12.07.2015 Views

Public Safety Realignment - ACLU of Northern California

Public Safety Realignment - ACLU of Northern California

Public Safety Realignment - ACLU of Northern California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Instead <strong>of</strong> taking extraordinary and expensive measures to finance jail construction, maintenance andstaffing or to open closed facilities—especially in a time <strong>of</strong> fiscal crisis with critical social servicesand education funding being cut across the board—counties would do better to implement smart,effective policies that reduce the number <strong>of</strong> people unnecessarily taking up expensive jail space. Jailbeds should be reserved for those who present a significant threat to public safety. Counties shouldnot be spending the lion’s share <strong>of</strong> AB 109 funding to expand jail capacity. The state should eithersuspend all AB 900 funding until such time as less costly and more effective community-basedalternatives have been fully implemented, or expand the AB 900 grant criteria to allow counties touse AB 900 monies for non-jail community sanctions and alternatives to incarceration.INCARCERATED WITHOUT TRIAL: THE REALITY OF JAILOVERCROWDING IN CALIFORNIABecause the state will no longer take mostpeople convicted <strong>of</strong> low-level felony <strong>of</strong>fensesinto state facilities, there is a common—butmistaken—perception at the local level that jailconstruction is essential. Indeed, as noted above, all butone (Alameda) <strong>of</strong> the Big 25 counties intend to add jailcapacity, and <strong>of</strong> those all but three dedicated someportion <strong>of</strong> AB 109 money to do so. 60 However, effortsto create new jail capacity not only ignore the utterlyfailed state prison expansion and overcrowdingexperience; they also turn a blind eye to the reality <strong>of</strong>jail overcrowding in <strong>California</strong> and to the new powersgiven to counties to better manage their jailpopulations. Rather than expand jail capacity, countiesshould implement evidence-based practices to manageboth pretrial and sentenced populations.As sheriffs have readily admitted, county jails are not full <strong>of</strong> individuals who have been convicted <strong>of</strong>crimes, or even individuals thought to present a high public safety risk to the community. Rather,most <strong>of</strong> those filling up scarce and expensive jail beds are individuals waiting for their day in courtbut unable to afford bail. It is hard to overstate the severity <strong>of</strong> this crisis. Years before the enactment<strong>of</strong> realignment, the <strong>California</strong> State Sheriffs’ Association bemoaned the fact that there was “no roomfor sentenced inmates” in county jails due to the rising pretrial detainee population. 61<strong>California</strong> far exceeds the national average <strong>of</strong> 61 percent <strong>of</strong> jail space occupied by pretrial jailpopulations. 62 More than 50,000 <strong>of</strong> the 71,000 <strong>California</strong>ns held in county jail on any given day havenot been convicted <strong>of</strong> a crime but rather are awaiting trial—71 percent <strong>of</strong> county jails’ average daily18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!