WWBD? What Would Ben (Graham) Do? - AB Freeman School of ...
WWBD? What Would Ben (Graham) Do? - AB Freeman School of ...
WWBD? What Would Ben (Graham) Do? - AB Freeman School of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
November 25, 2011<br />
CLECO CORPORATION<br />
CNL/NYSE<br />
Continuing Coverage: Power Up!<br />
Investment Rating: Market Outperform<br />
PRICE: $ 33.81 S&P 500: 1,158.67 DJIA: 11,231.78 RUSSELL 2000: 666.16<br />
� Strong cash position allows for flexibility and improves investor value.<br />
� Current business environment makes Cleco an acquisition candidate.<br />
� Future holds steady, predictable growth and returns.<br />
� Expanded rate base increases operational efficiencies and decreases<br />
risks.<br />
� Our 12-month target price is $41.00.<br />
Valuation<br />
EPS*<br />
P/E<br />
CFPS<br />
P/CFPS<br />
2010 A<br />
$ 2.22<br />
15.2x<br />
$ 5.33<br />
6.3x<br />
2011 E<br />
$ 2.74<br />
12.3x<br />
$ 7.03<br />
4.8x<br />
2012 E<br />
$ 3.03<br />
11.2x<br />
$ 7.39<br />
4.6x<br />
* Excluding non-recurrinng<br />
items<br />
Market Capitalization Stock Data<br />
Equity Market Cap (MM): $ 2,051.25 52-Week Range: $30.05- $37.74<br />
Enterprise Value (MM): $ 3,276.70 12-Month Stock Performance: 190.07%<br />
Shares Outstanding (MM): 60.67 Dividend Yield: 171.00%<br />
Estimated Float (MM): 59.41 Book Value Per Share: $ 23.18<br />
6-Mo. Avg. Daily Volume: 5,360,000 Beta: 0.80<br />
Company Quick View:<br />
Location: Pineville, Louisiana<br />
Industry: Electric Utility<br />
Description: Cleco Corporation is a public utility holding company that provides energy<br />
services to central Louisiana. The corporation operates two primary business segments:<br />
Cleco Power and Midstream.<br />
Key Products & Services: Cleco Power focuses on generation, transmission, and<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> electricity services. Midstream owns and operates an unregulated power<br />
generation station.<br />
Company Website: www.cleco.com<br />
Analysts: Investment Research Manager:<br />
Omar Cameron Seth Hamstead<br />
Aashish Chhachhi<br />
Nianxiong (Eric) Huang<br />
David Marsh<br />
Jeffrey Rohr<br />
Wall Street's Farm Team<br />
The BURKENROAD REPORTS are produced solely as a part <strong>of</strong> an educational program <strong>of</strong> Tulane University's<br />
A.B. <strong>Freeman</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business. The reports are not investment advice and you should not and may not rely<br />
on them in making any investment decision. You should consult an investment pr<strong>of</strong>essional and/or conduct your<br />
own primary research regarding any potential investment.<br />
BURKENROAD REPORTS
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
STOCK PRICE<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
Figure 1:<br />
5-year Stock Price<br />
Performance<br />
INVESTMENT<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Source: http://www.finance.yahoo.com/CNL<br />
We rate Cleco as a Market Outperform based on a weighted average <strong>of</strong><br />
the price to earnings, price to book value, discounted cash flow and<br />
dividend discount valuation methods. We project a 21% increase from the<br />
November 25, 2011 price <strong>of</strong> $33.81 for a 12-month target price <strong>of</strong> $41.00.<br />
Cleco is an electric utility holding company based in Pineville, Louisiana.<br />
The Company has two operating subsidiaries, Cleco Power and Cleco<br />
Midstream Resources LLC (Midstream). Cleco Power is a regulated<br />
utility company that owns electricity generating units with a net capacity<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2,403 megawatts (MW) and serves approximately 279,000 customers<br />
throughout Louisiana. Midstream owns two combined-cycle gas turbine<br />
units with a net capacity <strong>of</strong> 755 MW. Midstream generates electricity for<br />
sale on the wholesale market.<br />
One-time transactions, including a 2010 restructuring <strong>of</strong> the tolling<br />
agreement with J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation, have left<br />
Cleco with significant cash. Our forecast predicts that Cleco will<br />
effectively utilize this strong cash position for the benefit <strong>of</strong> stakeholders.<br />
Management has indicated that increasing dividends and stock<br />
repurchases are to be part <strong>of</strong> a long-term plan to deliver value to its<br />
shareholders.<br />
Cleco has positioned itself for the future through capital investments. The<br />
Madison Unit 3 plant was successfully completed and came online in<br />
2010. The Acadiana Load Pocket and Advanced Metering projects are<br />
proceeding on schedule towards their respective completion dates in 2012<br />
and 2013. The combined result <strong>of</strong> these three capital investments puts<br />
Cleco in an auspicious position to compete in Louisiana’s electricity<br />
market.<br />
2
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
PREVIOUS<br />
BURKENROAD<br />
RATINGS AND<br />
PRICES<br />
INVESTMENT<br />
THESIS<br />
Strong cash position<br />
allows for flexibility<br />
and improves<br />
investor value.<br />
Financial and environmental regulations also impact our price forecast.<br />
Cleco secured a new rate plan that allows the Company to target a return<br />
on equity <strong>of</strong> 10.7% beginning in 2010. This rate increase will have a<br />
direct positive impact on Cleco’s earnings potential. Environmental<br />
regulations, however, continue to challenge managers <strong>of</strong> electric utility<br />
companies.<br />
Table 1: Previous Burkenroad Ratings and Prices<br />
Date Rating Price*<br />
11/16/10 Market Outperform $35.85<br />
11/13/09 Market Perform $28.33<br />
11/17/08 Market Outperform $25.85<br />
02/18/08 Market Outperform $33.66<br />
12/01/06 Market Outperform $25.11<br />
04/14/05 Market Perform $19.94<br />
03/28/04 Market Perform $16.87<br />
03/24/03 Market Perform $10.41<br />
11/14/01 Market Perform $16.34<br />
03/05/01 Market Perform $17.86<br />
02/25/00 Market Perform $11.69<br />
*Price at time <strong>of</strong> report date<br />
Cleco’s success relies heavily on its ability to maintain strong cash flows,<br />
to achieve a sufficient return on equity, to continue to grow its rate base,<br />
and to position itself well in anticipation <strong>of</strong> future regulations. This<br />
section reviews Cleco’s recent performance and analyzes its outlook for<br />
the future.<br />
Cleco considerably increased its cash reserves in 2011 mainly from the<br />
Company’s sale <strong>of</strong> its Acadia Unit 2 generating facility to Entergy<br />
Louisiana in April. In addition, higher than average electricity use by<br />
Cleco’s customers throughout much <strong>of</strong> the year contributed to higher<br />
revenues. These developments followed an equally strong year in 2010<br />
during which Cleco made significant gains on a toll settlement with JP<br />
Morgan. This situation allows Cleco to easily maintain its target debt-toequity<br />
ratio, effectively fund current capital projects, and it provides<br />
Cleco the flexibility to engage in new projects if necessary.<br />
In addition, the cash position allowed Cleco to twice increase its<br />
dividends in 2011, most recently to $1.25 per share (annualized) in the<br />
third quarter. Cleco had also increased its dividend payments in 2010,<br />
after paying dividends at a flat rate for the previous seven years. In the<br />
third quarter <strong>of</strong> 2011, Cleco repurchased over $13 million <strong>of</strong> common<br />
stock.<br />
3
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Current business<br />
environment makes<br />
Cleco an acquisition<br />
candidate.<br />
Future holds steady,<br />
predictable growth<br />
and returns.<br />
Expanded rate base<br />
increases<br />
operational<br />
efficiencies and<br />
decreases risks.<br />
Cleco’s current financial and business environment positions it as a<br />
candidate for acquisition. The Company’s free cash flows are greater than<br />
10% <strong>of</strong> its market capitalization, which indicates the opportunity for a<br />
leveraged buyout. Additionally, Entergy recently decided to connect to<br />
the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator (MISO). With<br />
Entergy’s decision, Cleco will have the option to join the MISO grid as<br />
well, thus, increasing potential synergies between the two companies and<br />
making an acquisition possible.<br />
In 2010, regulators approved a new rate plan that permits Cleco to earn a<br />
target return on equity <strong>of</strong> 10.7%, effectively increasing the rate Cleco is<br />
allowed to charge for retail electricity. Investors can, therefore, expect to<br />
regularly enjoy higher earnings in the future. Moreover, Cleco is subject<br />
to forces that affect the utility sector as a whole. Projected GDP growth<br />
and projected increases in fuel prices over the next few years will likely<br />
help to improve Cleco’s total revenue. Total revenues will increase along<br />
with fuel costs because the amount Cleco’s regulated business is<br />
permitted to charge is affected by total costs.<br />
Although rapid expansion is unlikely, if Cleco seeks to expand its service<br />
area, it must undergo competitive bid processes to secure long-term<br />
contracts with local municipalities. Because these contracts do not expire<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten, opportunities are few. Industrial expansion in the Haynesville shale<br />
area in northern Louisiana is a possible source <strong>of</strong> customer growth for the<br />
Company. However, as the area becomes fully developed, this<br />
opportunity will gradually wane.<br />
Cleco’s rate base, the property on which it may earn a rate <strong>of</strong> return,<br />
expanded steadily throughout 2010 and 2011. The Acadiana Load Pocket<br />
transmission project and the Advanced Metering project will both<br />
contribute to the rate base in 2011 and over the following several years.<br />
The completion <strong>of</strong> Madison Unit 3 and the purchase <strong>of</strong> Acadia Unit 1 in<br />
2010 gave Cleco $1.3 billion <strong>of</strong> additional assets and added 600<br />
megawatts (MW) <strong>of</strong> capacity to the Company’s electricity generation<br />
portfolio.<br />
Overall, the Company’s increased capacity allows it to rely less on<br />
outside power purchases. Cleco can, therefore, forecast its expenses with<br />
considerable accuracy and reduce its exposure to the risk associated with<br />
unpredictable wholesale electricity prices.<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> 2011, Cleco’s Midstream segment will terminate its tolling<br />
agreement with J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation. The two units<br />
under its control, Coughlin Units 6 and 7, will then become available to<br />
sell electricity on the wholesale market. Both units are combined-cycle<br />
gas turbines that emit less carbon than typical gas plants and are the only<br />
such unregulated units in Louisiana. Midstream is, consequently, prepared<br />
to take advantage <strong>of</strong> future wholesale demand for clean energy.<br />
4
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
VALUATION Our 12 month target price for Cleco is $41 per share based on the<br />
following four valuation methods: Discounted Cash flow (DCF),<br />
Dividend Discount Model (DDM), Price to Earnings multiple (P/E) and<br />
the Price to Book Value multiple (P/BV). The peers used for the relative<br />
valuation techniques include Southern Company, American Electric<br />
Power, TECO Energy and CMS Energy.<br />
Price to Earnings To estimate the target price <strong>of</strong> Cleco, we multiplied the forecasted<br />
earnings for the next four quarters by the average P/E multiple <strong>of</strong> Cleco’s<br />
peers. The target price using this method is $46.41.<br />
Price to Book Value The Price to Book Value method compares the price per share <strong>of</strong> a<br />
company to its book value per share. We multiplied the average P/BV<br />
multiple <strong>of</strong> Cleco’s peers by the book value estimates for the coming year<br />
to yield a target price <strong>of</strong> $43.60.<br />
Discounted Cash<br />
Flow<br />
Dividend Discount<br />
The relative valuation techniques only compare a company against its<br />
peers; they may overlook the internal strengths <strong>of</strong> a company. To address<br />
this problem we estimated the future Free Cash Flows (FCF) and then<br />
discounted them at the Weighted Average Cost <strong>of</strong> Capital (WACC) to<br />
arrive at the enterprise value. By subtracting the debt and adding cash<br />
back to this enterprise value we derived the value <strong>of</strong> equity. After<br />
factoring in the WACC, the resultant target price is $34.64.<br />
The Dividend Discount Method (DDM) involves forecasting future<br />
dividends and discounting them at a company’s cost <strong>of</strong> equity. Cleco’s<br />
dividend growth rate exceeds the cost <strong>of</strong> equity; consequently, we<br />
deployed a modified version <strong>of</strong> DDM. We calculated the terminal value<br />
on the basis <strong>of</strong> the diluted earnings per share at the end <strong>of</strong> explicit<br />
forecasting period. This method produces a target price <strong>of</strong> $ 39.01.<br />
Current Price as <strong>of</strong> November 25, 2011<br />
5
INDUSTRY<br />
ANALYSIS<br />
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Cleco operates in the electric utilities industry. According to 2009<br />
statistics from the United States Census Bureau, the industry accounts for<br />
almost 5% <strong>of</strong> U.S. annual GDP and is among the largest industries in the<br />
country. This industry comprises four sectors: electricity generation,<br />
energy network operations, energy trading and marketing, and energy<br />
service providers and retailers. This report focuses primarily on the<br />
electricity generation segment because that is where Cleco operates.<br />
Production Process Electricity is typically produced by electromechanical generators<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> an engine powered by fuel combustion or nuclear fission.<br />
The energy produced rotates a magnet inside a coil <strong>of</strong> wires, generating<br />
an electrical current. Generators can also be powered by energy from<br />
other sources including solar radiation, geothermal energy, flowing water<br />
and wind. Steam operated turbines produce most <strong>of</strong> the electricity in the<br />
United States. The most common fuels are coal and natural gas. Cleco’s<br />
generating units are primarily steam turbines powered by coal, natural<br />
gas, and petroleum coke, and combined-cycle turbines powered by natural<br />
gas. Figure 3 illustrates U.S. electricity generation by fuel type. As shown<br />
in the figure, coal (45%) is by far the leading fuel source <strong>of</strong> electric power<br />
generation in the United States.<br />
Figure 3. U.S. Electric Power Industry Net Generation by Fuel, 2009<br />
Series1,<br />
Nuclear, 20%,<br />
20%<br />
Series1,<br />
Hydroelectric,<br />
7%, 7%<br />
Series1, Natural<br />
Gas, 23%, 23%<br />
Source: Energy Institute <strong>of</strong> America<br />
Industry Drivers Electric power is a critical resource for residential, commercial and<br />
industrial uses throughout United States. Population and economic<br />
activity are therefore primary drivers <strong>of</strong> the electric utility industry.<br />
Consequently, electric utilities benefit from steady GDP and population<br />
growth in their service areas. The International Energy Agency predicts<br />
that U.S. demand for electricity will double over the next twenty-five<br />
years.<br />
6<br />
Series1, Other,<br />
5%, 5%<br />
Series1, Coal,<br />
45%, 45%
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Regulations<br />
Regulations are also an important industry driver because all utility<br />
companies are subject to state and federal regulations. Regulators <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
set the maximum pr<strong>of</strong>its that a utility can realize from selling power.<br />
Price regulations increase the importance <strong>of</strong> the economic factors.<br />
Environmental regulations are also imposed on U.S. electric utility<br />
companies by both state and federal agencies. Twenty-six states have<br />
implemented Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) that require a certain<br />
portion <strong>of</strong> energy to be produced from renewable sources. Electric<br />
utilities’ heavy dependence on burning coal makes the industry one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
nation’s main emitters <strong>of</strong> greenhouse gases. Greenhouse gases contribute<br />
to global climate change, and industry analysts anticipate increased<br />
government action to limit emissions. Therefore, RPS will probably<br />
increase in the future. Carbon trading, carbon taxing, and carbon capping<br />
are federal options that would impose a price on carbon emissions, and<br />
increase costs for electricity generating companies.<br />
Weather<br />
Weather is another industry driver. Demand for electricity spikes when<br />
extreme hot or cold weather occurs. Increased demand benefits Cleco<br />
because utility companies are permitted to charge their customers higher<br />
prices during peak usage seasons. Conversely, if unusually mild<br />
temperatures occur during peak usage seasons electric utility companies<br />
will realize decreased revenues.<br />
Barriers to Entry Considerable barriers to entry provide an advantage to existing utility<br />
companies. The industry is capital-intensive and new entrants need<br />
considerable capital to set up generation plants. In addition, the<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> regulatory bodies makes gaining approval for new<br />
infrastructure a long and complicated process. Cleco enjoys high<br />
customer satisfaction in its territory. Therefore, a new competitor would<br />
be unlikely to successfully operate in Cleco’s region or to draw away<br />
Cleco’s customers. Municipalities sign long-term power contracts with<br />
utility companies, and changes in these contracts are relatively rare.<br />
Bargaining Power<br />
<strong>of</strong> Suppliers<br />
Generally, the bargaining power <strong>of</strong> suppliers is somewhat low. Suppliers<br />
in the industry include raw fuel providers and other electricity providers.<br />
