Testing More, Teaching Less - American Federation of Teachers

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ReferencesBruno, Robert, Steven Ashby and Frank Manzo (2012).Beyond the Classroom: An Analysis of a ChicagoPublic School Teacher’s Actual Workday. School ofLabor and Employment Relations, University ofIllinois at Urbana-Champaign.Carlson D., G.D. Borman and M. Robinson (2011). “AMulti-State District-Level Cluster Randomized Trialof the Impact of Data-Driven Reform on Readingand Mathematics Achievement.” EducationalEvaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 378–398.Chingos, Matthew (2012). Strength in Numbers: StateSpending on K-12 Assessment Systems. WashingtonDC: Brookings Institution.Cornman, Stephen, Jumaane Young and KennethC. Herrell (2013). Revenues and Expenditures forPublic Elementary and Secondary Education:School Year 2010-11 (Fiscal Year 2011). NationalCenter for Education Statistics.Faria, Ann-Marie, Jessica Heppen, Yibing Li, SuzanneStachel, Wehmah Jones, Katherine Sawyer, KerriThomsen, Melissa Kutner, David Miser, SharonLewis, Michael Casserly, Candace Simon, RenataUzzell, Amanda Corcoran, and Moses Palacios(2012). Charting Success: Data Use and StudentAchievement in Urban Schools. Washington DC:Council of the Great City Schools.Fryer, Roland (2012). Learning from the Successesand Failures of Charter Schools. Washington DC:Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution.Furgeson, Joshua, Brian Gill, Joshua Haimson,Alexandra Killewald, Moira McCullough, IraNichols-Barrer, Bing-ru Teh, Natalya VerbitskySavitz, Melissa Bowen, Allison Demeritt, Paul Hilland Robin Lake. Charter-School ManagementOrganizations: Diverse Strategies and DiverseStudent Impacts. Cambridge, MA: MathematicaPolicy Research, January 2012.The Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessmentin Education (2013). A Public Policy Statement.Washington DC: Educational Testing Service.Hanushek, E. A., and M. E. Raymond. 2005. “Doesschool accountability lead to improved studentperformance?” Journal of Policy Analysis andManagement 24: 297-327.Henderson, S., A. Petrosino, S. Guckenburg andS. Hamilton (2007). Measuring how benchmarkassessments affect student achievement (Issues &Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 039). Washington,DC: U.S. Department of Education Instituteof Education Sciences, National Center forEducation Evaluation and Regional Assistance,Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast andIslands.Heppen, Jessica, Wehmah Jones, Ann-Marie Faria,Katherine Sawyer, Sharon Lewis, AmandaHorwitz, Candace Simon, Renata Uzzelland Michael Casserly (2011). Using Data toImprove Instruction in the Great City Schools:Documenting Current Practice. AmericanInstitutes for Research and Council of the GreatCity Schools.Hussar, W., and T. Bailey (2011). Projections ofEducation Statistics to 2020 (NCES 2011-026).U.S. Department of Education, National Centerfor Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S.Government Printing Office.Jones, G., B. Jones, B. Hardin, L. Chapman, T.Yarbrough and M. Davis (1999). “The Impacts ofHigh-Stakes Testing on Teachers and Students inNorth Carolina.” Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3).Lucadamo, Kathleen (2005). “Test Prep SapsTeaching Time.” New York Daily News.Marshall , Kim (2006). Interim Assessments: Keyto Successful Implementation. New York: NewLeaders for New Schools.May, H., and M.A. Robinson (2007) A randomizedevaluation of Ohio’s Personalized AssessmentReporting System (PARS). Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Consortium for PolicyResearch in Education.Testing More, Teaching Less 27
