championship in August,which attracted visitors from across the state.4.7.4 Commercial OperatorsA number <strong>of</strong> OFRCR land parcels are held under licence by commercial operators. A commercialoperation is considered here to be an activity which provides direct or relatively direct income orrevenue to the leaseholder. Table 4.9 provides details <strong>of</strong> these. Income details for land parcels heldunder tenure are provided in the economic review (Section Error! Reference source not found., TableF.).Table 4.9: Commercial Tenures within the OFRCR (After DoL, 2005)<strong>Land</strong>LotParcel DP No. Tenure Current Commercial UseNo.ID No.45 183 752038 L156030, L6678 Grazing (including dam and pipeline)91 1082 752038 L168445 Grazing89 2627 752038 L192632 Grazing, market garden and orchard44 181 752038 L199849 Grazing, nursery, storage shed90 1084 752038 L302720, L431972 Dam and pipeline73 2640 752038 L346092, L76239 Pig and poultry farm20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 57H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority<strong>Land</strong>ParcelID No.LotNo.DP No. Tenure Current Commercial Use56 964 752038 Several licences Telstra mobile phone towersOther commercial activities which operate in close proximity to the OFRCR include:Cromer Golf Club; andThe Sydney Academy <strong>of</strong> Sport and Recreation.Commercial opportunities within certain land parcels <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR may not be fully realisedcurrently. There may be some potential to further explore a very limited number <strong>of</strong> commercialoperations for certain land parcels within the OFRCR, in accordance with the ecological and socioculturalvalues <strong>of</strong> the area.4.8 Visual Amenity and <strong>Land</strong>scape CharacterThe OFRCR has particularly high scenic value and comprises areas <strong>of</strong> relatively intact naturalvegetation, ecological features and landforms, with extensive views from higher reaches andridgetops looking down to areas such as the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Valley and the east coast <strong>of</strong> NSW.Lookouts contribute to the scenic and aesthetic amenity <strong>of</strong> the area and include Governor PhillipLookout, Beacon Hill and other lookouts at Red Hill <strong>Reserve</strong>, Deep Creek <strong>Reserve</strong> and alongLindhurst Way, Belrose. Views <strong>of</strong> the water along the Narrabeen foreshores are also prominent andadd to the character <strong>of</strong> the landscape. Informal lookouts include those from OFRCR land parcelssuch as 101 (distant views to ocean) and from Corymbia Circuit onto 70 (bushland views).Photographs demonstrating the landscape character <strong>of</strong> the area can be found in Appendix C (Photos9, 10, 17, 22, 29 and 30). Access to these areas is important for the local community as well asvisitors and tourists to experience the landscape character <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR and its surrounds.4.9 Existing Infrastructure and AssetsSewerage InfrastructureMost sewerage infrastructure owned and operated by Sydney Water Corporation is located in theresidential areas to the south <strong>of</strong> the study area. There are limited services to most OFRCR landparcels. <strong>Land</strong> parcels adjacent to Morgan Road, Maybrook Avenue, Little Willandra Road andWakehurst Parkway are generally located within close proximity to sewer mains, whilst sewerinfrastructure can be found on <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> within OFRCR land parcels 63, 64, 80, 102-104, 166, 168,and 169.Water InfrastructureWater utilities operated by Sydney Water Corporation service residential lots to the south <strong>of</strong> theOFRCR, and infrastructure can be found along roads with residential properties such as MorganRoad, Wearden Road, <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Road, Little Willandra Road and Maybrook Avenue.OFRCR land parcels that lie within close proximity to water mains include 23, 24, 28-31, 63, 64, 66-72, 85, 95, 97 (crosses through the lot), and 102-104.Electricity and Telecommunications InfrastructureElectricity and telecommunications infrastructure exists on the following land parcels (DoL, 2005):20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 58H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority24 – Cable TV cable crossing lot;33 – High voltage easement;47 – Powerlines;56 – 132kv power transmission line and telecommunication tower;70 – High voltage lines (adjacent to this lot);95 – Powerline crossing lot;97 – Powerlines;101 – Powerline easement and power line crossing lot;106, 108, 110 and 112 – Power lines crossing lot; and169 – 132kv power transmission line;4.10 Rapid Spatial AssessmentBased on the site inspection, data compilation and review and initial stakeholder consultation, theOFRCR was found to have substantial significance with respect to a range <strong>of</strong> different features,including catchment protection, environmental protection (including flora and fauna), recreational use,cultural heritage and visual character.For this reason, a Rapid Spatial Assessment was undertaken in order to summarise the findings <strong>of</strong>the <strong>Land</strong> Assessment (DoL, 2005) in conjunction with the additional information compiled during thedata compilation and review stage (Task 2 <strong>of</strong> the scope <strong>of</strong> works). Using spatial modelling techniquesin a Geographical Information System (GIS), a Rapid Spatial Assessment (RSA) <strong>of</strong> values and riskwas performed to summarise the inherent values and risks associated with each individual land parcelwithin the OFRCR. Table 4.10 provides a summary <strong>of</strong> the 12 land characteristics that were used inthe RSA, as well as the values and/or risks associated with these characteristics.Table 4.10: Summary <strong>of</strong> Attributes used in Rapid Spatial Assessment<strong>Land</strong> Characteristic Value/Risk Data Source1. Riparian Buffer Zones Catchment Protection ValuesEnvironmental Protection ValuesWarringah Council GIS,Cardno analysis2. Wildlife Corridors Environmental Protection Values Warringah Council GIS3. Indigenous Heritage Cultural Heritage Values DECCW (AHIMS)4. Non-Indigenous Heritage Cultural Heritage Values Warringah Council GIS5.Threatened Habitat Areas including Environmental Protection Values Warringah Council GISEndangered Ecological Communities6. Core Bushland Habitat Environmental Protection Values Warringah Council GIS7. Recreation Areas Recreation Values Warringah Council GIS8. Areas with a Slope >10% Catchment Protection ValuesHazards and RiskWarringah Council GIS,Cardno analysis9. Bushfire Prone <strong>Land</strong> (Category 1, Catchment Protection Values Warringah Council GISCategory 2 and/or buffer)Hazards and Risk10. Acid Sulfate Soils Risk Catchment Protection Values Warringah Council GISHazards and Risk11. Extreme Erosion Hazard Catchment Protection ValuesHazards and Risk12. Flooding Hazard (land within the100 year ARI extent)Hazards and RiskDNR and Chapman,G.A & Murphy, C.L.(1989)Warringah Council GISFor the RSA, each land parcel was assessed and given a value <strong>of</strong> either “0” (indicating that the landcharacteristic was not present) or “1” (indicating that the land characteristic was present on part or all<strong>of</strong> the land parcel). These values were summed to give a score from 0 to 12. The outcome <strong>of</strong> theRSA was therefore a score for each land parcel within the OFRCR that provides an indication <strong>of</strong> the20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 59H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authoritykey attributes or values associated with each land parcel. The scores also provide some guidance tothe <strong>Reserve</strong> Trust as to what type <strong>of</strong> activities might be compatible with the features <strong>of</strong> an individualland parcel. <strong>Land</strong> parcels that received higher scores are likely to have a larger number <strong>of</strong> significantattributes that relate to the value and use <strong>of</strong> that area. Strategic identification <strong>of</strong> future usage <strong>of</strong> theseland parcels is therefore likely to be important.The lower and upper limit rapid spatial assessment scores are as follows:0 = no significant value in terms <strong>of</strong> the attributes listed in Table 4.10; and12 = significant inherent value combined with significant natural hazards and risk to land use.Scores in between these two extremes represent a continuum whereby combinations <strong>of</strong> differentattributes (values or risks) are associated with each land parcel.These scores are intended for use as a guide to site-specific values and risks only. However ingeneral terms, sites with a high score are more likely to be retained for conservation and recreation,while sites with a lower score are more likely to be allocated a new land use in keeping with theobjectives <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR.For example, land parcel 172 received a score <strong>of</strong> 10 because the following ten attributes were foundto be present on this land parcel: Riparian Buffer Zones; Wildlife Corridors; Non-Indigenous Heritage; Threatened Habitat Areas including Endangered Ecological Communities; Core Bushland/Habitat; Recreation Areas; Areas with a Slope >10%; Bushfire Prone <strong>Land</strong> (Category 1, Category 2 and/or buffer); Acid Sulfate Soils Risk; and Extreme Erosion Hazard.Based on the presence <strong>of</strong> these attributes within land parcel 172, LMPA may decide to designate theprimary purpose <strong>of</strong> this land parcel as environmental protection and recreation within the <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Management</strong>.The results <strong>of</strong> the assessment have been tabulated and are provided in Appendix D.4.10.1 LimitationsThe rapid spatial assessment provides an overview <strong>of</strong> the main landscape characteristics and givesan indication <strong>of</strong> which land parcels may be suitable for certain land uses. However, there arelimitations <strong>of</strong> the assessment, as follows:Only a limited number <strong>of</strong> characteristics were considered by the assessment;Each characteristic was equally weighted (i.e. slope was considered to have equal influenceon future land use as presence <strong>of</strong> a threatened habitat);Spatial data, which was gathered from a number <strong>of</strong> sources (e.g. DECCW and WarringahCouncil), may contain some inaccuracies; andPotential for as yet unknown items such as threatened species or Aboriginal heritage itemsmay exist.These limitations mean that the results achieved from this assessment should be used as a guide tovalues and risks rather than a definitive basis for decision-making.