Utility companies buy raw fuel from suppliers on long-term contracts as<br />
well as on the spot market. The bargaining power <strong>of</strong> the suppliers is<br />
relatively low during the life <strong>of</strong> a contract. Utility companies also buy fuel<br />
in the futures market to hedge their supply risk. Utility companies are<br />
occasionally forced to buy power from other utility companies when they<br />
cannot meet customer demand. When a company is forced to make an<br />
energy purchase because <strong>of</strong> high demand, the supplier holds a strong<br />
position and can charge a high price.<br />
7
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Bargaining Power<br />
<strong>of</strong> Buyers<br />
Availability <strong>of</strong><br />
Substitutes<br />
The bargaining power <strong>of</strong> buyers is low. To encourage competition, retail<br />
electricity markets have been fully or partly deregulated in fifteen states<br />
and the District <strong>of</strong> Columbia. Customers in those states have the ability to<br />
choose their electricity providers. Business and industrial customers have<br />
some leverage when signing the long-term power purchasing contracts<br />
with utility companies. In Louisiana, individual retail customers have low<br />
bargaining power because consumers are unable to change their<br />
electricity provider. Louisiana municipalities and other political entities<br />
act on behalf <strong>of</strong> consumers to negotiate electricity contracts with utilities.<br />
Because Cleco, Entergy Louisiana, and SWEPCO are the only competing<br />
suppliers in Louisiana, bargaining power is limited for buyers in<br />
Louisiana.<br />
The availability <strong>of</strong> substitutes is low. Customers can employ alternate<br />
ways to generate electricity, but very few substitute products exist.<br />
Although trends in solar energy and other alternative energy sources<br />
could potentially affect Cleco and other utility companies in the future,<br />
these sources currently tend to be prohibitively expensive to retail<br />
electricity customers.<br />
Competitive Rivalry Competitive rivalry is medium. When utilities compete for contracts with<br />
municipalities in Louisiana, the competitors compete on both price and<br />
service. Base rates are determined by state regulators. To be competitive<br />
in the industry, a company needs to expand its capacity and customer<br />
base. After expansion, the key factor to increasing pr<strong>of</strong>it is to increase<br />
efficiency and customer satisfaction. The efficiency <strong>of</strong> generating pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />
determined by government regulations, fuel cost, and technology. The<br />
wholesale electricity market operates in an unregulated business<br />
environment. Because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> regulations, barriers to entry are<br />
lower and competitive rivalry is higher in this segment.<br />
COMPANY<br />
DESCRIPTION<br />
History, Location<br />
and Facilities<br />
Cleco is an electric utility holding company that, through subsidiaries,<br />
generates, transmits, and sells retail and wholesale electricity in<br />
Louisiana. The Company is based in Pineville, Louisiana and supplies<br />
electricity to approximately 279,000 customers across the central and<br />
southeastern parts <strong>of</strong> the state.<br />
Louisiana Ice and Utilities, Cleco’s earliest incarnation, began in Bunkie<br />
Louisiana in 1914 as an ice manufacturing operation. The excess power<br />
generated for the ice manufacturing process was sold to nearby homes<br />
and businesses as a secondary source <strong>of</strong> revenue. Financier Floyd Wilson<br />
Woodcock played an essential role in changing that company’s focus<br />
from ice manufacturing to electricity generation. A pivotal date in Cleco’s<br />
transition was January 1935 when Mr. Woodcock and five East Coast<br />
businessmen reorganized the business.<br />
8
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
The reorganization resulted in the Company’s first articles <strong>of</strong><br />
incorporation and a new name, Louisiana Ice and Electric Company.<br />
Under Woodcock’s leadership, that company’s breadth <strong>of</strong> production<br />
expanded to include refrigerators and lighting equipment. F. Hugh<br />
Coughlin, the Company’s second President, completed the transformation<br />
Woodcock initiated. His 20-year tenure as president included significant<br />
acquisitions and reorganizations that resulted in the company Cleco is<br />
today. Most notably, Cleco’s merger with Gulf Public Service Company<br />
in 1951 doubled the size <strong>of</strong> Cleco.<br />
In the years following this merger, Cleco divested itself <strong>of</strong> nearly all<br />
nonelectric generating assets. In 1968 Cleco was admitted for trading on<br />
the New York Stock Exchange. The most recent reorganization occurred<br />
in 1999 when Cleco implemented a public utility holding company<br />
structure, with Cleco Utility Group and Cleco Midstream Resources LLC<br />
as the two primary subsidiaries.<br />
Today, the two subsidiaries are known as Cleco Power and Midstream<br />
Resources LLC (Midstream). Cleco Power provides retail electricity<br />
service and Midstream owns and operates a merchant power plant. The<br />
shaded regions in Figure 4 represent Cleco’s current retail service areas<br />
throughout the state <strong>of</strong> Louisiana.<br />
Figure 4. Cleco Service Areas<br />
Source: http://www.cleco.com<br />
9
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Unit Name<br />
Cleco owns and operates eleven generating units between Cleco Power<br />
and Midstream. Table 2 lists each generating unit’s names, type and<br />
generation capacity in megawatts (MW).<br />
Table 2. Generating Units<br />
Cleco Power<br />
Net Capacity<br />
Type Fuel<br />
(MW)<br />
Cleco Power<br />
Nesbitt 1 422 Steam Natural gas/oil<br />
Rodemacher 2 146 Steam Coal/ natural gas<br />
Madison 3 515 Steam Petroleum coke<br />
Acadia 1 583 Combined cycle Natural gas<br />
Teche 1 18 Steam Natural gas<br />
Teche 2 33 Steam Natural gas<br />
Teche 3 328 Steam Natural gas/oil<br />
Teche 4 31 Steam Natural gas<br />
<strong>Do</strong>let Hills 319 Steam Lignite/natural gas<br />
Franklin 8 Gas Natural gas<br />
Midstream<br />
Coughlin 6 258 Combined Cycle Natural gas<br />
Coughlin 7 497 Combined Cycle Natural gas<br />
Total 3158 (MW)<br />
Products Cleco Power<br />
Cleco Power is a regulated electric utility that provides retail electricity to<br />
customers in Louisiana. The rate Cleco Power charges its customers is<br />
regulated by the Louisiana Public Service Commission (LPSC) and the<br />
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), along with other<br />
government bodies.<br />
Cleco Power delivers its power to customers through a network <strong>of</strong><br />
transmission and delivery lines owned by Cleco and other companies. The<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> power the transmission grid can carry is limited by physical<br />
constraints and is subject to state and federal regulation.<br />
Midstream<br />
Midstream is a merchant electricity producer that owns two electricity<br />
generating facilities located at a single merchant power plant. Midstream<br />
sells electricity on the wholesale electricity market to electric utilities and<br />
other merchant power companies. Midstream can also earn revenue<br />
through tolling agreements with outside parties. These agreements give<br />
10
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
the counterparty the right to sell all <strong>of</strong> the electricity generated at a given<br />
facility. The counterparty is responsible for all fuel and maintenance costs<br />
associated with operating the facility during the term <strong>of</strong> the agreement.<br />
Strategy Through Cleco Power and Midstream, Cleco has articulated a strategy for<br />
increasing revenues and augmenting future growth. Cleco’s strategy is<br />
based upon its subsidiaries’ core businesses. Cleco Power derives a great<br />
deal <strong>of</strong> its success from its ability to generate unit fuel diversity at low<br />
costs. Many <strong>of</strong> Cleco’s generating facilities are capable <strong>of</strong> using multiple<br />
fuel sources. Figure 5 illustrates Cleco’s reliance by fuel type based on<br />
each facility’s primary fuel source.<br />
Natural Gas 69%<br />
Figure 5. Cleco’s Primary Fuel Source Portfolio<br />
In addition, the regulated utility aims to deliver top-notch customer<br />
service, maintain high customer satisfaction, and have strong regulatory<br />
relationships to position the Company to continue growing by acquiring<br />
new customers and making efficient investments.<br />
Cleco Power<br />
The overarching goal <strong>of</strong> Cleco Power is to extract maximum allowable<br />
returns through fuel diversity, state <strong>of</strong> the art technology, and renewable<br />
capability in a regulated market. Cleco Power relies on solid-fuel,<br />
petroleum coke, natural gas, and coal-based sources to efficiently produce<br />
electricity at its power plants in central Louisiana. Cleco Power has<br />
established a four-year formula rate plan with riders for large projects and<br />
targets a 10.7% return on equity.<br />
11<br />
Petroleum Coke<br />
16%<br />
Lignite 10%<br />
Coal 5%
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Strategically, Cleco Power views its vast customer base and smart<br />
investments as the key to navigating the recent economic slowdown.<br />
Cleco Power identifies two major investments as integral parts <strong>of</strong> its longterm<br />
strategy: 1) the Acadiana Load Pocket transmission project and 2)<br />
the advanced metering infrastructure project. With the Acadiana project,<br />
Cleco Power intends to relieve constraints in its southern Louisiana<br />
service territory by developing 90 miles <strong>of</strong> new transmission<br />
infrastructure. By replacing all its existing meters with smart meters,<br />
Cleco Power believes its Advanced Metering project will provide better<br />
information for customers and the Company by enhancing outage<br />
detection.<br />
Midstream<br />
Midstream competes in an unregulated market. The overarching goal is to<br />
position Midstream’s assets to extract maximum long-term value.<br />
Through its Coughlin plant, a combined-cycle generator, Midstream is<br />
well-suited to capitalize on future environmental regulations that may<br />
emphasize the use <strong>of</strong> cleaner generating facilities.<br />
Cleco Corporation<br />
Finally, Cleco has a long-term goal <strong>of</strong> maintaining a strong investment<br />
grade rating. Despite the investments Cleco has made, the corporation still<br />
has a significant amount <strong>of</strong> cash on hand. Additionally, the availability <strong>of</strong><br />
credit ensures that the corporation will not need to issue equity in the<br />
immediate future. By monetizing the Acadia Unit 2 asset, the Company<br />
has been able to wipe out most <strong>of</strong> its debt and secure capital to embark<br />
upon future investments.<br />
Competitors Cleco Power<br />
Cleco Power operates under franchise agreements with various<br />
government entities, including municipalities and parishes. The<br />
agreements secure it the right to provide power to customers in those<br />
regions. In addition to renewing expiring agreements, the Company<br />
continually attempts to expand the region for which it provides electricity.<br />
Consequently, Cleco Power is primarily in competition with the region’s<br />
other retail electricity providers.<br />
SWEPCO (Southwestern Electric Power Company) is a utility<br />
headquartered in Shreveport, Louisiana that provides electricity to<br />
customers in Louisiana, Arkansas, and Texas. It is a subsidiary <strong>of</strong><br />
American Electric Power, one <strong>of</strong> the largest electric utilities in the United<br />
States.<br />
Entergy is a large energy company serving customers in Louisiana,<br />
Arkansas, Mississippi and Texas. Cleco Power primarily competes with<br />
its electric utility subsidiaries in the region, namely Entergy Louisiana,<br />
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy New Orleans.<br />
12
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Latest<br />
Developments<br />
The Louisiana Energy and Power Authority (LEPA) is a state-run,<br />
nonpr<strong>of</strong>it agency that represents communities that own their own<br />
independent power distribution systems. LEPA runs a computerized<br />
“Energy Control Center” out <strong>of</strong> Lafayette, Louisiana, that dispatches<br />
electricity and allows its members to have reliable electricity at the lowest<br />
possible cost. Cleco Power also competes against municipalities that<br />
produce their own power but are not represented by LEPA.<br />
Midstream<br />
Midstream’s customers are typically merchant providers and regulated<br />
utilities that buy and sell electricity on the wholesale market. Cleco<br />
Power, if it produces power in excess <strong>of</strong> customer demand, can also<br />
engage in similar wholesale activities. For these reasons, Midstream and<br />
Cleco Power are in competition with the region’s other wholesale power<br />
providers. These include electric utilities, independent power producers<br />
and industrial companies that produce power for internal use and sell the<br />
excess. Louisiana is home to dozens <strong>of</strong> such companies, ranging in<br />
generation capacity from under 1 megawatt (MW) to over 1 gigawatt<br />
(GW). As a result, the wholesale generation market is very competitive.<br />
The largest natural gas field in North America was found in Haynesville,<br />
Louisiana in 2008. The quantity <strong>of</strong> gas in the field totals about 130-150<br />
billion cubic feet. The proximity <strong>of</strong> this important resource will benefit<br />
Cleco in the future. Because the field is located within Cleco’s current<br />
service area, a resulting increase in industrial activity may benefit Cleco.<br />
On July 7, 2011, the EPA finalized the “Cross State Air Pollution Rule.”<br />
The rule could impact the operations <strong>of</strong> utility companies in Louisiana.<br />
The rule greatly reduces Louisiana’s emission allowances for nitrogen<br />
oxide during the summertime ozone season. In addition to federal<br />
environmental regulations, the state <strong>of</strong> Louisiana is initiating<br />
requirements to increase the use <strong>of</strong> renewable sources <strong>of</strong> power. The<br />
states’ “renewable pilot program” requires local energy companies,<br />
including Cleco, to install at least 300 MW <strong>of</strong>, solar, and other renewable<br />
capacity by the end <strong>of</strong> 2014. In preparation, Cleco plans to test burn<br />
biomass at the Madison 3 plant by the end <strong>of</strong> 2011.<br />
In April 2011, Entergy announced its decision to join the Midwest<br />
Independent Transmissions System Operator (MISO). Entergy’s target<br />
implementation date is December 2013. Cleco Power is currently<br />
studying whether to continue operating its transmission system<br />
independently or to join MISO or the Southwest Power Pool (SPP). The<br />
pending decision may have influenced the Company’s choice <strong>of</strong><br />
replacement for retiring CEO Mike Madison. Bruce Williamson, formerly<br />
CEO <strong>of</strong> Dynegy, <strong>of</strong>ficially became the CEO <strong>of</strong> Cleco on July 5, 2011.<br />
Williamson’s experience at Dynegy, a Midwest based power company,<br />
gives him an in-depth familiarity with MISO.<br />
13
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
In November 2011, Cleco restructured its management team. George<br />
Bausewine, president and COO <strong>of</strong> Cleco Power will retire in February<br />
2012, after which several current managers will be promoted and<br />
responsibilities will be redistributed. The new structure is outlined in the<br />
Management Background and Performance section.<br />
PEER ANALYSIS We consider Cleco’s peers to be utility companies that have the ability to<br />
convert multiple sources <strong>of</strong> fuel into electricity, but that primarily rely on<br />
coal and natural gas. Cleco’s peers vary by market capitalization, but all<br />
operate in a similar geographic location. Regulated utility companies<br />
operate as monopolies based on long-term contracts with municipalities<br />
within their service area. Cleco may compete with its peers for natural<br />
resources but does not currently compete for customers.<br />
Company Ticker Market<br />
Cap (bil)<br />
Table 3 presents key ratios for comparing Cleco to its peers. Cleco stands<br />
out because <strong>of</strong> low P/E and P/BV ratios. These rates are significantly<br />
lower than the industry average, which suggests Cleco is either<br />
undervalued or, when compared to peers, investors lack confidence in the<br />
Company’s ability to create long-term growth. It is important to note that<br />
Cleco has less debt and a significantly higher return on equity (ROE) than<br />
its peers. Recent transactions, including the 2010 sale <strong>of</strong> Acadia unit 2,<br />
significantly impacted both <strong>of</strong> these figures.<br />
Table 3. Peer Comparisons<br />
P/E P/BV<br />
14<br />
EV/<br />
EBITDA<br />
Debt/<br />
Equity<br />
Div.<br />
Yield<br />
Southern Company SO $35.86 17.95 2.11 9.75 122.73 4.50% 12.16%<br />
American Electric<br />
Power<br />
AEP 17.68 12.05 1.27 7.33 133.29 4.80 9.05<br />
TECO Energy TE 4.01 16.88 1.83 7.85 140.52 4.50 10.90<br />
CMS Energy CMS 4.86 12.79 1.64 7.37 264.45 4.20 12.01<br />
Cleco CNL 2.06 11.94 1.47 6.79 119.18 3.30 21.00<br />
Southern Company<br />
(SO/NYSE)<br />
ROE<br />
Southern Company is the largest company included in Cleco’s peer group<br />
and is among the largest energy companies in America. Southern<br />
Company’s customer base includes 4.4 million retail customers in<br />
Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida. Southern Company builds<br />
and maintains power generating facilities to serve the electricity needs <strong>of</strong><br />
its customer base. Like Cleco, Southern Company also sells power on the<br />
wholesale market. The company relies on coal, nuclear, oil, gas and<br />
hydroelectric resources for electricity generation. Southern Company also<br />
owns a significant telecommunications subsidiary called Southern<br />
Telecom.
