Validation of the TTM Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MANOVA: Pros and Cons by Stage5550T-Score4540ProsCons35PC(N=32)C(N=43)PR(N=199)A(N=70)M(N=169)Stage of ChangeMANOVA:F(8,1006)=6.08, p < .05, η 2 =.05;ANOVA (Pros): F(4, 504) = 12.13, p
ANOVA: Self-Efficacy by Stage5550T-Score454035PC(N=32)C(N=43)PR(N=199)A(N=70)M(N=169)Stage of ChangeF(4, 501) = 11.03, p all stages
Page 1 and 2: Validation of the TTM DecisionalBal
Page 3 and 4: Introduction• Effective intervent
Page 5 and 6: Hypotheses• H 1 : Decisional Bala
Page 7 and 8: Stage of Change5 04 03 02 010038.23
Page 9 and 10: Measures• Stage of Change:o A sta
Page 11: Self-Efficacy: Confirmatory Model1.
Page 15 and 16: Discussion• Results comparable to
Page 17 and 18: Future Directions• Longitudinal A
Page 19 and 20: Staging• Precontemplation- Not th
Page 21 and 22: Self-Efficacy:Items and Descriptive
Page 23: Self-Efficacy:Alternative Model Tes

Validation of the TTM Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?