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 60H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority4.10.2 Environmentally Sensitive <strong>Land</strong>sEnvironmentally sensitive lands incorporate those parcels which are likely to be more suited toenvironmental protection and low intensity community use/recreation due to high biodiversity,catchment, cultural heritage or recreation values. Particularly environmentally sensitive lands arelikely to include land parcels that received higher scores in the rapid spatial assessment.The highest returned value in the rapid spatial assessment for all land parcels was 10 (out <strong>of</strong> 12).One land parcel (172) returned a score <strong>of</strong> 10, meaning that ten out <strong>of</strong> 12 land characteristics werepresent and that environmental protection and passive recreational uses are likely to be moresuitable.A score <strong>of</strong> 9 out <strong>of</strong> 12 was returned for 18 land parcels. Similarly, environmental protection andpassive recreational uses are likely to be more suitable for these areas. <strong>Land</strong> parcel 122, forexample, comprises <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> (the waterfall). The following land parcels returned a score <strong>of</strong> 9: 122 133 141 146 147 149 151 154 156 157 160 161 163 164 167 169 170 171These findings are consistent with the preferred land use (DoL, 2005), which categorised all theabove land parcels as ‘Green’ Areas, being lands classified for “Environment/Community”. Inaddition, these findings are also consistent with the Mapping Areas from the land assessment (DoL,2005). All the above land parcels had previously been assigned to Mapping Area 1 (suitable forenvironmental protection and low intensity recreation (natural or semi-natural) and not suitable forurban development).4.10.3 Less Environmentally Sensitive <strong>Land</strong>sLess environmentally sensitive lands incorporate those parcels which are likely to be capable <strong>of</strong>sustaining slightly more intensive uses (e.g. recreational uses) as they possess slightly lowerbiodiversity, catchment or cultural heritage values, or are subject to lower levels <strong>of</strong> environmental risk.Some <strong>of</strong> these parcels may be considered suitable for disposal subject to additional, detailed studiesat these locations.The lowest returned value in the rapid spatial assessment for land parcels was 2 out <strong>of</strong> 12. Only oneland parcel received this score (land parcel 62), with only two out <strong>of</strong> 12 land characteristics present forthis land parcels. A score <strong>of</strong> 3 out <strong>of</strong> 12 was returned for 8 land parcels, as listed below: 12 28 30 31 32 99 116 118.These findings are relatively consistent with the preferred land use (DoL, 2005), which categorisedthe majority <strong>of</strong> the above land parcels as ‘Orange’ Areas, being lands classified for “InvestigateDisposal”.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 61H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority5 <strong>Management</strong> StudyIn accordance with Task 3 <strong>of</strong> the scope <strong>of</strong> works (Section 1.6), this section summarises themanagement context in terms <strong>of</strong> the values and significance <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR lands (Section 5.1) andkey management issues identified during the course <strong>of</strong> this study (Section 5.2). Based on thisinformation, a series <strong>of</strong> goals for management (Section 5.3) have been developed and a number <strong>of</strong>management options proposed for consideration for inclusion as actions in the plan <strong>of</strong> management(Section 5.4). Under the plan, specific actions for implementation would be selected annually duringthe forward planning and prioritisation process.5.1 Values and SignificanceThe values and significance <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR lands have been assessed based on the feedbackprovided by stakeholders (Section 2.3), and the data compilation and review process detailed inSection 4. Determining the values and significance <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR and surrounding areas formed animportant step in setting the context for the management goals (Section 5.3).5.1.1 Catchment ProtectionNarrabeen Lagoon CatchmentNarrabeen Lagoon catchment provides habitat for a range flora and fauna species and is comprised<strong>of</strong> many varying vegetation communities including Peppermint Angophora Forest and Water FernSwamp (Smith and Smith 2005b). The lagoon itself provides habitat (such as seagrass beds) forbirds, fish and invertebrates. The lagoon and foreshore areas form part <strong>of</strong> a wildlife corridor whichlinks Long Reef Headland, Dee Why Lagoon and South Creek to the Warriewood Wetlands(Warringah Council, 2009a). The area also provides extensive and significant areas for recreationalusers, providing for activities such as bushwalking, cycling and mountain biking, swimming, kayakingand boating (Section 4.7.1).TributariesTributary creeks such as Middle, Snake, Wheeler, Deep, South and <strong>Oxford</strong> Creeks have high levels<strong>of</strong> species diversity and abundance. A biodiversity study <strong>of</strong> Wheeler Creek (NPA, 2001) recorded atotal <strong>of</strong> 11 mammal species, 13 reptile species and rare species <strong>of</strong> birds not seen in similar bushlandnearby, whilst Smith and Smith (2008), indicate that Middle Creek supports a rich biodiversity <strong>of</strong> floraand fauna. Narrabeen Lagoon, Middle Creek and South Creek are all considered by NSW DII to beKey Fish Habitat.Parks and <strong>Reserve</strong>sGarigal National ParkGarigal National Park lies to the north and south <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR, with some OFRCR land parcels lyingdirectly adjacent to the northern areas <strong>of</strong> the National Park (e.g. land parcels 38, 39, 40, 169, 171 and172). Parts <strong>of</strong> Garigal National Park lie within the Narrabeen Lagoon catchment and provide habitatlinkages and wildlife corridors between the OFRCR, Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park, the NarrabeenLagoon foreshores and other bushland areas in the Warringah LGA. The park is a source <strong>of</strong> extensivenatural habitats and species diversity and abundance.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 62H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityWheeler Creek <strong>Reserve</strong>The National Parks Association (NPA) owns a portion <strong>of</strong> land in Wheeler Creek Valley which ismanaged as a flora and fauna reserve and shares boundaries on two sides with OFRCR land. Thisland is held under a Voluntary Conservation Agreement with Natural Areas Ltd so that it can beconserved and protected.Narrabeen Head Aquatic <strong>Reserve</strong>The Narrabeen Head Aquatic <strong>Reserve</strong> includes the whole foreshore from the southern end <strong>of</strong>Turimetta Beach to the rock baths at Narrabeen Head, extending 100 metres seawards from meanlow water. Although not located directly adjacent to the OFRCR, the Narrabeen Head Aquatic<strong>Reserve</strong> is located within close proximity to Narrabeen Lagoon and may therefore be influenced bycatchment inputs to the lagoon. The reserve incorporates a combination <strong>of</strong> estuarine and oceanicinfluences, supports a wide variety <strong>of</strong> marine life and has educational value with respect to catchmentconservation (DECC, 2009b).5.1.2 Environmental Protection – Flora and FaunaThe OFRCR and surrounding areas comprise diverse habitats which have given rise to a range <strong>of</strong>flora and fauna species. Flora, fauna and vegetation community surveys undertaken for theWarringah LGA by Smith and Smith (2002, 2005a, 2005b) indicate that a range <strong>of</strong> species can befound in the area, including a number <strong>of</strong> threatened species. A rapid fauna habitat assessmentconducted by Sydney Metropolitan Catchment <strong>Management</strong> Authority (SMCMA, 2008) assessed 50sites within the Sydney catchment area for biodiversity values. Narrabeen