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
American<br />
Electric Power<br />
(AEP/NYSE)<br />
TECO Energy<br />
(TE/NYSE)<br />
CMS Energy<br />
(CMS/NYSE)<br />
MANAGEMENT<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
AND<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
American Electric Power is one <strong>of</strong> the largest electricity generating<br />
companies in the United States. The company relies on natural gas, coal,<br />
lignite and hydroelectric resources to generate electricity. The company<br />
owns and leases approximately 38,000 megawatts <strong>of</strong> generating capacity.<br />
American Electric’s 39,000- mile transmission network is the largest in<br />
the nation and is used to serve customers in Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky,<br />
Louisiana, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and<br />
West Virginia.<br />
TECO Energy is an electric and gas utility that generates, transmits, and<br />
sells electricity in central Florida. The company serves approximately<br />
672,000 customers with retail electricity services. TECO also sells and<br />
distributes natural gas and owns and operates mineral mines and coal<br />
processing facilities.<br />
CMS Energy is a utility holding company that consists <strong>of</strong> two subsidiaries<br />
and operates throughout the state <strong>of</strong> Michigan. The first subsidiary,<br />
Consumer’s Energy, is an electricity and natural gas supplier that services<br />
over six million customers. The second subsidiary, CMS Enterprises, is<br />
an independent power generation facility. CMS Enterprises also<br />
participates in natural gas transmission.<br />
Cleco’s board <strong>of</strong> directors features an eclectic group <strong>of</strong> accomplished men<br />
and women, all <strong>of</strong> whom have substantial experience in the finance,<br />
public, energy, and government sectors. Elected by Cleco’s shareholders,<br />
the current board <strong>of</strong> directors comprises 11 individuals. Among the<br />
responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the board <strong>of</strong> directors are evaluating the performance <strong>of</strong><br />
the CEO and other key executives, determining executive compensation,<br />
and adhering to a management succession plan. The board <strong>of</strong> directors has<br />
the responsibility to evaluate executive performance annually.<br />
One measure <strong>of</strong> management effectiveness is return on invested capital<br />
(ROIC). Table 4 compares Cleco’s recent ROIC values to its peer<br />
average. Cleco was slightly below its peers in 2008 and 2009, but rose<br />
substantially in 2010. This is likely a result <strong>of</strong> Cleco Power’s new rate<br />
plan, approved in 2010 by regulating authorities, which gives it the right<br />
to earn a higher return on equity.<br />
Table 4. ROIC Comparison<br />
Cleco ROIC Average Peer ROIC<br />
2008 3.52% 4.68%<br />
2009 3.27% 4.09%<br />
2010 5.23% 3.66%<br />
15
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Bruce Williamson President and Chief Executive Officer <strong>of</strong> Cleco Corporation (52)<br />
Bruce A. Williamson has served as CEO <strong>of</strong> Cleco since July 2011. Mr.<br />
Williamson came to Cleco after a ten-year tenure with Dynegy Inc. He<br />
had served as the as director and president <strong>of</strong> the electric utility since<br />
April 2007. Prior to his time at Dynegy, Williamson joined PanEnergy in<br />
1997, and worked with that company through its merger with Duke<br />
Energy. Mr. Williamson received his bachelor’s degree in Finance from<br />
the University <strong>of</strong> Montana-Missoula in 1981.<br />
George W.<br />
Bausewine<br />
President and Chief Operating Officer <strong>of</strong> Cleco Power (56)<br />
George W. Bausewine has served as president and chief operating <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />
<strong>of</strong> Cleco Power LLC since August, 2010. He has held numerous<br />
executive positions with Cleco dating back to 1998. Mr. Bausewine<br />
received his BA in Business Administration from Rolling College and<br />
his MBA from Southern Methodist University.<br />
Darren Olagues Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (40)<br />
Darren J. Olagues has served as the chief financial <strong>of</strong>ficer and senior vice<br />
president <strong>of</strong> Cleco since May 7, 2009. Prior to joining Cleco, Mr.<br />
Olagues worked as the vice president <strong>of</strong> asset management and<br />
development for Exelon Power. As a CPA, Mr. Olagues also has<br />
significant pr<strong>of</strong>essional background in financial accounting; he served as<br />
the CFO <strong>of</strong> Sithe Energies from October 2002 to February 2005, and was<br />
previously employed by PricewaterhouseCoopers as a manager <strong>of</strong><br />
auditing and regulatory services. Mr. Olagues received his BSM from<br />
Tulane University in 1992. In November 2011, Mr. Olagues assumed<br />
temporary duties as corporate treasurer.<br />
Wade A. Hoefling Senior Vice President General Counsel and<br />
Director Regulatory Compliance (55)<br />
Wade A. Hoefling has served as senior vice president, general counsel<br />
and director <strong>of</strong> regulatory compliance <strong>of</strong> Cleco and Cleco Power since<br />
January 2007. He has over 25 years’ legal experience in the energy<br />
sector. Prior to his time at Cleco, Mr. Hoefling served as vice president<br />
and general counsel for energy trading <strong>of</strong> Reliant Resources Inc. Mr.<br />
Hoefling holds a bachelor's degree from Harvard and a JD from Harvard<br />
Law <strong>School</strong>. He is a member <strong>of</strong> the Texas Bar Association and the<br />
Oklahoma Bar Association.<br />
Judy P. Miller Senior Vice President <strong>of</strong> Corporate Services and Internal Audit (53)<br />
Judy Miller was named senior vice president <strong>of</strong> corporate services and<br />
internal audit in November 2011. From 2004 to 2011, Ms. Miller served<br />
as corporate secretary for Cleco Corporation. She also held the title <strong>of</strong><br />
assistant controller from June 2000 to January 2004.<br />
16
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Jeffrey W. Hall Senior Vice President <strong>of</strong> Governmental Affairs and<br />
Chief Diversity Officer (59)<br />
Jeffery W. Hall has served as senior vice president <strong>of</strong> governmental<br />
affairs and chief diversity <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> Cleco since 2006. Mr. Hall has held<br />
numerous executive and upper-level management positions at Cleco<br />
dating back to 1997. Mr. Hall holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting<br />
from Gambling State University. He is a graduate <strong>of</strong> the Louisiana<br />
Leadership Program.<br />
R. Russell Davis Senior Vice President <strong>of</strong> External Relations and<br />
Information Technology (54)<br />
Russell Davis has served as senior vice president <strong>of</strong> external relations<br />
and information technology since November 2011. Prior to his current<br />
position, Mr. Davis served as vice president for investor relations and<br />
chief accounting <strong>of</strong>ficer. Additionally, Mr. Davis enjoyed a brief tenure<br />
as interim CFO <strong>of</strong> Cleco. Prior to joining Cleco Mr. Davis worked for a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> electric-utility companies in both Texas and Oklahoma. Mr.<br />
Davis received his bachelor <strong>of</strong> business administration in accounting<br />
from McMurry University in Abilene, Texas. In addition, Mr. Davis is a<br />
member <strong>of</strong> both <strong>of</strong> the American Institute <strong>of</strong> Certified Public<br />
Accountants and the Society <strong>of</strong> Louisiana Certified Public Accountants.<br />
SHAREHOLDER<br />
ANALYSIS<br />
Institutions held 74.5% <strong>of</strong> Cleco as <strong>of</strong> June 30, 2011. The largest<br />
institutions holding shares are Blackrock Fund advisors, Vanguard<br />
Group, Artisan Partners And Allianz Global Investors <strong>of</strong> America. Table<br />
5 lists the top ten shareholders <strong>of</strong> Cleco, all <strong>of</strong> which are institutional<br />
investors.<br />
The top-ten institutions hold 40.4% <strong>of</strong> the total shares outstanding. From<br />
June 30 t, 2010 to June 31, 2011, these institutions have been net sellers <strong>of</strong><br />
4,324,260 shares. Mutual funds hold 45.4% <strong>of</strong> the shares outstanding.<br />
29.3% <strong>of</strong> the holdings fall under index funds, 20.3% under growth and<br />
11.7% under value funds. These holdings represent a good mix <strong>of</strong> all<br />
investment strategies indicating that institutions see both short-term and<br />
long-term value in Cleco.<br />
17
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
RISK ANALYSIS<br />
AND<br />
INVESTMENT<br />
CAVEATS<br />
Table 5: Top-10 Shareholders<br />
Holder No. <strong>of</strong> Shares % Outstanding<br />
Blackrock Fund advisors 3,568,571 5.84<br />
Vanguard Group 2,943,269 4.82<br />
Artisan partners limited partnership 2,779,269 4.55<br />
Allianz global investors <strong>of</strong> America L.P. 2,568,302 4.21<br />
Scrodher Investment Management Group 2,557,215 4.19<br />
Price Associates 2,388,980 3.91<br />
State Street Corporation 2,132,780 3.49<br />
Blackrock Institutional Trust Co 1,639,527 2.69<br />
Oppenheimer Funds 1,562,552 2.56<br />
Northern Trust Corporation 1,409,404 2.31<br />
Source: Bloomberg. Filing Date June 30, 2011<br />
In 2010, Cleco issued 262,162 shares <strong>of</strong> common stock worth $263,000<br />
to meet the compensation requirements for its management. Cleco did<br />
not buy back any stock in 2008, 2009 or 2010. In 2010 the board<br />
terminated a 1991 agreement that entitled management to buy back up to<br />
30 million common shares. In its place, in January 2011 the board<br />
directed management to buy back shares whenever needed to maintain<br />
the diluted common number <strong>of</strong> shares outstanding at the 2010 level.<br />
Insiders hold 1% <strong>of</strong> the shares outstanding. The major holdings per<br />
insider are shown in Table 6. Between February 2011 and October 2011,<br />
insiders have purchased 1800 common shares. During this same period<br />
20,059 shares were sold by insiders, representing a net sell-<strong>of</strong>f by<br />
insiders.<br />
Table 6: Major Direct Holders<br />
Holder No. <strong>of</strong> Shares % Outstanding<br />
Madison, Michael 205,801 0.3531<br />
Williamson, Bruce A. 88,110 0.1512<br />
Samil, Dilek 87,870 0.1507<br />
Walker, William H. Jr. 73,350 0.1258<br />
Bausewine, George W 68,917 0.1182<br />
Source: Yahoo Finance<br />
Cleco faces many risk factors across its business segments that could<br />
have a significant effect on the future success <strong>of</strong> the Company. Risks can<br />
derive from Cleco’s business operations, from current and future<br />
regulatory activities, and from the Company’s financial structure.<br />
18
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Operational Risks Environmental Considerations<br />
As an electricity producer, Cleco must comply with federal, state and<br />
local environmental regulations on CO2 emissions, air quality, water<br />
quality, waste management, and other factors. New regulations or<br />
changes in existing regulations could prove costly to Cleco because<br />
upgrades and compliance may require significant expenditures. Future<br />
regulations and new generation technologies could make the use <strong>of</strong><br />
existing power plants unfeasible and limit the viability <strong>of</strong> certain fuel<br />
sources used by Cleco.<br />
Market Risks and Risk Management<br />
Cleco’s expenses are directly tied to the cost <strong>of</strong> fuels used for generating<br />
power, and therefore, the Company is exposed to considerable risk<br />
