Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery ... - RM Solutions

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mid-term Mortality• Meta-analysis six randomized, controlled trials of 1135patients.Outcome n (N) OPCAB CABG OR(95% CI)pValueDeath, 1–2years1135 (6) 2.3% 2.6% 0.88(0.41–1.88)Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JA, Novick RJ: Does off-pump coronary arterybypass reduce mortality, morbidity and resource utilization when compared toconventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.Anesthesiology 20050.8
Perioperative MorbidityOutcome n (N) OPCAB CABG OR(95% CI)pValueAFPERIOPERATIVE MORBIDITYTransfusion2425 (17) 17.6 26.8 0.58
Page 4 and 5: What percentage of surgical revascu
Page 6 and 7: Core CABG procedures are declining
Page 8 and 9: The “Pump Head Paper”• Newman
Page 11 and 12: OPCAB becomes Surgeons’ secret we
Page 13 and 14: • Reduced perioperative morbidity
Page 15 and 16: Early Mortality• Retrospective an
Page 17 and 18: Early Mortality• Randomized trial
Page 19: Mid-term Mortality• Single center
Page 23 and 24: Early Cognitive Dysfunction• Rand
Page 25 and 26: Renal Failure• No differences in
Page 27 and 28: Completeness of Revascularization -
Page 29 and 30: Completeness of Revascularization -
Page 31 and 32: ROOBY Trial• Primary short term e
Page 33 and 34: ROOBY Trial• Graft Patency:• 64
Page 35 and 36: Discussions• Prospective, randomi
Page 37: Disclosures• I am OPCAB surgeon

Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery ... - RM Solutions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?