Lakes was ranked in the“Highest” category in terms <strong>of</strong> fauna values, whilst Garigal-<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> was ranked in the “Very High”category.In addition to this:24 flora and fauna species found in the area are listed as threatened under theCommonwealth EPBC Act (DEWHA, 2009a); and15 flora species and 32 fauna species found in the area are listed as threatened under theTSC Act (NPWS, 2009).EECs found in the Narrabeen catchment include Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains(Smith and Smith, 2005b). Smith and Smith (2002, 2005a, 2005b) also indicated that:Local habitats are associated with high rates <strong>of</strong> diversity and abundance <strong>of</strong> different flora andfauna species; andWildlife corridors link with Garigal National Park and Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park.In addition to this, the following were noted within the Warringah LGA (excluding national parks)(Smith and Smith, 2002, 2005a, 2005b):17 locally significant flora species within the Warringah LGA; 10 locally significant fauna species within the Warringah LGA (5 reptile, 4 bird and 1mammal); 176 regionally significant flora species within the northern Sydney region; 32 regionally significant fauna species within the northern Sydney region (5 frog, 5 reptile, 18bird and 4 mammal); Endangered species listed under bilateral and multilateral agreements (e.g. JAMBA, CAMBAand ROKAMBA).20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 63H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority5.1.3 Visual CharacterElements such as landforms, vegetation, buildings and infrastructure contributes to the overallcharacter <strong>of</strong> the landscape and has a bearing on the way in which an area is experienced and valuedby people (The <strong>Land</strong>scape Institute and IEMA, 2008). Visual amenity and the landscape character <strong>of</strong>the OFRCR and surrounding areas are particularly significant for residents and visitors. The naturaland built environment may evoke sensory, cultural and spiritual responses and is likely to contributesubstantially to the quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> users and nearby residents. Formal and informal lookouts withinthe area incorporate views <strong>of</strong> local bushland, water and the ocean, and are particularly important incontributing to the scenic and aesthetic quality <strong>of</strong> the area (Section 4.8). Narrabeen Lagoon is aprominent landscape feature, and views <strong>of</strong> the water along the Narrabeen foreshores are particularlyscenic.5.1.4 Cultural and Recreational ValuesThe OFRCR and surrounding areas is <strong>of</strong> significance for Aboriginal people, namely the GuringaiAboriginal people and representative bodies such as the Metropolitan Local Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong> Council.A number <strong>of</strong> Aboriginal heritage items and places can be found in the area. These sites are valuedbecause they give evidence <strong>of</strong> the past occupation <strong>of</strong> the land by Aboriginal people and provideinsight into their cultural traditions (Section 4.6.1).The OFRCR holds particularly significant recreational value. Recreational activities carried out withinthe OFRCR include bushwalking, mountain biking and horse riding. Recreational clubs which utiliseland within the OFRCR include:Northern Beaches Mountain Biking Group;Manly Warringah Mountain Bike Club;Warringah Radio Control Society; andGarigal District Scouts.There are many tracks and trails in the OFRCR which are used by a range <strong>of</strong> different recreationaluser groups on a regular basis. Linkages and access to these tracks and trails is highly valued byrecreational users.5.1.5 Summary <strong>of</strong> ValuesA summary <strong>of</strong> the significance and values <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR and surrounding areas is given in Table 5.1.Table 5.1: Significance and Values <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR and Surrounding AreasScale Significance ValuesCatchment ProtectionLocal› The Narrabeen Lagoon catchment iscomprised <strong>of</strong> many varying vegetationcommunities including PeppermintAngophora Forest and Water FernSwamp.› Tributaries within the catchment, suchas Middle Creek and Wheeler Creeksupport high rates <strong>of</strong> diversity andabundance <strong>of</strong> different flora andfauna species.› The OFRCR lands are important inmaintaining water quality suitable foraquatic ecosystem health andrecreational usage both within the<strong>Reserve</strong> and in Narrabeen Lagoon.<strong>Regional</strong>/State› Narrabeen Lagoon and its foreshoresform part <strong>of</strong> a wildlife corridor whichlinks Long Reef Headland, Dee Why20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 64H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityScale Significance ValuesLagoon and South Creek toWarriewood Wetlands.National› EECs that are found in the Narrabeencatchment include Bangalay AlluvialForest and Swamp Sclerophyll Foreston Coastal Floodplains.› Catchment links with Garigal NationalPark.Environmental Protection – Flora and FaunaLocal<strong>Regional</strong>/StateNational› Local habitats are associated withhigh rates <strong>of</strong> diversity and abundance<strong>of</strong> different flora and fauna species.› 17 locally significant flora specieswithin the Warringah LGA (Smith andSmith, 2005b).› 10 locally significant fauna specieswithin the Warringah LGA (5 reptile, 4bird and 1 mammal) (Smith andSmith, 2005a).› 176 regionally significant flora specieswithin the northern Sydney region(Smith and Smith, 2005b).› 32 regionally significant fauna specieswithin the northern Sydney region (5frog, 5 reptile, 18 bird and 4 mammal)(Smith and Smith, 2005a); and› 15 flora species and 32 fauna speciesare listed as threatened under theTSC Act (NPWS, 2009).› 24 flora and fauna species are listedas threatened under theCommonwealth EPBC Act (DEWHA,2009a);› Wildlife corridors link with GarigalNational Park and Ku-ring-gai ChaseNational Park;› The Wheeler Heights Area is listed onthe RNE as an Indigenous Place;› Narrabeen Head Aquatic <strong>Reserve</strong> is amarine protected area in Australia.› OFRCR lands perform an importantfunction in terms <strong>of</strong> biodiversityconservation through themaintenance <strong>of</strong> significant areas <strong>of</strong>natural habitat for rare and threatenedflora and fauna species.InternationalVisual Character› Endangered species listed underbilateral and multilateral agreements(e.g. JAMBA, CAMBA andROKAMBA).Local› Extensive bushland vistas and oceanviews.<strong>Regional</strong>/State › Views <strong>of</strong> significant landscapefeatures such as Narrabeen Lagoon,› The landform provides for a range <strong>of</strong>views, characterised by the naturalbushland setting <strong>of</strong> the area.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 65H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityScale Significance Values<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Valley and the NorthernBeaches.NationalHuman Use and Enjoyment› Views towards and from GarigalNational Park.› The Beacon Hill and Governor PhillipLookout <strong>Reserve</strong>, and Manly Damand Surrounds are listed on the RNEas Natural Heritage Places.Local<strong>Regional</strong>/StateNational› Significance for the GuringaiAboriginal people and theMetropolitan Local Aboriginal <strong>Land</strong>Council, including Aboriginal heritageitems;› Extensive recreational usage <strong>of</strong> theOFRCR and surrounding areas bylocal people on a regular basis;› Place for activities for variousrecreational clubs and organisations;and› Cultural significance <strong>of</strong> non-Aboriginalheritage items which exist in the area.› Attractive destination for tourists fromother areas in NSW;› Bushwalks such as the NarrabeenLakes to Manly Lagoon walk;› <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> Peace Park is <strong>of</strong>recreational and historical/heritagesignificance; and› Events such as the NSW GolfAssociation 2009 NSW FoursomesChampionship held at Cromer GolfClub.› The Beacon Hill and Governor PhillipLookout <strong>Reserve</strong>, and Manly Damand Surrounds are listed on the RNEas Natural Heritage Places; and› Recreational links (such as walkingtracks and trails) to Garigal NationalPark and Ku-ring-gai Chase NationalPark.› The OFRCR lands form part <strong>of</strong> anarea that has traditionally heldsignificance for local Aboriginalpeople.› The <strong>Reserve</strong> lands represent animportant regional recreationalresource for a range <strong>of</strong> different usergroups, commensurate with theenvironmental values <strong>of</strong> the land.5.2 Existing <strong>Management</strong> ModelAs discussed in Section 1.4.2, the <strong>Management</strong> Strategy for the <strong>Reserve</strong> lands prepared by DoL(2006) identified that there currently exists a fragmented and piecemeal approach to management <strong>of</strong>the land parcels making up the OFRCR, as illustrated in Figure 5.1.The flow chart also provides an indication <strong>of</strong> the various sources <strong>of</strong> income and expenditures relatedto each <strong>of</strong> the five categories <strong>of</strong> management regime for the various land parcels.