Figure 3: Program Experience by DecadeThese findings are consistent with the <strong>Peace</strong> Corps’own assessment. In June 2010, the <strong>Peace</strong> Corpsreleased a Comprehensive Agency Assessment basedon hundreds of responses the assessment teamreceived from Volunteers, RPCVs, agency staff, hostcountry partners, Members of Congress and their staff,and others.As the world has advanced and become moresophisticated through new technologies, and countriesworldwide now have university trained leaders andnational development strategies, the assessment foundthat the <strong>Peace</strong> Corps must evolve its model for the 21stCentury. Such modernization of the <strong>Peace</strong> Corps musthelp meet host country expectations and ensure <strong>Peace</strong>Corps Volunteers have meaningful and important work<strong>to</strong> do for which they have received the appropriatetraining and preparation <strong>to</strong> complete their assignments.The current training process emphasizes generalpreparation for the volunteer experience. Beforethey deploy, <strong>Peace</strong> Corps Volunteers receive from8 <strong>to</strong> 12 weeks of initial training that focuses onpreparing them <strong>to</strong> live in host communities. There iscross-cultural training, language training, health andwellness training, and safety training, all of whichis based on preparing the <strong>Peace</strong> Corps Volunteer fortheir experience. There is relatively less emphasis,however, on job training or preparing them <strong>to</strong> carryout skilled work.Technical training <strong>to</strong> teach <strong>Peace</strong> Corps Volunteers<strong>to</strong> carry out assignments is typically done in thehost country once the volunteer arrives. The 2010Assessment found that the number of projectscombined with each post developing its own trainingcontent led <strong>to</strong> a need for improved technical trainingfor <strong>Peace</strong> Corps Volunteers. Our survey results supportthis finding and suggest that more effective on-the-jobteacher training for the Volunteers new <strong>to</strong> teaching maybe among the greatest needs.While language training has improved over thedecades, according <strong>to</strong> the RPCVs, satisfaction with thepreparation they were given <strong>to</strong> carry out assignmentshas declined. The share of RPCVs reporting theyreceived “sufficient language training” rose from 56percent among RPCVS from the 1960s <strong>to</strong> 71 percentamong RPCVS from the 2000s. The share of RPCVSwho “felt your training prepared you <strong>to</strong> carry out yourassignment,” however, declined from 66 percent amongRPCVs from the 1960s <strong>to</strong> 55 percent among RPCVsfrom the 2000s.Most assignments are based on the interests of <strong>Peace</strong>Corps Volunteers and involve partnerships with localorganizations in the host country. Yet, who sets thegoals for Volunteer assignments is unclear.According <strong>to</strong> the RPCVs, 80 percent receivedplacements that matched their interests or expertiseprior <strong>to</strong> joining (figure 4). Also, 77 percent reportedpartnering with a local organization during theirservice <strong>to</strong> carry out their assignments. But despite thesepartnerships, RPCVs reported that it is not clear whosets the goals for their work, and this in part couldexplain why the majority of RPCVs do not feel confidentthey achieved their goals (30 percent “describes verywell” in figure 2).Figure 4: AssignmentsWhen asked who set the goals for their service (andallowed multiple responses) roughly half said “I did,”the local community did, or the host country <strong>Peace</strong>Corps office did (figure 5). Further analysis of thedata determined that just 16 percent in fact set thegoals themselves, while 37 percent set the goals inconjunction with the local partner or <strong>Peace</strong> Corps,and 47 percent relied entirely on the local partner or| 14A CALL TO PEACE SEPTEMBER 2011
<strong>Peace</strong> Corps <strong>to</strong> set the goals of their service.These responses show that <strong>to</strong> measure impact, theremust be clear goals and accountability for whodetermines them.Figure 5: Who set the goals for your<strong>Peace</strong> Corps Service?Measuring impact can become more complicated whenthere are so many local partnerships involved with the<strong>Peace</strong> Corps. In fiscal year 2009, <strong>Peace</strong> Corps postsreported 560 collaborations with host governmentagencies and more than 360 collaborations with localNGOs, universities and local private companies. 8While reported partnerships with local organizationsin the communities where <strong>Peace</strong> Corps Volunteers liveand serve have risen over time, the effectiveness ofthese partnerships has declined according <strong>to</strong> theRPCVs (figure 6).Figure 6: Local PartnershipsThe result is that despite very high general levels ofsatisfaction, more recent RPCVs give their overall <strong>Peace</strong>Corps experience lower scores than do earlier cohortsand a higher proportion characterize it as frustrating(figure 7). This may be due in part <strong>to</strong> the gradual shiftin the objectives of service from measurable objectivessuch as teaching, agriculture, and engineering <strong>to</strong> agreater emphasis on personal outreach like communityand youth development that make it more difficult<strong>to</strong> assess impact. These findings also likely reflectthe difficulty the <strong>Peace</strong> Corps has faced updatingand adapting a 1960s model for <strong>to</strong>day’s world. Arecommended strategy from the 2010 ComprehensiveAgency Assessment is <strong>to</strong> improve the <strong>Peace</strong> Corps’moni<strong>to</strong>ring and reporting systems for measuring impac<strong>to</strong>f the first goal.Figure 7: Satisfaction has DeclinedGoal 2: Helping promote a better understandingof Americans on the part of peoples servedThe <strong>Peace</strong> Corps has had much greater successhelping promote a better understanding ofAmericans around the world. When the RPCVswere asked how their service impacted attitudes<strong>to</strong>ward Americans in the community they served,more than 90 percent reported positive attitudesafter completing their service compared <strong>to</strong> 78percent when they arrived (figure 8). After 9/11,deliberate efforts were undertaken <strong>to</strong> deploy <strong>Peace</strong>Corps Volunteers <strong>to</strong> countries with significantMuslim populations <strong>to</strong> help promote cross-culturalunderstanding. The survey results attest that RPCVsfelt their greatest impact in the field has been asagents of soft diplomacy for the U.S. rather thantechnical assistance.8 The <strong>Peace</strong> Corps. (2010). The <strong>Peace</strong> Corps: A Comprehensive Agency Assessment.A CALL TO PEACE SEPTEMBER 201115|