12.07.2015 Views

The Distribution of Income in Ireland (2000) - Combat Poverty Agency

The Distribution of Income in Ireland (2000) - Combat Poverty Agency

The Distribution of Income in Ireland (2000) - Combat Poverty Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

94 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Distribution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Income</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ireland</strong>composition <strong>of</strong> the G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient has no implicit referencedistribution and therefore should not be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as a measure<strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>come source on <strong>in</strong>equality, and that decompositionsbased on the G<strong>in</strong>i coefficient are not suitable toanalys<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>equality over time. <strong>The</strong>y analyse suchchanges us<strong>in</strong>g the coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation, develop<strong>in</strong>g several"thought experiments". Here this approach is applied to thecontribution <strong>of</strong> wives' earn<strong>in</strong>gs to household <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong>equalitybetween 1987 and 1994.<strong>The</strong> first experiment was to compare the observed <strong>in</strong>equality<strong>in</strong> household <strong>in</strong>comes <strong>in</strong> 1987 to the <strong>in</strong>equality that wouldhave been seen if the distribution <strong>of</strong> wives' earn<strong>in</strong>gs hadchanged to the 1994 pattern, but all other <strong>in</strong>come componentshad stayed fixed at their 1987 levels. <strong>The</strong> second experimentwas to compare the actual distribution <strong>in</strong> 1994 with what thelevel <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>equality would have been if wives' earn<strong>in</strong>gs hadstayed at their 1987 levels. <strong>The</strong> results us<strong>in</strong>g these two alternativecounterfactuals may differ because the base year valuesdiffer between the two — a common problem <strong>in</strong> other areas, forexample us<strong>in</strong>g base-year versus end-year weights <strong>in</strong> construct<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dex numbers. As <strong>in</strong> those contexts, here we deriveboth sets <strong>of</strong> results and see if they show the same broad pattern.<strong>The</strong> results for both decompositions are given <strong>in</strong> TableAl.l.Appendix 1on the distribution <strong>of</strong> household <strong>in</strong>come. <strong>The</strong> reduction <strong>in</strong> dispersion<strong>in</strong> earn<strong>in</strong>gs across all married women (reflect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gnumbers employed), as well as a reduction <strong>in</strong> the correlationbetween wives' earn<strong>in</strong>gs and non-labour <strong>in</strong>come, wereequalis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> the household <strong>in</strong>come distribution. <strong>The</strong>sewere large enough to outweigh the effect <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>creased correlationbetween the earn<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> spouses, which <strong>in</strong> itself wouldhave worked <strong>in</strong> the opposite direction.95Table Al.l: Decomposition <strong>of</strong> Changes <strong>in</strong> the Coefficient <strong>of</strong>Variation for Gross Household <strong>Income</strong>, 1987-1994Observed 19871987 with women's earn<strong>in</strong>gs at 1994 levels1994 with women's earn<strong>in</strong>gs at 1987 levelsObserved 1994Coefficient <strong>of</strong> Variation0.6780.671/0.663*0.656/0.662*0.644» * * » »*»« «*«*•• * ** conelationsZ^lnT^!!^! between <strong>in</strong>come sources11 Ae-<strong>The</strong>se results suggest that, despite the fact that the correlation<strong>in</strong> spouses earn<strong>in</strong>gs has <strong>in</strong>creased substantially over this period,the evolution <strong>of</strong> wives' earn<strong>in</strong>gs had an equalis<strong>in</strong>g effect

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!