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 66H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityFigure 5.1: Current <strong>Management</strong> Model20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 67H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityCurrently the various land parcels making up the <strong>Reserve</strong> are not held under a single Trust and thereare various managers for different clusters <strong>of</strong> land parcels. The LPMA, the Ministerial Corporation(Min Corp, part <strong>of</strong> the LPMA) and Warringah Council are collectively responsible for the management<strong>of</strong> all lands within the OFRCR.Figure 5.2 shows land parcels under management by the respective authorities The figure indicatesthe fragmented operational management <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR that currently includes a number <strong>of</strong>relationships and interdependencies:Council: As trust manager <strong>of</strong>, for example, the Wakehurst Parkway Trust, Council receivesfinancial support from the LPMA. Council also generates funds for management from grantsand levies obtained by Council for the management <strong>of</strong> land parcels within the RCR undertheir management (parcels either under trusts or devolved lands from LPMA).LPMA: Maintains direct management responsibility for a number <strong>of</strong> parcels within the <strong>Oxford</strong>Fall RCR which are currently not part <strong>of</strong> any trust or devolved to council.Min Corp: Has specific management responsibilities for land parcels falling within the <strong>Oxford</strong><strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> Trust. Min Corp receives financial support from LPMA to manage the relevantlands.Figure 5.3 shows the distribution <strong>of</strong> income from OFRCR lands.In an agreed variation to the original scope <strong>of</strong> works (Section 1.6), an economic assessment <strong>of</strong> theexisting management model has been undertaken (refer to Appendix F). The economic analysishighlights the inefficiencies associated with this management model.In summary, the key constraints associated with the existing management model are:Different land parcels making up the OFRCR are managed by different parties, resulting in anuncoordinated approach;Integrated management is difficult; andOpportunities to re-distribute funds amongst land parcels is limited.Generally, this fragmented approach fails to provide a coordinated regional approach in the delivery <strong>of</strong>social and economic benefits to the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> region (DoL, 2006). Therefore, the continuation <strong>of</strong>the existing management model is not recommended.5.3 <strong>Management</strong> IssuesA range <strong>of</strong> management issues were identified through both the stakeholder consultation (Section 2)and from previous studies, including the DoL <strong>Land</strong> Use Assessment (2005) and OFRCR <strong>Management</strong>Strategy (DoL, 2006). These management issues effectively represent a conflict with the recognisedvalue <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Reserve</strong> lands and the objectives for the management <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> lands. They wereidentified so as to provide a basis for management objectives and goals for the plan <strong>of</strong> management,and also to assist in the development <strong>of</strong> management options for the OFRCR (Section 6).The 52 management issues identified for the OFRCR are presented in Table 5.2. The managementcategories in the table were formulated by Cardno on the basis <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> issues identified.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 68H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityTable 5.2: <strong>Management</strong> Issues Identified for the OFRCRNo. <strong>Management</strong> CategoryIssueID<strong>Management</strong> Issue Location <strong>Land</strong> Parcel Suggested By1 Catchment Protection C1 High erodibility <strong>of</strong> soils combined with steep gradesleads to erosion and sedimentation.All All Cardno2 Catchment Protection C2 Degradation <strong>of</strong> riparian vegetation resulting inerosion and sedimentation.All All Cardno, NPA3 Catchment Protection C3 Crushed sandstone is used in track and trailmaintenance (e.g. Slippery Dip fire trail) and thismaterial can erode leading to siltation <strong>of</strong> nearbyareas.Slippery DipTrail37-39, 40 and42MWRCS4 Catchment Protection C4 Siltation has occurred near Wakehurst Parkwayand at locations fronting the NSWIS.WakehurstParkway,NarrabeenLagoonvariousMWKC5 Catchment Protection C5 Siltation from access road impacting on Red<strong>Crown</strong>ed Toadlet Habitat6 Catchment Protection C6 Faecal contamination associated with septic tanksin the catchment.7 Catchment Protection C7 Unauthorised dumping <strong>of</strong> rubbish, household andother items onto lands within the OFRCR.8 Catchment Protection C8 Presence <strong>of</strong> the aquatic weed Horsetail (Equisetumsp.) in portions <strong>of</strong> Snake Creek on private property.Belrose 16 CardnoAll CardnoAll All CardnoBelrose LPMA9 Catchment Protection C9 Fire trails improperly used as vehicle access waysfor some private properties.VariouslocationsE.g. 16LPMA20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 69H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityIssueNo. <strong>Management</strong> Category<strong>Management</strong> Issue Location <strong>Land</strong> Parcel Suggested ByID10 Catchment Protection C10 Poor water quality in creeks. Various - CGC, Cardno11 Catchment Protection C11 The lands comprising the OFRCR have beenidentified as Bushfire Prone <strong>Land</strong>.All All except 12,62 and 128RFS, Cardno12 Catchment Protection C12 Enforcement <strong>of</strong> suitable asset protection zones isrequired on lands subject todevelopment/commercial use within the OFRCR.13 Cultural Heritage H1 There is a high probability for the occurrence <strong>of</strong>previously unidentified items <strong>of</strong> heritagesignificance, primarily with respect to Aboriginalheritage.All All NPAAll All AHO, LPMA14 Cultural Heritage H2 Some heritage items or places are at threat fromincidental damage from recreational users.E.g. parts <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>ConservationAreaE.g. 121-124,126-130, 132,133, 141, 142,145, 146, 148,149Cardno15 Cultural Heritage H3 There is a need for ongoing protection <strong>of</strong> items <strong>of</strong>European and Aboriginal heritage significancewithin the OFRCR.16 Cultural Heritage H4 Poor promotion and acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> theheritage significance <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR.All All CardnoAll All Cardno17 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE1Development <strong>of</strong> lands within and adjacent to theOFRCR has resulted in direct (e.g. loss <strong>of</strong> habitat)and indirect (e.g. fragmentation/edge effects)impacts on flora and fauna.All All NBE, FoNL,BNARC20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 70H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo.<strong>Management</strong> CategoryIssueID<strong>Management</strong> Issue Location <strong>Land</strong> Parcel Suggested By18 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE2Weed infestation is common throughout theOFRCR.All All NPA, Cardno19 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE3Lack <strong>of</strong> detailed information on biodiversity withinthe OFRCR.All All NBARC20 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE4Lack <strong>of</strong> ongoing monitoring <strong>of</strong> biodiversity within theOFRCR.All All NBARC21 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE5Fire trails and other tracks function to transmitweeds through the bushland comprising theOFRCR.Variouslocations- Cardno, LPMA22 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE6Unauthorised encroachment <strong>of</strong> private landholdersonto adjoining <strong>Crown</strong> land has occurred with aresultant reduction in natural bushland.Variouslocations- NPA23 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE7Forest Way forms a barrier to the movement <strong>of</strong>many fauna species.Forest Way - SMCMA24 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE8Horse riding causes ho<strong>of</strong> damage to trails, weedtransmission and the dispersal <strong>of</strong> nutrient-richfaecal deposits.Variouslocations- NBE25 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE9Introduced flora and fauna are impacting on nativespecies within the OFRCR.All All SMWS26 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE10High incidence <strong>of</strong> wildlife mortality/injury byvehicles, particularly on roads with higher trafficvolumes.All parcelsadjacent toroadways- NBE, NBARC,WIRES20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 71H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo.