emove anyone’s wine glass—althoughin some cases, a special glass is providedfor the purpose. If no glass is speciallyprovided, toast-wise people usuallyleave a little wine in their glass,but to make sure, chairmen sometimessay, before any toasts are proposed:“Ladies and gentlemen, please be sureyour glasses are charged.” (I said thatonce and someone remarked, “Ithought my wine was paid for.”)If you ask to charge glasses, it ishelpful to have waiters ready to pouran inch of wine into any glass that hasbeen drained. Try not to force them todrink water—which is barbaric.2) If Loyal Toasts are to be done,always begin with the head of state ofthe country you are in. In all cases, theLoyal Toasts must come immediatelyafter the wait staff has left.3) It is the height of vulgarity toannounce, “John Smith will now proposethe toast to the President.” Theessence of a good toast is spontaneity.If he must introduce the toaster, thechairman just says, “Ladies and gentlemen,Mr. John Smith.” John Smith(usually from his seat) rises and asksthe multitude to “please rise” or “pleasebe upstanding.” Only after they are ontheir feet does he offer his toast, beingas brief as possible:“The President” (“of the UnitedStates” is optional).“The Queen” (“Her Majesty” isusually considered too much).“The Memory of Sir <strong>Winston</strong><strong>Churchill</strong>.”4) If there is more than one toastthe crowd should be made to sit beforethe next toaster is introduced.5) On occasions where a bandstrikes up the National Anthem after aLoyal Toast is proposed, the multitudewaits until the Anthem is completebefore drinking the toast.UK VARIATIONSby Paul CourtenayIn the UK coffee is usually servedafter the Loyal Toast. Once the mealitself is finished, the table is completelycleared and port glasses laid (if notalready in place). Then come thetoasts, after which coffee is served,smoking is permitted (definitely notbefore this point) and brandy andliqueurs offered.Toasts should not be prolongedaffairs. After the Loyal Toasts, “TheMemory of Sir <strong>Winston</strong> <strong>Churchill</strong>”may follow immediately. If a speech isto precede <strong>Churchill</strong> toast, this createsa problem over whether to delay permissionto smoke and the serving ofcoffee. If the speech lasts for no morethan two or three minutes, I’d delaythe coffee and cigars; but if the speechwill go fifteen minutes or more, Ithink it would be acceptable to havecoffee and cigars etc before the addressand the <strong>Churchill</strong> toast.Editor’s note: In Britain, coffee is adefinite separate course, whereas in theUSA, dessert and coffee come at youalmost simultaneously. And in theLand of the Free nowadays, to smokeat any point would result in a sputterof coughs and hard looks. So forget it!1971: NEWFIELD NEARLYDISGRACES WSCSU!Finest Hour editor Dalton Newfieldwas a guest at the 1971 Annual Banquetof The Rt. Hon. Sir <strong>Winston</strong> Spencer<strong>Churchill</strong> Society of Edmonton, Alberta,where the speaker was Lt-Gen. Sir IanJacob GBE, CB, DL. From Finest Hour19, May-June 1971: we were then the<strong>Winston</strong> S. <strong>Churchill</strong> Study Unit.Preferring to rent “black tie” inEdmonton to packing it on anextended holiday, Newfield tried onhis rented tuxedo shortly before thebanquet, only to find the trousers weresize 32. No Adonis, Newfield wearssize 34, but 36 feels so good that hebuys size 38. The only solution was tohave the renter deliver a pair of 38s tothe hotel desk. Newfield thus arrivedwearing blue worsted trousers.Fortunately for the reputation ofthe USA and Old Glory, he was ableto slip in unnoticed, though he wasintroduced to several important peoplewho would look him up and downand say, “Oh yes, Mr. Newfield, I’ve,er, heard of you.” That’s once…Having done some homework,Newfield knew that, as a former Lt.Col., he was allowed, when toastingThe Queen, to add the words “GodBless Her,” a privilege accorded ranksabove major.* Thus when The Queenwas proposed he said the proper wordsand lifted his glass toward his lips.Fortunately Allan Cawsey hadbeen stationed next to Dal by theSociety’s Executive, probably for thisvery purpose, and applied gentle pressure,about two tons psi, to Dal’s arm,thus preventing complete dissolutionof Canadian-American amity, whilethe band played “O Canada” and“God Save The Queen.” Only thenwas Al’s hand withdrawn and Daljoined the nearly 500 others present inthe liquid toast. That’s twice…One of the fine traditions of theSociety is that, at the end of theirannual banquet, they toast “TheHeroic Memory” (of WSC). Before SirIan’s speech, the wine stewards providedglasses of brandy. As the speechprogressed, the level of the brandy inNewfield’s glass got lower and loweruntil, toward the end of the speech, itwas empty. In the meanwhile, Cawsey’sglass remained untouched. (Dalthought Al didn’t like brandy.)Sir Ian finished, Al poured halfhis brandy into Dal’s glass, and therewas the call to the toast. Except forCawsey’s solicitude, Newfield wouldhave had nothing in his glass withwhich to toast “The Heroic Memory”and would probably have cut histhroat. That’s enough!*I have never heard of “God Bless Her”being the prerogative of Lt. Cols., but in theArmy every regiment has a different formula.In my own regiment, for example, we alwaysdrank sitting down, due to our 18th centuryorigins on board ship, where it was impossibleto stand. There are even one or two regimentswhich have permission not to give theLoyal Toast because “I know that your loyaltyis above question.” —PHC ,FINEST HOUR <strong>130</strong> / 44