related to shifting fuel prices. Cleco attempts to hedge its exposure to<br />
market volatility by entering into financial derivative contracts and by<br />
engaging in other risk management activities. These positions can<br />
nevertheless result in financial losses, and the Company’s ability to<br />
recover any losses is subject to regulation by the Louisiana Public<br />
Service Commission (LPSC), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission<br />
(FERC), and other government bodies.<br />
Generation Outages<br />
Cleco’s generating facilities, even when properly maintained, risk<br />
unplanned equipment failures and outages. Insufficient fuel supply,<br />
unexpected interruptions in fuel deliveries, severe weather, and other<br />
variables outside <strong>of</strong> Cleco’s control can decrease Cleco’s ability to<br />
generate power. Outages can result in lost revenue and unexpected costs<br />
if Cleco has to purchase power from other sources.<br />
Customer Demand<br />
Cleco’s revenues can be adversely affected by any significant changes in<br />
the electricity demands <strong>of</strong> its customer base. <strong>Do</strong>wnturns in the overall<br />
state <strong>of</strong> the economy, for example, can negatively impact demand,<br />
especially from commercial and industrial customers. Demand is also<br />
closely tied to weather patterns, and unexpectedly mild conditions can<br />
result in reduced electricity usage. In addition, weather causes peaks and<br />
troughs in customer demand on both a daily and a seasonal basis. Cleco<br />
sees its highest demand during the summer when electricity is used for<br />
cooling, and also sees increased usage during the winter when electricity<br />
is used for heating.<br />
Regulatory Risks Cleco must comply with industry regulations imposed by governing<br />
organizations. Specifically, Cleco operates under the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the<br />
LPSC and FERC. Cleco has successfully sought and received rate<br />
adjustments from both organizations in the past, but future requests may<br />
not be granted. Table 7 illustrates Cleco’s operations and the regulatory<br />
agency that oversees them.<br />
19
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Table 7. Operations and Regulatory Agencies<br />
Under Jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the LPSC Under Jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> FERC<br />
Retail Rates Rates for Wholesale Service<br />
Service Standards Transmission <strong>of</strong> Power and Reliability<br />
Accounting Practices Accounting Practices<br />
Interconnections with Other Utilities<br />
Financial Risks Cleco’s total debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.19 is the lowest among all<br />
peers discussed in this report and is also lower than the 1.50 industry<br />
average. A concomitant benefit <strong>of</strong> a low D/E ratio is a higher credit<br />
rating and, consequently, lower costs <strong>of</strong> raising debt in the capital<br />
market.<br />
Company<br />
Cleco targets a debt to capital ratio <strong>of</strong> 55%-60%. This stated target<br />
indicates a slight debt increase because Cleco’s current debt level is only<br />
45% <strong>of</strong> capital. Cleco does not face insolvency risk, and 60% debt to<br />
capital is a comfortable leverage level. Thus, raising debt levels to 55%-<br />
60% will increase tax savings while not increasing bankruptcy risk.<br />
Cleco’s Debt Service Coverage Ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.712 is slightly below the<br />
industry average. Cleco’s strong net income growth and low interest are<br />
<strong>of</strong>fset by a recent large debt retirement. The debt retirement, a one-time<br />
event that increased current liabilities, does not detract from Cleco’s<br />
strong financial position.<br />
Table 8 compares Cleco to its peers across several important financial<br />
ratios.<br />
Table 8. Ratio Comparison<br />
Current<br />
Ratio<br />
20<br />
Quick<br />
Ratio<br />
Debt to<br />
Equity Ratio<br />
Debt Service<br />
Coverage Ratio<br />
Cleco 1.275 1.000 1.192 0.712<br />
American Electric Power 0.770 0.547 1.342 0.704<br />
TECO Energy 0.900 0.667 2.320 1.835<br />
CMS Energy 1.365 0.784 2.645 0.810<br />
Southern Company 0.910 0.390 1.111 1.087<br />
Industry Average 1.070 0.750 1.500 1.029<br />
Altman Z-Score The Altman Z-score analysis, created by Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Edward Altman in<br />
1968, is used to predict the probability <strong>of</strong> a company going bankrupt<br />
within two years. Altman believes that a Z-score above 2.99 is ideal, and<br />
that a Z-score below 1.80 indicates that a company is close to<br />
bankruptcy. Studies show that the Z-score test has 72% accuracy. The Zscore<br />
formula is described in Table 9.
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
FINANCIAL<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
AND<br />
PROJECTIONS<br />
Operating<br />
Activities<br />
Table 9. Z-Score Formula<br />
Ratio Multiplier<br />
Working capital to total assets 1.2<br />
Retained earnings to total assets 1.4<br />
Operating earnings to total assets 3.3<br />
Market cap to total liabilities 0.6<br />
Sales to total assets 1<br />
Cleco’s Z-score is 1.22 for 2010, increasing from 1.06 in 2008. Although<br />
1.22 puts Cleco in the distress zone according to Altman, we do not<br />
believe this is an effective analysis. The Company earns a regulated<br />
return on equity set forth by state and federal authorities and<br />
consequently is not in any danger <strong>of</strong> bankruptcy. Moreover, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
metrics compare key company statistics to total assets. Cleco is in fact a<br />
healthy company with sound capital structure and steadily increasing<br />
working capital, EBIT, and sales. Comparing these values to total assets,<br />
which will inevitably be high for an electric utility, is not meaningful<br />
when using the Z-score to evaluate Cleco against non-utility companies.<br />
A low Z-score is typical in a regulated utility company. Table 10 shows<br />
that, among its peers, Cleco’s Z-score is among the highest and is above<br />
the industry average.<br />
Table 10. Altman Z-Score Comparison<br />
Cleco 1.22<br />
Southern Company 1.35<br />
American Electric Power 0.90<br />
TECO Energy 1.25<br />
CMS Energy 0.76<br />
Industry Average 1.10<br />
Our financial forecasts for Cleco were based on a number <strong>of</strong> factors,<br />
including the Company’s recent financial performance, management<br />
goals for the future, independent research, and macroeconomic and<br />
company-specific assumptions.<br />
Because Cleco earns a regulated rate <strong>of</strong> return, we first forecast operating<br />
expenses, and then forecast operating revenues based on expenses. To<br />
determine the most significant drivers <strong>of</strong> Cleco’s operations, we ran<br />
multiple regressions using quarterly data from 2002 to 2011. The most<br />
important factors affecting operating expenses were the season, natural<br />
gas prices, and the overall economy as represented by U.S. GDP.<br />
21
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
Investing and<br />
Financing<br />
Activities<br />
Operating revenues were primarily determined by operating expenses,<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> cooling degree days, and the implementation <strong>of</strong> Cleco’s<br />
new formula rate plan in 2010.<br />
Using government GDP projections, National Weather Service weather<br />
forecasts, and Burkenroad Reports gas price forecasts, we were able to<br />
project future operating expenses and revenues. To refine our figures, we<br />
took into account increases in Cleco Power’s generation capacity and the<br />
fact that Midstream will cease its tolling agreement at the end <strong>of</strong> 2011.<br />
We also considered historical ratios to help project accounts receivable,<br />
accounts payable, inventories, and related figures.<br />
We projected purchases, construction, and other capital expenditure<br />
figures based on the cost <strong>of</strong> current capital projects, including the<br />
Acadiana Load Pocket and the Advanced Metering projects, and based<br />
on historical expenditures. We calculated debt and equity values<br />
primarily using debt schedules in Cleco’s annual report, keeping in mind<br />
management’s stated target ratio <strong>of</strong> 51% debt. We arrived at our<br />
projected dividend payments based on Cleco press releases and<br />
management guidance that Cleco will target payments equal to 50% <strong>of</strong><br />
earnings in the future.<br />
Gas price increases, GDP growth, and Cleco’s new rate plan all<br />
contribute to our predictions for strong cash flows from operations and<br />
overall earnings growth. Forward-looking assumptions are inherently<br />
uncertain, but Cleco’s control over its generation assets and its status as a<br />
regulated utility prevent it from being highly sensitive to deviations from<br />
our projections.<br />
SITE VISIT Our site visit to Cleco’s headquarters was scheduled for Friday, October<br />
14, 2011 at 12:00 p.m. The members <strong>of</strong> the Cleco analyst team met at<br />
approximately 7:30 a.m., to depart for Pineville, Louisiana. Jeffrey Rohr,<br />
Nianxiong Huang, Aashish Chhachhi, David Marsh, Omar Cameron and<br />
Seth Hamstead were all present for the meeting. We arrived in Pinesville<br />
at approximately, 11:00 a.m., making the journey a full 3-1/2 hour trip.<br />
At 11:50 a.m., we entered Cleco’s headquarters where we were greeted<br />
by management.<br />
At Cleco’s headquarters we met with VP <strong>of</strong> investor relations and CAO,<br />
Russell Davis; president & COO, George Bausewine; senior VP and<br />
CFO, Darren Olagues; group VP <strong>of</strong> Cleco Power, Keith D. Crump; and<br />
group VP <strong>of</strong> Cleco Power, William G. Fontenot. President and CEO,<br />
Bruce Williamson was unable to attend the meeting.<br />
Mr. Davis <strong>of</strong>fered significant insight into the Company’s background and<br />
history, and how Cleco’s subsidiaries, Cleco Power and Midstream,<br />
operate within the electric utility industry. Mr. Davis also articulated<br />
Cleco’s current strategic vision. Mr. Davis praised the strong liquidity<br />
22
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
INDEPENDENT<br />
OUTSIDE<br />
RESEARCH<br />
position the Company enjoys as well as Cleco’s current infrastructure<br />
investment projects such as the Acadiana Load Pocket initiative and the<br />
advanced metering infrastructure project. Both <strong>of</strong> these two major<br />
investments are slated for completion within the next two years. In<br />
addition, both projects are expected to increase efficiency in operations.<br />
Mr. Olagues and his colleagues <strong>of</strong>fered their opinion on the most<br />
challenging issues facing Cleco in the immediate future. They mentioned<br />
that the large amount <strong>of</strong> cash on hand represents a fundamental challenge<br />
for Cleco because the corporation generally does not hold cash at the<br />
subsidiary level. Cleco Power would usually use the cash resources to<br />
invest in infrastructure improvements or to pay down corporate debt.<br />
However, neither <strong>of</strong> these options is currently available; the only option<br />
is to give the additional cash to the parent company to pay out as<br />
dividends or to repurchase stock. Mr. Olagues added that steady yet<br />
sustained growth typically characterizes electric utility companies; he<br />
indicated that seeking out growth opportunities is a current challenge for<br />
the Company.<br />
At the conclusion <strong>of</strong> the site visit, management <strong>of</strong>fered a guided tour <strong>of</strong><br />
Cleco’s control room where highly skilled analysts monitor the<br />
fluctuating energy prices, weather conditions, and power usage to<br />
dispatch Cleco’s output accordingly. Shortly, thereafter the Cleco analyst<br />
