ARRA's experience in the identification of top research teams:

HumanitiesChanges to evaluation methodology Due to the different publication patterns, it was impossible toapply all the assessment methods/criteria used for Sections 1and 2 Moreover, no benchmarks were available Bibliometric analyses were possible only to some extent; andthe four main categories of evaluation (similar to those usedfor Section 1 and 2) were applied:• Quantity: the number and the „quality‟ (categories: books,articles, conf.papers, etc.) of publications, including articles andbooks outside international databases• Global influence: number of citations for these publications• Effectiveness: an average number of citations per publication• Relative impact: publications cited more than 10/20/50/100times (rough equivalent of papers in 20/10/1/0.1/.01 percentile)