European Cities Tourism 1 Proposal for a questionnaire design for ...
European Cities Tourism 1 Proposal for a questionnaire design for ...
European Cities Tourism 1 Proposal for a questionnaire design for ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>European</strong> <strong>Cities</strong> <strong>Tourism</strong><br />
4 Survey Methodology<br />
Face-to-face interviews are essential <strong>for</strong> this type of survey. They enable close control over the composition of<br />
the sample and allow <strong>for</strong> a wide range of questioning techniques. In addition there is the guarantee that the<br />
questions have been answered in the order in which they are set out.<br />
Self-completion <strong>questionnaire</strong>s are recommended <strong>for</strong> collecting in<strong>for</strong>mation about spend. Asking this type of<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation in the face-to-face interview is possible but the replies will be influenced by the timing of the<br />
interview relative to the overall length of stay in the city. For example, interviewing a respondent on the second<br />
day of their 5-day visit is likely to produce a different set of answers in comparison to an interview on the last<br />
day of their visit. It would also make the <strong>questionnaire</strong> unacceptably long if the spend questions were asked<br />
face-to-face.<br />
For the Eurocity Survey, self-completion <strong>questionnaire</strong>s should be distributed at the end of the face-to-face<br />
interview and the interviewer should explain briefly what the respondent should do. A reply-paid envelope<br />
should be attached to the <strong>questionnaire</strong>. Experience in Edinburgh has shown that having a prize draw is an<br />
incentive to respondents to complete and return the <strong>questionnaire</strong>. The prize could be, <strong>for</strong> example, a two night<br />
stay in a hotel in the city (exclusive of access costs), which would be used either by the respondent or a friend or<br />
family member. Each city should be responsible <strong>for</strong> organising its own prize.<br />
4.1 Interviews<br />
Number of interviews<br />
It is recommended that each city carry out 1,500-2,000 interviews. This may seem a lot especially <strong>for</strong> a smaller<br />
city. However this volume is necessary because:<br />
♦ There must be enough interviews to provide a representative sample of the city’s visitors.<br />
♦ These numbers will allow the possibility of sub-analysis of most subsets of visitors <strong>for</strong> the city’s own use<br />
and <strong>for</strong> comparative purposes.<br />
♦ It is not possible to establish year-on-year trend data from a smaller sample; <strong>for</strong> example, a small sample<br />
might produce 21 Americans one year and 52 the next, but this would be too small a numerical difference to<br />
be a reliable indicator of a trend.<br />
♦ Small cohort sizes lead to increased error when weighting is applied.<br />
All cities are likely to have large numbers of visitors and 1,500-2,000 will cover all the cities’ needs on this type of<br />
survey.<br />
8