12.07.2015 Views

2007 Winter Meeting - London - The Pathological Society of Great ...

2007 Winter Meeting - London - The Pathological Society of Great ...

2007 Winter Meeting - London - The Pathological Society of Great ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P25An Interesting Case <strong>of</strong> Indigestion{P} R Arora, P PichmanWest Herts Hospital NHS Trust, Northwood, <strong>London</strong>, United KingdomPancreatic heterotopia or aberrant pancreatic tissue in not an uncommoncondition in the antrun and pyloric canal. Most <strong>of</strong> these are howeverunsymptomatic. Some which become symptomatic require surgicalresection.<strong>The</strong>y can mimic other upper gastrointestinal pathologiesendoscopically and histopathologically.We present an interesting case <strong>of</strong> distal gastrectomy performed forsymptoms <strong>of</strong> indigestion and pyloric obstruction in a 70 year old male.Macroscopically there was a 12mm firm area at the antrum which on histologyshowed islands <strong>of</strong> varying sizes <strong>of</strong> glandular structures within the muscularispropira which were interspersed with smooth muscle and fibrous tissue.Occasional foci <strong>of</strong> heterotopic pancreatic tissue including acinar cells andneuroendoocrine islet-like cells were seen. <strong>The</strong>se apprearences are <strong>of</strong>adenomyoma or myoepithelial hamartoma which is thought to be a congenitalabnormality due to separation <strong>of</strong> fragments <strong>of</strong> pancreatic tissue from the mainmass <strong>of</strong> the pancreas during rotation <strong>of</strong> the forgut.P26Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Genomic Instability in Sporadic ColorectalCancers: Array-Comparative Genomic HybridisationOutperforms Flow Cytometric Analysis{P} G Poulogiannis 1 ,KIchimura 1 , NG Miller 1 , IM Frayling 2 ,RG Morris 3 , DJ Harrison 3 , VP Collins 1 , A Ibrahim 1 , AH Wyllie 1 ,MJ Arends 11 University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, Pathology Department, Cambridge, UnitedKingdom, 2 University Hospital <strong>of</strong> Wales, Institute <strong>of</strong> Medical Genetics,Cardiff, United Kingdom, 3 University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, PathologyDepartment, Edinburgh, United KingdomColorectal cancers (CRCs) show at least two patterns <strong>of</strong> genomic instability:chromosomal instability resulting in aneuploidy, and microsatellite instability(usually occurring in near-diploid CRCs), with inactivation <strong>of</strong> the DNAmismatch repair (MMR) pathway, and sometimes both patterns or neither. Inthis study, we evaluated chromosomal instability in >100 sporadic CRCs using1Mb array-comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) to assess DNA copynumber alterations <strong>of</strong> the whole genome with arrays <strong>of</strong> 2904 cloned DNAinserts (mean clone size 152kb) spaced on average 0.97 Mb apart. <strong>The</strong>quantitative assessment <strong>of</strong> DNA copy number changes by aCGH identifiedmany genomic abnormalities ranging from copy number variations <strong>of</strong> entirechromosomes and chromosomal arms to small micro-deletions and micro-gains<strong>of</strong> chromosomal subregions. <strong>The</strong> overall DNA content <strong>of</strong> these CRCs was alsoevaluated by the quantitative assessment <strong>of</strong> propidium iodide labelled tumournuclei by flow cytometry (FCM). Comparison <strong>of</strong> FCM DNA histograms withaCGH analyses showed that a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> tumours with a neardiploidDNA content by FCM exhibited >1000 DNA copy number changes byaCGH indicating widespread chromosomal instability. This discrepancy islargely due to tumours displaying approximately equivalent numbers <strong>of</strong> DNAgains and losses resulting in an overall near-diploid DNA content. Most (>85%)MMR defective CRCs showed near-diploidy with few DNA breakpoints byaCGH. Furthermore, we developed a computational method to correlate aCGHdetectedDNA copy number changes in CRCs with published changes in theexpression levels <strong>of</strong> genes localised to the relevant chromosomal regions inorder to identify novel putative oncogenes, such as LIVIN that showed copynumber gains in ~70% <strong>of</strong> CRCs. We conclude that flow cytometric analysis <strong>of</strong>DNA ploidy underestimates chromosomal instability in CRCs, whereas aCGHprovides a more accurate evaluation <strong>of</strong> chromosomal instability and canidentify novel putative cancer-related genes.P27Poster withdrawnP28<strong>The</strong> Predictive Value for Adenocarcinoma <strong>of</strong> HGPIN andAtypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP) in ProstateNeedle BiopsiesL Hatsell, {P} N MayerUniversity Hospitals <strong>of</strong> Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United KingdomBackground and Aims: High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia(HGPIN) is characterised by architecturally benign prostatic glands lined bycytologically atypical cells. Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP), ratherthan being a specific diagnostic entity, is a term used to describe a focus <strong>of</strong>glands which are suspicious for adenocarcinoma but for a variety <strong>of</strong> reasons fallbelow the threshold for a definite cancer diagnosis. In this retrospective audit<strong>of</strong> prostate needle biopsies, we compared our own diagnostic rates <strong>of</strong> HGPINand ASAP and their predictive values for a subsequent diagnosis <strong>of</strong>adenocarcinoma against published standards. Methods: We identified 162biopsies with an initial diagnosis <strong>of</strong> HGPIN and/or ASAP and determined howmany <strong>of</strong> these had adenocarcinoma on re-biopsy. We compared this with acontrol group with a benign first biopsy. Results: In 2004 and 2005, HGPINaccounted for 6.9% and 5.8% <strong>of</strong> all prostate biopsies, respectively. Our‘suspicious rate’ (ASAP and ASAP/HGPIN) was 2.6% in 2004 and 2.3% in2005. <strong>The</strong> predictive value for adenocarcinoma in the HGPIN group was 15%which was similar to the control group <strong>of</strong> 13% (P=0.746). <strong>The</strong> predictive valuefor ASAP was 24% (P=0.286) and combined ASAP/HGPIN 33% (P=0.150).Conclusion: Our diagnostic rates for HGPIN and ASAP are withinrecommended guidelines. <strong>The</strong> predictive value for adenocarcinoma in theisolated HGPIN group is virtually the same as in the control group who had abenign first biopsy. <strong>The</strong> predictive value <strong>of</strong> ASAP and ASAP/HGPIN is higher(although failing to reach statistical significance).<strong>The</strong>se results are in keepingwith recent published series and suggest a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> isolated HGPIN doesnot justify immediate re-biopsy whereas ASAP or combined ASAP/HGPINprobably does.34 <strong>Winter</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> (191 st ) 3–5 January <strong>2007</strong> Scientific Programme

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!