Northwest Evaluation Association (2006). MAP TestPreparation Checklist.Northwest Evaluation Association (2012). TestingSeason Checklist. www.nwea.org/sites/www.nwea.org/files/resources/Testing_Season%20_Checklist.pdf.Nunnery, J. A., S.M. Ross and A. McDonald (2006).A randomized experimental evaluation ofthe impact of Accelerated Reader/ReadingRenaissance Implementation on readingachievement in grades 3 to 6. Journal of Educationfor Students Placed At Risk, Vol. 1, No. 1.Pedulla, J., L. Abrams, G. Madaus, M. Russell, M.Ramos and J. Mia (2003). Perceived Effects ofStandardized Testing Programs on Teaching andLearning: Findings from a National Survey ofTeachers. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Studyof Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy,Boston College.Pennsylvania Department of Education (2011).2011-2012 PSSA/PSSA-M Assessment Handbook.Pennsylvania Department of Education, Bureauof Assessment and Accountability, Division ofAssessment.Quint, J., S. Sepanik and J. Smith and MDRC (2008)Using student data to improve teaching andlearning: findings from an evaluation of theFormative Assessments of Students Thinking inReading (FAST-R) Program in Boston elementaryschools. Retrieved from ERIC database(ED503919).Ross, S. M., J. Nunnery and E. Goldfeder. (2004).A Randomized Experiment on the Effects ofAccelerated Reader/Reading Renaissance in anUrban School District. Memphis, TN: Center forResearch in Educational Policy, University ofMemphis.Roza, Marguerite and Karen Hawley Miles (2008).Taking Stock of the Fiscal Costs of ExpandedLearning Time. Washington, DC: Center forAmerican Progress.Silva, E. (2007). On the Clock: Rethinking the WaySchools Use Time. Washington, DC: EducationSector.Slavin, Robert, Alan Cheung, GwenCarol Holmes,Nancy Madden and Anne Chamberlain (2013).“Effects of a Data-Driven District Reform Modelon State Assessment Outcomes,” AmericanEducational Research Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2.Tepper Jacob, Robin and Susan Stone (2005).“Teachers and Students Speak,” Education Next,Vol. 5, No. 1.Texas Federation of Teachers (2005). TexasFederation of Teachers Survey on the Impacts ofTAKS.Topol, Barry, John Olson, Ed Roeber and Pat Hennon(2012). Getting to Higher-Quality Assessments:Evaluating Costs, Benefits, and InvestmentStrategies. Assessment Solutions Group.Yeh, S. ( 2008). The Cost-Effectiveness ofComprehensive School Reform and RapidAssessment. Education Policy Analysis Archives(13), http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v16n13/.——— (2010). The Cost-Effectiveness of 22Approaches for Raising Student Achievement.Journal of Education Finance, Vol. 36, No. 1.Ysseldyke, J. and D.M. Bolt, D. M. (2007). Effect ofTechnology-Enhanced Continuous ProgressMonitoring on Math Achievement. SchoolPsychology Review, 36(3), 453–467.Ysseldyke, J. and S. Tardrew. (2007). Use of aProgress-Monitoring System to Enable TeacherstoDifferentiate Math Instruction. Journal ofApplied School Psychology, 24(1), 1–28.Zellner, Michael, Anthony Frontier and DenisePheifer (2006). “What Are NCLB’s InstructionalCosts?” Educational Leadership, Vol. 44, No. 3.28 American Federation of Teachers
Page 1 and 2: Testing More,Teaching LessWhat Amer
Page 3 and 4: Randi WeingartenpresidentLorretta J
Page 5 and 6: ation. Instead, public policy and p
Page 8 and 9: Executive SummaryOBJECTIVESStudents
Page 10 and 11: associated interim/benchmarking tes
Page 12 and 13: The Testing LandscapeState-mandated
Page 14 and 15: Table 1BAssessment Inventory, Midwe
Page 16 and 17: Midwestern Public SchoolsTesting Ca
Page 18 and 19: added teacher assessment, class siz
Page 20 and 21: approximately four hours to student
Page 22 and 23: $20,000 per pupil in the highest-sp
Page 24 and 25: Instructional Time Lostto Test Prep
Page 26 and 27: proximately three hours per week. T
Page 28 and 29: Time Initiative estimated that incr
Page 32 and 33: APPENDIXResearch on Time Used for T
Page 34 and 35: Appendix Table ADirect Cost of Asse
Page 36 and 37: Appendix Table CEstimated Hours of

Testing More, Teaching Less - American Federation of Teachers

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?