ARRA's experience in the identification of top research teams:

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Social Sciences in the world,region and Slovakia2001-2010 World The most citedArticle100th most citedArticleEconomics 883 239Social Sciences 620 214Psychology/Psychiatry 2037 399Matematics 2280 144Technical Sciences 1822 2881994 SVK CZE HUN2011 Art Cit top1top10Art Cit top1top10Art Cit top1Econ 1264 770 22 9 2927 2665 123 30 1033 2682 230 45Psy 836 1608 41 23 1686 5941 383 72 1447 12442 466 132top10
HumanitiesChanges to evaluation methodology Due to the different publication patterns, it was impossible toapply all the assessment methods/criteria used for Sections 1and 2 Moreover, no benchmarks were available Bibliometric analyses were possible only to some extent; andthe four main categories of evaluation (similar to those usedfor Section 1 and 2) were applied:• Quantity: the number and the „quality‟ (categories: books,articles, conf.papers, etc.) of publications, including articles andbooks outside international databases• Global influence: number of citations for these publications• Effectiveness: an average number of citations per publication• Relative impact: publications cited more than 10/20/50/100times (rough equivalent of papers in 20/10/1/0.1/.01 percentile)
Page 1 and 2: IREG-5 ForumThe National Rankings o
Page 3 and 4: Main Goals of the ProjectSAS asked
Page 5 and 6: Teams’ identification Primary lis
Page 7 and 8: First “filter” In Sections 1 an
Page 9 and 10: AnorChem-TeoChem Art Cit Cit/Art H-
Page 11 and 12: Summary 1 22 top teams were identif
Page 13: Section 3 (SSH)The majority are ind
Page 19 and 20: Comparison of total data in a 10-ye
Page 21 and 22: Summary 2 (chart)from 1900 assessed

ARRA's experience in the identification of top research teams:

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?