Drug vs medical device clinical trial applications - TOPRA
Drug vs medical device clinical trial applications - TOPRA
Drug vs medical device clinical trial applications - TOPRA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
26RegulatoryRapporteurPart 3 – Technical dossierThe content of the technical dossier for an IMP (so-called IMP dossier,“IMPD”) or a <strong>medical</strong> <strong>device</strong> should include different sectionssummarising the quality, the non-<strong>clinical</strong> and the <strong>clinical</strong> data (whererelevant) and include a benefit/risk assessment.Obviously, the content of the quality, non-<strong>clinical</strong> and <strong>clinical</strong> sectionswill differ significantly between both product types and thereforecannot be compared. Nonetheless, guidance on the content of thetechnical dossier of specific products has been released and is brieflysummarized here.Case of <strong>medical</strong> <strong>device</strong>s containing an active substance“Where the bio<strong>medical</strong> research implies the use of a <strong>medical</strong> <strong>device</strong>containing an active substance, which – when used separately – islikely to be considered as a medicinal product, the technical dossiershould be completed by information regarding this active substance”.Pursuant to this requirement, the technical dossier should includequality, non-<strong>clinical</strong> and <strong>clinical</strong> data – in particular local pharmacokineticand local effects data – on the active substance used, completed by ascientific rationale justifying its addition to the <strong>medical</strong> <strong>device</strong>.It is interesting to note that, where the active substance has alreadybeen authorised as part of a medicinal product in the EU, the qualitysection related to this substance may be limited to the SmPCtogether with a statement from its manufacturer specifying that it isstrictly identical to the one contained in the authorised medicinalproduct – and described in the quality part of the approved MarketingAuthorisation dossier. In that case, the non-<strong>clinical</strong> and <strong>clinical</strong> datashould demonstrate that the efficacy/safety ratio remains unalteredwhen compared to the usual utilisation of the medicinal product.On the contrary, when the <strong>medical</strong> <strong>device</strong> contains an “unauthorisedactive substance”, the data to be provided on the active substance aresimilar to the ones which need to be included in the so-called “full IMPD”.Table 4 details the data to be provided as part of each of the threesections of the “active substance technical dossier” depending on itsauthorisation status.