<strong>Management</strong> Category27 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaIssue<strong>Management</strong> Issue Location <strong>Land</strong> Parcel Suggested ByIDE11 Tree vandalism on <strong>Crown</strong> land. All All Cardno28 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE12Insufficient public education and promotion <strong>of</strong> theenvironmental significance <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR,particularly with respect to threatened species andEECs.All All Cardno29 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE13Heavy weed infestation along the eastern side <strong>of</strong>South Creek, particularly at the corner <strong>of</strong> TorontoAve and South Creek Road.South Creek 174 CGC30 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE14Transmission <strong>of</strong> weed propagules via thestormwater system and creeks.All All Cardno31 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE15Site tenure incompatible with some <strong>of</strong> theenvironmental values <strong>of</strong> the site.Belrose, <strong>Oxford</strong><strong>Falls</strong>44 and 85 Cardno32 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE16Neighbouring residents encroaching on <strong>Crown</strong> landwhile mowing lawns.All All Cardno33 Environmental Protection -Flora and FaunaE17Lack <strong>of</strong> habitat connectivity within the OFRCR andwith neighbouring areas.All All Cardno34 Governance G1 <strong>Land</strong> tenure, land use and managementresponsibilities are not clearly defined.35 Governance G2 The existing organisational framework formanagement <strong>of</strong> lands comprising the OFRCR iscomplex and confusing due to the large number <strong>of</strong>agencies involved.All All FoNL, NPA,CardnoAll All FoNL, NPA,Cardno20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 72H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo. <strong>Management</strong> CategoryIssueID<strong>Management</strong> Issue Location <strong>Land</strong> Parcel Suggested By36 Governance G3 Cumulative impacts <strong>of</strong> proposed developments arepoorly considered.All All37 Recreation R1 Non-permissible recreational uses are occurring inparts <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR.Variouslocations, e.g.Lizard RockE.g. 48-51NBE38 Recreation R2 Conflicts are occurring between differentrecreational user groups.Variouslocations, e.g.parcelsadjacent toSlippery DipTrailE.g. 37-40, 42Cardno39 Recreation R3 Conflicts are occurring between recreational usersand environmental and catchment protectionvalues.40 Recreation R4 There are insufficient recreational resourcesavailable, particularly for certain user groups, suchas mountain bikers.All All CardnoAll All NoBMoB, NBE41 Recreation R5 Closure <strong>of</strong> available bike trails within the OFRCRincreases pressure on trails on neighbouring areas.Variouslocations- NoBMoB42 Recreation R6 The potential economic benefits relating torecreational usage <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR are not beingrealised.43 Recreation R7 Unauthorised bike trails and other recreationalareas have been constructed within the OFRCR,resulting in damage to native vegetation.All All CardnoAll NoBMoB20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 73H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo. <strong>Management</strong> CategoryIssueID<strong>Management</strong> Issue Location <strong>Land</strong> Parcel Suggested By44 Recreation R8 The unauthorised establishment <strong>of</strong> informal bikejumps at Red Hill is impacting on native vegetation(including threatened species) and causing erosion.Red Hill (nearLady PenrhynDrive)92 Cardno45 Recreation R9 There is a risk <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> the public walkingthrough <strong>Crown</strong> land adjacent to the Cromer GolfCourse being struck with golf balls.46 Recreation R10 Access via foot to the walking track near SouthCreek is impeded by a weir wall.Cromer 174 CGCCromer 174 CGC47 Recreation R11 Recreational amenities at Middle Creek <strong>Reserve</strong> onthe foreshore <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon are run down.48 Recreation R12 The recreational and commercial potential <strong>of</strong>Middle Creek <strong>Reserve</strong> on the foreshore <strong>of</strong>Narrabeen Lagoon has not been fully realised.49 Recreation R13 The intersection at the turn<strong>of</strong>f from WakehurstParkway to Middle Creek <strong>Reserve</strong> is dangerous forpeople wanting to access the reserve from thesouth.NarrabeenLagoonNarrabeenLagoonNarrabeenLagoon173 LPMA, Cardno173 Cardno173 Cardno50 Recreation R14 Inadequate delineation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> and NationalParks lands. Need to clarify tenure for recreationalusers.<strong>Land</strong> parcelsadjacent toNational Parkland1, 38-41, 168,169, 171, 172Cardno51 Recreation R15 Information regarding permissible and acceptableactivities on <strong>Crown</strong> land is inadequate.All All Cardno20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 74H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNo.<strong>Management</strong> Category52 Scenic Amenity and<strong>Land</strong>scape CharacterIssueIDL1<strong>Management</strong> Issue Location <strong>Land</strong> Parcel Suggested ByLack <strong>of</strong> acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> the scenic values andlandscape character <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR.All All Cardno20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 75H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority5.4 <strong>Management</strong> GoalsCommensurate with the identified values and significance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Reserve</strong> lands, a number <strong>of</strong>management goals (Table 5.3) have been developed that express the desired managementoutcomes for the OFRCR.These goals have been developed in consultation with the Steering Committee. They seek toaddress both the principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> management as defined under the <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Act 1989(Section 1.1) and the broader management objectives which define the overall direction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong>(Section 1.5).Table 5.3: <strong>Management</strong> Goals<strong>Management</strong> GoalValue Category:Catchment ProtectionGoal: To provide for the ongoingprotection <strong>of</strong> sensitive lands withinthe OFRCR.Value Category:Environmental ProtectionGoal: To protect and retain existinghabitat for species (especiallythreatened species and communities)within the OFRCR, rehabilitatedegraded habitat and provide forecological connectivity throughoutthe OFRCR.Value Category: GovernanceGoal: To establish a robustorganisational framework withrepresentation from the responsibleimplementing agencies as well as thecommunity to ensure the OFRCR<strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> is implemented.Ultimately this goal seeks to providefor the sustainable, ongoingmanagement <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR.NotesThe following notes accompany this goal:• This goal relates to catchment protection, where sensitiveparts <strong>of</strong> the catchment contribute to the maintenance <strong>of</strong>water quality within creeks and receiving waters (i.e.Narrabeen Lagoon).• This goal also relates to locations within the OFRCR thatare subject to environmental hazards such as bushfirerisk and flooding.The following notes accompany this goal:• This strategy recognises the regional significance <strong>of</strong>lands within the OFRCR in terms <strong>of</strong> their ecologicalattributes, including a large number <strong>of</strong> regionallysignificant vegetation communities and their flora andfauna species. In addition, this strategy acknowledgesthe importance <strong>of</strong> the existing bushland in the OFRCR forconnectivity at a regional level.• The primary strategy is to retain existing habitat, with aview to re-establishment <strong>of</strong> terrestrial habitat wherepossible.• When measuring the achievement <strong>of</strong> this goal there is aneed to recognise the existing constraints (e.g. land use).The following notes accompany this goal:• This goal will seek to ensure that the various Governmentagencies, authorities and other organisations involvedwork together to achieve a holistic and integratedapproach to management <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR.• This goal will also seek to ensure the allocation <strong>of</strong>appropriate resources for implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong>,including revenue-generating activities with proceedsgoing to the governing body. Activities which hold widereconomic benefit are also important for the achievement<strong>of</strong> this strategy.• It is recognised that ongoing liaison between thesedifferent groups will be an essential component <strong>of</strong> thisgoal.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 76H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority<strong>Management</strong> GoalValue Category: Cultural HeritageGoal: To acknowledge, conserveand, where appropriate, promoteIndigenous and non-Indigenousheritage <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR.Value Category: RecreationalUsageGoal: To encourage, provide andenhance facilities for the appropriaterecreational usage <strong>of</strong> the lands withinthe OFRCR and to provide for andenhance recreational connectivitywith surrounding lands (whereappropriate) whilst also maintainingecosystem viability.Value Category: Scenic Amenityand <strong>Land</strong>scape CharacterGoal: To maintain or enhance thevisual experience <strong>of</strong> the landscapefrom scenic vantage points withinand around the OFRCR.NotesThe following notes accompany this goal:• Any promotion <strong>of</strong> heritage items and places should beundertaken as appropriate and with consultation,particularly for Aboriginal heritage.The following notes accompany this goal:• There is a need to balance competing recreational usesand reduce the incidence <strong>of</strong> conflict between differentuser groups.