Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery ... - RM Solutions

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Renal Failure• One center, cohort of 350 patients, STS risk scoreCABG OPCABLow risk 4% 3% P=0.49Medium risk 10% 10% P=0.79High risk 21% 3% P=0.006Safety and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Arom KV, Flavin TF, Emery RW, et al. Ann Thorac Surg2000;69:704-710.
Renal Failure• No differences in randomized trial or in metaanalysis
Page 4 and 5: What percentage of surgical revascu
Page 6 and 7: Core CABG procedures are declining
Page 8 and 9: The “Pump Head Paper”• Newman
Page 11 and 12: OPCAB becomes Surgeons’ secret we
Page 13 and 14: • Reduced perioperative morbidity
Page 15 and 16: Early Mortality• Retrospective an
Page 17 and 18: Early Mortality• Randomized trial
Page 19 and 20: Mid-term Mortality• Single center
Page 21 and 22: Perioperative MorbidityOutcome n (N
Page 23: Early Cognitive Dysfunction• Rand
Page 27 and 28: Completeness of Revascularization -
Page 29 and 30: Completeness of Revascularization -
Page 31 and 32: ROOBY Trial• Primary short term e
Page 33 and 34: ROOBY Trial• Graft Patency:• 64
Page 35 and 36: Discussions• Prospective, randomi
Page 37: Disclosures• I am OPCAB surgeon

Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery ... - RM Solutions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?