team departed Pineville for New Orleans.<br />
While researching Cleco, our team relied on the knowledge <strong>of</strong> several<br />
outside sources. We sought the advice <strong>of</strong> an industry expert working at a<br />
regional transmission organization for information regarding the<br />
fundamentals <strong>of</strong> generation, transmission and distribution and the role <strong>of</strong><br />
state and federal regulations in the industry. In addition, we consulted<br />
with energy faculty at Tulane University, specifically those with<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional experience with electric utilities. We complemented this<br />
information by reading third-party reports relating to electric utility<br />
forecasting as well as the industry as a whole.<br />
Other sources <strong>of</strong> information included Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters,<br />
Yahoo Finance, The Wall Street Journal, Cleco’s management team and<br />
its corporate Web site, and SEC filings.<br />
23
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
<strong>WWBD</strong>?<br />
<strong>What</strong> <strong>Would</strong> <strong>Ben</strong> (<strong>Graham</strong>) <strong>Do</strong>?<br />
BEN GRAHAM<br />
ANALYSIS<br />
(slightly modified)<br />
<strong>Ben</strong> <strong>Graham</strong> is considered the father <strong>of</strong> value investing, and the analysis<br />
developed by him helps investors evaluate promising opportunities.<br />
Under <strong>Ben</strong> <strong>Graham</strong>’s analysis, potential investments are tested on eight<br />
criteria. The first six criteria focus on whether a stock is undervalued<br />
while the last two place emphasis on a stock’s growth both past and<br />
future.<br />
A company is considered an attractive investment opportunity by<br />
<strong>Graham</strong> if it meets more than half <strong>of</strong> the eight hurdles. Cleco might be <strong>of</strong><br />
interest to <strong>Graham</strong> because it satisfies four <strong>of</strong> the eight criteria. Namely,<br />
an earning price yield double that <strong>of</strong> the 10 year treasury, a dividend<br />
yield half <strong>of</strong> the yield on the 10 year treasury, debt lower than book<br />
value, and earnings growth over 7% in the past five years. Cleco’s stock<br />
price is currently just above 1.5 times the book value <strong>of</strong> the Company<br />
which leads to a lower margin <strong>of</strong> security in case <strong>of</strong> a market crash.<br />
Moreover, Cleco’s earnings growth has not been stable over the past five<br />
years.<br />
It is important to note that Cleco’s volatility in earnings was primarily a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> fluctuating revenues from tolling operations. As <strong>of</strong> 2011, Cleco<br />
has eliminated its tolling practice. Going forward, investors can expect a<br />
steady earnings growth backed by relatively inelastic retail energy<br />
consumption. Also, the stock price exceeds 1.5 times book value by only<br />
a very slender margin. These aspects when taken in conjunction with the<br />
<strong>Ben</strong> <strong>Graham</strong> analysis lead us to reaffirm our belief in Cleco as a strong<br />
investment opportunity. (See the following table for the complete <strong>Ben</strong><br />
<strong>Graham</strong> analysis.)<br />
24
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
CLECO CORPORATION (CNL)<br />
<strong>Ben</strong> <strong>Graham</strong> Analysis<br />
Hurdle # 1: An Earnings to Price Yield <strong>of</strong> 2X the Yield on 10 Year Treasury<br />
Earnings per share (ttm) $ 3.04<br />
Price: $ 33.81<br />
Earnings to Price Yield 9.01%<br />
10 Year Treasury (2X) 3.94%<br />
Yes<br />
Hurdle # 2: A P/E Ratio <strong>Do</strong>wn to 1/2 <strong>of</strong> the Stocks Highest in 5 Yrs<br />
P/E ratio as <strong>of</strong> 12/31/06 21.9<br />
P/E ratio as <strong>of</strong> 12/31/07 10.1<br />
P/E ratio as <strong>of</strong> 12/31/08 12.1<br />
P/E ratio as <strong>of</strong> 12/31/09 13.7<br />
P/E ratio as <strong>of</strong> 12/31/10 5.0<br />
Current P/E Ratio<br />
No<br />
11.1<br />
Hurdle # 3: A Dividend Yield <strong>of</strong> 1/2 the Yield on 10 Year Treasury<br />
Dividends per share (ttm) $ 1.06<br />
Price: $ 33.81<br />
Dividend Yield 3.14%<br />
1/2 Yield on 10 Year Treasury<br />
Yes<br />
0.99%<br />
Hurdle # 4: A Stock Price less than 1.5 BV<br />
Stock Price $ 33.81<br />
Book Value per share as <strong>of</strong> 9/30/11 $ 23.25<br />
150% <strong>of</strong> book Value per share as <strong>of</strong> 9/30/11<br />
No<br />
$ 34.88<br />
Hurdle # 5: Total Debt less than Book Value<br />
Interest-bearing debt as <strong>of</strong> 9/30/11 $ 1,383,684<br />
Book value as <strong>of</strong> 9/30/11<br />
Yes<br />
$ 1,406,113<br />
Hurdle # 6: Current Ratio <strong>of</strong> Two or More<br />
Current assets as <strong>of</strong> 9/30/11 $ 530,984<br />
Current liabilities as <strong>of</strong> 9/30/11 $ 351,413<br />
Current ratio as <strong>of</strong> 9/30/11<br />
No<br />
1.5<br />
Hurdle # 7: Earnings Growth <strong>of</strong> 7% or Higher over past 5 years<br />
EPS for year ended 12/31/10 $ 4.20<br />
EPS for year ended 12/31/09 $ 1.76<br />
EPS for year ended 12/31/08 $ 1.70<br />
EPS for year ended 12/31/07 $ 2.54<br />
EPS for year ended 12/31/06<br />
Yes<br />
$ 1.36<br />
Hurdle # 8: Stability in Growth <strong>of</strong> Earnings<br />
EPS for year ended 12/31/10 $ 4.20 139%<br />
EPS for year ended 12/31/09 $ 1.76 4%<br />
EPS for year ended 12/31/08 $ 1.70 -33%<br />
EPS for year ended 12/31/07 $ 2.54 87%<br />
EPS for year ended 12/31/06<br />
No<br />
$ 1.36<br />
Stock price data as <strong>of</strong> November 25, 2011<br />
25
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
2011 E<br />
2012 E<br />
2010 A 31-Mar A 30-Jun A 30-Sep A 31-Dec E 2011 E 31-Mar E 30-Jun E 30-Sep E 31-Dec E 2012 E<br />
CLECO CORPORATION (CNL)<br />
Quarterly and Annual Earnings<br />
In thousands<br />
2009 A<br />
2008 A<br />
$ 1,086,102 $ 238,468 $ 260,485 $ 324,532 $ 261,652 $ 1,085,137 $ 265,115 $ 292,493 $ 346,083 $ 286,700 $ 1,190,390<br />
26,067<br />
2,781<br />
4,222<br />
9,133<br />
3,181 19,317<br />
44,529 12,728 12,983 16,064<br />
9,158 50,933<br />
9,279 10,237 12,113 10,034 41,664<br />
1,564<br />
147<br />
55<br />
202<br />
1,158,262 254,124 277,745 349,729 273,991 1,155,589 274,394 302,730 358,195 296,734 1,232,054<br />
(9,596)<br />
(434) (4,822)<br />
1,852<br />
(3,404)<br />
1,148,666 253,690 272,923 351,581 273,991 1,152,185 274,394 302,730 358,195 296,734 1,232,054<br />
363,550 96,968 78,268 122,774 93,604 391,614 95,740 103,707 125,899 105,126 430,471<br />
141,864<br />
8,449 25,477 24,739<br />
4,927 63,592<br />
5,039<br />
5,458<br />
6,626<br />
5,533 22,656<br />
119,516 27,662 31,671 32,872 36,268 128,473 35,745 38,596 46,539 39,104 159,984<br />
81,228 16,809 28,269 14,587 11,824 71,489 12,093 15,283 21,204 19,919 68,499<br />
112,203 29,098 29,985 30,557 30,994 120,634 31,506 31,817 32,130 32,443 127,896<br />
34,626<br />
9,460<br />
9,464<br />
9,845<br />
9,853 38,622 10,078 10,916 13,253 11,066 45,313<br />
338<br />
10<br />
(506)<br />
27<br />
(469)<br />
853,325 188,456 202,628 235,401 187,470 813,955 190,201 205,778 245,651 213,190 854,819<br />
295,341 65,234 70,295 116,180 86,521 338,230 84,194 96,952 112,545 83,545 377,235<br />
409<br />
115<br />
170<br />
509<br />
794<br />
12,413<br />
1,978<br />
876<br />
902<br />
1,536<br />
5,292<br />
1,536<br />
1,536<br />
1,536<br />
1,536<br />
6,145<br />
38,849<br />
611 61,440<br />
(1)<br />
62,050<br />
148,402<br />
5,242<br />
1,205<br />
1,050<br />
2,128<br />
1,007<br />
5,390<br />
1,007<br />
1,007<br />
1,007<br />
1,007<br />
4,029<br />
(6,991) (1,318) (1,344) (3,360) (1,481) (7,503) (1,481) (1,481) (1,481) (1,481) (5,923)<br />
493,665 67,825 132,487 116,358 87,584 404,254 85,256 98,015 113,608 84,607 381,486<br />
100,339 27,328 25,935 26,105 21,364 100,732 21,364 21,364 21,364 21,364 85,457<br />
(4,563)<br />
(714)<br />
(316)<br />
(326)<br />
(563) (1,919)<br />
(563)<br />
(563)<br />
(563)<br />
(563) (2,253)<br />
397,889 41,211 106,868 90,579 66,783 305,441 64,455 77,214 92,806 63,806 298,281<br />
142,498 12,195 36,520 24,737 24,676 98,128 23,755 28,348 33,961 23,521 109,586<br />
255,391 29,016 70,348 65,842 42,107 207,313 40,700 48,866 58,845 40,285 188,696<br />
46<br />
12<br />
15<br />
27<br />
112<br />
112<br />
$ 255,345 $ 29,004 $ 70,221 $ 65,842 $ 42,107 $ 207,174 $ 40,700 $ 48,866 $ 58,845 $ 40,285 $ 188,696<br />
60,431 60,576 60,656 60,468 60,656 60,589 60,656 60,656 60,656 60,656 60,656<br />
60,755 60,905 61,023 60,873 61,082 61,058 61,199 61,316 61,499 61,786 62,246<br />
808,646<br />
$<br />
1,032,970<br />
$<br />
33,651<br />
11,461<br />
853,758<br />
36,768<br />
10,460<br />
1,080,198<br />
853,758<br />
1,080,198<br />
261,456<br />
216,906<br />
109,060<br />
51,300<br />
235,706<br />
471,261<br />
99,028<br />
47,089<br />
78,204<br />
77,876<br />
29,947<br />
76<br />
746,949<br />
106,809<br />
1,512<br />
73,269<br />
(17,423)<br />
34,471<br />
(110)<br />
965,321<br />
114,877<br />
5,417<br />
64,953<br />
(5,542)<br />
5,581<br />
(2,807)<br />
166,941<br />
77,228<br />
(26,173)<br />
115,886<br />
9,579<br />
106,307<br />
46<br />
1,263<br />
(7,970)<br />
172,998<br />
72,042<br />
(19,642)<br />
120,598<br />
Operating revenues<br />
Electric operations<br />
Tolling operations<br />
Other operations<br />
Affiliate revenue<br />
Gross operating revenue<br />
Electric customer credits<br />
Total operating revenue<br />
Operating expenses:<br />
Fuel used for electric generation<br />
Power purchased for utility customers<br />
Other operations<br />
Maintenance<br />
Depreciation<br />
Taxes other than income taxes<br />
(Gain) Loss on sale <strong>of</strong> assets<br />
Total operating expenses<br />
Operating income<br />
Interest income<br />
Allowance for other funds used during construction<br />
Equity loss (gain) from investees<br />
Gain on toll settlement<br />
Other income<br />
Other expense<br />
Income before interest charges<br />
Interest charges, net <strong>of</strong> capitalized interest<br />
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction<br />
Income from continuing operations before income taxes<br />
Federal and state income taxes<br />
Net income (loss)<br />
Preferred dividend requirements, net<br />
Preferred stock redemption costs, net <strong>of</strong> tax<br />
Net income applicable to common stock<br />
Average shares <strong>of</strong> common stock outstanding:<br />
Basic<br />
Diluted<br />
18,457<br />
102,141<br />
46<br />
106,261<br />
$<br />
102,095<br />
$<br />
60,188<br />
60,498<br />
59,990<br />
60,215<br />
$ 4.23 $ 0.48 $ 1.16 $ 1.09 $ 0.69 $ 3.42 $ 0.67 $ 0.81 $ 0.97 $ 0.66 $ 3.11<br />
$ 1.99 $ 0.01 $ 0.65<br />
$ 0.66<br />
$ 2.24 $ 0.47 $ 0.51 $ 1.09 $ 0.69 $ 2.76 $ 0.67 $ 0.81 $ 0.97 $ 0.66 $ 3.11<br />
1.77<br />
(0.19)<br />
1.96<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
1.70<br />
$<br />
1.70<br />
$<br />
Basic earnings per share<br />
Net income applicable to common stock<br />
Non-recurring items<br />
Net income adjusted for non-recurring items<br />
$ 4.20 $ 0.48 $ 1.15 $ 1.08 $ 0.69 $ 3.39 $ 0.67 $ 0.80 $ 0.96 $ 0.65 $ 3.03<br />
$ 1.98 $ 0.01 $ 0.65<br />
$ 0.65<br />
$ 2.22 $ 0.47 $ 0.50 $ 1.08 $ 0.69 $ 2.74 $ 0.67 $ 0.80 $ 0.96 $ 0.65 $ 3.03<br />
1.76<br />
(0.18)<br />
1.94<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
1.70<br />
$<br />
1.70<br />
$<br />
Diluted earnings per share<br />
Net income applicable to common stock<br />
Non-recurring items<br />
Net income adjusted for non-recurring items<br />
$ 0.98 $ 0.25 $ 0.28 $ 0.28 $ 0.28 $ 1.12 $ 0.31 $ 0.31 $ 0.31 $ 0.31 $<br />
1.25<br />
0.90<br />
$<br />
0.90<br />
$<br />
Cash dividends paid per share<br />
26
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
CLECO CORPORATION (CNL)<br />
Quarterly and Annual Earnings<br />
2011 E<br />
2012 E<br />
2008 A 2009 A 2010 A 31-Mar A 30-Jun A 30-Sep A 31-Dec E 2011 E 31-Mar E 30-Jun E 30-Sep E 31-Dec E 2012 E<br />
