30.11.2012 Views

20110720_S3-LL Polytrauma DGU_final_eng_cleaned_mc_korrigiert

20110720_S3-LL Polytrauma DGU_final_eng_cleaned_mc_korrigiert

20110720_S3-LL Polytrauma DGU_final_eng_cleaned_mc_korrigiert

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>S3</strong> Guideline on Treatment of Patients with Severe and Multiple Injuries<br />

1.2 Airway management, ventilation and emergency anesthesia<br />

Summary<br />

Endotracheal intubation and ventilation, and hence definitive securing of the airways, with the<br />

aim of the best possible oxygenation and ventilation of the patient, is a central therapeutic<br />

measure in emergency medicine [80]. The basic vital functions directly linked to survival have to<br />

be secured. The “A” for airway and “B” for breathing are First Aid measures found in<br />

established standards on trauma care and therefore have a particular value in terms of weighting<br />

in both the prehospital and the early hospital management [3, 74, 107].<br />

Variations in the emergency medical services (EMS) internationally pose a problem. Whereas<br />

paramedics are often used in the Anglo-American region, the emergency physician system is<br />

widely used in continental Europe. But even here there are differences. In Germany, (specialist)<br />

physicians in all disciplines can be involved in the emergency service after acquiring an<br />

appropriate additional qualification but in Scandinavian countries this is mainly the prerogative<br />

of anesthesiologists [9]. Consequently, the evaluation of international studies on the topic of<br />

securing the airway in the prehospital phase reveals that emergency services personnel have<br />

different levels of training. Depending on the personnel employed and how commonly they<br />

perform intubation, a high rate of esophageal intubations is found in up to 12% of cases in the<br />

literature [20]. In addition, there is a high rate of failed intubations (up to 15%) [99]. In<br />

paramedic systems, non-guideline-compliant airway management is more common [39]. Due to<br />

the different clinical routine of the users, negative outcomes in particular cannot be transferred<br />

directly from paramedic systems to the German emergency services and emergency physician<br />

system [60, 89]. In the Federal Republic of Germany, the agreed minimum qualification of<br />

“Additional qualification in emergency medicine” and the introduction of emergency anesthesia<br />

in the emergency physician system offers a different scenario compared to the Anglo-American<br />

paramedic system.<br />

The following features of the prehospital setting can and must influence the establishing of<br />

indications and planning of anesthesia, intubation and ventilation:<br />

� level of experience and routine training of emergency physician<br />

� circumstances of the medical emergency (e.g., patient is trapped, rescue time)<br />

� type of transport (land-based versus air support)<br />

� transport time<br />

� concomitant injuries around the airway and anything (assessable) that impedes intubation<br />

Depending on the individual case, the indication to carry out or not to carry out prehospital<br />

anesthesia, intubation/airway management and ventilation ranges between the extremes of<br />

“advanced training level, long transport time, simple airway” and “little experience, short<br />

transport time, predicted difficult airway management”. In any event, sufficient oxygenation<br />

must be secured by appropriate measures.<br />

Prehospital – Airway management, ventilation and emergency anesthesia 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!