12.07.2015 Views

Joints and Veins - Global Change

Joints and Veins - Global Change

Joints and Veins - Global Change

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2917-CH07.pdf 11/20/03 5:10 PM Page 149DolomiteS<strong>and</strong>stoneDolomiteFIGURE 7.11 Cross-sectional sketch illustrating amultilayer that is composed of rocks with different values ofYoung’s modulus. The stiffer layers (dolomite) develop moreclosely spaced joints.cumstances, a rock with a smaller E may actuallyhave a lower tensile strength than a rock with alarger E. Thus, it will crack at a lower strain than arock with a larger E, if the rock with the larger Ealso has a larger tensile strength. Other factorsbeing equal, rocks with smaller tensile strengthdevelop more closely spaced joints.Relation between joint spacing <strong>and</strong> the magnitudeof strain. A bed that has been stretched more containsmore joints than a bed that has been stretchedless, as you might expect.Overall, the spacing of well-developed joints isabout equal to the bed thickness. If you ever have thechance to hike down the Gr<strong>and</strong> Canyon, don’t forget tolook at the jointing in different units as you descend.Bedding planes tend to be weak <strong>and</strong> do not transmitshear stress efficiently, so joints typically terminate atbedding planes. Because joint spacing depends on bedthickness <strong>and</strong> lithology, joint spacing varies from bedto bed. Weak, thinly bedded shales contain suchclosely spaced joints that they break into tiny fragments,<strong>and</strong>, as a consequence, they tend to form slopes.In contrast, thick s<strong>and</strong>stone beds develop only widelyspaced fractures, so thick s<strong>and</strong>stone beds typically protrude<strong>and</strong> hold up high cliffs.7.4 JOINT STUDIESIN THE FIELDBefore discussing how to go about studying joints inthe field, it’s worth discussing why you might want tostudy joints in the field. Perhaps the most common reasonsto study joints are for engineering or hydrologicapplications. As we noted before, fractures affect thestrength of foundations, quarrying operations, excavations,groundwater <strong>and</strong> (toxic) waste flow, <strong>and</strong> slopestability. For example, if you find that a region containsa systematic joint set that is oriented north–south,you can expect groundwater to flow faster in thenorth–south direction than in the east–west direction,or that quarrying might be easier if the quarry wallsstrike north–south than if they strike east–west. But thestudy of jointing has applications to more academicgeologic issues as well. Geologists who are interestedin tectonics study joints to see if they provide informationabout (paleo)stress fields, <strong>and</strong> geomorphologistsstudy joints to find out if they control the drainage patternsor the orientation of escarpments. With thesegoals in mind, what specifically do we look for in ajoint study? In most cases the questions that we askinclude the following:1. Is jointing in the outcrop systematic or nonsystematic?In other words, can we define distinctsets of planar joints <strong>and</strong>/or regularly orientedcross joints in an outcrop, or does the outcropcontain irregular <strong>and</strong> r<strong>and</strong>omly oriented jointswith relatively short traces (i.e., nonsystematicjoints)? If nonsystematic jointing is present, is itlocalized or pervasive? Formulating hypotheseson joint formation in a region needs to take intoaccount whether the joints are systematic or not.Systematic joints likely reflect regional tectonicstress trajectories at the time of fracturing,whereas nonsystematic joints reflect local heterogeneitiesof the stress field. While nonsystematicjoints may be important for determiningrock strength <strong>and</strong> permeability, they provide noinformation on regional paleostress orientation.2. What are the orientations of joint sets, if present?If there is more than one set, is there a consistentangular relationship between them, such that wecan describe a joint system? Information on theorientation <strong>and</strong> distribution of joint sets <strong>and</strong> systemsis critical for engineering <strong>and</strong> hydrologicanalyses. For example, joint sets that run parallel toa proposed road cut would create a greater rockfallhazard than joints that are perpendicular to the cut.3. What is the nature of cross-cutting relationshipsbetween joints of different sets, <strong>and</strong> what is thegeometry of joint intersections? Do joints crosswithout appearing to interact, do they curve tocreate J intersections, or do they curve into parallelismwith one another? Knowledge of crosscuttingrelations allows us to determine whetherone set of joints is older or younger than anotherset of joints, a determination that is critical totectonic interpretations using joints.7.4 JOINT STUDIES IN THE FIELD149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!