Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery ... - RM Solutions

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ROOBY TrialMajor Secondary End Points:• Completeness of Revascularization• The number of bypasses planned was the same in the twogroups (3.0±0.9)• 2.9±0.9 vs 3.0±1.0, (P=0.002)• The proportion of patients with fewer grafts than originallyplanned was higher in the off-pump group than in the on-pumpgroup (17.8% vs. 11.1%, P
ROOBY Trial• Graft Patency:• 64.5% had follow-up angiograms• 4093 grafts were analyzed• Rate of graft patency was significantly lower in the off-pumpgroup than in the on-pump group (82.6% vs. 87.8%, P
Page 4 and 5: What percentage of surgical revascu
Page 6 and 7: Core CABG procedures are declining
Page 8 and 9: The “Pump Head Paper”• Newman
Page 11 and 12: OPCAB becomes Surgeons’ secret we
Page 13 and 14: • Reduced perioperative morbidity
Page 15 and 16: Early Mortality• Retrospective an
Page 17 and 18: Early Mortality• Randomized trial
Page 19 and 20: Mid-term Mortality• Single center
Page 21 and 22: Perioperative MorbidityOutcome n (N
Page 23 and 24: Early Cognitive Dysfunction• Rand
Page 25 and 26: Renal Failure• No differences in
Page 27 and 28: Completeness of Revascularization -
Page 29 and 30: Completeness of Revascularization -
Page 31: ROOBY Trial• Primary short term e
Page 35 and 36: Discussions• Prospective, randomi
Page 37: Disclosures• I am OPCAB surgeon

Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery ... - RM Solutions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?