SELECTED COMMON-SIZE AMOUNTS (% <strong>of</strong> electric operations revenues less ffuel<br />
and power cossts<br />
unless otherwise<br />
noted)<br />
Operating revenues<br />
Electric operations (% <strong>of</strong> total operating revenue)<br />
95.63% 94.72% 94.55% 94.00% 95.44% 92.31% 95.50% 94.18% 96.62% 96.62% 96.62% 96.62% 96.62%<br />
Tolling operations (% <strong>of</strong> total operating revenue)<br />
0.00%<br />
0.00%<br />
2.27% 1.10% 1.55% 2.60% 1.16% 1.68% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%<br />
Other operations (% <strong>of</strong> total operating revenue)<br />
3.40%<br />
3.94%<br />
3.88% 5.02% 4.76% 4.57% 3.34% 4.42% 3.38% 3.38% 3.38% 3.38% 3.38%<br />
Affiliate revenue (% <strong>of</strong> total operating revenue)<br />
0.97%<br />
1.34%<br />
0.14% 0.06% 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%<br />
Fuel used for electric generation<br />
(% <strong>of</strong> electric operations)<br />
22.82% 32.33% 32.69% 40.19% 29.57% 36.80% 35.34% 35.46% 36.11% 35.46% 36.38% 36.67% 36.16%<br />
Power purchased for utility customers<br />
(% <strong>of</strong> electric operations)<br />
45.62% 26.82% 13.06% 3.54% 9.78% 7.62% 1.88% 5.86% 1.90% 1.87% 1.91% 1.93% 1.90%<br />
Other operations (% <strong>of</strong> revenues less power costs) 27.30% 29.97% 18.35% 18.62% 18.21% 16.26% 20.67% 18.35% 20.59% 19.94% 20.62% 21.02% 20.54%<br />
Maintenance<br />
14.44% 15.53% 13.99% 12.63% 18.04% 8.24% 7.25% 11.35% 7.36% 8.34% 9.93% 11.31% 9.29%<br />
Depreciation<br />
23.89% 23.68% 19.32% 21.87% 19.13% 17.26% 19.00% 19.15% 19.17% 17.36% 15.05% 18.43% 17.35%<br />
Taxes other than income taxes 10.57% 9.07% 5.96% 7.11% 6.04% 5.56% 6.04% 6.13% 6.13% 5.95% 6.21% 6.29% 6.15%<br />
Total operating expenses (% <strong>of</strong> total revenues)<br />
89.37% 87.49% 74.29% 74.29% 74.24% 66.95% 68.42% 70.64% 69.32% 67.97% 68.58% 71.85% 69.38%<br />
Operating income (% <strong>of</strong> total revenues)<br />
10.63% 12.51% 25.71% 25.71% 25.76% 33.05% 31.58% 29.36% 30.68% 32.03% 31.42% 28.15% 30.62%<br />
YEAR TO YEAR CHANGE<br />
Operating revenues<br />
Electric operations<br />
4.53% -21.72% 34.31% -5.67% -0.24% -0.34% 6.12% -0.09% 11.17% 12.29% 6.64% 9.57% 9.70%<br />
Other operations 4.20% -8.48% 32.33% 17.03% 26.73% 20.74% -9.36% 14.38% -27.10% -21.15% -24.60% 9.57% -18.20%<br />
Fuel used for electric generation<br />
-13.96% 10.92% 39.05% 2.52% -4.03% 22.06% 7.81% 7.72% -1.27% 32.50% 2.55% 12.31% 9.92%<br />
Power purchased for utility customers<br />
22.33% -53.97% -34.60% -82.48% 3.95% -52.13% -71.78% -55.17% -40.36% -78.58% -73.22% 12.31% -64.37%<br />
Other operations<br />
-3.37% 10.13%<br />
9.59% 3.78% 6.12% 8.53% 10.81% 7.49% 29.22% 21.87% 41.58% 7.82% 24.53%<br />
Maintenance<br />
-4.87%<br />
8.94% 58.34% 21.48% 30.68% -37.56% -47.21% -11.99% -28.05% -45.94% 45.36% 68.46% -4.18%<br />
27
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
CLECO CORPORATION (CNL)<br />
Quarterly and Annual Balance Sheets<br />
In thousands<br />
2011 E<br />
2012 E<br />
31-Dec-10 A 31-Mar A 30-Jun A 30-Sep A 31-Dec E 31-Dec-11 E 31-Mar E 30-Jun E 30-Sep E 31-Dec E 2012 E<br />
$ 191,128 $ 137,191 $ 162,126 $ 158,232 $ 170,198 $ 170,198 $ 206,445 $ 160,258 $ 201,950 $ 177,538 $ 177,538<br />
14,959<br />
5,352<br />
8,073<br />
3,554<br />
3,554<br />
3,554<br />
3,554<br />
3,554<br />
3,554<br />
3,554<br />
3,554<br />
38,820 36,425 46,007 52,299 35,619 35,619 36,487 40,255 47,113 39,029 39,029<br />
831<br />
1,369<br />
6,688<br />
6,688<br />
6,658<br />
7,342<br />
8,680<br />
7,197<br />
7,197<br />
52,546 47,944 51,043 49,290 40,966 40,966 40,782 44,970 53,168 44,084 44,084<br />
50,104 47,194 40,444 36,705 36,705 36,705 36,705 36,705 36,705 36,705 36,705<br />
44,649 32,380 40,757 33,112 30,480 30,480 30,884 34,073 40,316 33,398 33,398<br />
82,737 57,024 43,944 38,070 73,719 73,719 50,267 81,676 66,102 82,793 82,793<br />
48,265 50,058 52,622 52,257 43,023 43,023 29,337 47,667 38,578 48,319 48,319<br />
6,399<br />
4,114<br />
5,148<br />
5,004<br />
4,614<br />
4,614<br />
4,675<br />
5,158<br />
6,103<br />
5,056<br />
5,056<br />
10,348<br />
4,882 20,986<br />
9,162 12,882 12,882 12,882 12,882 12,882 12,882 12,882<br />
4,106<br />
3,554 26,304 25,057 25,057 25,057 25,057 25,057 25,057 25,057 25,057<br />
49,789 51,109 51,965 50,628 50,628 50,628 50,628 50,628 50,628 50,628 50,628<br />
13,508 12,997 12,973 12,869 12,869 12,869 12,869 12,869 12,869 12,869 12,869<br />
661<br />
2,842<br />
1,346<br />
4,745<br />
4,745<br />
4,745<br />
4,745<br />
4,745<br />
4,745<br />
4,745<br />
4,745<br />
608,850 494,435 563,738 530,984 551,748 551,748 551,975 567,838 608,450 583,853 583,853<br />
3,810,896 3,828,289 3,839,211 3,859,621 3,949,300 3,949,300 3,988,410 4,027,747 4,067,098 4,106,465 4,106,465<br />
(1,162,456) (1,178,593) (1,198,373) (1,218,818) (1,219,174) (1,219,174) (1,219,330) (1,219,486) (1,219,642) (1,219,798) (1,219,798)<br />
2,648,440 2,649,696 2,640,838 2,640,803 2,730,126 2,730,126 2,769,081 2,808,261 2,847,456 2,886,667 2,886,667<br />
135,785 150,804 170,684 223,640 170,684 170,684 170,684 170,684 170,684 170,684 170,684<br />
2,784,225 2,800,500 2,811,522 2,864,443 2,900,810 2,900,810 2,939,765 2,978,945 3,018,140 3,057,351 3,057,351<br />
86,732 87,343 13,083 13,081 13,081 13,081 13,081 13,081 13,081 13,081 13,081<br />
5,274<br />
5,040<br />
4,940<br />
4,580<br />
4,580<br />
4,580<br />
4,580<br />
4,580<br />
4,580<br />
4,580<br />
4,580<br />
26,089 26,304 27,126 25,349 25,349 25,349 25,349 25,349 25,349 25,349 25,349<br />
203,696 206,203 208,247 213,847 213,847 213,847 213,847 213,847 213,847 213,847 213,847<br />
266,431 261,106 256,513 249,410 249,410 249,410 249,410 249,410 249,410 249,410 249,410<br />
13,817 13,768 13,719 13,676 13,676 13,676 13,676 13,676 13,676 13,676 13,676<br />
145,374 142,903 139,648 136,393 133,311 133,311 130,019 126,727 123,435 120,144 120,144<br />
20,922 20,309 20,183 19,778 16,696 16,696 13,613 10,531<br />
7,448<br />
4,366<br />
4,366<br />
$ 4,161,410 $ 4,057,911 $ 4,058,719 $ 4,071,541 $ 4,122,507 $ 4,122,507 $ 4,155,314 $ 4,203,984 $ 4,277,416 $ 4,285,656 $ 4,285,656<br />
31-Dec-09 A<br />
$ 145,193<br />
29,941<br />
29,550<br />
12,129<br />
28,878<br />
15,449<br />
21,975<br />
80,038<br />
41,410<br />
3,571<br />
2,854<br />
35,059<br />
6,799<br />
30,269<br />
9,914<br />
896<br />
493,925<br />
2,144,491<br />
(999,204)<br />
1,145,287<br />
1,101,743<br />
2,247,030<br />
251,617<br />
5,096<br />
26,510<br />
264,343<br />
201,381<br />
157,098<br />
47,847<br />
$ 3,694,847<br />
31-Dec-08 A<br />
$ 97,483<br />
62,311<br />
40,677<br />
3,428<br />
34,209<br />
13,663<br />
19,713<br />
57,221<br />
37,547<br />
3,751<br />
368<br />
69,154<br />
22,934<br />
2,553<br />
1,367<br />
466,379<br />
2,015,269<br />
(948,581)<br />
1,066,688<br />
978,598<br />
2,045,286<br />
249,144<br />
6,067<br />
Restricted cash, less current portion<br />
40,671<br />
Regulatory assets - deferred taxes<br />
174,804<br />
Regulatory assets - other<br />
158,206<br />
Net investment in direct financing lease<br />
Intangible assets<br />
167,826<br />
Other deferred charges<br />
32,821<br />
Total assets<br />
$ 3,341,204<br />
Current liabilities<br />
Short-term debt<br />
$ -<br />
Long-term debt due within one year<br />
63,546<br />
Accounts payable<br />
117,337<br />
Retainage payable<br />
12,734<br />
Accounts payable - affiliate<br />
8,229<br />
Customer deposits<br />
27,155<br />
Provision for rate refund<br />
Taxes accrued<br />
Interest accrued<br />
16,787<br />
Accumulated current deferred taxes, net 64,838<br />
Regulatory liabilities - other<br />
392<br />
Risk management liability<br />
30,109<br />
Interest rate risk management liability<br />
Deferred compensation<br />
5,118<br />
Uncertain tax positions<br />
Other current liabilities<br />
14,588<br />
Total current liabilities<br />
360,833<br />
Deferred credits:<br />
Deferred federal and state income taxes<br />
373,825<br />
Deferred investment tax credits<br />
11,286<br />
Postretirement benefit obligations<br />
155,910<br />
Regulatory liabilities - other<br />
85,496<br />
Restricted storm reserve<br />
27,411<br />
Uncertain tax provision<br />
76,124<br />
Tax credit fund investment, net<br />
Contingent sale obligations<br />
Other deferred credits<br />
82,635<br />
Total deferred credits<br />
812,687<br />
Long-term debt, net<br />
1,106,819<br />
Total liabilities<br />
2,280,339<br />
Stockholders' equity:<br />
Preferred stock not subject to mandatory redemption<br />
1,029<br />
Common stock, $1 par value<br />
60,066<br />
Premium on capital stock<br />
394,517<br />
Retained earnings<br />
615,514<br />
Treasury stock, at cost<br />
(428)<br />
Other comprehensive income<br />
(9,833)<br />
Total common shareholders' equity<br />
1,059,836<br />
Total shareholders' equity<br />
1,060,865<br />
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity<br />
$ 3,341,204<br />
Cash and cash equivalents<br />
Restricted cash<br />
Customer accounts receivable, net<br />
Accounts receivable - affiliate<br />
Other accounts receivable<br />
Tax receivables<br />
Unbilled revenues<br />
Fuel inventory, at average cost<br />
Materials and supplies, inventory, at average cost<br />
Prepayments<br />
Risk management asset<br />
Accumulated deferred fuel<br />
Accumulated deferred federal and state income taxes,net<br />
Cash surrender value <strong>of</strong> company owned life insurance policies<br />
Regulatory assets - other<br />
Other current assets<br />
Total current assets<br />
Property, plant and equipment<br />
Accumulated depreciation<br />
Net property, plant and equipment<br />
Construction work-in-progress<br />
Total property, plant and equipment, net<br />
Equity investment in investee<br />
Prepayments<br />
$ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
12,269 12,683 12,683 13,108 13,108 13,108 13,108 13,108 13,108 88,108 88,108<br />
123,042 86,140 110,814 93,186 103,750 103,750 106,378 116,611 141,573 119,843 119,843<br />
2,726<br />
4,535<br />
3,967<br />
3,231<br />
3,231<br />
3,231<br />
3,231<br />
3,231<br />
3,231<br />
3,231<br />
3,231<br />
155<br />
1<br />
38,934 40,256 41,303 42,181 41,535 41,535 41,651 41,768 41,884 42,002 42,002<br />
9,598 10,032 14,854<br />
3,917<br />
3,917<br />
3,917<br />
3,917<br />
3,917<br />
3,917<br />
3,917<br />
3,917<br />
34,462 57,091 53,120 62,377 62,377 62,377 62,377 62,377 62,377 62,377 62,377<br />
43,562 40,502 38,828 33,272 30,494 30,494 30,494 30,494 30,494 30,494 30,494<br />
9,027<br />
7,574<br />
5,743<br />
5,159<br />
5,159<br />
5,159<br />
5,159<br />
5,159<br />
5,159<br />
5,159<br />
5,159<br />
29,962 29,962 29,962 29,962 29,962 29,962 29,962 29,962<br />
7,751<br />
8,585<br />
8,345<br />
7,562<br />
7,562<br />
7,562<br />
7,562<br />
7,562<br />
7,562<br />
7,562<br />
7,562<br />
31,853 63,603 73,325 42,674 42,674 42,674 42,674 42,674 42,674 42,674 42,674<br />
14,302 13,059 15,040 14,784 14,784 14,784 14,784 14,784 14,784 14,784 14,784<br />
477,681 494,061 378,022 351,413 358,553 358,553 361,297 371,647 396,726 450,113 450,113<br />
553,211 545,333 588,282 624,429 643,043 643,043 651,161 659,326 667,493 675,665 675,665<br />
8,669<br />
8,360<br />
8,051<br />
7,741<br />
7,420<br />
7,420<br />
7,099<br />
6,778<br />
6,457<br />
6,136<br />
6,136<br />
166,387 108,238 108,968 109,865 109,865 109,865 109,865 109,865 109,865 109,865 109,865<br />
44,313 32,455 26,577<br />
7,026<br />
7,026<br />
7,026<br />
7,026<br />
7,026<br />
7,026<br />
7,026<br />
7,026<br />
25,993 26,208 26,433 24,656 24,656 24,656 24,656 24,656 24,656 24,656 24,656<br />
60,395 26,087 20,375 47,715 47,715 47,715 47,715 47,715 47,715 47,715 47,715<br />
56,563 48,494 48,494 48,494 48,494 48,494 48,494 48,494 48,494<br />
30,243 29,443 29,443 29,443 29,443 29,443 29,443 29,443 29,443<br />
106,845 105,640 40,784 44,070 44,070 44,070 44,070 44,070 44,070 44,070 44,070<br />
965,813 852,321 906,276 943,439 961,732 961,732 969,529 977,373 985,219 993,070 993,070<br />
1,399,709 1,377,684 1,387,346 1,370,576 1,370,992 1,370,992 1,371,452 1,371,956 1,372,511 1,298,123 1,298,123<br />
