12.07.2015 Views

The Distribution of Income in Ireland (2000) - Combat Poverty Agency

The Distribution of Income in Ireland (2000) - Combat Poverty Agency

The Distribution of Income in Ireland (2000) - Combat Poverty Agency

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Distribution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Income</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ireland</strong>1997. Turn<strong>in</strong>g to the distribution <strong>of</strong> gross <strong>in</strong>come, there is onceaga<strong>in</strong> some decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> share for the bottom 30 per cent from1997 to 1998, as there had been from 1994 to 1997.Table 3.12: Decile Shares for Direct and Gross <strong>Income</strong>among Households, 1994,1997 and 1998 LII SurreyDecileBottom23456789TopAllGmi<strong>The</strong>il19940.00.00.32.86.09.012.115.420.434.0100.00.S650.587Direct19970.00.01.13.86.69.512.015.119.232.8100.00.5360.529Share <strong>in</strong> Total <strong>Income</strong> (%)19980.00.01.54.27.09.512.015.219.331.4100.079941.92.73.95.16.88.811.013.717.528.7100.0Inequality Measure0.5200.4950.4220.295Gross19971.72.63.95.37.39.111.113.617.228.3100.00.4170.29119981.62.53.75.27.59.211.313.717.627.7100.00.4180.291F<strong>in</strong>ally, Table 3.13 shows the distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come amonghouseholds after adjust<strong>in</strong>g for differences <strong>in</strong> size and compositionus<strong>in</strong>g the 1/0.66/0.33 equivalence scale. We now see theshare <strong>of</strong> the bottom 30 per cent <strong>of</strong> households down by 0.7 percent <strong>of</strong> total <strong>in</strong>come between 1997 and 1998. This br<strong>in</strong>gs thecumulative fall <strong>in</strong> the share <strong>of</strong> the bottom 30 per cent up to 1.4per cent <strong>of</strong> total <strong>in</strong>come over the 1994-98 period. A decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gshare for the top decile from 1994 to 1997 had <strong>of</strong>fset this decl<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> overall <strong>in</strong>equality as reflected <strong>in</strong> the summarymeasures. From 1997 to 1998, however, the share <strong>of</strong> the topdecile rose and so did the summary <strong>in</strong>equality measures<strong>The</strong> <strong>Distribution</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Income</strong> <strong>in</strong> the 1990s 33Table 3.13: Decile Shares <strong>in</strong> Equivalised Disposable<strong>Income</strong> for Irish Households, 1994,1997 and 1998 LIISurveys (1/0.66/0.33 Scale)DecileBottom23456789TopAllG<strong>in</strong>i<strong>The</strong>ilShare <strong>in</strong> Total Equivalised (1/0.66/0.33) Disposable<strong>Income</strong> (%)1994 Ul1997LII1998 LII3.94.85.46.17.18.710.512.715.925.0100.00.3260.1843.64.65.26.17.59.010.713.015.924.6100.0Inequality Measure0.3290.1853.44.35.06.27.69.110.612.815.825.2100.00.3380.1953.7 CONCLUSIONSThis chapter has looked at the distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come amongIrish households and persons <strong>in</strong> the 1990s, us<strong>in</strong>g data fromhousehold surveys carried out by the ESRI <strong>in</strong> 1994 and 1997 andsome <strong>in</strong>itial results from 1998.Focus<strong>in</strong>g on the period from 1994 to 1997, summary measuressuggested little change <strong>in</strong> the overall level <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>equality <strong>in</strong>the distribution <strong>of</strong> disposable <strong>in</strong>come among Irish householdsover this period. <strong>The</strong>re was however a shift away from the bottom30 per cent and the top decile to the middle <strong>of</strong> the distribution.<strong>The</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come directly from the market was ifanyth<strong>in</strong>g more equally distributed among households <strong>in</strong> 1997than 1994, but the equalis<strong>in</strong>g effects <strong>of</strong> social welfare transfersdecl<strong>in</strong>ed." !

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!