• This will include identification <strong>of</strong> environmentally sensitiveareas for which less intensive uses may be moreappropriate.The following notes accompany this goal:• This goal is expected to be difficult to measure withoutbaseline data or the use <strong>of</strong> 3D modelling.5.5 <strong>Management</strong> OptionsA series <strong>of</strong> management options were developed that aim to address the management issues(Section 5.2) and achieve the management goals for the OFRCR (Section 5.3).An initial list <strong>of</strong> over 70 options was developed by the study team for discussion. This wassubsequently modified and condensed into a final list <strong>of</strong> 53 management options in consultation withthe Steering and Consultative Committees (Appendix E). They represent activities or strategies thatwere considered for inclusion in the OFRCR <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>.Information provided for each management option identified includes: The primary management goal addressed by that option (noting that a single option maycontribute to achieving more than one goal), A description <strong>of</strong> the option, The specific location or land parcel to which the option applies (where relevant), Agencies supporting implementation. The OFRCR Trust is assumed to be theimplementation body for all options, Option cross-references indicating a dependency between two or more options, Cross-references to management issues (where relevant), An estimated net present value <strong>of</strong> implementation over a 20 year period (at a discount rate <strong>of</strong>7%) based on estimates <strong>of</strong> capital and ongoing costs, Potential funding streams (i.e. other revenue obtained from leases and licences).The options listed in Appendix E were presented to the Steering Committee once again for furtherconsideration and refinement for inclusion as actions in the plan <strong>of</strong> management.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 77H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority6 The <strong>Plan</strong>6.1 OverviewThe OFRCR <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> aims to be both a strategic and an operational document.In summary, the preceding sections <strong>of</strong> this report have sought to: Establish the background for the preparation <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (Section 1), Clarify the statutory and non-statutory framework surrounding the management <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong>lands (Section 3), Provide an audit <strong>of</strong> the features <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR (Section 4), and Summarise the existing management context and provide a series <strong>of</strong> recommendations foroptimising the future management <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Reserve</strong> (Section 5).This Section presents the <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> for the OFRCR.The <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> seeks to clearly identify lands within the OFRCR, to implement a moreholistic and integrated approach to management <strong>of</strong> these lands in accordance with surrounding landuses and management plans for these adjacent lands.6.2 Proposed <strong>Management</strong> ModelThe LPMA’s <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> system aims to provide a holistic approach to the management<strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> lands on a regional basis and facilitates a balance between the competing needs <strong>of</strong> publicenjoyment and use <strong>of</strong> the reserve, and the need for environmental protection. Having identified thestrategic and operational issues associated with the existing management model (Section 5.2) theLPMA, in conjunction with Warringah Council, have developed a new model for the management <strong>of</strong>the OFRCR that seeks to take advantage <strong>of</strong> the specific values, significance and usage <strong>of</strong> theOFRCR lands.Warringah Council and the LPMA propose to establish a Trust between Council and Min Corp tomanage the OFRCR. A Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Understanding (MoU) will be established that sets out theroles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> each party and describes how the Trust finances are to be managed assummarised in Figure 6.1.The key features <strong>of</strong> the proposed management model are as follows:Joint management arrangement as determined by the MoU;There will be a need for agreement between the two parties on income sharing and approvalsfor any major activities (such as land disposal);Individual land parcels are not allocated to each manager, rather the OFRCR lands aremanaged in a holistic fashion;Provides a more coordinate approach in accordance with the objectives <strong>of</strong> management for<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>s; andUnder the new management model, any revenue derived from any new (or renewed) leasesor licences would be paid directly to the OFRCR Trust for use in management <strong>of</strong> OFRCRlands.In a strategic sense, the new management model provides for a more coordinated approach tomanagement <strong>of</strong> OFRCR lands as a whole. This is important in the context <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Reserve</strong> lands as regional resource for biodiversity conservation and recreational usage. It isenvisaged that the joint Trust arrangement will provide Council with a more direct role in management20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 78H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Reserve</strong> assets in terms <strong>of</strong> both decision making and the allocation <strong>of</strong> resources. The potentialfinancial benefits <strong>of</strong> the new management model, as compared to the existing model, are discussed inthe Economic Assessment provided in Appendix F.Consultation with stakeholders and the community would be undertaken on an ‘as needs’ basis, likelythrough Council’s existing consultative mechanisms, such as the range <strong>of</strong> Committees established fornatural resource management purposes.Figure 6.1: Proposed <strong>Management</strong> Model6.3 <strong>Management</strong> ActionsA total <strong>of</strong> 53 management actions have been developed for implementation as part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Management</strong> (Appendix G).The management actions were derived by the Steering Committee after further consideration andrefinement <strong>of</strong> the initial list <strong>of</strong> management options presented in Section 5.5 (and Appendix E). Theactions represent a series <strong>of</strong> activities for implementation by the Trust that aim to: Work towards the attainment <strong>of</strong> the desired outcomes for the OFRCR outlined as<strong>Management</strong> Goals in Table 5.3; Address existing management issues listed in Table 5.2;20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 79H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityManage the OFRCR lands in a regional context and in a manner that is consistent with theobjectives for management <strong>of</strong> these lands, including access and public requirements, tourismpurposes and environmental and heritage conservation.The following information is provided for each management action:A unique Action Identification Number,Supporting organisations for implementation (the OFRCR Trust is the primary implementingbody in all cases),The main management goal addressed, andDependencies or cross-references between actions.‘The management actions represent strategic directives rather than targeted, site-specific activities,and therefore no cost estimates for implementation have been provided. Further advice onimplementation is provided in Section 7.4.6.4 Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation6.4.1 Implementation StrategyThe key tool for management <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR will comprise an annual reporting function, whereby theAnnual Report provides an overview <strong>of</strong> activities undertaken in the previous financial year andidentifies activities for the coming financial year. The Annual Report should include as a minimum:Confirmation <strong>of</strong> the extent and status <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR lands (i.e. identification <strong>of</strong> any lands thathave either been acquired or are no longer part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Reserve</strong>),Details <strong>of</strong> the Trust structure and objectives for management <strong>of</strong> the OFRCR,Priority management categories for that year,The list <strong>of</strong> actions selected for implementation that address these management categories,The status <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> these actions and (where complete) a review <strong>of</strong> their successin achieving the corresponding management goal,Details <strong>of</strong> any corrective actions or further activities that should be undertaken to address anyimplementation issues,An overview <strong>of</strong> the financial status <strong>of</strong> the Trust, andA list <strong>of</strong> priority management goals and corresponding actions for implementation in thecoming financial year.As indicated above, each year the OFRCR Trust will select the management goals (Section 5.4), andpriority strategies for the coming year. At that time, the Trust will consider the full list <strong>of</strong> managementactions (Appendix G) and identify one or more actions best suited to contribute towards themanagement goal(s). These actions may then be developed into more detailed strategies forimplementation in the coming year.Some decision support tools to aid in selection <strong>of</strong> management actions have been discussed inSection 7.4.2.The Annual Report will, therefore, perform an important function in setting the strategic direction formanagement in the coming year, while also reporting on the outcomes <strong>of</strong> initiatives undertaken in theprevious year in a transparent fashion. This approach aims to provide sufficient flexibility to permit anadaptive management response, while also considering the availability <strong>of</strong> funding for implementation(be it Trust funds or a specific grant that is available in that year). As previously discussed,consultation will be undertaken on an as needs basis through Council’s existing consultationmechanisms, in addition to which the Annual Report will be made publicly available.