29.11.2012 Views

BOOK OF ABSTRACTS

BOOK OF ABSTRACTS

BOOK OF ABSTRACTS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12th Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology <strong>BOOK</strong> <strong>OF</strong> ABSTRACT<br />

choices made during the whole process will have affected its direction. The neutral tone erases<br />

the interpretive acts that produced the facts and eradicates ambiguities in both the studied scenes<br />

and their analytic treatment (Charmaz, 2006).<br />

From a social constructionist view the story of the policy-supporting researcher is not just to<br />

construct a narrative, a story with a beginning, middle, and an end designed to tell what happened<br />

and what it means. He also actively translates this into an argument, the form employed to<br />

persuade an audience that something ‘ought’ to be (cf. Fischer, 2003, p. 181). We are convinced<br />

that a carefully crafted argument is more valuable than a vague conclusion. But at the same time,<br />

as we have argued that knowledge is forged through consensus, and is as such, never complete<br />

(Fischer, 2003, p. 124) or able to conclude (that is, to close an argument). Instead of speaking ‘truth<br />

to power’ by revealing law-like regularities based on causal explanations, our approach is aimed<br />

at ‘making sense together’ (Hoppe, 1999). Policymakers are not blank pages to be filled with<br />

research findings. Based on our understanding of the policy process, we recognize that we are<br />

merely a part of a myriad of other stories.<br />

The insight that our policy supporting research is only a small part of the claims making process<br />

is actually rather liberating. Pleasing or satisfying the sponsor becomes of lesser importance as<br />

a dozen of other actors will also affect the shape of the eventual policy (Weiss, 1982). It urges the<br />

researcher to take responsibility and take into account the possible consequences of his or her<br />

endeavour.<br />

That’s why policy argumented recommendations do not exclude an open-ended discussion.<br />

yOuNG MOThERS WITh “BAd” KIdS. ThE<br />

RELATIONShIp BETWEEN yOuNG pARENThOOd ANd<br />

<strong>OF</strong>FSpRING dELINquENCy<br />

JORIS BEIJERS<br />

phOOLAN dEvI INSTITuTE / vu uNIvERSITy AMSTERdAM, AMSTERdAM,<br />

NEThERLANdS<br />

CATRIEN BIJLEvELd<br />

vu uNIvERSITy AMSTERdAM, AMSTERdAM, NEThERLANdS<br />

TERENCE ThORNBERRy<br />

uNIvERSITy <strong>OF</strong> MARyLANd, Md, uSA<br />

International studies, mainly conducted in Anglo-Saxon countries, show that children of teenage<br />

mothers are at elevated risk for offending. This Dutch study investigates the effect of early<br />

parenthood of mothers and fathers on offspring delinquency. The results confirm results from<br />

earlier studies elsewhere and show that early fatherhood does not add to offending risk over and<br />

above early motherhood. Factors like family instability, family size and parental delinquency do<br />

not account for the association between early motherhood and delinquency. The elevated risk of<br />

offending applies to all children of young mothers, not just to the first-born children.<br />

324 CRIMINOLOGICAL ThEORy, RESEARCh ANd EduCATION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!