2,843,203 2,724,066 2,671,644 2,665,428 2,691,276 2,691,276 2,702,277 2,720,975 2,754,457 2,741,305 2,741,305<br />
-<br />
11,478<br />
111,358<br />
813<br />
2,370<br />
34,195<br />
$<br />
11,880<br />
33,592<br />
13,767<br />
7,091<br />
15,260<br />
241,804<br />
460,894<br />
9,954<br />
146,270<br />
149,638<br />
25,434<br />
115,643<br />
108,839<br />
1,016,672<br />
1,320,299<br />
2,578,775<br />
1,029<br />
1,029<br />
60,540 60,645 60,677 60,684 60,684 60,684 60,684 60,684 60,684 60,684 60,684<br />
405,313 406,819 407,638 409,040 409,040 409,040 409,040 409,040 409,040 409,040 409,040<br />
863,237 876,959 930,098 978,942 1,004,060 1,004,060 1,025,866 1,055,838 1,095,789 1,117,180 1,117,180<br />
(274)<br />
(252)<br />
(231) (13,228) (13,228) (13,228) (13,228) (13,228) (13,228) (13,228) (13,228)<br />
(11,638) (11,355) (11,107) (29,325) (29,325) (29,325) (29,325) (29,325) (29,325) (29,325) (29,325)<br />
1,317,178 1,332,816 1,387,075 1,406,113 1,431,231 1,431,231 1,453,037 1,483,009 1,522,960 1,544,351 1,544,351<br />
1,318,207 1,333,845 1,387,075 1,406,113 1,431,231 1,431,231 1,453,037 1,483,009 1,522,960 1,544,351 1,544,351<br />
$ 4,161,410 $ 4,057,911 $ 4,058,719 $ 4,071,541 $ 4,122,507 $ 4,122,507 $ 4,155,314 $ 4,203,984 $ 4,277,416 $ 4,285,656 $<br />
4,285,656<br />
1,029<br />
60,277<br />
399,148<br />
667,220<br />
(311)<br />
(11,291)<br />
1,115,043<br />
1,116,072<br />
3,694,847<br />
$<br />
28
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
2011 E<br />
2012 E<br />
31-Dec-10 A 31-Mar A 30-Jun A 30-Sep A 31-Dec E 31-Dec-11 E 31-Mar A 30-Jun A 30-Sep A 31-Dec E 2012 E<br />
CLECO CORPORATION (CNL)<br />
Quarterly and Annual Balance Sheets<br />
31-Dec-09 A<br />
3.38% 14.36% 16.86% 14.88% 13.00% 3.09% 13.30% 13.30% 13.15% 13.15% 3.17%<br />
3.89% 12.76% 14.93% 9.42% 11.12% 2.65% 11.26% 11.26% 11.26% 11.26% 2.71%<br />
7.20% 22.48% 16.10% 10.83% 26.91% 6.40% 18.32% 26.98% 18.45% 27.90% 6.72%<br />
4.20% 19.73% 19.28% 14.86% 15.70% 3.73% 10.69% 15.75% 10.77% 16.28% 3.92%<br />
230.57% 1044.46% 967.61% 751.12% 996.43% 236.95% 1009.16% 927.65% 794.94% 972.81% 234.30%<br />
0.46% 1.99% 1.81% 1.30% 1.67% 0.40% 1.67% 1.51% 1.28% 1.54% 0.37%<br />
1.82% 8.01% 7.40% 5.63% 6.09% 1.45% 4.96% 3.48% 2.08% 1.47% 0.35%<br />
10.71% 33.95% 40.60% 26.50% 37.87% 9.00% 38.77% 38.52% 39.52% 40.39% 9.73%<br />
3.39% 15.87% 15.13% 12.00% 15.16% 3.60% 15.18% 13.80% 11.69% 14.15% 3.41%<br />
3.46%<br />
2.57%<br />
9.37%<br />
4.85%<br />
134.15%<br />
0.60%<br />
5.60%<br />
13.04%<br />
4.01%<br />
31-Dec-08 A<br />
3.77%<br />
1.82%<br />
5.30%<br />
3.48%<br />
98.75%<br />
0.56%<br />
3.04%<br />
10.86%<br />
2.51%<br />
SELECTED COMMON SIZE BALANCE SHEET AMOUNTS (% <strong>of</strong> revenues)<br />
Customer accounts receivable, net<br />
Unbilled revenues<br />
Fuel inventory, at average cost<br />
Materials and supplies, inventory, at average cost<br />
Net property, plant and equipment<br />
Prepayments<br />
Other deferred charges<br />
Accounts payable<br />
Customer deposits<br />
14.63% 12.18% 13.89% 13.04% 13.38% 13.38% 13.28% 13.51% 14.22% 13.62% 13.62%<br />
63.64% 65.30% 65.07% 64.86% 66.22% 66.22% 66.64% 66.80% 66.57% 67.36% 67.36%<br />
3.26% 3.72% 4.21% 5.49% 4.14% 4.14% 4.11% 4.06% 3.99% 3.98% 3.98%<br />
2.08% 2.15% 0.32% 0.32% 0.32% 0.32% 0.31% 0.31% 0.31% 0.31% 0.31%<br />
0.13% 0.12% 0.12% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11% 0.11%<br />
4.89% 5.08% 5.13% 5.25% 5.19% 5.19% 5.15% 5.09% 5.00% 4.99% 4.99%<br />
6.40% 6.43% 6.32% 6.13% 6.05% 6.05% 6.00% 5.93% 5.83% 5.82% 5.82%<br />
0.33% 0.34% 0.34% 0.34% 0.33% 0.33% 0.33% 0.33% 0.32% 0.32% 0.32%<br />
3.49% 3.52% 3.44% 3.35% 3.23% 3.23% 3.13% 3.01% 2.89% 2.80% 2.80%<br />
0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.49% 0.40% 0.40% 0.33% 0.25% 0.17% 0.10% 0.10%<br />
11.48% 12.18% 9.31% 8.63% 8.70% 8.70% 8.69% 8.84% 9.27% 10.50% 10.50%<br />
23.21% 21.00% 22.33% 23.17% 23.33% 23.33% 23.33% 23.25% 23.03% 23.17% 23.17%<br />
33.64% 33.95% 34.18% 33.66% 33.26% 33.26% 33.00% 32.63% 32.09% 30.29% 30.29%<br />
68.32% 67.13% 65.82% 65.46% 65.28% 65.28% 65.03% 64.72% 64.40% 63.96% 63.96%<br />
0.02% 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%<br />
31.65% 32.84% 34.18% 34.54% 34.72% 34.72% 34.97% 35.28% 35.60% 36.04% 36.04%<br />
13.37%<br />
31.00%<br />
29.82%<br />
6.81%<br />
0.14%<br />
7.15%<br />
5.45%<br />
0.00%<br />
4.25%<br />
1.29%<br />
6.54%<br />
27.52%<br />
35.73%<br />
69.79%<br />
0.03%<br />
30.18%<br />
13.96%<br />
31.93%<br />
29.29%<br />
7.46%<br />
0.18%<br />
5.23%<br />
4.73%<br />
0.00%<br />
5.02%<br />
0.98%<br />
10.80%<br />
24.32%<br />
33.13%<br />
68.25%<br />
0.03%<br />
31.72%<br />
SELECTED COMMON SIZE BALANCE SHEET AMOUNTS (% <strong>of</strong> total assets)<br />
Total current assets<br />
Net property, plant and equipment<br />
Construction work-in-progress<br />
Equity investment in investee<br />
Prepayments<br />
Regulatory assets - deferred taxes<br />
Regulatory assets - other<br />
Net investment in direct financing lease<br />
Intangible assets<br />
Other deferred charges<br />
Total current liabilities<br />
Total deferred credits<br />
Long-term debt, net<br />
Total liabilities<br />
Total preferred stock not subject to mandatory redemption<br />
Total common shareholders' equity<br />
29
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
CLECO CORPORATION (CNL)<br />
Quarterly and Annual Statements <strong>of</strong> Cash Flows<br />
In thousands<br />
2011 E<br />
2012 E<br />
2008 A 2009 A 2010 A 31-Mar A 30-Jun A 30-Sep A 31-Dec E 2011 E 31-Mar A 30-Jun A 30-Sep A 31-Dec E 2012 E<br />
Cash flows from operating activities:<br />
Net income before preferred dividends<br />
$ 102,141 $ 106,307 $ 255,391 $ 29,016 $ 70,347 $ 65,842 $ 42,107 $ 207,312 $ 40,700 $ 48,866 $ 58,845 $ 40,285 $ 188,696<br />
Adjustments:<br />
Depreciation and amortization<br />
120,652 121,436 170,399 48,098 48,119 17,887 40,174 154,278 44,935 45,959 47,867 43,315 182,076<br />
Gain on sale <strong>of</strong> property, plant and equipment<br />
(110)<br />
76<br />
Gain on forgiveness <strong>of</strong> debt<br />
(129,870)<br />
Provision for doubtful accounts<br />
3,826<br />
1,682<br />
1,553<br />
1,484<br />
1,484<br />
1,520<br />
1,677<br />
1,963<br />
1,626<br />
6,787<br />
Equity loss (gain) from investees<br />
5,542 17,423 (38,849)<br />
(611) (61,441)<br />
1<br />
(62,051)<br />
Return on equity investment in investee<br />
5,106<br />
750<br />
58,665<br />
58,665<br />
Unearned compensation<br />
2,540<br />
6,087<br />
5,587<br />
2,487<br />
1,308<br />
2,270<br />
6,065<br />
Allowance for other funds used during construction<br />
(64,953) (73,269) (12,413) (1,978)<br />
(876)<br />
(903) 12,761<br />
9,004 12,761 12,761 12,761 12,761 51,044<br />
Cash-surrender value <strong>of</strong> company/trust-owned life insurance<br />
5,334<br />
(5,180) (2,759) (1,141)<br />
(202)<br />
2,398<br />
1,055<br />
Amortization <strong>of</strong> investment tax credits<br />
(1,380) (1,332) (1,285)<br />
(321)<br />
(321)<br />
(321)<br />
(321)<br />
(321)<br />
(321) (1,284)<br />
Deferred income taxes<br />
5,154<br />
(5,983) 54,873 (13,144) 21,436 37,044 18,614 63,950<br />
8,118<br />
8,165<br />
8,168<br />
8,171 32,622<br />
Deferred fuel costs<br />
6,444<br />
7,223 21,086<br />
3,030 (19,107)<br />
9,655<br />
(3,720) (10,142)<br />
Gain (loss) on economic hedges<br />
2,213<br />
167<br />
(405)<br />
Changes in assets and liabilities<br />
Accounts receivable, net<br />
(5,557)<br />
8,310 (35,156)<br />
5,042 (24,965)<br />
1,649 23,520<br />
5,246<br />
(2,204) (9,633) (17,019) 15,542 (13,314)<br />
Notes and accounts receivable, affiliate<br />
14,242<br />
(8,701)<br />
2,109<br />
(538)<br />
1,371<br />
241<br />
(6,688) (5,614)<br />
30<br />
(684) (1,338)<br />
1,483<br />
(509)<br />
Unbilled revenues<br />
(1,954) (2,262) (22,675) 12,269<br />
(8,377)<br />
7,646<br />
2,632 14,170<br />
(403) (3,189) (6,243)<br />
6,918<br />
(2,918)<br />
Fuel, material and supplies inventories<br />
(12,282) (26,680) (7,465) 23,920 10,517<br />
6,238 (26,415) 14,260 37,138 (49,738) 24,662 (26,432) (14,370)<br />
Prepayments<br />
1,050<br />
1,575 (2,316)<br />
2,520<br />
(935)<br />
504<br />
390<br />
2,479<br />
(61)<br />
(483)<br />
(945)<br />
1,047<br />
(442)<br />
Accounts payable<br />
2,806 11,231<br />
3,459 (31,823) 24,248 (27,411) 10,564 (24,422)<br />
2,628 10,233 24,962 (21,730) 16,093<br />
Notes and accounts payable, affiliate<br />
(34,260) (22,796) (2,215)<br />
(154)<br />
(398)<br />
(552)<br />
Customer deposits<br />
5,961 12,906 12,313<br />
3,205<br />
3,221<br />
3,292<br />
(646)<br />
9,072<br />
116<br />
117<br />
117<br />
117<br />
467<br />
Long-term receivable<br />
27,976<br />
Postretirement benefit obligations<br />
4,899 (11,555)<br />
2,553 (58,149)<br />
509<br />
897<br />
(56,743)<br />
Regulatory assets and liabilities, net<br />
43,790 32,922 (88,333) (12,266) (6,265) (21,673) (8,875) (49,079) (10,138) (10,850) (12,446) (7,580) (41,013)<br />
Contingent sale obligations<br />
10,900<br />
10,900<br />
Other deferred accounts<br />
(114,855) (46,051)<br />
4,491<br />
1,877<br />
(2,606) (1,455)<br />
3,083<br />
899<br />
3,083<br />
3,083<br />
3,083<br />
3,083 12,330<br />
Retainage payable<br />
12,709 (11,921)<br />
1,913<br />
1,004<br />
(1,434) (2,051)<br />
(2,481)<br />
Taxes accrued/receivable<br />
1,984 23,612 (34,266)<br />
2,958<br />
6,229<br />
3,759<br />
12,946<br />
Interest accrued<br />
(4,439) (4,138)<br />
2,466 12,555 (13,192) 11,375<br />
10,738<br />
Margin deposits<br />
(16,482)<br />
Risk management assets and liabilities, net<br />
4,406<br />
7,885<br />
749<br />
1,241<br />
1,890<br />
3,880<br />
Other, net<br />
(595) (1,066) (2,642) (2,815)<br />
3,406<br />
(4,283)<br />
(3,692)<br />
Net cash provided by operating activities<br />
89,526 135,179 193,405<br />
26,111 121,719 114,812 108,662 371,304 137,903 55,962 144,117 78,284 416,265<br />
Cash flows from investing activities<br />
Additions to property, plant and equipment<br />
(335,757) (250,286) (283,389) (45,692) (20,389) (79,588) (67,361) (213,030) (70,461) (70,998) (71,325) (71,653) (284,436)<br />
Allowance for other funds used during construction<br />
64,953 73,269 12,413<br />
1,978<br />
876<br />
903 (12,761) (9,004) (12,761) (12,761) (12,761) (12,761) (51,044)<br />
Proceeds from sales <strong>of</strong> property, plant & equipment<br />
1,894<br />
751<br />
801<br />
Cash from reconsolidation <strong>of</strong> VIEs<br />
812<br />
3,879<br />
3,879<br />
Return on equity investment in investees 3,852<br />
850<br />
Return <strong>of</strong> equity investment in investee<br />
89,654<br />
89,654<br />
Equity investment in investee<br />
(18,522) (45,539) (44,571) (9,239)<br />
9,239<br />
Premiums paid on company/trust-owned life insurance<br />
(1,664) (2,752) (3,554)<br />
Advances on company-owned life insurance loan, net<br />
(13,207)<br />
Cash transferred from restricted accounts, net<br />
(85,021) 46,531 45,535<br />
9,391<br />
(3,542)<br />
6,295<br />
12,144<br />
Settlements received from insurance policies<br />
941<br />
Return <strong>of</strong> investment in tax credit fund<br />
244<br />
244<br />
Contributions to tax credit fund<br />
(18,479)<br />
(18,479)<br />
Other Investment activities<br />
599<br />
23<br />
216<br />
113<br />
44<br />
373<br />
Net cash provided by investing activities<br />
(368,725) (177,176) (285,137) (43,346) 61,595 (72,346) (80,122) (134,219) (83,222) (83,759) (84,086) (84,414) (335,481)<br />
Cash flows from financing activities<br />
Change in short-term debt, net<br />
150,000<br />
(150,000)<br />
-<br />
(150,000)<br />
Retirement <strong>of</strong> long-term obligations<br />
(350,412) (114,846) (200,867) (21,283) 15,000<br />
(5,986)<br />
(12,269)<br />
Repurchase <strong>of</strong> common stock<br />
13,009<br />
13,009<br />
Repayment <strong>of</strong> capital leases<br />
(1,422) (1,701)<br />
416<br />
416<br />
460<br />
504<br />
555<br />
612<br />
2,131<br />
Issuance <strong>of</strong> long-term debt<br />
651,541 255,369 247,245<br />
Deferred financing costs<br />
(361) (1,953) (6,851)<br />