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 80H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityThis implementation strategy has been developed by the Steering Committee and agreed by bothCouncil and the LPMA, representing the future members <strong>of</strong> the joint Trust for the OFRCR.6.4.2 Decision Support ToolsThe LPMA has stated that a key objective for management <strong>of</strong> RCR lands is the ongoing sustainability<strong>of</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> lands, providing ongoing benefits to the local and broader community andaddressing triple bottom line considerations (i.e. social, environmental and economic). Therefore, twodecision support tools have been developed to aid in the selection and further development <strong>of</strong> specificmanagement actions for implementation, including a multi-criteria matrix tool and the delineation <strong>of</strong>management precincts.Multi-criteria Matrix ToolA multi-criteria matrix assessment has been undertaken for all the identified management actions andis included in Appendix G. It provides assistance in identifying actions for implementation thataddress the specific management priorities (or categories) for that year. It is effectively a triple bottomline assessment <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the management actions in terms <strong>of</strong> the key value categories (Section5.1) for the OFRCR:Environmental Protection,Catchment Protection,Recreation,Cultural Heritage,Governance, andWider Economic Value.EnvironmentalSocialEconomicFor each <strong>of</strong> the value categories identified above, a score has been assigned to each managementaction based on the extent to which the goal will impact on that value (in accordance with thedescriptors provided in Tables G.1-G.6 in Appendix G). The scores for each <strong>of</strong> the six valuecategories are then summed to calculate a Raw Benefit Index.In assigning scores to each <strong>of</strong> the options it is assumed that construction impacts will be assessedprior to any physical works and that appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented to ensureminimal impacts on ecology and human use during works.In effect, the Raw Benefit Index provides an assessment <strong>of</strong> the sustainability <strong>of</strong> the managementaction and in this way acts as a planning tool to assist in selecting actions for implementation.The Steering and Consultative Committees have also been provided opportunity to assign a score foreach action in terms <strong>of</strong> their priorities (High priority = 3, Medium priority = 2, low priority = 1). Thesescores have been included in the multi-criteria matrix in order to provide an indication <strong>of</strong> the currentpriorities <strong>of</strong> the Steering Committee, and also the likely community support for each action. Thesescores have been summed with the Raw Benefit Index to provide an Adjusted Benefit Index.<strong>Management</strong> PrecinctsBased on discussion with the Steering Committee, the OFRCR has been broken down into a series <strong>of</strong>functional units known as management precincts. The management precincts effectively identify themost appropriate land uses for each part <strong>of</strong> the reserve in accordance within its public purpose andtherefore assist in selecting sites for implementation <strong>of</strong> the chosen management action(s).20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 81H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityOne <strong>of</strong> the challenges to management <strong>of</strong> a large reserve network such as the OFRCR is the disjunctand diverse nature <strong>of</strong> the individual land parcels comprising the reserve. The management precinctsseek to group land parcels into clusters that have similar attributes and which may be targeted fordifferent types <strong>of</strong> activities or levels <strong>of</strong> development. They were delineated based upon consideration<strong>of</strong> the following attributes: The size <strong>of</strong> each land parcel and proximity to other OFRCR lands; Adjacent land uses; Ease <strong>of</strong> public access (whether by vehicle or on foot/bike); Proposed land use zonings identified in the draft Warringah LEP 2009; The outcome <strong>of</strong> the rapid spatial assessment (Section 4.10); and Sub-catchment boundaries.The management precincts are mapped in Figure 6.2.The key characteristics and suitable land uses for each precinct are provided in Table 6.1.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 82H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityTable 6.1: Precinct StatementsPrecinctKey Characteristics* Notes Suitable <strong>Land</strong> UsesNo.123• Environmental Protection Values:very high• Catchment Protection Values: veryhigh• Cultural Heritage Values: high• Recreation Values: moderate to high• Hazard and Risk: high.• <strong>Land</strong> Use Zoning: Predominantly RE1,some portions <strong>of</strong> SP2 and E3.• Environmental Protection Values:high• Catchment Protection Values:moderate to high• Cultural Heritage Values: moderate tohigh• Recreation Values: low to moderate• Hazard and Risk: moderate.• <strong>Land</strong> Use Zoning: Predominantly E3• Environmental Protection Values:moderate to high• Catchment Protection Values:moderate• Cultural Heritage Values: low• Recreation Values: low• Hazard and Risk: moderate.• <strong>Land</strong> Use Zoning: All E3Continuous corridor that establishes connectivitythrough the OFRCR and to Narrabeen Lagoon.Access is generally limited, particularly forvehicles.Some recreational facilities currently provided onthe foreshore <strong>of</strong> Narrabeen Lagoon (e.g. BBQs,car parking, picnic areas).Large heritage conservation area coveringseveral land parcels.Relatively contiguous cluster <strong>of</strong> land parcels.Some significant flora and fauna speciespresent.Good access to parts <strong>of</strong> the precinct, however,access to other areas is limited due totopographical constraints.Located adjacent to Garigal National Park.Access is limited for most <strong>of</strong> this precinct (via afire trail or by foot only).Priority land uses relate to environmentalconservation and catchment protection.Suitable for low intensity passive recreationalusage with no/minimal supporting infrastructure,except for those land parcels adjacent toNarrabeen Lagoon, which can support higherrecreational intensities supported by amenities.Suitable for scientific research andenvironmental education activities.Priority land uses relate to environmentalconservation and catchment protection.Suitable for low intensity passive recreationalusage with no/minimal supporting infrastructure.Suitable for scientific research. Educationalactivities may be appropriate commensuratewith the ecological and cultural sensitivities <strong>of</strong>some sites.Priority for land uses relate to environmentalconservation and catchment protection (due tocontinuity between this precinct and the adjacentNational Park).Suitable for low intensity passive recreationalusage with no/minimal supporting infrastructure.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 83H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityPrecinctNo.Key Characteristics* Notes Suitable <strong>Land</strong> Uses4• Environmental Protection Values:moderate• Catchment Protection Values:moderate• Cultural Heritage Values: moderate• Recreation Values: moderate to high• Hazard and Risk: moderate.• <strong>Land</strong> Use Zoning: All E3.Adjacent to Garigal National Park.Relatively contiguous land parcel.<strong>Land</strong>s under tenure for recreational purposes(radio-controlled aeroplane club).Moderate intensity, controlled recreational usagepossible (retain existing recreational usage asper tenure arrangement).Medium priority for environmental protectioncommensurate with recreational uses.5• Environmental Protection Values: lowto moderate• Catchment Protection Values:moderate to high• Cultural Heritage Values: low tomoderate• Recreation Values: moderate to high.• Hazard and Risk: moderate.• <strong>Land</strong> Use Zoning: Predominantly E3.Consists <strong>of</strong> fragmented land parcels close toresidential areas.Good access from surrounding residential andrural residential areas.High intensity recreational usage possible.Medium priority for catchment protection.Low priority for environmental protection.6• Environmental Protection Values: lowto moderate• Catchment Protection Values: low• Cultural Heritage Values: low• Recreation Values: moderate to high• Hazard and Risk: moderate.