An Interpersonal Skills Learning Taxonomy for Program Evaluation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

N. V. ChristieFootnoteThis method is an expansion of Baizerman’s (2009) approach.ReferencesAlkin, M., & Christie, C. A. (2002). The use of role-play in teaching evaluation. American Journal ofEvaluation, 23(2), 209–218.American Evaluation Association. (1995). W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. Scheirer, & C. Wye.Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.American Evaluation Association, Task Force on Guiding Principles for Evaluation. (1995). Guidingprinciples for evaluators. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.),Guiding principles for evaluators. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66, 19–26. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revisionof Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: David McKay.Anderson, S. B., & Ball, S. (1978). The profession and practice of program evaluation. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.Anderson-Draper, M. H. (2006). Understanding cultural competence through the evaluation of“Breaking the silence: A project to generate critical knowledge about family violence withinimmigrant communities.” Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 21(2), 59–79.Baizerman, M. (2009). Deepening understanding of managing evaluation. In D. W. Compton & M.Baizerman (Eds.), Managing program evaluation: Towards explicating a professional practice. NewDirections for Evaluation, 121, 87–98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2006). Real world evaluation: Working under budget, time, data,and political constraints. San Francisco: Sage.Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. E., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (1956). Taxonomyof educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. NewYork: David McKay.Broadnax, W. (1997). Educating tomorrow’s public administrators: Embracing theory and practice.Journal of Public Administration Education, 3(3), 391–396.Brown, R. D. (1985). Supervising evaluation practicum and intern students: A developmental model.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(2), 161–167.Campbell, H., & Tatro, B. J. (1998). Teaching program evaluation to public administration students ina single course: An experiential solution. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 4(2), 101–122.Carnevale, A., P., Gainer, L. J., & Meltzer, A., S. (1988). Workplace basics: The skills employers want.Washington, DC: Employment and Training Administration (DOL).Chouinard, J. A., & Cousins, J. B. (2009). A review and synthesis of current research on cross-culturalevaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(4), 457–494.Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stagemodels. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 383–412.754 Journal of Public Affairs Education
Interpersonal Skills TaxonomyDreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directedskill acquisition. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertisein the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.Fenger, M., & Homburg, V. (2011). The studio approach in public administration teaching: Bringingcoherence and practice into the curriculum. Journal of Public Administration Education, 17(3),385–405.Garnett, J. L. (1996). Communicating effectively. In Handbook of public administration (2nd ed., pp.665–681). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Ghere, G., King, J. A., Stevahn, L., & Minnema, J. (2006). A professional development unit forreflecting on program evaluator competencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 108–123.Gibbs, N., Epperson, S. E., Mondi, L., Graff, J., & Towle, L. (1995, October 2). The EQ factor.Time Magazine. Retrieved from www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,983503,00.htmlGlaser, S. R. (1983). Interpersonal communication instruction: A behavioral competency approach.Communication Education, 32, 221–225.Jaeger, A. J. (2003). Job competencies and the curriculum: An inquiry into emotional intelligence ingraduate professional education. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 615–639.Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.King, J. A., Stevhan, L., Ghere, G., & Minnema, J. (2001). Toward a taxonomy of essential evaluatorcompetencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 229–247.Lan, Z. (1997). A conflict resolution approach to public administration. Public Administration Review,57(1), 27–35.Lee, J., Wallace, T. L., & Alkin, M. (2007). Using problem-based learning to train evaluators. AmericanJournal of Evaluation, 28(4), 536–545.Mastracci, S. H., Newman, M. A., & Guy, M. E. (2010). Emotional labor: Why and how to teach it.Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16(2), 123–141.McDavid, J. C., & Hawthorn, L. R. (2006). Program evaluation and performance measurement: Anintroduction to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Morris, M. (1994). The role of single evaluation courses in evaluation training. The preparation ofprofessional evaluators: Issues, perspectives, and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation,62, 51–59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Orlandi, M. A., Weston, R., & Epstein, L. G. (Eds.). (1992). Cultural competence for evaluators: A guidefor alcohol and other drug abuse prevention practitioners working with ethnic/racial communities.CSAP Cultural Competence Series. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.———. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Perrin, B. (2005). How can the information about the competencies required for evaluation be useful?Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 20(2), 169–188.Journal of Public Affairs Education 755
Page 1 and 2: An Interpersonal Skills Learning Ta
Page 3 and 4: Interpersonal Skills Taxonomyprogra
Page 5 and 6: Interpersonal Skills TaxonomyThey f
Page 7 and 8: Interpersonal Skills Taxonomyprompt
Page 9 and 10: Interpersonal Skills Taxonomy6. In
Page 11 and 12: Interpersonal Skills Taxonomy• Fa
Page 13 and 14: Interpersonal Skills Taxonomyevalua
Page 15: Interpersonal Skills TaxonomyEppers

An Interpersonal Skills Learning Taxonomy for Program Evaluation ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?