Settlement <strong>of</strong> treasury rate lock<br />
4,696<br />
5,675<br />
Redemption <strong>of</strong> preferred stock<br />
(1,039)<br />
(1,039)<br />
Dividends paid on preferred stock<br />
(46)<br />
(46)<br />
(46)<br />
(12)<br />
(14)<br />
(26)<br />
Dividends paid on common stock<br />
(54,036) (54,221) (58,988) (15,171) (16,997) (17,002) (16,990) (66,160) (18,894) (18,894) (18,894) (18,894) (75,576)<br />
Change in revolving credit facility (5,000) (10,000)<br />
(15,000)<br />
Other financing<br />
983<br />
2,130<br />
3,200<br />
(236)<br />
(329)<br />
(363)<br />
(928)<br />
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities<br />
247,669 89,707 137,667 (36,702) (158,379) (46,360) (16,574) (258,015) (18,434) (18,390) (18,339) (18,282) (73,444)<br />
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents<br />
(31,530) 47,710 45,935 (53,937) 24,935<br />
(3,894) 11,966 (20,930) 36,247 (46,187) 41,692 (24,413)<br />
7,340<br />
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning <strong>of</strong> period<br />
129,013 97,483 145,193 191,128 137,191 162,126 158,232 191,128 170,198 206,445 160,258 201,950 170,198<br />
Cash and cash equivalents at end <strong>of</strong> period<br />
97,483 145,193 191,128 137,191 162,126 158,232 170,198 170,198 206,445 160,258 201,950 177,538 177,538<br />
Operating cash flow per share excluding working capital changes<br />
$ 3.16 $ 2.90 $ 5.33 $ 1.08 $ 1.94 $ 2.20 $ 1.82 $ 7.03 $ 1.76 $ 1.91 $ 2.10 $ 1.71 $ 7.39<br />
Operating cash flow per share including working capital changes<br />
$ 1.49 $ 2.23 $ 3.18 $ 0.43 $ 1.99 $ 1.89 $ 1.78 $ 6.08 $ 2.25 $ 0.91 $ 2.34 $ 1.27 $<br />
6.69<br />
30
CLECO Corporation (CNL) BURKENROAD REPORTS (www.burkenroad.org) November 25, 2011<br />
CLECO CORPORATION (CNL)<br />
Ratios<br />
2011 E<br />
2012 E<br />
For the percod ended 2008 A 2009 A 2010 A 31-Mar A 30-Jun A 30-Sep A 31-Dec E 2011 E 31-Mar E 30-Jun E 30-Sep E 31-Dec E 2012 E<br />
Productivity Ratios<br />
Receivables turnover<br />
22.55 22.63 26.42 6.74 6.62 7.15 6.23 26.80 7.61 7.89 8.20 6.89 33.01<br />
Working capital turnover 21.66 5.84 36.16 3.86 2.93 1.92 1.47 8.73 1.43 1.57 1.76 1.72 7.54<br />
Net fixed asset turnover 1.05 0.77 0.47 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.43 0.10 0.11 0.13 0.10 0.44<br />
Gross fixed asset turnover 0.55 0.41 0.32 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.30 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.07 0.31<br />
Total asset turnover 0.35 0.25 0.29 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.28 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.29<br />
# <strong>of</strong> days Sales in A/R 14 13 13 14 16 15 13 12 13 13 13 13 12<br />
# <strong>of</strong> days Sales in Unbilled Revenues 7 10 15 12 14 9 11 10 11 11 11 11 10<br />
# <strong>of</strong> days cash-based expenses in payables 48 61 61 49 58 42 61 55 61 61 61 61 60<br />
Liquidity Measures<br />
Current ratio 1.29 2.04 1.27 1.00 1.49 1.51 1.54 1.54 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.30 1.30<br />
Quick ratio 0.49 0.89 0.59 0.45 0.69 0.74 0.71 0.71 0.80 0.68 0.78 0.60 0.63<br />
Cash ratio 0.49 0.89 0.59 0.45 0.69 0.74 0.71 0.71 0.80 0.68 0.78 0.60 0.63<br />
Cash flow from operations ratio 0.25 0.56 0.40 0.05 0.32 0.33 0.30 1.04 0.38 0.15 0.36 0.17 0.92<br />
Working capital 105,546 252,121 131,169 374 185,716 179,571 193,195 193,195 190,678 196,192 211,724 133,740 133,740<br />
Financial Risk (Leverage) Ratios<br />
Total debt/equity ratio 2.15 2.31 2.16 2.04 1.93 1.90 1.88 1.88 1.86 1.83 1.81 1.78 1.09<br />
Debt/equity ratio (excluding deferred taxes) 1.80 1.90 1.74 1.63 1.50 1.45 1.43 1.43 1.41 1.39 1.37 1.34 0.65<br />
Total LT debt/equity ratio 1.81 2.09 1.79 1.67 1.65 1.65 1.63 1.63 1.61 1.58 1.55 1.48 0.79<br />
LT debt/equity (excluding deferred taxes) 1.46 1.68 1.37 1.26 1.23 1.20 1.18 1.18 1.16 1.14 1.11 1.05 0.35<br />
Interest coverage ratio (Earnings = EBIT) 2.40 2.16 4.92 2.48 5.11 4.46 4.10 4.01 3.99 4.59 5.32 3.96 4.46<br />
Interest coverage ratio (Earnings = EBI) 2.15 2.04 3.50 2.04 3.70 3.51 2.94 3.04 2.88 3.26 3.73 2.86 3.18<br />
Total debt ratio 0.68 0.70 0.68 0.67 0.66 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.64 0.64 0.39<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>itability/Valuation Measures<br />
Gross pr<strong>of</strong>it margin 31.56% 40.84% 54.25% 56.26% 60.65% 55.58% 62.77% 58.68% 61.99% 62.68% 61.71% 61.40% 33.74%<br />
Operating pr<strong>of</strong>it margin 10.57% 9.07% 5.96% 7.11% 6.04% 5.56% 6.04% 6.13% 6.13% 5.95% 6.21% 6.29% 6.15%<br />
Return on assets 3.35% 3.07% 6.48% 0.71% 1.73% 1.62% 1.03% 5.07% 0.98% 1.17% 1.39% 0.94% 4.49%<br />
Return on equity 9.84% 9.82% 20.21% 2.19% 5.16% 4.71% 2.97% 15.07% 2.82% 3.33% 3.92% 2.63% 12.68%<br />
Earnings before interest margin 14.31% 18.43% 30.57% 21.93% 35.16% 26.06% 22.96% 26.57% 22.41% 23.01% 22.24% 20.59% 22.07%<br />
EBITDA margin 23.22% 28.71% 52.75% 38.21% 59.53% 41.79% 43.28% 45.56% 42.55% 42.89% 40.69% 39.45% 41.34%<br />
EBIDA/Assets 5.07% 4.55% 8.91% 1.35% 2.36% 2.25% 1.54% 7.50% 1.49% 1.67% 1.88% 1.43% 7.77%<br />
Dividend (Distribution) payout percentage 5.10% 4.86% 4.48% 1.14% 1.23% 1.21% 1.19% 4.62% 1.30% 1.27% 1.24% 1.22% 4.89%<br />
31
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
BURKENROAD REPORTS RATING SYSTEM<br />
MARKET OUTPERFORM: This rating indicates that we believe forces are in place that would enable this<br />
company's stock to produce returns in excess <strong>of</strong> the stock market averages over the next 12 months.<br />
MARKET PERFORM: This rating indicates that we believe the investment returns from this company's<br />
stock will be in line with those produced by the stock market averages over the next 12 months.<br />
MARKET UNDERPERFORM: This rating indicates that while this investment may have positive<br />
attributes, we believe an investment in this company will produce subpar returns over the next 12<br />
months.<br />
BURKENROAD REPORTS CALCULATIONS<br />
• CPFS is calculated using operating cash flows excluding working capital changes.<br />
• All amounts are as <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> the report as reported by Bloomberg or Yahoo Finance unless<br />
otherwise noted. Betas are collected from Bloomberg.<br />
• Enterprise value is based on the equity market cap as <strong>of</strong> the report date, adjusted for long-term<br />
debt, cash, and short-term investments reported on the most recent quarterly report date.<br />
• 12-month Stock Performance is calculated using an ending price as <strong>of</strong> the report date.<br />
The stock performance includes the 12-month dividend yield.<br />
2011-2012 COVERAGE UNIVERSE<br />
AFC Enterprises Inc. (AFCE)<br />
Amerisafe Inc. (AMSF)<br />
CalIon Petroleum Company (CPE)<br />
Cal-Maine Foods Inc. (CALM)<br />
Carbo Ceramics Inc. (CRR)<br />
CLECO Corporation (CNL)<br />
Conn's Inc. (CONN)<br />
Craftmade International Inc. (CRFT)<br />
Crown Crafts Inc. (CRWS)<br />
Cyberonics Incorporated (CYBX)<br />
Denbury Resources Inc. (DNR)<br />
EastGroup Properties Inc. (EGP)<br />
Energy Partners Ltd. (EPL)<br />
Evolution Petroleum Corp. (EPM)<br />
Gulf Island Fabrication Inc. (GIFI)<br />
Hibbett Sports (HIBB)<br />
Hornbeck Offshore Services Inc. (HOS)<br />
Houston Wire & Cable Company (HWCC)<br />
IBERI<strong>AB</strong>ANK Corp. (IBKC)<br />
ION Geophysical Corp. (IO)<br />
PETER RICCHIUTI<br />
Director <strong>of</strong> Research<br />
Founder <strong>of</strong> Burkenroad Reports<br />
Peter.Ricchiuti@tulane.edu<br />
ANTHONY WOOD<br />
Senior Director <strong>of</strong> Accounting<br />
Awood11@tulane.edu<br />
NATALIE DOMINO<br />
RANDALL FROST<br />
RICHARD GRAY<br />
Associate Directors <strong>of</strong> Research<br />
Key Energy Services (KEG)<br />
Marine Products Corp. (MPX)<br />
McMoRan Exploration Co. (MMR)<br />
MidSouth Bancorp Inc. (MSL)<br />
PetroQuest Energy Inc. (PQ)<br />
Pool Corporation (POOL)<br />
Powell Industries Inc. (POWL)<br />
Reddy Ice Holdings Inc. (RDDY)<br />
Rollins Incorporated (ROL)<br />
RPC Incorporated (RES)<br />
Sanderson Farms Inc. (SAFM)<br />
SEACOR Holdings Inc. (CKH)<br />
Sharps Compliance Inc. (SMED)<br />
Shaw Group Inc. (SHAW)<br />
Stone Energy Corp. (SGY)<br />
Superior Energy Services Inc. (SPN)<br />
Susser Holdings Corp. (SUSS)<br />
Team Incorporated (TISI)<br />
Teche Holding Company (TSH)<br />
Willbros Group Inc. (WG)<br />
BURKENROAD REPORTS<br />
Tulane University<br />
New Orleans, LA 70118-5669<br />
(504) 862-8489<br />
(504) 865-5430 Fax
Named in honor <strong>of</strong> William B. Burkenroad Jr., an alumnus and a longtime<br />
supporter <strong>of</strong> Tulane’s business school, and funded through contributions<br />
from his family and friends, BURKENROAD REPORTS is a nationally<br />
recognized program, publishing objective, investment research reports on<br />
public companies in our region. Students at Tulane University’s <strong>Freeman</strong><br />
<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business prepare these reports.<br />
Graduates <strong>of</strong> the BURKENROAD REPORTS Program have moved on to positions<br />
at a number <strong>of</strong> highly respected financial institutions including:<br />
<strong>AB</strong>N AMRO Bank · AYCO · Aegis Value Fund · Invesco/AIM Capital Management<br />
· Alpha Omega Capital Partners · American General Investment Management ·<br />
Banc <strong>of</strong> America Securities · Bank <strong>of</strong> Montreal · Bancomer · Barclays Capital ·<br />
Barings PLC · Bearing Point · Bessemer Trust · Black Gold · Capital Blackrock<br />
Financial Management · Boston Consulting Group · California Board <strong>of</strong> Regents<br />
· Cambridge Associates · Central Bank <strong>of</strong> Turkey · Chaffe & Associates · Citadel<br />
Investment Group · Citibank · Citigroup Private Bank · City National Bank<br />
· Cornerstone Resources · Credit Suisse · Deutsche Banc · Duquesne Capital<br />
Management · Financial Models · First Albany · Fiduciary Trust · Fitch Investors<br />
Services · Forex Trading · Franklin Templeton · Fulcrum Global Partners · Gintel<br />
Asset Management · Global Hunter Securities · Goldman Sachs · Grosever Funds<br />
· Gruntal & Co. · Guggenheim Securities , LLC · Hancock Investment Services ·<br />
Hanifen Imh<strong>of</strong>f Inc. · Healthcare Markets Group · Capital One Southcoast Capital<br />
· Howard Weil Labouisse Friedrichs · J.P. Morgan Securities · Jefferies & Co. ·<br />
Johnson Rice & Co. · KBC Financial · KDI Capital Partners · Key Investments<br />
· Keystone Investments · Knight Securities · Legacy Capital · Liberty Mutual ·<br />
Lowenhaupt Global Advisors · Manulife/John Hancock Investments · Marsh &<br />
McLennan · Mercer Partners · Merrill Lynch · Miramar Asset Management ·<br />
Morgan Keegan · Morgan Stanley/Smith Barney· New York Stock Exchange ·<br />
Piper Jaffray & Co. · Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Advisory Services · Quarterdeck Investment<br />
Services · RBC <strong>Do</strong>minion Securities · Raymond James · Restoration Capital · Rice<br />
Voelker, LLC · Sanford Bernstein & Co. · Second City Trading LLC · Sequent<br />
Energy · Sidoti & Co · Simmons & Co. · Southwest Securities · Spear, Leeds<br />
& Kellogg · Stewart Capital LLC · Susquehanna Investment Group · Thomas<br />
Weisel Partners · TD Waterhouse Securities · TXU · Texas Employee Retirement<br />
System ·Tivoli Partners ·Tudor Pickering & Co. · Tulane University Endowment<br />
Fund · Turner Investment Partners · UBS · Value Line Investments · Wells Fargo<br />
Capital Management · Whitney National Bank · William Blair & Co. · Zephyr<br />
Management<br />
To receive complete reports on any <strong>of</strong> the companies we follow, contact:<br />
Peter Ricchiuti, Founder & Director <strong>of</strong> Research<br />
Tulane University<br />
A.B. <strong>Freeman</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Business<br />
BURKENROAD REPORTS<br />
Phone: (504) 862-8489<br />
Fax: (504) 865-5430<br />
E-mail: Peter.Ricchiuti@Tulane.edu<br />
Please visit our web site at www.BURKENROAD.org<br />
Printed on Recycled Paper