12.07.2015 Views

Lyapunov exponents of the predator prey model Ljapunovovy ...

Lyapunov exponents of the predator prey model Ljapunovovy ...

Lyapunov exponents of the predator prey model Ljapunovovy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

21The following example uses <strong>the</strong> alternative definition to compute <strong>the</strong> <strong>Lyapunov</strong> exponent<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tent map.Example 3.10 (Tent map)Let T be a tent map, defined byT (x) =2x x ∈ 0, 1 2,−2x + 2 x ∈ 12 , 1The <strong>Lyapunov</strong> exponent <strong>of</strong> T can be computed asn−11 L (T ) = lim log T ′ T k (x).n→∞ nk=0for some initial x.Since |T ′ (x)| = 2 for any x ∈ (0, 1/2) ∪ (1/2, 1) it is log |T ′ T i (x) | = log 2. Hence <strong>the</strong><strong>Lyapunov</strong> exponent <strong>of</strong> T is equal to <strong>the</strong> mean value <strong>of</strong> log 2.L (T ) = log 2.This is in agreement with Theorem 3.9 because <strong>the</strong> Tent map is topologically conjugateto <strong>the</strong> Logistic map by conjugacy h (x) = sin 2 π2 x which is piecewise differentiable on[0, 1].The geometrical representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lyapunov</strong> exponent is <strong>the</strong> divergence speed <strong>of</strong> twoneighboring points. The following definition gives us <strong>the</strong> way to numerically approximate<strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Lyapunov</strong> exponent by computing <strong>the</strong> distances <strong>of</strong> orbits <strong>of</strong> twoclose points.Definition 3.11 [6, page 276] Let x ∈ a, b − 10 −k , a, b ∈ R and ˜x = x + 10 −k . DefineH n,k (x) = 1 n log |f n (x) − f n (˜x)| + k n .Theorem 3.12 Suppose f is an ergodic and piecewise continuously differentiable map on X =[a, b]. For large enough k, n is H n,k (x) close to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Lyapunov</strong> exponent <strong>of</strong> f.Pro<strong>of</strong>. Let x ∈ a, b − 10 −k , a, b ∈ R and ˜x = x + 10 −k as in Definition 3.11The following inequality is equivalent to <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> derivation <strong>of</strong> f(∀ε > 0) (∃k 0 > 0) (∀k ≥ k 0 ) :|f (x) − f (˜x)||x − ˜x|It is easy to see that <strong>the</strong> following statement holds.(∀n ∈ N) (∀ε > 0) (∃k n > 0) (∀k ≥ k n ) :|f n (x) − f n (˜x)||x − ˜x|−− f ′ (x) ≤ ε 2 .n−1i=0f ′ f i x ≤ ε 2 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!