28.11.2012 Views

REI Mar-Apr 2012 - Renewable Energy Installer

REI Mar-Apr 2012 - Renewable Energy Installer

REI Mar-Apr 2012 - Renewable Energy Installer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DTX<br />

Non-Toxic Ethylene Glycol<br />

Previously Propylene Glycol was the only non-toxic<br />

glycol available. That’s no longer the case. DTX has<br />

been especially formulated to exploit the advantages<br />

Ethylene Glycol has over Propylene Glycol. Specifically;<br />

� �����������������������������<br />

� �����������������<br />

� �������������������������������������<br />

� ��������������������<br />

Ground & Air Souce<br />

Heat Transfer Fluids<br />

BUY DIRECT FROM THE<br />

MANUFACTURER<br />

Get the fluid you need, when you need it.<br />

��������Next day delivery service<br />

� �����������������������������<br />

� �������������������������������<br />

Call the technical sales team for expert advice<br />

and prices.<br />

01792 586800<br />

www.hydratech.co.uk salesdept@hydratech.co.uk<br />

14 | www.renewableenergyinstaller.co.uk<br />

News: Profi le<br />

Care for the community<br />

In a recent issue of <strong>REI</strong>, Howard Johns<br />

of Southern Solar described the Ovesco<br />

community solar roof project in Lewes,<br />

as an example of the kind of initiative<br />

that has been hit hard by the proposed<br />

changes to the Feed-in Tariff. Liz<br />

Mandeville, a director of Ovesco,<br />

spells out what this means<br />

e completed and<br />

W<br />

registered our 98kW<br />

roof last August.<br />

No Feed-in Tariff<br />

(FiT) payment in sight, but our<br />

most serious problem was the<br />

uncertainty over the future of<br />

the FiT for solar. Community<br />

projects don’t give investors<br />

any direct fi nancial benefi t. Our<br />

evidence shows that community<br />

benefi t is the main motive for<br />

investing, but there are lots of<br />

ways to benefi t a community<br />

that don’t require large sums of<br />

money, so we have to include<br />

interest payments in our<br />

planning. The earlier FiT enabled<br />

us, to maintain the system, pay<br />

interest and a modest return on<br />

investments, and have a small<br />

sum for administration and<br />

development.<br />

The reductions in the FiT, on<br />

the most optimistic assumptions,<br />

just about make a project break<br />

even, but leave nothing to pay<br />

investors and for the continued<br />

existence of Ovesco. We have<br />

two good 30kW projects ready<br />

to go, but will probably have to<br />

abandon them. We could have<br />

completed them by the <strong>Mar</strong>ch<br />

deadline, but the back-dating<br />

of the new FiT has made this<br />

impossible.<br />

The government, with its<br />

series of appeals, is using up<br />

the narrow window in which<br />

we could have done something<br />

more. If it loses in the fi nal<br />

stage of its legal battle then,<br />

organisations like Ovesco should<br />

be given equivalent time to that<br />

lost in litigation before the new<br />

rates apply, to carry out projects<br />

that could have been completed<br />

within the original consultation<br />

period. At the moment, it’s a case<br />

of heads, the government wins,<br />

tails, community solar loses. In<br />

the longer term, communities,<br />

people employed in the solar<br />

business, individuals - every<br />

one loses from this cack-handed<br />

policy making. Hard to feel that<br />

anyone in government actually<br />

cares about climate change.<br />

Tough times:<br />

Those<br />

involved<br />

in the<br />

Ovesco solar<br />

community<br />

roof project.<br />

Photo<br />

courtesy<br />

of David<br />

McHugh

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!