F R O M T H E C A N O NThe United States of EuropeBY WINSTON S. CHURCHILL, 1938 • PART 2“WE ARE BOUND to further every honest and practical stepwhich the nations of Europe may make to reduce the barrierswhich divide them and to nourish their common interests andtheir common welfare. We rejoice at every diminution of theinternal tariffs and the martial armaments of Europe. We seenothing but good and hope in a richer, freer, more contentedEuropean commonalty.”The reflections of Europeannations upon the need ofunity must be stimulated bythe financial relations ofEurope to the United States. Underthe arrangements which have nowbeen agreed to by all parties, practicallythe whole of the reparationspaid by Germany to the countries shehas injured will flow by one channelor another to the least harmed andmost prosperous member of the victorcombination against her.For sixty years to come* animmense flow of wealth must rolloutward from Europe across theAtlantic. It cannot go in the form ofmerchandise, for the United Statestariffs, rising ever higher, bar the paymentof a debit in such a form. It isthe declared economic policy of theUnited States to aim at an excess ofexports. Therefore, on the one hand,the United States is entitled to theseimmense prolonged payments and,on the other, will not receive them inany form which can be conveyedacross the ocean. From this there hasfollowed and, whatever temporarychecks may intervene, there mustcontinue to follow, a process of reinvestmentof American capital inEurope. This process is cumulativefrom year to year; consciouslythrough the excess of Americanexports, almost unconsciously, perhaps,by the subtle and surprisingmanifestations of profits and compoundinterest.Sir Josiah Stamp—perhaps themost eminent of practical economists—made calculations whichshow that before the reparations anddebt payments to the United Statesare completed, Washington andAmerican investors together ownperhaps two-thirds of the entire presentincome of Germany.Such conclusions transcend thelimits of imagination. Inch by inch,with mathematical certainty, theyapproach a conclusion of monstrousEditor’s note: We publish this long, reflective article not as a prescription for modern timesbut to shed light on <strong>Churchill</strong>’s thinking when he wrote it, and on those concepts of his thatmay be worthy of reflection. His article was published in The Saturday Evening Post and inThe News of the World on 9 May 1938, under the heading “Why Not ‘The United States ofEurope’?” An abridged version, “A Great Big Idea,” appeared in John Bull on the same day.Reprinted by permission of <strong>Winston</strong> S. <strong>Churchill</strong>.*Delivering the Fifth <strong>Churchill</strong> Lecture in Washington on October 18th, Sir Martin Gilbertannounced that at midnight on 31 December 2005, all British war debts to the United Stateswill have been paid.absurdity. The most hopeful comment—andthere is solid reassurancein it— is the German saying: “Thetrees do not grow up to the sky.”To write thus is not to blamethe policy of the United States; stillless to impugn their lawful and contractualrights. American statesmenmay with blunt justice and unanswerablelogic point out that Europehas no grievance against the UnitedStates. The ancestors of the men andwomen who inhabit the Americancontinent took little with them whenthey quitted Europe. They leftbehind and surrendered an immenseaccumulated inheritance. All thatthey have, they and their descendantshave made for themselves by toil andscience, and the resolute exploitationof those natural resources they hadthe courage to go out and find. If theNew World has grown rich, it is notat the expense of the Old.The Government and people ofthe United States were in no wayresponsible for Armageddon. They didnot create or foment the hatreds andquarrels which led to that supremecatastrophe. They were drawn into thewar against their will, against their tradition,because they were jostled andknocked about by the combatants andforced to take a side and take a part.The movement of soldiers, of warships,supplies, and of treasure, wassolely eastward. The traffic was “oneway only”—from the United States toEurope. And this ought never to beforgotten by Europe, and will never beforgotten by the rest of the Englishspeakingworld.Nevertheless, American statesmenand leaders of public opinion inevery part of the United Statesshould ponder carefully, and as realists,upon the chains of causationwhich have now been forged. ForFINEST HOUR <strong>130</strong> / 45