12.07.2015 Views

Report on Bioethics: Advance Care Directives - Law Reform ...

Report on Bioethics: Advance Care Directives - Law Reform ...

Report on Bioethics: Advance Care Directives - Law Reform ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.27 Two of the <strong>Law</strong> Lords also expressed views <strong>on</strong> the potential legalstatus of advance care directives. Lord Keith stated: 29―an adult, who is c<strong>on</strong>scious and of sound mind…is completely atliberty to decline to undergo treatment, even if the result of his doingso is that he will die. This extends to the situati<strong>on</strong> where the pers<strong>on</strong>,in anticipati<strong>on</strong> of his... entering into a c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> such as PVS, givesclear instructi<strong>on</strong>s that is such event his is not to be given medicalcare, including artificial feeding, designed to keep him alive.‖1.28 Similarly, Lord Goff stated: 30(b)―a patient of sound mind may, if properly informed, require that lifesupport should be disc<strong>on</strong>tinued: see Nancy B v Hotel-Dieu deQuebec. 31 Moreover, the same principle applies where the patient‘srefusal to give his c<strong>on</strong>sent has been expressed at an earlier date...though in such circumstances especial care may be necessary toensure that the prior refusal of c<strong>on</strong>sent is still properly to be regardedas applicable in the circumstances which have subsequentlyoccurred (see eg Re T (adult: refusal of medical treatment). 32 ‖Case law after Bland1.29 In Re C, 33 a 68-year old man with chr<strong>on</strong>ic paranoid schizophreniasuffered from the delusi<strong>on</strong> that he was a world famous doctor who had neverlost a patient. He developed gangrene in his leg, but refused amputati<strong>on</strong> despitethe hospital‘s assessment that he would die immediately if the operati<strong>on</strong> wasdelayed. He sought an injuncti<strong>on</strong> to prevent the hospital from amputating his legin the future. Thorpe J was prepared to find him competent and granted theinjuncti<strong>on</strong>. Mr C survived without the amputati<strong>on</strong>. Re C is an illustrati<strong>on</strong> thatadvance care directives are not c<strong>on</strong>fined to end-of-life situati<strong>on</strong>s but alsoinvolve the c<strong>on</strong>tinuati<strong>on</strong> of care.1.30 In Re AK, 34 a 19-year old patient suffered from a progressive neuromusculardisease causing paralaysis. He informed his carers, by means of aneyelid movement, that he would wish his artificial ventilati<strong>on</strong> to be stopped if hecould no l<strong>on</strong>ger communicate. The health authority applied to the High Court for293031323334[1993] 1 All ER 821, at 860.Ibid, at 866.(1992) 86 DLR (4 th ) 385 (Quebec Superior Court).[1992] 4 All ER 649.[1994] 1 WLR 290.[2001] 1 FLR 129.16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!