REI Mar-Apr 2012 - Renewable Energy Installer
REI Mar-Apr 2012 - Renewable Energy Installer
REI Mar-Apr 2012 - Renewable Energy Installer
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DTX<br />
Non-Toxic Ethylene Glycol<br />
Previously Propylene Glycol was the only non-toxic<br />
glycol available. That’s no longer the case. DTX has<br />
been especially formulated to exploit the advantages<br />
Ethylene Glycol has over Propylene Glycol. Specifically;<br />
� �����������������������������<br />
� �����������������<br />
� �������������������������������������<br />
� ��������������������<br />
Ground & Air Souce<br />
Heat Transfer Fluids<br />
BUY DIRECT FROM THE<br />
MANUFACTURER<br />
Get the fluid you need, when you need it.<br />
��������Next day delivery service<br />
� �����������������������������<br />
� �������������������������������<br />
Call the technical sales team for expert advice<br />
and prices.<br />
01792 586800<br />
www.hydratech.co.uk salesdept@hydratech.co.uk<br />
14 | www.renewableenergyinstaller.co.uk<br />
News: Profi le<br />
Care for the community<br />
In a recent issue of <strong>REI</strong>, Howard Johns<br />
of Southern Solar described the Ovesco<br />
community solar roof project in Lewes,<br />
as an example of the kind of initiative<br />
that has been hit hard by the proposed<br />
changes to the Feed-in Tariff. Liz<br />
Mandeville, a director of Ovesco,<br />
spells out what this means<br />
e completed and<br />
W<br />
registered our 98kW<br />
roof last August.<br />
No Feed-in Tariff<br />
(FiT) payment in sight, but our<br />
most serious problem was the<br />
uncertainty over the future of<br />
the FiT for solar. Community<br />
projects don’t give investors<br />
any direct fi nancial benefi t. Our<br />
evidence shows that community<br />
benefi t is the main motive for<br />
investing, but there are lots of<br />
ways to benefi t a community<br />
that don’t require large sums of<br />
money, so we have to include<br />
interest payments in our<br />
planning. The earlier FiT enabled<br />
us, to maintain the system, pay<br />
interest and a modest return on<br />
investments, and have a small<br />
sum for administration and<br />
development.<br />
The reductions in the FiT, on<br />
the most optimistic assumptions,<br />
just about make a project break<br />
even, but leave nothing to pay<br />
investors and for the continued<br />
existence of Ovesco. We have<br />
two good 30kW projects ready<br />
to go, but will probably have to<br />
abandon them. We could have<br />
completed them by the <strong>Mar</strong>ch<br />
deadline, but the back-dating<br />
of the new FiT has made this<br />
impossible.<br />
The government, with its<br />
series of appeals, is using up<br />
the narrow window in which<br />
we could have done something<br />
more. If it loses in the fi nal<br />
stage of its legal battle then,<br />
organisations like Ovesco should<br />
be given equivalent time to that<br />
lost in litigation before the new<br />
rates apply, to carry out projects<br />
that could have been completed<br />
within the original consultation<br />
period. At the moment, it’s a case<br />
of heads, the government wins,<br />
tails, community solar loses. In<br />
the longer term, communities,<br />
people employed in the solar<br />
business, individuals - every<br />
one loses from this cack-handed<br />
policy making. Hard to feel that<br />
anyone in government actually<br />
cares about climate change.<br />
Tough times:<br />
Those<br />
involved<br />
in the<br />
Ovesco solar<br />
community<br />
roof project.<br />
Photo<br />
courtesy<br />
of David<br />
McHugh