12.07.2015 Views

The forage yield potential of Lavina hooded barley

The forage yield potential of Lavina hooded barley

The forage yield potential of Lavina hooded barley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 5 2010 NARC dryland (rainfed) fallow spring cereal <strong>forage</strong> <strong>yield</strong> and quality evaluations.Exp 23NARC Northern Agricultural Research Center. Havre, MontanaPlant Forage Dry MatterCultivar/ID Species Head DateHeight Content Yield Protein ADF NDF C. Fiber NO 3 -NJulian in % ton/ac % % % % ppmHB62-2 <strong>barley</strong> 183 30.2 27 2.971 9.2 49.9 53.4 29.1 1050Haxby <strong>barley</strong> 180 32.1 27 2.495 12.6 30.2 51.5 29.1 573Haybet <strong>barley</strong> 180 38.6 26 3.677 13.6 29.1 51.1 28.9 556Hays <strong>barley</strong> 183 32.3 26 3.202 11.1 29.9 51.3 27.7 364Hockett <strong>barley</strong> 184 29.5 29 3.495 10.3 29.8 50.8 29.4 633Horsford <strong>barley</strong> 177 38.2 21 2.112 12.7 32.6 55.7 30.4 1320<strong>Lavina</strong> <strong>barley</strong> 183 31.5 27 3.398 9.0 32.6 53.2 31.5 566Stockford <strong>barley</strong> 180 36.7 25 3.382 9.1 31.1 52.3 29.4 36904T90141-141 triticale 184 50.3 26 2.698 10.5 36.3 58.4 33.7 495Pronghorn triticale 180 43.9 24 2.829 14.5 32.9 54.5 31.5 1048Average 181.5 36.3 25.8 3.026 11.25 33.43 53.22 30.05 697.1LSD (p=0.05) 0.54 3.11 2.393 0.64 3.81 19.86 4.80 2.48 nsCV% 0.17 4.98 5.409 12.31 14.98 26.26 3.99 3.65 0.47Counts per mean 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2Typical toxic threshhold to restrict intake NO 3 -N=350ppmTable 6 2010 WARC-Corvallis irrigated spring cereal <strong>forage</strong> agronomics and quality evaluations.Exp 23WARC Western Agricultural Research Center. Corvallis, MontanaHead Plant Forage Dry MatterCultivar Entry Date Height Content Yield Protein ADF NDF C.Fiber NO 3 -NJulian inches # t/a % % % % ppmHB62-2 <strong>barley</strong> 188 32 0.27 3.447 9.9 30.9 52.3 27.7 267Haxby <strong>barley</strong> 188 34 0.31 3.421 12.7 28.4 50.0 25.7 315Haybet <strong>barley</strong> 188 38 0.29 3.163 10.3 29.8 49.5 26.2 567Hays <strong>barley</strong> 188 32 0.29 4.165 12.6 31.6 53.7 30.2 675Hockett <strong>barley</strong> 190 37 0.34 4.529 10.5 27.7 48.5 24.3 373Horsford <strong>barley</strong> 179 37 0.23 2.665 12.1 31.2 53.2 28.8 736Stockford <strong>barley</strong> 188 35 0.27 3.585 13.0 30.5 51.3 27.6 509<strong>Lavina</strong> <strong>barley</strong> 188 35 0.26 3.792 11.8 32.9 54.4 28.5 61904T90141-143 triticale 190 52 0.34 3.919 10.0 37.1 59.4 32.5 288Pronghorn triticale 187 48 0.29 3.238 10.5 36.3 56.3 31.2 461Mean 187.2 38.0 0.29 3.592 11.34 31.62 52.87 28.26 480.8CV1 6.7 11.7 17.1 15.1 2.7 3.3 4.4 41.3LSD (0.05) 4.377 0.06 ns ns 1.95 3.922 2.813 nsCounts per mean 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2Irrigation: total <strong>of</strong> 10 inches in 2 inch sets across the season.Typical toxic threshhold to restrict intake NO 3 -N=350ppm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!