• <strong>Land</strong> Use Zoning: Predominantly E3.Large contiguous block <strong>of</strong> land.Relatively good access, although vehicularaccess is limited due to the steep topography inplaces.High intensity recreational usage possiblecommensurate with the provisions <strong>of</strong> the draftLEP.Low priority for catchment protection andenvironmental protection values.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 84H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority7 ConclusionThis plan <strong>of</strong> management has been developed for the OFRCR (R1012168, gazetted 25/08/06) inaccordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Clause 112 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s Act 1989. The OFRCRincorporates a number <strong>of</strong> individual parcels summing to a total <strong>of</strong> approximately 520ha <strong>of</strong> land andwas established with a view to providing for a more strategic approach to the delivery <strong>of</strong> regionalsocial, economic and environmental benefits associated with the <strong>Reserve</strong> lands (DoL, 2006).The <strong>Plan</strong> provides a framework for management <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Reserve</strong> lands and identifies a number <strong>of</strong>management actions for implementation by the <strong>Reserve</strong> Trust subject to availability <strong>of</strong> funds andcommunity priorities. The management model proposed (Section 6.2) is a Trust arrangementbetween Warringah Council and Min Corp, that would provide significant strategic and operationalbenefits over the current separate management entities. The <strong>Plan</strong> was developed in consultation witha Steering Committee (comprising Council, LPMA and DECCW) and a Consultative Committee(comprising representatives <strong>of</strong> community-based organisations).It is recommended that the Minister for <strong>Land</strong>s adopt the <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Management</strong> and that a joint Trust incorporating Warringah Council and Min Corp be established toimplement the <strong>Plan</strong>.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 85H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> Authority8 ReferencesCardno (2008). Climate Change Actions for Manly LGA. Prepared for Manly Council.Chapman, G.A & Murphy, C.L. (1989), Soil <strong>Land</strong>scapes <strong>of</strong> the Sydney 1:100 000 Sheet. SoilConservation Service <strong>of</strong> NSW, Sydney.Cordell (2005). Cordell NSW Commercial / Industrial Building Cost Guide, September 2005. Volume36, Issue 3.DECC (2009a). Re: AHIMS search for the following area at E:334420-340482; N:6263665-6269126.Online Database: Aboriginal Heritage Information <strong>Management</strong> System. Available:http://www3.environment.nsw.gov.au/npws.nsf/Content/How+to+obtain+AHIMS+data. AccessedMarch 2009.DECC (2009b). Narrabeen Head Aquatic <strong>Reserve</strong>. Webpage. Online:http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/NationalParks/parkHome.aspx?id=a003 Accessed 15 July 2009.DECCW (2010). EnValue Database. Online Database. Available:www.environment.nsw.gov.au/envalue/ Accessed 7 April 2010. Department <strong>of</strong> Environment, ClimateChange and Water.DEWHA (2009a). EPBC Act Protected Matters Report for Area. Coordinates: -33.69844, 151.21073, -33.75737, 151.21073 to -33.75737, 151.27898; -33.69844, 151.27898. Online database. Available:http://www.environment.gov.au/apps/boobook/mapservlet?app=pmst. Accessed 22 July 2009.DEWHA (2009b). Australian Heritage Database Search Results for Warringah LGA. Online Database.Available: http://www.environment.gov.au/heritage/ahdb/ Accessed 2 April 2009.DoL (2003). Draft Assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> at Belrose, Cromer and <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>. NSW Department<strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s.DoL (2005). Final Assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Land</strong> at Belrose, Cromer and <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong>. NSW Department<strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s.DoL (2006). <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> (R1012168) <strong>Management</strong> Strategy. Prepared byJohn Filocamo, NSW Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s.DoL (2007). Trust Handbook, Chapter 5 – <strong>Plan</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>. NSW Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Land</strong>s.DoP (2007). Draft North East Subregional Strategy. NSW Government.DoP Heritage Branch (2009). Heritage Branch State Heritage Register Search Results for WarringahLGA. Online Database. Available: http://www.heritage.nsw.gov.au/07_subnav_04b.htm Accessed 2April 2009.Fairfull, S. and Witheridge, G (2003). Why Do Fish Need to Cross the Road? Fish PassageRequirements for Waterway Crossings. NSW Fisheries Office <strong>of</strong> Conservation.Geological Survey <strong>of</strong> NSW (1983). Australia 1:100,000 geological series; Map Sheet 9130. NSWDepartment <strong>of</strong> Mineral Resources.Montgomery Watson Harza (2002). Warringah Creek <strong>Management</strong> Strategy. Prepared for WarringahCouncil, Dee Why.NPA (2001) Wheeler Creek Biodiversity Survey. National Parks Association <strong>of</strong> NSW.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 86H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityNPWS (1971). Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, 1971.NPWS (2008). Garigal National Park <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – November 2008.NPWS (2009). Database Search Results, Threatened Flora and Fauna species recorded since 1980.Selected Area - 151.19658,-33.78051 to 151.29658,-33.68051. Online Database. Available:http://wildlifeatlas.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/wildlifeatlas/watlas.jsp Accessed: 2 April 2009.NSW DPI (1999). Policy and Guidelines for Fish Friendly Waterway Crossings.NSW Rural Fire Service (2003). Bushfire Prone <strong>Land</strong> Map – Warringah LGA.NSW Rural Fire Service (2006). <strong>Plan</strong>ning for Bushfire Protection 2006. Online:http://www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/dsp_content.cfm?CAT_ID=900. Accessed: 22 July 2009.Smith, P. and Smith, J. (2002). Warringah Natural Area Survey – Vegetation Communities and <strong>Plan</strong>tSpecies. Prepared by P&J Smith Ecological Consultants for Warringah Council.Smith, P. and Smith, J. (2005a). Warringah Natural Area Survey – Fauna Species. Prepared by P&JSmith Ecological Consultants for Warringah Council.Smith, P. and Smith, J. (2005b). Warringah Natural Area Survey – Vegetation History and WildlifeCorridors. Prepared by P&J Smith Ecological Consultants for Warringah Council.Smith, P. and Smith, J. (2008). Middle Creek Biodiversity Assessment and <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>.Prepared by P&J Smith Ecological Consultants for Warringah Council.Suter and Associates (1998). Warringah Council Recreation Strategy <strong>Plan</strong>. Prepared for WarringahCouncil.Taronga Zoo Fauna Survey Team (1992). Avifauna, Herpet<strong>of</strong>auna and Mammal Fauna <strong>of</strong> the MiddleCreek <strong>Reserve</strong>, Narrabeen, NSW. Prepared for Warringah Council.The <strong>Land</strong>scape Institute and IEMA (2008). Guidelines for <strong>Land</strong>scape and Visual Impact Assessment(2nd Ed.). Spon Press, Oxon.Warringah Council (2000). Red Hill & Golden Grove Parks <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>. 25 July 2000.Warringah Council (2002a). Coastal <strong>Land</strong>s <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – A Generic <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>.Adopted 24 September 2002.Warringah Council (2002b). Community <strong>Land</strong> Categorised as General Community Use (IncludingMiscellaneous <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong>s) Generic <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – 24 May 2002.Warringah Council (2007). Sportsgrounds <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – December 2007.Warringah Council (2007). Warringah <strong>Regional</strong> Multiple Use Trail Strategy. Adopted 2007.Warringah Council (2008a). Generic Parks <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong> – November 2008.Warringah Council (2008b).<strong>Management</strong>.Dee Why Valley and South Creek Open Space Corridor <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong>Warringah Council (2009a). Narrabeen Lagoon: Creating A Sustainable Catchment Project.Webpage. Online: http://www.warringah.nsw.gov.au/environment/NarrabeenLagoon-C-Project.aspxAccessed 20 July 2009.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 87H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION


<strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Crown</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>Prepared for NSW <strong>Land</strong> and Property <strong>Management</strong> AuthorityWarringah Council (2009b). Warringah Council's Cultural and Heritage Web Page. Online:http://www.warringah.nsw.gov.au/plan_dev/heritage.aspx Accessed 20 July 2009.20 July 2010 Cardno (NSW/ACT) Pty Ltd Page 88H:\Doc\2010\Reports.2010\Rep2554v2.docDRAFT FOR PUBLIC EXHIBITION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!